Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 02:53:29 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 [38] 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 ... 684 »
741  Other / Meta / Re: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic) on: January 17, 2019, 06:43:19 PM

JETCASH DO YOUR JOB OR GET OFF DT AND MERIT SOURCE.


Two points.

I don't have a "job" here.

I don't think it is me who needs to get off the sauce. Smiley

Stop being a pathetic coward. You have 2 links to read and you are scared to even review them. This demonstrates just how broken the forum is getting.

Review and tell me how lauda who you support for a trust position is not a liar.

You are responsible for your own actions. You are supporting someone untrustworthy (you can exclude him) into a position of trust. I mean you are not that thick you can't understand this are you.

I am explaining it to you as simply as i can.

Are you saying you willingly assist a proven liar on to DT1  ?? You know the T in DT is meant to stand for trust do you not?

You realise this makes you complicit and also a responsible for a liar being on DT even though I present you with the facts right?

So I would need to make sure these facts are known right? I mean it would be my responsibility to people to point them to this thread where you refuse to read the facts proving you are supporting and enabling a proven liar on DT1.

I mean if I did not make that known I would be complicit? wouldn't I?

I hope you can see the position we are both in. I am trying to help you help us.
742  Other / Meta / Re: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic) on: January 17, 2019, 06:18:36 PM
I have reached a stage in my life when I don't do anything if I don't want to.

Right at this moment I'm more interested in deciding if I should start to use Grin or Beam. Grin seems to be better for everyday payments, but some people think Beam is better for asset transfers. I don't know enough to comment any further, and I prefer to investigate that rather than try to revive Lauda's history, which seems to have had considerable investigation by members who are more au fait with the situation than I am.

Excuses will not cut it.

There is no need to investigate. The evidence is on this thread.

You don't want to because you are too scared to give an objective review. This is the state of this board. People are scared to even view presented FACTS.

Remove jetcash from dt and merit source now. The guy is obviously terrified of giving a review of posted facts.

Lauda here too but is far to scared to debate with me also. I mean there is no debate he lied, called me a liar (brought no evidence) then red trust me for saying if he said that again I will encourage people to review his history where I know there are proven lies he has told in black and white because he told them to me personally.  

Now he is a proven liar + other filthy deeds giving me red trust for daring to say I will encourage people to look at his history if he does not fuck off calling me a liar with no evidence.

JETCASH DO YOUR JOB OR GET OFF DT AND MERIT SOURCE.




743  Economy / Reputation / Re: Calling out LoyceV the dumb ass - come and back up your claims I await. on: January 17, 2019, 06:10:12 PM
I bet he does not dare post here at all. He is scared of me
Boo Cheesy

(and this is all the attention you'll get from me)



Oh my...
mdayonliner -16: -4 / +0
cryptohunter -16: -4 / +0

Hahaha - see how this coward hides from me.

Look at this chicken shit idiot loyceV - I told you that he would NOT DARE debate his statement ...he is a liar and a weasel. Else why not state his case and prove to me what he says is true. Untrustworthy scoundrel.

LOL maydayonliner tries to be nice to loyce and gets hate haha
744  Other / Meta / Re: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic) on: January 17, 2019, 05:49:38 PM
Jetcash??
I'm awaiting the review of my evidence provided above.

I haven't had a chance to read it, as I'm having to cope with some serious problems and unreasonable discrimination. McDonalds refused to serve me with a burger this morning at 9:45, and their justification was that they don't start cooking them until 10:30. I'm starting to feel that your evidence may be of a similar nature. Theymos has created a distributed model for the new trust system, so I'm going to allow the review to be distributed amongst the other DT1 members. I don't want to be accused of starting too many reports, and of monopolising the system.

Look at tman trying to get diverting with his superior mcdonalds knowledge. Gym hahaha


In other words Jetcash is  too scared to review the FACTS presented IN THIS THREAD that lauda lied.  Then lauda repeatedly called me a liar with no evidence and when I told him to stfu calling me that with no evidence or else I will encourage others to look into his history he red trusts me.

Well you need to be taken off of DT if you are scared to review my evidence because we need people with some courage.

I insist you review these facts POST HISTORY IN BLACK AND WHITE or be removed from DT.

If you think my evidence is anything like this mcdonalds nonsense you need to be removed from merit source because clearly you have a reading and comprehension issue.  

