I completely forgot about those when I made my previous post ^{[thank you]} and I'd blame the markets that allow such listings and registrars that do nothing in return ^{[e.g. cough... Name... cough... cheap]}!

Not sure how they're detecting such scams in Russia, but in one of my countries ^[PH], they seem to be only counting or rather giving public announcements for those that already have some victims ^{[in other words, the latter part of your quote goes unnoticed until some of the victims approach the right department to report it (users can't rely on the government to keep them safe]}.

I think I'm missing the point with regard to Bitcoin's contribution to printing money, but scams are happening in various forms and unfortunately, this is one of them.

Thank you for the provided links... Unfortunately, it seems to be rising in the past few years but it could also mean that the Russian government is doing a better job nowadays in identifying them.

It seems that they just silently added the support for Taproot addresses <sup>[the interesting part is the fact that you made this comment two weeks ago, and now it's here]
- screenshot</sup>

---

Good news: Crystal explorer has decided to "indefinitely suspend" its operation ^{[one less source for law enforcement agencies to spy on]}!

Both of them are good, but make sure to check or rather compare different values/amounts as well ^{[results aren't always the same and it probably has something to do with their current supplies]}:

e.g. If you get Netflix 70 BRL ^[screenshot]:

• At the moment is 0.0007669 BTC on Coinsbee, while on Bitrefill is 0.00077504 BTC.
  
  • Even if we take into account the 1% reward on Bitrefill, it's still slightly cheaper on Coinsbee (I'm referring to this case only):
    0.00077504 - 1% reward (0.0000077504) = 0.0007672896BTC
    

Even though I like seeing this gorgeous jersey on that list, it doesn't belong here ^{[refer to the subject field and only suggest "soccer" teams that have blockchain-related kit sponsors]}

Here you go: TSM FTX 2022 Championship White Jersey

IIRC, they didn't even have quality control in their "own" factory ^{[I might be wrong, so don't quote me on that]}, but regardless of that, that's what users get for going with a brand that only cares how their product looks, as opposed to how it does work:

• Here's their latest alteration: Nano X in different colors

May thread tayo dito tungkol sa "virtual visa card" nila pero hindi nagtagal masyado dahil sa mga "regulatory changes", hindi nakapag offer ng services ang issuer na ginagamit nila noon.
^{- I'm surprised hindi man lang sila nag-effort na maghanap ng bagong issuer!}

Considering that Ledger had 5M+ sales already, I was expecting the number to be a bit higher for Trezor, but looks like I was wrong.

Is it just me or does it look similar to what ledger did with their "academy" section?

---

It appears that the number of "authorized resellers" has been slightly reduced!

I should've been clearer ^{[my bad]}... I knew the usage of mixing codes, but I meant to ask what happens when your pre-mixer reserve finishes? Sooner or later you're going to rely on the funds gathered through the mixing service itself... Am I right?
^{- I'm trying to point out how that could directly/indirectly link your users together.}

Judging by how they used load shedding in the sentence, I believe it's just a temporary precaution against the situation in question and not something that'd completely halt mining operations, so perhaps it's not as bad as it looks ^{[having said that, there'll be collateral damages for sure]}.

Here you go

Regardless of it not being the sole addition, I still enjoyed seeing it in GWR but the person who's responsible for publishing it, didn't bother to check multiple sources:

Archived version of First decentralized cryptocurrency

• e.g.
  
  • In the first paragraph, it stated that the whitepaper was published on 18 August 2008, but that's actually the date for registering bitcoin.org!
  • In the third paragraph, they put nodes and miners in the same category, but we all know there's a big difference between the two!

Yes, we've got lots of those as well, but not to that extent... It's worth noting that the real number is actually smaller than what they've reported simply because of the fact that most scammers tend to create multiple websites and just use the same skin or rather theme/template with little to no change!
^{- It'd be interesting to also see the results for previous years.}

Considering that there are a lot of creative scammers out there, no matter how tight/loose those rules are, they'll always find a way to do their thing ^{[unfortunately]}!

---

I'm a bit surprised that the government of Japan has decided to open the gates to more issues, in exchange for profits:

• Lure in crypto exchanges with relaxed listing rules ^{[most exchanges charge for it]} > More crypto exchanges acquiring licenses ^{[more money for them]}

Thank you for the clarification and it's good that you went with the cold storage route, but I don't understand why you're not allowing them to manage their mined cryptocurrencies through your website ^{[I'm not a developer by any means but AFAIK, it doesn't require you to have everything on a hot wallet]}!
^{- The way I see it, it has more to do with the fees (you can easily add a reasonable withdrawal fee if that's the issue).}

Since your website is new and targeted toward Spanish speakers, do what @OmegaStarScream suggested, and instead of Adsense, try to combine it with one of "these advertising networks ^{[I do know Adsense is also included on this list, but I wouldn't suggest using it at this stage]}".
^{Note: Make sure your ad blocker isn't "on" to view the list!}

In addition to what @tranthidung said, it's worth noting that depending on the type of 2FA someone uses, it might give them a false sense of security ^{[e.g. SIM jacking for those that use SMS 2FA]}!

There are two issues with this:

• Some users can't afford to have a separate PC for other stuff.
• AFAICR, nothing can stop hackers from infiltrating other computers if all of them are connected to the same network.

Sa pagkakaalam ko, wala silang problema sa pag issue ng cards dahil may mga license na sila ^{[e.g. EMI license under the name DCPay]}, pero considering na napaka higpit nila, I doubt maraming gagamit sa card nila dahil nothing stops them from suddenly freezing it!

Even though that's the case with some of the miners, I don't think the same can be said with most manufacturers, and on top of that, if they can capitalize on the situation to come up with a really efficient chip at a reasonable or rather better price compared to their competition, then they can create a great gap between them and the rest ^{[even as a newcomer and that surely leads to significant profits]}.

The fact that they've tried and failed is a clear indication that they actually wanted it, but due to some limitations, they couldn't use it!

If you don't warn your child about the various risks of flashing such things in public, then that makes you a bad parent!

Without considering the security aspect of the situation, if I were drunk, it'd probably be easier for me to operate a HW with physical buttons than the one with the large touch screen!

Instead of being fixated on nonsensical stuff, please take a minute to familiarize yourself with other aspects of Bitcoin ^{[the current or future price of Bitcoin doesn't define its "real" value]}!

I'm surprised you didn't mention anything about its security!

Can you name a single HW out there that never had such a thing?

I did enjoy reading almost everything that she said, except for the part where she implied it's safe or rather nothing bad could happen to it and that gives the wrong impression to both newcomers & tech-illiterate users that no matter how you store it, it's going to be impenetrable ^{[all of us know that's not true]}!

I don't think so... Despite reading "this ^{[refer to the "NEW DEVELOPMENTS" section]}", I still can't think of an instance where they actually made life easier for BitLicense holders ^{[e.g. I couldn't find the exact thread, but there was a user on this forum that mentioned he spent more to gather & fulfill the requirements than he paid for the application fee]} and "this" is one of their recent additions.