|
Sent tx id 083b64b1879600fb197cb6b6ef4a50d2ed7823d3d5335e4ea0b578fb13746eac
|
|
|
|
I think you meant " inclusions" , makes perfect sense now, but is there a chance that he won't be on DT on the next round assuming for an example that 1 of his voter's vote goes to someone else who "needs it more"? i remember reading something related to this but i can't recall the exact point. I just counted the number of supervotes people have who have included me in their trust lists. The count is ~38. If I didn't make it on DT1 because I couldn't get 2 out of 38 votes, I would think theymos would need to revisit his algorithm. However, I only have 12 people including me on the list. 3 could drop me like a hot potato at any moment. The later situation would probably be the most likely, IMHO. However, if I don't make it, I'll just shrug it off and go back on my patrol hunting for posts to merit. I've had a small break from that since I ran out of smerit and source merit two days ago. |
|
|
|
I think you mean inclusions, correct? I only had 6 at the time. @o_e_l_e_o, don't worry about me. I'm perfectly content with being DT2. Although it appears that I may be getting a promotion the next time theymos updates the dt1 list. However, you never know. People can change their trust lists at any time. |
|
|
|
|
Is the auction part of this over now? Should we start sending in our funds?
|
|
|
|
well these are Theymos own words are they not? I thought he said that recently in his guidelines.
Actually, these are theymos' last words regarding this matter. I do not view it as appropriate for trust ratings to relate primarily to non-trust matters. By giving someone negative trust, you're basically attaching a note to all of their posts telling people "warning: do not trade with this person!". If we can get DT working well enough, in the future I'd like to prevent guests from even viewing topics by negative-trust users in trust-enabled sections, so you have to ask yourself whether your negative trust would warrant this sort of significant effect. In particular, in my view: - Giving negative trust for being an annoying poster is inappropriate, since this has nothing to do with their trustworthiness. If they're disrupting discussion or never adding anything, then that's something for moderators to deal with, and you should report their posts and/or complain in Meta about it. - Giving negative trust for merit trading and deceptive alt-account use may be appropriate, but you should use a light touch so that people don't feel paranoid. - You should be willing to forgive past mistakes if the person seems unlikely to do it again. - It is absolutely not appropriate to give someone negative trust because you disagree with them. I'm disappointed in the reaction to this post. Although H8bussesNbicycles is perhaps not particularly trustworthy for other reasons, the reasons many people gave for neg-trusting him are inappropriate. You can argue that what he's advocating is bad on a utilitarian level, but he would disagree, and his advocacy of a certain Trust philosophy doesn't by itself mean that he's an untrustworthy person. DT selection is meant to be affected by user lists, and it is totally legitimate to try to honestly convince other (real) people to use a list more in-line with your views. I'm not going to blacklist people from DT selection due to not following my views, since a big point of this new system is to get me less involved, but if a culture somewhat compatible with my views does not eventually develop, then I will consider this more freeform DT selection to be a failure, and I'll probably get rid of it in favor of enforcing custom trust lists. As stated by theymos, he does not desire blacklisting people that don't follow his views. It appears that if this does not work out, theymos is simply going to get rid of it entirely and enforce custom trust list. I also believe theymos is going to give this new system a try for more than a couple months before considering giving up on it. Perhaps he will tweek it a bit in the coming months. However, Loycev data suggests that this will only have a nominal effect. Therefore, given this data, increasing activity is likely not to be a tweek he will implement. As for your suggested approach to directly confront a potential scammer and then accelerating a response to eventually include red trust, I see nothing wrong with that approach. However, I also see nothing wrong with simply "snitching." Most law enforcement agencies that I know of use both approaches. When I was a bill collector, I frequently resorted to both overt and covert means to attempt to get the bill paid. Whatever works and did not violate the law was fair game. |
|
|
|
if Theymos started blacklisting people
So now that your cockamamie theories have been debunked you want to go back to a top-down DT structure. I have a suspicion that if theymos started actively blacklisting several members, CH would not like those results either...CH will probably blame it on you if someone gets blacklisted that CH feels should not be blacklisted. So the false speculations and assumptions just keep pouring in. Do you ever stop to think before posting pure drivel? You can only be blacklisted for abusing trust. Your job as a DT is (as far as red trust is concerned) 1. red trust scammers 2. red trust persons STRONGLY likely to scam you red trust others you are blacklisted. Trust abusers are banned it is quite simple. Stop asskissing suchmoon, huge black woman etc... it's sickening. You make it seem like that is a total black and white decision. It isn't. Especially when you add some vague qualifier such as "strongly." Do you mean more likely than not or do you mean beyond all doubt? |
|
|
|
if Theymos started blacklisting people
So now that your cockamamie theories have been debunked you want to go back to a top-down DT structure. I have a suspicion that if theymos started actively blacklisting several members, CH would not like those results either...CH will probably blame it on you if someone gets blacklisted that CH feels should not be blacklisted. |
|
|
|
If you want the ability to wear a signature, purchase a copper membership.
Don't encourage newbie to buy copper membership in order to wear signature. They will spam over forum and this topic is a example. If someone need to post image then he should buy it. To be honest most of new copper member spamming on the forum in my observation. @OP, you need at least 1 merit become Jr. Member and I don't think you deserve it. Hey look. I don't need to be reprimanded by you. I'm only conveying what theymos himself is conveying. Many of these limitations can be eliminated with a copper membership. In particular, you can set a signature at Member level if you wear a copper membership. Just consider it a deposit to be paid for garbage removal.  |
|
|
|
Make an account using a new email. But do not log in after the registration button was clicked. After the registration, click the back button in the browser. Then go to the login tab and enter new details which were used in registration.