No read the facts and review them here in public.
745  Other / Meta / Re: I like new DT on: January 17, 2019, 05:34:33 PM
It is unfortunate that we have to put so much emphasis on negative reporting. I prefer to highlight the positive behaviour of members. So far I have only made one negative report, but I will increase this in the future. As TMAN stated, this tagging should be dynamic. DT1s need to be infinitely just and infinitely merciful, so they can't condemn members to eternal damnation for venal sins. I seem to have so many things on the go at the moment, that I created an appeals ticket system on a spare domain - The Jet Cash appeal system. It could be worth making new members aware of the recommended methods available to remove red tags. Starting abusive threads in Meta may not be the optimum way, but it does seem to be the choice of some. Polite private messages would probably be more effective, but newbies can't avail themselves of this method if the DT has newbie PMs on ignore.

Well I presented you with facts and you ran off. I do not take much confidence from that. I hope you will return and review these facts because I will keep presenting them to you over and over when they are on topic.
746  Other / Meta / Re: Show your trust list! on: January 17, 2019, 05:29:03 PM
i recommend all users add to trust lists

~TMAN
~Lauda
~suchmoon
~actmyname


cos drug addict lauda and his mafia ( e.g asshole TMAN ) abuse trust and merit system
all peple can make own list

agreed.... on the top 3 for sure. tman and lauda are scum bags who abuse the trust system - suchmoon is untrustworthy by his own diagnosis and by connection to them and has ludicrous opinions of this board.

actmyname is obviously far smarter than the above and is civil so for now so I will just continue to debate with him regardless of his motives or allegiances.
747  Economy / Reputation / Re: Calling out LoyceV the dumb ass - come and back up your claims I await. on: January 17, 2019, 05:03:37 PM
LoyceV is better than my data Centre and a drama watcher. He has his pop corns in hand  Tongue

S_Therapist is this you?
After reading all the replies from this thread : S_Therapist = mdayonliner still there is not enough evidence that Mday is alt of S_Therapist.
Thank you mate also read this : [Evidences] S_Therapist can not be mdayonliner. <== it's in investigation section.

Thanks

@cryptohunter: I will also suggest you to read the topics before saying anyone is me. Thanks

Oh really? not nice being accused of things is it? stop sticking your nose in on my threads then.

You always siding with these idiots before against me now they turned on you and attacked you. Welcome to my world.
748  Other / Meta / Re: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic) on: January 17, 2019, 03:57:42 PM
Jetcash??

is mcdonalds wifi down again?  try burger king they are more reliable tp says.

I'm awaiting the review of my evidence provided above.

749  Economy / Reputation / Re: OgNasty bending the truth. on: January 17, 2019, 03:09:33 PM
Nevermind, I revert my statement. I am picking sides, I trust OgNasty more than most users on here, especially these DT people that are so incredibly stupid and think they can do whatever they like.

The problem is they can do whatever they like because the systems of control are broken.

They cycle merit to each other to meet the merit threshold to get on to DT1 and then just vote each other on and then gang together on anyone that demonstrates this is exactly what they are doing.

I have proven 1 of them is a liar.
I have proven 1 of them left me red trust for presenting facts about that.


still the gang does what they like

the rest of DT are a bunch of scared wimps or ass lickers like jetcash. I present him some facts that he can not ignore and the retarded pussy just runs off.

DT = gang members or pussies.

Red trust is going to soon be a positive thing.


Click the first link in my sig - this person was linked to these divs and implicated in an extortion scheme.

The only thing people can do if they feel like it is keep bitch slapping them in every post with the truth that some are proven dirt bags.
750  Economy / Reputation / Calling out LoyceV the dumb ass - come and back up your claims I await. on: January 17, 2019, 02:31:41 PM
Obviously LoyceV is a moron as I have previously demonstrated several times. His logic and reason are totally broken he can copy and paste data from servers and that's pretty much it really. He can parrot other views but I have never seen him present any original insightful posts ever. Yet he has the most earned merit on the entire board(except special characters)


Now he makes this claim

Reference post: Why have I excluded members on my trust list?
Since I can't give an explanation or Reference link with my trust list, I'll keep track here.

Currently excluded
~peloso
A red trusted Merit abuser who's trying a hostile takeover of DT to clear his red trust.

~cryptohunter
Total flawed judgement, conspiracy nut, and spamming many topics with his "ideas".

~BiPolarBob
Hacked account.

~Gleb Gamow
Several reasons, see his red trust.



Total flawed judgement, conspiracy nut, and spamming many topics with his "ideas" ??


Come bring an example of such, and bring evidence, we will debate it. Just me and you. If you are not able to prove what you say -- then you need to retract your statement.

I bet he does not dare post here at all.

He is scared of me because he knows that he is a fool and just because I have demonstrated this he gets upset and makes false claims.

Only loyceV the most merited person on this board can reply here. I am not interested in all the other fools poking their noses in.

Come loyceV back up your statement.


