You might want to provide an "in-depth explanation" about the warning in question ^{[a proof that they blocked you for it, would be nice as well]}.

---

That new platform ^{[around 50 days]} doesn't have any representatives here ^[CMIIW], so from where did you find it?

And yet, you still have better stats than a lot of other users out there ^{[try to see the glass half-full, as opposed to being half-empty]}!
^{- Despite saying the above things, you're being unfair to yourself by comparing your stats with others [all of us have different journeys].}

I have no doubt you'd reach those ranks in the future, but if I were you, I'd focus more on improving your unhandled reports ^{[it's not a big deal, but you have "a lot of those"]}:

• Quote from: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=reportlist;mine
  A report that stays unhandled can be thought of as "soft-bad", since no moderator positively thought that it warranted action.

Update:
That also means the 183 unhandled reports that you had in your previous screenshot, were all made in the past day or two! I'm impressed

Thank you, I'll probably do that on the weekend

You're very welcome... Perhaps you'd be able to find better candidates from "crwth's recent update".

I salute you for that... You're going to give him/her a heart attack with your generosity

Update:
You're a legend

You're right, but the main issue is the manner in which they accept such ads ^{[I have a strong feeling it's automated]}; in other words, there are no preventive measures in place!

I have to respectfully disagree with you on that one... If you visit the "Scam Accusations" board regularly, you'll see that there are still users who report such ads from time to time!

This thread would come in handy: Crypto Debit Cards
^{Note: I prefer to not vouch for any of those providers [DYOR before trying them]!}

Trust no one ^{[the same goes for other sellers on the "Digital goods" board]} and use one of the "escrow providers from this forum ^{[anyone from the list, except me]}".

Based on the link you've provided, I believe you meant to type my username and you're correct, I'm Filipino ^[half].

Unfortunately, I'm not a merit source and recently, I explained ^{[on another thread]} why I still haven't tried to submit my application.

You have a point, but most of the veteran members ^{[in our local board]} still need "sMerits ^{[I wish there was a way to transfer those to users that you truly trust]}"!
^{- BTW, congratulations [I'm happy for you]}

AFAICS, that's also the case with fiat currencies or traditional methods ^{[I do know it's harder with those and it requires more fees to achieve a similar result, but at least you have a better chance of tracking one of them]}!

---

After reading the above part and also the following quote from the "original article", I have a strong feeling that they'd go with the CBDC route instead:

• Quote from: https://bulawayo24.com/index-id-news-sc-local-byo-211383.html
  "It brings into play all the necessary players and within our sector we have people who are knowledgeable. We have to put security in place and its is our responsibility to share and showcase what can be done," he said.

I wish I had seen this thread earlier ^{[sorry to hear that you've been scammed]}, but since the product that you're going to buy is less than $100, then you should consider creating a WebMoney account instead. You have to "at least" verify your phone number to get an "alias passport" but after that, you'll have enough limits to pay ^[limits]!

• Deposit BTCitcoin ^{[look for WMX purse]} > Convert it ^{[within the platform]} to what the seller accepts on their website ^{[most of them usually accept WMZ [$] or WME [€]]} > Pay
  
  • _{Note: I haven't used their platform for almost a year, so make sure to do some research and see if they've added other restrictions.}

If Cyrus approves it, we can try to get the attention of translators by posting in the following thread: Overview of trusted/recommended Translators

Assuming that you were referring to the editing part, then all they have to do ^[AFAICS] is to forward those subtitles to the video editor ^{[he'll be the one to adjust their timings]}, or did I miss something?

Sang-ayon ako sa lahat ng mga sagot mo, except dun sa huli... Halos pareho lang yung mga scam na ngyayari sa crypto space at real world ^{[for the most part]}.

• Dalawa lang ang solutions para sa mga potential victims:
  
  • Don't be greedy!
  • Don't trust. Verify!

I would go with SaaS ^{[assuming that there's no issue with the type of data that's being transmitted]}.

Personally, I think the first two should be the USPs.

Instead of those, can't you just offer a subscription-based model?

---

Note: Those were just my subjective opinions, based on my limited knowledge in this field ^{[other users might have a different opinion]}.

Restart your computer > stop Norton > if you still experience frozen screens or screen stutters without running Bitcoin Core, then it could be one of the following things:

• Your 1TB HDD is almost full ^{[due to other stuff (e.g. movies, games and etc...)]}.
• Your HDD is starting to fail.