LOL, that would be ban evasion.  |
|
|
|
When do we stop responding to cryptohunter’s walls of repetitive bull shit?
I kinda like it actually.... He/she gives me a chuckle on a Saturday nite after I've had a few and I post a snarky reply... Perhaps we should make some of these a mantra. OOOM skanky snitchy bitch OOOM  |
|
|
|
I see almost 90% of all posts @ iwamoto77 on gift twitter and facebook. And what about this post. Is he a native Russian. I doubt. Гoмoceкcyaлизм-бoлeзнь. Лeчить aднaкa или ф тoпкy.
Homosexuality is a disease. Treat adnaka or f furnace.Hmm, seems like the suggested treatment is much worse than the disease. |
|
|
|
@mdayonliner. Is it possible to delete the reference to the previous key that I just used and replace it with this instead? I told everyone that I didn't know what the hell I am doing.  Fingerprint: 6BAF2F53353A8734F25715A7B3DF4AF45C3E2B2B -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----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=UM3H
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
I already deleted my old post but can't delete your post. Link to staked Bitcoin address: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=996318.msg27270018#msg27270018Address: 1Q7cMPzu5WCUX54RBfbojLba62ea6xyVre Message 3.2.19 I am bones261. Req delete quote of last PBG Key I posted. Signatur HybQUhIPS4JBIbD+I+oJNmx7yDZ9Flsoo6RLXlPB3wkWBSHIk9Arl3zaHaXucVkqHj0146s2+FdQO4fx0SpJ+c8= |
|
|
|
Yes? what? you are agreeing with a cowardly sock puppet snivelling wretch who is obviously untrustworthy for needing a puppet account which is making observably false accusations.
He would not if he pushed for a real decentralised board you can guarantee that. Probably be red trusted and called a troll lol.
Oh please. If he returned, he'd be so venerated that whatever he said would be considered scripture. His very presence would throw out any hopes of decentralization, since he'd call all of the shots around here. It's probably best he stays away. |
|
|
|
|
Username: bones261
Post Count:4684
BTC Address (must be SegWit):394Bi5bUphJ3WJrwFQxsXxX97PSBsS5G8N
Will change signature if accepted.
|
|
|
|
why it would not be better to make it 100 earned merits + 1500 activity or even 2000 activity? Some users are happy. The people that benefit greatly from the broken systems of control. That is no reason not to improve them for a fairer environment for all. >Complains the "broken" system isn't "fair" enough >Wants to skew the system entirely for his own benefit Yes, under the CH system, if satoshi himself ever returned, he'd have to post regularly for over two years to gain the activity necessary for a supervote. However, with the current system, satoshi already has 7 supervotes. (And I'm sure if he returned and started regularly posting, he'd have more merit than God in short order.) |
|
|
|
|
Well that sucks. You recovered you account on February 26th and now you are autobanned? I hope a moderator can take a look at your case. One should not be held accountable for posts made while you were not in control of your account.
|
|
|
|
Using Bitcoin keys is more difficult, you need to get people to use legacy addresses, as there's no message signing standard using segwit addresses. Awkward situation.
And what's the trouble keeping a legacy address? Also it IS possible to sign a message with a segwit address. Exactly. Especially since it it is probably advisable to stake an address here that you never intend on using for receiving payments. |
|
|
|
@Bones
are you now claiming that I am a troll? If so present the incorrect and trolling posts in a thread claiming they are are trolling and I'll see you there.
Start with the thread of the year trolling thread because i can't get people to that thread even after they chime in then run off
Or perhaps the let's define net positive and valuable posts
Or well ANY thread I have started in meta. Just bring it here and list it under is cryptohunter a troll and we can break down the posts and see if it is trolling or if it is presentation of facts and observable events and an attempt to make this board a fairer and better place for all members.
When I look at the snitchy bitchy crap suchmoon posts in reply to a lot of people and also the LACK of original content /suggestions that actually would make ANY difference to the board in a big way then I realise that she is just a big bag of wasted merit.
So nothing of note ever achieved here and supporting proven untrustworthy scum and accused of actual scamming herself in the past. = yeah excellent member suchmoon.
Oh please, you are prone to calling people names. That is a form of trolling. In fact most people on this forum are prone to being a troll from time to time. If you are looking for honeypots of merit where people are posting net positive and valuable posts, just head over to Development & Technical Discussion or Bitcoin Technical Support.Also, if someone has some collectables to sell, the Collectibles board can help someone rack up the merit. There are probably other merit honeypots outside of meta and reputation that I am missing. The merit system is much more decentralized than you seem to think. There are 122 merit sources and they are not exclusively distributing their merit here. Theymos should consider enlisting some more notables in the altcoin community to become merit sources since the altcoin boards do seem to lack some love at the moment. |
|
|
|
CH should just go to the WO thread, request a hat avatar, and post rocket memes. He'll have 250+ merits in no time. It's really not that hard. CH is more of a verbal person, memes are too much work. So is JayJuanGee... and he has 600+ merits. He can even troll people in that thread and have a good chance of racking up the merit.
However, I have already said I will willingly be blacklisted from BOTH systems of control merit source and DT so i have no need of gaining 250 merits if we can swap it to a REAL decentralised approach.
The WO thread is a decentralized approach. Virtually anyone can rack up the merits there, although the supply has been drying up lately. Bulls and Bitcoin maximalists do have an easier time. But hey, this is bitcointalk after all. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
