I just finished watching a bunch of videos about "BitBox02" and I didn't like the following things:

• Not being able to see the whole address: Video link
  ^{- IIRC, that's also the case with Ledger Nano S, but on a Trezor model One, you can view everything despite having a small screen!}
  
  
• When you enter the wrong password, it doesn't have a wait time between each attempt: Video link
  - Trezor appears to be offering that feature ^{[I've never tried it on mine, so I'm just assuming that the following comment is accurate]}:
  
  Quote from: https://www.reddit.com/r/TREZOR/comments/it124m/comment/g5cdf8r/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3
  (the last attempt you have to wait for 65k seconds, so nearly a day).

---

They "might" restock it soon.

Unfortunately, it's not a "tempered glass"; in other words, it'll offer little protection.

Here's "one" similar to the one that you provided for model T.

You have a point, but only if you drop it on a flat surface ^{[from a short distance]}.



Small correction: It should be in "USD".

Update:
That's interesting and unfair at the same time ^{[apart from the shipping part]}.

Tama ka na hindi ito dahil sa XRP ^{[base sa mga nabasa kong tweets]}, kungdi dahil sa pag deposit or withdraw na malaking pera ^{[meron din akong pinost last week tungkol dito (pangalawang linya)]}:

• #1
• #2
• #3

---

May nakakaalam ba dito kung para saan ba yung bago nilang pinopromote na "#JoinTheCoinsMovement" hashtag?

Whoever first came up with the idea, is a genius!

And for comparison purposes, this is "how durable Trezor model T" is

They could even sell it separately as Trezor does and I'm quite surprised that there are little to no accessories for it ^{[apart from those that came in the box]}.

You're a legend for keeping it for that long

You're right, but you can pair it with a "PanzerGlass™ Screen Protector".
^{- Unfortunately, they're not offering anything for the model One.}

You should avoid both of them if you're just a beginner ^{[assuming that you meant to say "trading", instead of "investing"]}; even hodling has its own risks!
^{- Doing either of those things as a newcomer is quite similar to jumping in a manual truck, without having any prior experience in driving a manual car [you need to learn the basics first].}

No, it's not ^{[for the most part]}!

Sa tingin ko pareho siguro ang outcome dun sa mga naunang BTCitcoin ETFs na nareject sa US ^{[di ako familiar sa mga requirements nila pero I have a strong feeling na it'd take a few more years bago nilang iapprove ang mga ganyan ETF sa Pinas (assuming na may mag submit)]}.

Hindi pa rin safe ang mga documents natin sa mga traditional platforms or exchanges dahil pwede pa rin mahack ang mga yun ^{[false sense of security]}!

You're very welcome. Indeed, it's very cool.

I believe the "get on this list" button on the header part is intended for those who want to become their partner only... You just have to scroll down and choose different categories from the tabs ^{[e.g. entertainment, mining pools and etc...]}.

Seeing that you've not included those, then perhaps it's not worth adding Blockchair's awesome list as well ^{[e.g. the entertainment category is mostly just casinos]}.

Quoted and "verified with electrum".

Am I correct to assume that it'd extract the information ^{[signed messages + verifications]} from this thread and just lists them on a spreadsheet ^{[probably as a link]}?
^{- I'm sorry to sound rude, but I don't think such a thing is needed.}

It depends on how good those domains are! I've knowingly overpaid for a few domains before ^{[I do know that doesn't automatically equate to "some of the fees exchanges charge for withdrawing the funds", but it was pretty close to the average ones]}.

---

I'd suggest focusing more on "how and where" to market them instead.

The community might be able to propose certain stuff, but only you can lead or rather choose its path.

AFAICS, there's "at least" one way ^{[directly or as a workaround]} for every single one of them that "doesn't" prevent an inside job from taking place ^{[unfortunately]}.

Thank you as well for your answers.

For some reason, it's only displaying the result for the newest added feature ^{["Address Balance"]}: Video link
^{- Perhaps you forgot to change something from the back-end [tested in Chrome, Firefox, Opera, Tor and Edge].}

Update:
You're very welcome

If you use the correct format, they'll show up properly:
^{- After you've uploaded an image to "Imgur", hover over the three dots [upper right corner of the image], then click "get share links" and copy the link for "BBCode (Forums)".}

---

You might want to also provide a sample for the "animated/explainer" video part.

What happened:
As soon as I visited their website, I knew something wasn't right so I looked around and found a bunch of red flags!

