The price is increasing again because of the snapshot but this time a lil bit lower than the very first snapshot. If they will distribute it before the end of 6 snapshots, I believe the team has good plan on how to preserve its value. They have long been working on this project, so they know what they are doing to improve its value in the market and prevent the dump of those airdrop holders.

They said, they are still working on the developments of their project. I hope their wallet will be useful to everyone else and since they are decentralized you have full control of what's going on with your funds, which is great. But hopefully, they can release it soon so we will see if they can really compete with existing wallet apps.

I believe, it is more on isolated case. Apple, in my opinion, is more secure than any other OS. So it is not the system per se. Maybe we are wrong. but we don't know the whole story here. We need tangible facts before we can draw conclusion.

I don't think we can give such percentage here because the question of the OP is too hard to come up with numbers. Why do you think it is 60%, not 50 or 70 or 80? We have no basis in the percentage assumption. Also, most traders lost some, win some. So how can you really tell if the user succeeded? Just because of his holdings? So this one is very subjective. No one can give you a concrete answer on this one.

Making a movie without solid facts is just futile. You can't give a good narrative if the lead person himself has blurred personal history. So I don't think someone can ever make a movie for Satoshi. They can always use his persona in a movie but dedicating a movie for him is quite a challenge. So right now, even if someone has the funds to make it happen, they can't as they are not holding the facts about him, mostly are conspiracy theories and fake individuals admitting they are Satoshi.

Yes, never expect that it will reach the top 4 position toppling all the other well-founded projects. But anyhow, it is true that doge has use case before it becomes to what it is today. It is mainly used for transfer purposes of many crypto users because of its very low transaction fee. And you can find it also in many gambling sites. However, this being with low transaction fee, I believe is not true anymore today. If you compare the doge withdrawal fees in exchanges with other known alts, it is now becoming expensive. So being the transfer purpose may not be true anymore. The doge dev team needs to find another good use case for this project. Otherwise, once Elon is thru with this coin, this will fall down again.

Interesting if they will really be a platform for cat lovers. Normally, they will just use it as a front to gain potential users but in reality, they will not arrange any activity to support their initial mission. We need more time for us to see if they are sincere in this mission. Even the logo has similarities with doge, of course, instead of dog, cat is inserted at the middle.

They have huge trading volume already. So are they going to explore their opportunities here in the forum to increase more users? This is also good for mdex users here in the forum as they can reach out also to the mdex team directly. However, how are we going to know if the OP is indeed an official rep of this DEX?

Do you think you can accomplish one of your goals this coming 3rd quarter - partnership with international organizations like World Bank and IMF? Because by now, you should be sending some sort of letter to them, at least give them a heads up that you are aiming to work with them in the future. Collaborating with this type of organization would take a lot of effort to convince what you are up to. You know bureaucratic ways, your letter will be passed on from one hand to another, and you have no assurance if you will get a go signal.

"Rebus" or "Rubus"?

So still keeping the ticker SSS but renaming it to Rubus? In coingecko, your name is still Simple Software Solutions. So are you going to inform them that you are Rubus platform but same ticker? Even in cmc/crex, still the same name. But anyway, UNI is still not listed as one of your exchanges. Maybe you can tell them (coingecko, cmc) to add so we will see what trading volume you have in UNI.

That's a very good starting number of holders. Right now, the APY of 450-500%. Curious if they can maintain the same percentage of APY couple of months from now. Also, you mentioned that this is audited by professionals. Can you name such organization that handled this auditing?

Locking for 6 months is not an assurance that there is no rug pull. That's a very short period of time, in my opinion. Also, the amount is very huge. So once unlocked, even small percentage of that can be sold and then disappear. What do you think will be your tangible assurance to those potential buyers of your token that you will have at least relatively longer lifespan as compared to other projects?

Maybe, look for their tutorials first or clarify this on their social media channel. It is hard to execute a transaction if you are not well-informed of what's going on. For sure, they have some type of instructions on how to do this kind of order. Have you checked their blogs or telegram? I am certain, they will be helpful on this kind of query.

@OP - the telegram link posted is not working.

The first thing that came up to my mind reading SAFU, is the SAFU of Binance (insurance). What is the meaning of SAFU in this case?


@OP, are they going to publish their team members or is this anonymous project? The allotment of 20% to the team is quite big. Unless, they can come up valid reasons why they are reserving that amount to them.

Yes, this is considerably an old one. Not many of its contemporaries are still alive today. But is the RTM team looking for options that will attract traders of their coin? The trading volume where they are listed is not that much. Maybe hold like trading contests in those exchanges to revive the interest of the traders. But if you can list it to a much active crypto-exchange, that would be better. This quarter, they are planning to list it though. Wonder which exchange are they eyeing to get this listed with?

This project is considerably an old one and it is great that you managed to make this survive. And swapping them to PoS may give better future for this coin. Who knows? On the other hand, what are your major plans that you will dedicate with to improve the presence of XTA in the market? Let us say for the remaining months of this year?

Also, is it possible to add your coin in the Investbox of crex? You are already in PoS so maybe would be a good thing also to be added in the investbox of this exchange.

Cardano, even if it is taking the number 7 position in the market, it has a long way to go to compete ETH and definitely not overthrowing ETH. One should ask first, how many successful projects that ADA has under their network? Also, the ETH platform has long years of developments already, that is why they attained the number 2 position just behind bitcoin. ADA is a very promising platform, however, it is too early to even think that it can overthrow ETH. We need to see first successful projects under ADA and see their respective feedbacks on using this network.

Their trading volume is higher in Probit than in UNI. It is understandable as trading with a centralized exchange will incur you only small fees as compared to when you are using UNI. Though they said, the gas fee has been reduced but I believe CEX has still lower fees.

But can the team submit some missing details to coingecko like the circulating supply as of the moment. I think, only the total supply is reflected on their data. Marketcap is still question mark though.

But it will only be valuable if the dev team of the token is also doing their developments on the project. Burning alone is not an assurance that a token will increase its value in the market. But if it is accompanied by active development from the dev's side, there's a chance that the token will gain better value in the market. So don't be attracted by seeing that there is burning program for the token but also look if the project has good use case in the market. Without its actual application, would be hard for the token to get valuable if it is relying with the burn program only.

It is actually a surprise that they have better liquidity than most DeFi projects.

And as they said, 50% of the total supply was sent to Vitalik Buterin's wallet, they really did. However, will Buterin notice that he has this token in his wallet? Why not just airdrop it to other crypto users? What's the purpose of giving him the 50% of their total supply? Nothing much to see on their website, so we don't know if this meme token in UNI will be a short-lived project.