They re-enabled "address whitelisting" around 10 hours ago, but the interesting part is the fact that they just added delayed protection now! I'm quite surprised that a platform of that size, never had such protection in place ^{[there are certain platforms out there that have a 48 to 72-hour hold for withdrawing to new addresses and they're not that popular]} and in addition to that, most of their users are complaining about the added layer of security ^[SMH]!

• Quote from: https://twitter.com/Kris_HK/status/1483383030387408897
  Whitelisting of new addresses is now re-enabled.
  
  We introduced an additional layer of security: there is now a 24 hour delay between registration of a new whitelisted address and first withdrawal.

For the most part, that's right but it's worth noting that, that's not always the case... Certain situations could also lead to the other way around!

I'm not sure if I understood this part correctly! Would you mind paraphrasing it?

The same thing applies to us and a lot of other things...

If you're referring to the other cryptocurrencies, then I think the next generation is still going to deal with those shitcoins in the future ^{[unfortunately]}!

I have to salute them solely based on the amount of effort they've put into this, but having said that, it had an inconsistent part in it... I do know this may sound like I'm nitpicking, but the known "RTX series design" that was used in the video, might give the wrong impression to those newcomers that have or know about such GPU models!

Assuming that I've understood everything correctly ^{[based on @dkbit98's post and yours]}, I don't think that's a bug or a problem since that's how ".onion" links are supposed to be ^{[that shouldn't be an issue if you were using the Tor browser while having those options turned on, on Trezor Suite]}... If somehow I still missed something and you know your way around GitHub, then they might sort it out faster if you report it "in here".

Unfortunately, sa tingin ko ibang UnionBank ang naicheck mo, dahil yung pinost mong press release galing sa "MUFG Union Bank" at based sa Wikipedia pages nila, hindi sila connected sa "Unionbank (Philippines)"!

I've never encountered that issue and I just double-checked after I sent a transaction, but I didn't face that kind of issue! When I hover over the small button at the end of the Tx ID, the pop-up message says "open in block explorer" as opposed to "view transaction".

• Are you on its latest version?
  ^{- BTW, I've also checked their "forum" and so far, no one has reported that kind of issue!}

The ones I'm about to list, aren't necessarily the best places for selling such things, but they might come in handy:

• Bitify
• BitMarket
  ^{- Take note of rule #5 on that subreddit and don't explicitly mention the website that you're trying to sell!}

Note: As always, I prefer to not vouch ^[DYOR]!

Just stumbled upon this "Spanish article" that claims it had more than 1k transactions within the span of a few hours + it seems that they're going to expand it to other locations as well:

• Quote from: Google translated from https://holanews.com/mas-de-1-000-transacciones-en-el-estreno-de-un-cajero-para-criptomonedas-en-uruguay/
  More than 1,000 transactions were carried out in the initial hours of operation of the first UTM cryptocurrency ATM installed in Uruguay, which was inaugurated this Friday in the town of Punta del Este (southeast ).
  ~Snipped~
  The creators of the ATM, developed entirely in Uruguay, seek to expand the network in Maldonado (department in southeastern Uruguay where Punta del Este is located) and, later, take it to Montevideo and Colonia (southwest), another of the country's most popular tourist spots, such as next goals.

---

You're right ^{[it's not worth the trouble]}... The ones I've used didn't have that option ^{[even though they seemed to be from the previous generations]} but half of the videos I've seen on YouTube, had that option!

"All publicity is good publicity"

I'm quite impressed with how everything looks and works, but it's worth noting that the price shown ^[$250] in the title of the above video, is just for the vending machine alone ^{[depending on certain situations and our locations, the overall cost is around $350 to $400]}!

---

With a bit of creativity, you can use it to sell your domains

It's way more serious than what they've tweeted earlier in the day ^{[despite reading only some of the comments on that tweet, 1/4th of them seemed to be affected]}!

Depends on how safe that particular device is, but I wouldn't call that a proper 2FA setup!