Also whilst you are at it  bring  some of you best posts NOT STATS RELATED CRAP YOU ARE COPY AND PASTING FROM SERVERS

bring me some of the best posts demonstrating original thought and large contributions that you have made?  I will await. I mean surely someone with so much merit must have a ton of great and insightful posts.  Just 5 will do.


751  Other / Meta / Re: Some thoughts about the old-new trust system on: January 17, 2019, 02:10:49 PM
Today is a good day... to make your own DT0.

Dear User, take this seriously. if you read this, see the links please:


100% back this up. FYI anyone interested

~TheFuzzStone is on my trustlist.

xxx

Must mean he is not someone you want there for good reason.

Anyone with a ~ on a trust abusers (tman) list is probably worth looking at and likely to be very trustworthy.

Can you put you list up tman I'd like to laugh at the concentration of dirt bags.
752  Other / Meta / Re: Theymos I believe there is an issue with your trust algo. on: January 17, 2019, 02:04:33 PM
The obvious problem with it is that it is broken.

Because it relies on merit which is totally broken.

People are simply cycling their merits to each other (proven) does not matter what reason they give

Then voting the same people on to DT because the merit cyclers are the main ones that meet the threshold merit.

Simply observable by pulling up bpip  and studying top fans and receivers (even worse I am sure if you can see top 20)

start with suchmoon , loyceV, the pharmacist, ioeioe  start finishing through them all on bpip they are a linked together through the fans and receivers that's just the top 10.

Then pull up the DT lists of inclusions exclusions and you soon see what a joke the entire thing is.

I think you will find that is the main issue with it.

Merit should be abolished it is only good for stopping new spammers rank up. After snr it should be decoupled from rank and also legends should not be permited to give it to other legends.

NOTHING should be built upon the merit system in its subjective and gameable state.

Merit was and is a low low value metric because it was left with no criteria or strict mandate and no way to stop cycling it to friends and colluders who you all help get on to DT to push their agenda.  So not only does it mean something different to every person, depending on mood, or if they like your views it is also used by people to attract asslickers who they can recruit to their group.

I like this statement from suchmoon which is not especially damning since anyone is allowed to merit in this fashion.

I notice this post I reported all got merited ,Were this bad reports on my side? how come I wasn't rewarded or are  the merit reward for reporting quality post optional? If they aren't them I believe I should be encouraged

[...]

Noted,  I suggest the meriting of report should stop or all valid report should be merited. It isn't just fair meeting some and ignoring others (I'm taking about the reports not the reported posts). Lets play fair. It makes me feel undervalued when I come over here I see reports get merited but mine isn't.

If you're doing it for merits you're doing it wrong. Reading your post makes me cringe, please stop. This might even get you on Loyce's ignore list.

Also please keep in mind that every merit sender makes their own decisions so I can only speak for myself. The amounts of merit I send can vary from 0 to a lot, depending on how good the post is, my mood, the music I'm listening to, what my spouse is wearing, and whether I can get the stupid GRIN miner finally working on the GTX 1060 before Tuesday. That's just how life is.

LOL yeah merit such an objective meaningful metric let's link it to trust too whilst we are at it. Sounds like a good plan.



753  Other / Meta / Re: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic) on: January 17, 2019, 11:45:41 AM
>..<

I haven't read all of his/her posts, only those that are relevant or of interest to me. This is why I have read very few of yours. Smiley

ah man, Legend...

JC for president... or PM might be a quicker action the way the exit is looking


I prefer public analysis...........transparency is key.

I expect jet cash to examine the evidence provided in this thread and confirm

1. lauda is a liar.
2. Lauda will red trust you for presenting facts about this (even after he gets to call you a liar with no evidence many times)
3. Tman red trust abuse people ( as he stats in black and white for posting facts about it)

It is quite simple and there in black and white.

red trust is not there to stop people telling the truth it is there to allow people to tell the truth about wrong doing and untrustworthy behaviour.

I expect a full review

If jetcash refuses to do this after I have just told him  2 x and provided evidence on this thread then jetcash is also untrustworthy and complicit .  Or he is just a scared baby of lauda and his friends.

I want all my red trust removed else I will present the facts they should not be there. That is not blackmail that is reporting an abuse of the trust system. Got it.

@Harkorede

where are you with all your evidence that I asked for tick tock.... or else you have just proven you are an imbecile and your opinions are invalid. I mean if I am wrong about everything..... then you can provide just a couple of examples right?? where are you?

754  Other / Meta / Re: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic) on: January 17, 2019, 11:42:35 AM
>..<

I haven't read all of his/her posts, only those that are relevant or of interest to me. This is why I have read very few of yours. Smiley

LOL .... ha ha that is refusal to review observable fact. Hmm a DT who says they are not interested in reviewing the truth. Is that what you are saying?