Red flags:

• They're claiming that they've sold "4243 units to 1207 clients from 31 countries" in just "55 days", and yet, I couldn't find a single review about their services!
• Their "address" belongs to one of the "DSW designer shoe warehouses ^[archived]".
• They seem to have most of the "sold out" mining rigs from various manufacturers!
• There's almost no limit in regards to the number of mining rigs that you can add to the cart ^{[huge supply (#1 and #2)]}!
• They have two phone numbers!
  
  • The one in the "footer" area, belongs to another website ^{[Meds-Mart.com - archived]} that "has a different address ^{[they're probably connected]}".
• For some reason, they've added links to a couple of other websites that have nothing to do with the products that they're selling:
  
  • This "one" is linked to "kush-hub.com".
  • This "one" is linked to "meds-mart.com".

Scammers Profile Link:
alexcahill897

Reference Link:
Buy Bitcoin Miner, Ethereum Miner for Sale & Graphics Cards ^[archived]
Miners-Mart.com ^[archived]

• Shop (page 1) ^[archived]
• Shop (page 2) ^[archived]
• Shop (page 3) ^[archived]

Additional Notes:

---

Tagged and "created a flag".

It appears that it has already begun: Crypto Miners Blamed for Power Supply Deficit in Kazakhstan, Government Mulls Restrictions

By the look of things, they're going down the same road as Iran did last year ^{[a lot could change quickly if there's a broken system in place]}:

• Quote from: https://news.bitcoin.com/russia-considers-selling-power-to-kazakhstan-amid-deficit-caused-by-crypto-miners/
  Alexandra Panina, a member of the company’s management, explained that consumption growth in Kazakhstan is around 7%, noting that for the first time the country is facing a deficit in the cold winter months.

I don't think a lot of customers would be using it for that feature alone ^{[it doesn't make sense to use a BTM that forces its users to go through a KYC process for small amounts]}!
^{- Even they know that [hence why it's in the pilot stage].}

Unfortunately, it's only available in the US ^[AFAICS].
^{- They still have to partner with a third-party provider to offer that feature.}

The biggest problem with such marketplaces is the fact that most of the previous ones that announced themselves as decentralized platforms, turned out to be centralized ^{[to an extent]}!
^{- Would you mind giving an in-depth explanation in regards to how you'd be tackling that issue?}

That's the tricky part ^{[e.g. clean/real votes]}.

- How are you planning to choose/hire the escrow providers?
- How can you be sure that the escrow provider doesn't have any connection to the vendor or the buyer?

What's your plan in regards to dealing with fake ones?

I wonder why you didn't include scam busters?

It really doesn't matter how someone contributes to the forum, as long as it's in a positive way.

Both of them have parts that might be inaccurate ^{[the latter seems to be more accurate, but only due to being in a specific scenario]} and there are certain users that do both of those contributions.

• e.g.
  
  Quote from: _BlackStar on November 01, 2021, 04:15:15 AM
  • Be a cheater hunter, you will get more merit, have the opportunity to become a DT and you get the trust of many forum users and you will get your rank faster.
  In most cases, that wouldn't/shouldn't be the sole reason for getting into DT2/1, and doing such things, doesn't automatically equate to other users trusting you!

I'm a bit confused when it comes to choosing a custom value for the statecoin ^{[deposit page]}. Let's assume for a second that I want to swap a specific amount ^{[e.g. 0.4987BTC]}... Is it going to also show a pending swap group for that amount, on the swap page?
^{- From what I've understood, when you try to swap 1BTC, you automatically join a 1BTC swap group, as opposed to a bunch of smaller ones [hence why I asked the above question].}

And yet, this is the first time I've heard that name!

It's quite strange seeing a so-called "on-chain analyst" talking about a type of data that's "off-chain"! He clearly based that assumption on a bunch of publicly reported/available data ^{[those are incomplete; therefore, they're inaccurate]}!

This is the first time I've ever seen someone labeled or rather referred to less than a year hodlers, as "long-term holders".

I can see why you've described it like that, but since we're dealing with a currency that's quite volatile and not something that would provide various fixed amounts for investing certain amounts, then you shouldn't be considering it as a pyramid scheme!

I do that regularly and I'm sure I'm not the only one

Small correction: Some of the donations came when BTCitcoin was at "$12-$17k".

I was about to report a bug that affected the "add destination" and "mix" buttons, but it seems that you've quickly fixed the "bad request" error.

---

I noticed it doesn't show an error when someone adds the exact same address to new destinations ^{[already tested with zero delays for all of them]}.
^{- Same goes for the refund address.}