Then you should consider either removing the word "static" or completely changing the sentence in question... In its current state, it's quite misleading!

Would you mind providing a detailed breakdown of the costs, in order for us to easily understand how you're capable of achieving such profitabilities?

By the look of things, the main motivation or rather goal behind that particular automated teller machine is nothing but a way to promote their own cryptocurrency ^{[basically, they're using BTCitcoin's name to their advantage]}!

---

Depending on the model of the BTM, you might have different options:

• Manually enter your address
• Scan a QR code
• Use a generated paper wallet by the BTM

I had no luck with your website since it's still under construction, but would you mind providing an in-depth explanation in regards to the part I've bolded?
^{- IMHO, that's nothing but pure BS on so many levels [e.g. ridiculous ROI percentage + a static one, so you're telling us the difficulty adjustments aren't going to affect your services!]... Feel free to prove me wrong!}

Have you ever tried contacting the services that @dkbit98 mentioned on the other thread ^{[e.g. CipherTrace and Elliptic]}?
^{- I do know they're not the type of people that would be able to easily provide you with the information that you want, but I think they're the best route!}

• Similar services:
  
  
  • CipherBlade
  • Chainalysis
  • Crystal Blockchain
  • AML bot

So that means the following part, isn't completely true or accurate: 24/7 support

• While we're at it, I'd like to inform you even though the fee that you're charging ^[screenshot] is smaller than most of the other escrow providers in "other platforms", you might want to consider lowering it a bit more ^{[most escrow providers on this forum, have a lower fee and there are still certain users out there that refuse to hire escrow providers because of their fees]}!

Would you mind answering the above question @pablocokeninja? Why should you and your platform be in the equation, when other escrow providers could achieve a similar result without it?
^{- It's a sensitive subject, so I hope you understand why most of us would question every single one of your moves!}

That's the tricky part! That department has been dealing with a huge backlog of refund or replacement orders in the past few months and that's also what most users usually report in their subreddit.

On the other thread, they did mention an unlimited warranty if it's a software issue, but I was surprised to see them offering a replacement for a hardware issue ^{[case #2]} that's no longer under warranty!

Sa tingin ko may connection din ito sa BDO incident... Either directly ^{[naging mahigpit na ang UB]} or indirectly ^{[connected sa BDO yung mga poster na yun at gusto lang nila sirain yung reputation ni UB]}!
^{- Marami kasing conflicting parts dun sa sagot ni Arvie de Vera [Senior VP ng UB] at sa laman ng mga emails!}

Although medyo malaki yung ibang transactions, na flag din nila yung maliliit na amount:

• 15k
• Below 50k pero sa tingin ko iba ang case niya!

Salamat sa link at almost the same yung case, pero may kaunting difference... Doon sa email na natangap ng mga Reddit posters, pinapayagan na mag withdraw sila pero dun sa case ni @Coin_trader, nalock/nafreeze ang pera niya...

Are you sure your BRD wallet is synced properly?

I've never encountered that kind of issue, but would you mind answering the following questions?

• Which version of Electrum is being used?
• Have you verified it?
• What's the color of the circle in the bottom right corner?
• Have you tried changing the server?

I did some digging and it seems that out of the four players that were supposed to receive a consolation prize of 25BTC each ^{[worth $41.75 at the time]}, one of them ^{[Szikszai "Sziky" Miklós]} didn't take it ^{[source - not sure for the other three]}!

• Judging by the content of "this thread", I believe "BTCsportsbet.com ^[archived]" was responsible for those BTCitcoins.

Regardless of how small that 1% appears to some, I think it's a good start or as @worle1bm mentioned, a "smart move".

If that gets the green light, it'd be big news ^{[especially for those with multiple properties]}!

It's probably a little bit of both ^{[BTCitcoin and their own version of a CityCoin AKA "Crypto Rio" (like what @Lucius referred to: MiamiCoin) [there are a couple more: NYCCoin and AustinCoin]]}...