Well look the evidence is there above in this thread do you refuse to review it??

If so you need instant removal from DT and merit source you are not responsible.

I expect an answer or I want you removed from dt and merit source.

You can not as a DT refuse to read facts I am producing here for you to examine.
755  Other / Meta / Re: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic) on: January 17, 2019, 11:37:46 AM
My opinion of Lauda is based on my personal encounters and observations. I use that rather than being swayed by hearsay. I'm starting to wonder if Soros is funding the movements against long term members of this forum.

are you completely thick as well....  your anecdotal experience does not preclude or protect or undo what I have proven he has done. Please start to understand this simple concept.

his own post history is not hearsay  - is there something wrong with you? do you know that something he has written himself which is a proven lie is not hearsay. You can understand this right?

I have proven he is a liar

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5098591.0

I have proven he is an abuser of the trust system

I have proven his friend tman is an abuser of the trust system 2x now.

Do you deny either of those??

If so explain yourself now.
756  Economy / Reputation / Re: Yogg this user is a - protector of liars and abuser of the trust system himself. on: January 17, 2019, 11:27:03 AM
Yogg you moron read my example you dumb shit and try to understand


If i tell a criminal that has stolen my money to give it back or else I will tell the police.

That is revealing a secret they have to do them harm.  That is not blackmail that is reporting a crime you thick turd.



Sounds like HuhHuh?  sounds like? to you? that is subjective.

Never use yogg escrow services he is untrustworthy. I would not advise trusting this individual at all.

What if I say if you don't sent me a bitcoin I am going to ........................sounds like a threat coming......................send you 20 of my bitcoins as a reward for not doing it.  

Sounds like you're a fucking retard to me yogg... the trogg.

If you don't I will does not always indicate a negative reaction is coming. Only because you are retarded are you using this sounds like..... and deliberately ignoring focusing on what will come next and the context of the entire thing.

Yes because they are in the wrong in the first place you stupid idiot. The thing you are causing them to do is undo their wrongdoing. I know that is hard for you to understand.

Are they blackmailers??

Now removed it you stupid moron or present the entire case originating back to tmans colluding friend Lauda who called me a liar and I said if he kept saying that I will encourage others to investigate his past and I have proven already that he is in fact a liar.

Get it fool

Foxpup insists - If you are out and someone snatches your phone. You must not tell them to give it back or you will go to the police. Because the phone thief will report you to the police and you will go to jail. The phone thief may let you call them on their nice new phone using your one permitted call from jail to say sorry for being a blackmailer. LOLOLOLOL

Poor fox poop that dumb ass kissing fool.... go to bpip.org and see how that dumb shit gives out merit. He gives 100's and 100's to the same people??? he bookmarks his pals post history and just slaps out merit to them over and over.


Tman thinks it is a treat for me to follow him around telling people about his wrong doing which he full admits.
But then gets confused later and thinks I should be banned for telling the truth about his abuse of the trust system .... poor dumb wretch. I mean first he likes it now he doesn't unstable freak.

cryptohunter has tried to blackmail me numerous times, Using the treat of following me to every thread and harassing me until I remove my red paint.

Think seriously people, mental health issues are scary, you only got to look at the US president for proof.

Poor tman the confused idiot trust system abuser Sad



757  Other / Meta / Re: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic) on: January 17, 2019, 11:17:44 AM
When posting on the Meta board, is it really necessary to include some reference to Lauda?
Whilst I appreciate that merits are awarded for posts based on "honoribus cum laude", please not the word is "laude", which means praise, and not Lauda, who is a respected member of the forum. Is there a chance that we can have a month or two without constant bitching about Lauda?

[ Dammit, this is another thread started by that Jet Cash character, and it even includes a reference to Lauda Smiley]

respected by ass kissers like you only... plenty know lauda is a liar and a scum bag.

You are a noob who has no clue. Do you get it yet.


You're never going to stop, are you ?  
A lost course... I'm sure deep down within you, you must already know you're wrong about almost everything you post. Your ego is your real enemy here.

No, re read the post again. I have proven facts that he is a liar and abuses the trust system. Disprove that then you can give your groundless opinions. Are you completely stupid, how can I be wrong regarding proven facts. Explain.

Whilst you are about it can you present anything else you find that I am wrong about?  go on ... get on with it. Demonstrate all those things I have been wrong about because as yet NOBODY has demonstrated that I am wrong about anything.

