I think you're the one who's confused or trying to confuse others.

You're making a claim ("US has presidents on its dollars") that is false for 2 out of 7 (6 really; barely anyone uses the $2) dollar bills in circulation. And you use that false claim as an argument why Tubman shouldn't be on the $20. That's disingenuous or illiterate, depending on how well you know 3rd grade US history.

I think president Tubman fits the status quo just like president Hamilton and president Franklin.

No, he's not, quit making shit up. UN did not approve his "police action".

Wouldn't it be easier to just send the coins to a new wallet so that you don't have to worry about the old seed?

Nonsense. It's like breaking into your neighbor's house because he voted for democrats. Although I'm not sure you'd be totally against that. Putinists (and Trumpists and other dictator-worshiping absolutists) tend to forget about laws and rights when it suits them.

Lithuania is in NATO, so it's unlikely to cede anything tangible. If the Baltic states hadn't joined NATO I'm sure Putin would have invaded them first and not Georgia or Ukraine.

Economically there is also not much to lose. Trade with Russia is under massive sanctions for decades to come.

It's a free certificate and apparently we're getting what we're paying for.

I'm on it.

Edit: should be ok now.

I guess I need to go old school with it and put it on my calendar to renew it. Scheduled task keeps failing for some unclear reason.

I think the biggest issue in this the forum may be not posts with poor grammar or syntax, but posts that are grammatically correct however devoid of any meaning or purpose.

Just a random post from Bitcoin Discussion:


This doesn't have any major grammar or syntax issues, no more than e.g. the OP of this thread. However it's a useless shitpost. It doesn't say anything useful or interesting or anything that hasn't already been said earlier in the 10+ pages of that thread, or many other threads. It was typed (or copied from a translation tool or whatever) by someone who has zero interest in a discussion. Many threads on many boards devolve to this kinds of nonsense after the first 5-10 pages. In fact many of those threads are useless and repetitive to begin with.

Try reporting it and you'll get a solid "Unhandled". Basically the forum has surrendered to this shit.

I'll take a non-grammarly post that has an actual opinion, information, argument, even trolling over this kind of perfunctory indolent tripe.

Bitcoin choo choo undergoing maintenance, will be good as new soon enough and rolling to the moon.

The number on the side is a bit too low, they need to fix that.

Unfortunately it becomes a gateway drug to complete dependence on Russian (or Saudi, or some other totalitarian shithole) energy resources. Yes, a pipeline could be built while keeping viable backup options but ten years later a different party gets elected and says "why do we need to spend billions maintaining LNG terminals when we have this cheap gas flowing through the pipeline" or "why do we need the nuclear plants or solar or geothermal or anything really except cheap natural gas power plants" etc etc.

Let me guess, narcissistic sociopath?


There you go, that's the real TF, a scamtroll.

I didn't mean it to be rude, I just don't do "nice" well

No, I agree, they're trying to do their best given the circumstances, I don't have a problem with that. Just hoping it's irreversible and they won't build gas pipelines from Russia 20 years from now, like Germany did.


Former nazis must be like 100+ years old by now.

I don't know if a bump will do this any good, but blatant copypasta is again flowing freely in WO and the "Report to moderator" still exists so what exactly are we supposed to report, he asked rhetorically.

Here is another nuance with the new proposals: DT1 lottery.

(double check the math below before making long-reaching conclusions, as it could be completely wrong because Saturday and... you know...)

If there are 125 candidates to select DT1 from (AFAIK typical these days), the chance of any candidate to be in DT1 in any given month is 80%. Under current rules, that's also the chance of a DT2 member to be in DT2 if that DT2 member has bare minimum of inclusions (one).

If we bump this up to two inclusions, then even if a DT2 member has the required minimum of inclusions (two), their chance to be in DT2 is ~64% since they need both of their "includers" to be in DT1 at the same time (0.8 * 0.8 = 0.64).

Of course it gets more convoluted once you add exclusions and/or more inclusions. For example someone with one inclusion and two exclusions (barely out of DT2 under current rules) still has a ~16% chance to "sneak" into DT2 if one of their "excluders" is not in DT1 (20% chance) and their "includer" is in. Adding two required "includers" drops that chance to ~13% (0.64 * 0.2 = 0.128).

If the DT1 candidate pool is 150, then the numbers above change from ~ 67% to 44%, and from ~ 33% to 15%, so a larger pool appears to make the proposed rules even tougher. But this doesn't consider the increased chances of someone being included or excluded by a potential DT1 member because there are more potential DT1 members.

Count me in for 10. I think at this point instead of waiting/looking for two more teams we're better off discussing other stuff like divisions, playoffs etc, and I want to hit mock drafts as soon as possible LOL.

The fact that Kremlin is seriously pissed at Lithuania shows that for once they (Lithuanian government) are doing something right, even if forced by the EU.

For too long the politics in the Baltic states was influenced by the fear of turning the gas off or other "sanctions" from Russia. Too many pro-Russian politicians and just plain morons longing for Soviet times. Finally a chance to clean that shit out, hopefully they won't squander it. It's been 30 years, time to move on.

It's funny how all Russian trolls suddenly discovered that Lithuania actually exists and is very evil. Any nazis there? Kinda slow with the narrative, should have found someone with a swastika tattoo by now.

I think it should be Net 1 but with 2 inclusions minimum (i.e. like the current formula but bumped up by 1).

One inclusion, no exclusions - not in DT2.
Two inclusions, no exclusions - in DT2.
Two inclusions, one exclusion - still in DT2.
Two inclusions, two exclusions - no longer in DT2.

And so on.

This would reduce the chances of (lone) rogue "includers" and rogue "excluders" from messing with the system (self-scratching etc).


I don't like this asymmetry (you need to gain two inclusions to get in, but one asshole can kick you out). The current system is also asymmetric in the other direction (you need just one inclusion to get in, but only a gang of two assholes can kick you out). I prefer a balanced amount of assholery.

There you go, bona fide copypasta from Kremlin propaganda sites. I knew you could do it, comrade.


Not quite the same as passports but don't let minor details like that stop you from lying to us.

Except it doesn't say anything about "5-hour lines".