Despite knowing that such a move, isn't going to have a significant impact on BTCitcoin, I liked what I was reading until I reached the following part... What's the fuss surrounding these so-called "CityCoins"?
^{- SMH.}

• Quote from: Leviathan.007 on November 06, 2021, 08:25:03 AM
  "He has a MiamiCoin that is doing very well — we’re going to look in the direction to carry that out."
  

---

He was just aiming at a number, higher than what the "Miami Mayor" mentioned in his tweet ^{[he could've picked "two" instead]}.

They were gone but after seeing my post, you restored them ^{[it doesn't take a genius to figure out that part]}! It was showing a "404 error" and here's "proof" based on my browser history.
- Any other excuses?

• Quote from: https://www.businessinsider.com/what-is-a-404-error
  A 404 error indicates that the webpage you're trying to reach can't be found. You might see a 404 error because of a problem with the website, because the page was moved or deleted, or because you typed the URL wrong.

---

Thank you for confirming that none of those reviews were made on your platform!

Most of them probably haven't done any/enough research ^{[bitcointalk isn't the only forum/platform that warns users about such scams]}.

Depending on "a few things", results may vary from person to person...

• I've got the following results while using the incognito mode in Chrome: Video link

---

@RapTarX
If any of those threads save a single person from getting scammed, they've served their purpose!

You have a point but that'd probably only work if they've randomly picked someone to rob, as opposed to specifically choosing someone as their target + there's no guarantee that they'd not kill you after giving them what they wanted ^{[unfortunately, it's always 50-50]}!

Both of you are probably correct and he isn't the first one to intentionally ^{[convenience]}/unintentionally ^{[limited knowledge]} store a significant amount with a custodial service: California resident lost roughly $24 million in cryptocurrency

Not in where I am at the moment ^{[unfortunately]}! If you harm the robber in any way, they can sue you ^{[it's ridiculous]}!
^{- Your best bet is to pin down the robber, without actually hurting him [easier said than done]!}

1. Cosigner
3. Blockchain contracts

Despite not being sure with either of the above guesses, I would like to personally thank @cygan for allowing the remaining users to solve or rather complete the last two words

Small correction: I believe you meant to say the other way around since the seller in question, uses a "p2sh-segwit" address in his/her auctions.

---

I'm not buying that excuse! You've received that shipping quote on the exact same message that also had the questionable legacy address; in other words, that seller is a liar!

• Quote from: sweeteye on November 04, 2021, 09:58:30 PM
  Quote from: [username REDACTED] on 2021-11-03, 22:18:21
  Congrats on the winning bid, I am glad I was able to reply to you in time to bid.  Please send [amount REDACTED] (0.001. is for shipping) to the following address:
  [legacy address REDACTED]
  

---

All of us can easily & quickly change our IP addresses and pretend that we're someone else

No, it didn't... When someone changes their email, you'll see a warning ^{["like this"]} on their trust summary page ^{[that's not the case with the seller in question (it only shows the password changes)]}.

In regards to password changes:

• The first password change happened after the last PM that you included in your first post.
• The second password change was an hour after the PM that you included in "this post".

When you connect the dots, it's quite clear that it's just a made-up story from a seller who has ulterior motives!
^{- Go to the "security log" page and use CTRL + F to search for his/her name.}

---

The following thread comes in handy: Green hover color for bitcointalk.org links

How could you have the audacity to label those reviews as valid while 1/3rd of them have dates, "prior" to the creation date of your website?
^{@stompix also included one of them ["October 19, 2021"].}

• Video proof ^{[this time, don't even bother to delete the pages (like what you did with the one stompix linked yesterday)]
  Note: I had to record a video since none of those fake reviews appear if you try to archive them!}

To make them appear as genuine reviews, duh!

---

^Archived

They have a lot of valid points, but I just read in another article that might have something to do with "submitting Form 19b-4" and getting it approved.

• As someone with limited knowledge in this field, I wonder why should Spot ETFs be under a different regulatory framework?
  
  
  Quote from: https://cryptobriefing.com/how-a-bitcoin-spot-etf-would-differ-from-a-futures-etf/
  One of the biggest differences between the two types of ETFs lies in the regulatory framework, as they both go through different pathways. Physical ETFs are ruled via the 1933 Securities Act process, which requires exchanges to file a Form 19b-4 to show that the underlying market is not subject to manipulation. In contrast, futures-based ETFs are ruled via the 1940 Investment Company act and therefore do not require the same form.

Found a minor bug when calculating large numbers ^{[halfway through, it randomly alters the numbers]}: Video link

---

It'd probably look better without the ads, but there's no harm in trying to get a bit more for your efforts.