Until I see a complete removal of red trust abuse on my account then NO i will not stop presenting facts that is should not be there.
Well done.
758  Other / Meta / Re: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic) on: January 17, 2019, 11:08:34 AM
When posting on the Meta board, is it really necessary to include some reference to Lauda?
Whilst I appreciate that merits are awarded for posts based on "honoribus cum laude", please not the word is "laude", which means praise, and not Lauda, who is a respected member of the forum. Is there a chance that we can have a month or two without constant bitching about Lauda?

[ Dammit, this is another thread started by that Jet Cash character, and it even includes a reference to Lauda Smiley]

respected by ass kissers like you only... plenty know lauda is a liar and a scum bag.

You are a noob who has no clue. Do you get it yet.

I have proven he is a liar and gave me red trust from him for daring to say I would inform people of that FACT
759  Other / Meta / Re: grin is now accepted for forum payments on: January 17, 2019, 10:21:21 AM
I started to look at Grin and Beam as alternative payment methods for domain name sales. I'm also looking at Dash. It would be great if we could have somewhere to discuss these on Bitcoin Talk boards. I have had the alt boards on ignore for months now. In view of this move by Theymos, please could we have a Grin discussion board.

dash lol ... please ask pharmacist for a link to my cake analogy
760  Economy / Reputation / mods deleted my post Moglie - don't worry I will repost it here. red trust scam on: January 17, 2019, 10:08:30 AM
So in the racist thread I notice all the other off topic crap was left like tmans beast sex fantasies and foxpups offers ...and well just about everything else off topic ..still there not deleted.

However the one post that did get deleted was not some sexual depraved nonsense just a fact based post moglie requested to see that proves lauda is a liar.

here you go moglie I don't want you to miss out on this so you can keep your word.

Quote from: Bitcoin Forum
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted.

Quote
Do you wish to see the proof in that case?

Sure, always.

Know what? If you can prove me they're liars (on something that matters of course...) I'll add them to my distrust list and add you on my trust one.

On something that matters? how about being a liar for financial gain and repeatedly denying a provable instamine (actually proven to be a captive instamine) that had been proven since the very start.

Lauda claims whilst promoting this captive instamine scheme calling itself a fair launch like the other POW launches ...many times that there was no instamine and he was there at launch. If you read the clear evidence that is impossible.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=560138.msg7535561#msg7535561

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=560138.msg6748208#msg6748208


Protecting such an unfair scam scheme is one thing but denying there was a premine because he was there is a clear lie.

Now i will see you remove his trust and actually i don't care if you add me I dont want to be a dt1 list

This is not an isolated claim he is a known darkcoin pusher and protector and on many occasions would try to crush people mentioning the Captive instamine because he was a bag holder.

Not one person will deny including evan himself that the premine (captive instamine) took place and so did the reducing of the minting by 75% after they captive instamined it.  Then invented a masternode system that took more coins from each block miners find.

Proven lie for financial gain.







what is interesting about this is

My first red trust from lauda came about over this. He kept coming into my threads telling me I am a liar (he sought me out each time). I asked him to produce the lies and prove it. He did not. He called me a liar again in another thread so I said to him that if he kept coming to my threads saying this I will encourage others to examine his post history where I knew that he indeed did tell lies.

For saying that he red trusts me.

Next when I spot this red trust I am understandably angry so I write a facts based post about lauda being a liar and giving me red trust for presenting that fact and his other possible shady dealings.

Next tman gives me red trust for presenting that facts based post.

You can not red trust for fact based posts.

Can, have and will.

if you don't like it I suggest you petition all other DT-1 members to exclude me or if they feel that my tagging of you is not needed or accurate they will reach out to me like adults and have actual fluid conversations

so - Like it or fuck off back to your hole.


xxxx laters sexy pants


so now I have 2 red trusts  - also tman tells me he is considering giving me another red trust because I posted links to those urls and did not do it in a block quote ??


next owl catz the 3rd member of their alleged extortion scheme (perhaps not true who can say but they work together that is for sure)

give red trust too for the same fact based post.


so then I tell tman to tell owlcatz and lauda to remove my red trust or i will never let them rest because i will continue to tell everyone about this red trust abuse and their wrong doing.


next yogg another friend of theirs just check yogg on bpip you will see tman is a fan and on the dt lists supporting each other for dt.

comes and gives another red trust now because telling them to remove red trust abuse (given for presentation of fact ) is now called blackmail.

I mean so if a criminal steals your things and you say give them back or I will keep telling everyone and the police you are a thief ....then that means you are now a blackmailer.Huh


the joke of this entire system and this subjective cycled nonsense merit they all give each other cycling around to now gain full control of DT1 too.



Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 [38] 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 ... 684 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!