Would it be possible to statically link openssl-1.0.0? Having really hard time under fedora 26, they ditched 1.0.0 in favor for 1.1.0
My early versions used 1.1.0, I had to downgrade to 1.0.0 because ubuntu still uses the old version. I don't really like to link it statically because of the security implications and licensing. It's pretty easy to compile 1.0.0 and use LD_LIBRARY_PATH until ubuntu finally updates it's libraries. If there are any difficulties I might provide a version which is linked against openssl 1.1.0. That's what I did man, but it's still not working # ./zm
./zm: /lib64/libcrypto.so.1.0.0: no version information available (required by ./zm)
./zm: /lib64/libssl.so.1.0.0: no version information available (required by ./zm)
root@localhost stan]# ls -al /lib64/libcrypto.so.1.0.0
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 19 сеп 21 14:32 /lib64/libcrypto.so.1.0.0 -> libcrypto.so.1.0.0i
[root@localhost stan]# ls -al /lib64/libssl.so.1.0.0
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 16 сеп 21 14:32 /lib64/libssl.so.1.0.0 -> libssl.so.1.0.0i
I'll compile a new version against openssl 1.1.0 and pm it to you. I'll come up with a better solution later. Much obliged |
|
|
|
Hi, does anyone know when halving IRD? How the reward will change?
In a year, probably. |
|
|
|
Would it be possible to statically link openssl-1.0.0? Having really hard time under fedora 26, they ditched 1.0.0 in favor for 1.1.0
My early versions used 1.1.0, I had to downgrade to 1.0.0 because ubuntu still uses the old version. I don't really like to link it statically because of the security implications and licensing. It's pretty easy to compile 1.0.0 and use LD_LIBRARY_PATH until ubuntu finally updates it's libraries. If there are any difficulties I might provide a version which is linked against openssl 1.1.0. That's what I did man, but it's still not working # ./zm
./zm: /lib64/libcrypto.so.1.0.0: no version information available (required by ./zm)
./zm: /lib64/libssl.so.1.0.0: no version information available (required by ./zm)
root@localhost stan]# ls -al /lib64/libcrypto.so.1.0.0
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 19 сеп 21 14:32 /lib64/libcrypto.so.1.0.0 -> libcrypto.so.1.0.0i
[root@localhost stan]# ls -al /lib64/libssl.so.1.0.0
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 16 сеп 21 14:32 /lib64/libssl.so.1.0.0 -> libssl.so.1.0.0i
|
|
|
|
Thank you, I found some guides but mining is no longer profitable. High CPU power is needed or some GPUs to get some Coins mined. The electricity costs are too high to run from home.
Better to buy Coins at a low price and hold them for a while, only my opinion.
Hashes add up, if you get around 200h/s from a native miner it is nothing to be spat on, in a month you'd get about $10. My ryzen 1500x does 420 h/s and it's relatively cheap cpu drawing only about 50-60w which pays for its electricity and then some. If possible can we stop talking about Monero, this thread is for JSEcoin You and I both know this coin isn't going anywhere if you can't answer the most simple questions about the implementation. |
|
|
|
Thank you, I found some guides but mining is no longer profitable. High CPU power is needed or some GPUs to get some Coins mined. The electricity costs are too high to run from home.
Better to buy Coins at a low price and hold them for a while, only my opinion.
Hashes add up, if you get around 200h/s from a native miner it is nothing to be spat on, in a month you'd get about $10. My ryzen 1500x does 420 h/s and it's relatively cheap cpu drawing only about 50-60w which pays for its electricity and then some. |
|
|
|
LOL, OK I'll bite. We're still wondering why you're not glossed "garytheniceguy".  Or "garythesmartguy". Also. Isn't it nice that according to his own rules he has no right to respond to this. If he were to respond to it than he would be admitting that his last comment was moronic and if he doesn't respond to it than hes letting my snide remark slide with no consequence! What an amazing trap he has laid for himself. Oh you're still here? Why haven't you started on your grand implementation where transactions are paid with fluffy ponies or dingleberries? |
|
|
|
Well excuse me to burst your bubble, what grander scope implementation are you talking about? Oh wait you're just dreaming. You think it's easy and cheap to distribute work tasks across millions of clients and take a beating from millions of hashes submitted each second?
I'm not, actual stratum pools manage just fine with 1-3% fee on average.
Not sure how you reconcile these two posts. Did you really think 1-3% would burst my bubble? You seem disingenuous. I wasn't responding to you. If I was I would have quoted you, like now, now I am responding to you, that I wasn't responding to you. I hope I made myself clear. What have I said wrong? That these transactions aren't free, and that 30% is fucking ridiculous for a transaction? What's wrong with you people? |
|
|
|
Well excuse me to burst your bubble, what grander scope implementation are you talking about? Oh wait you're just dreaming. You think it's easy and cheap to distribute work tasks across millions of clients and take a beating from millions of hashes submitted each second?
You're contradicting yourself. Earlier you ridiculed calling it 'fair payouts' and now you are telling us (correctly) that there are significant costs to provide this service. There aren't any real barriers to entry here. If someone can offer a better deal to web hosts looking to monetize, they will. I'm not, actual stratum pools manage just fine with 1-3% fee on average. 30% is daylight robbery, you're right thought, everyone is free to offer an alternative. |
|
|
|
This fortune for the users of LINUX OS.
It should!, if the post is in this forum, it means public property there are no certain restrictions, but you limit it only to the users of certain OS only, this is very unfair.
If you think this restriction is appropriate, you should post it on your blog or website.
Ok Dev, good luck with your mining project.
What the fuck are you talking about? |
|
|
|
I think this is hinting at something much deeper here. Something far more profound. Yea yea monetizing websites without add blocker. Don't get me wrong that is cool. But did he just say practical micro-payments!? By doing proof of work for the benefit of someone else you can send small amounts of value to anyone you want for any reason you want for ~0 transaction cost. The scope of this surely must be greater than the article alludes to. It's far from ~0 transaction cost, they skim 30% of the hashes. I'm talking about a grander scope and you are drilling down on one specific implementation of the idea by one specific firm. Kind of going in the opposite direction of what I had in mind there. Well excuse me to burst your bubble, what grander scope implementation are you talking about? Oh wait you're just dreaming. You think it's easy and cheap to distribute work tasks across millions of clients and take a beating from millions of hashes submitted each second? |
|
|
|
Guys i dont know what to do with my moneros, i dont know if should i wait until it recovers to $150, or just dump them now that the price is a little bit quiet, i only have 1,50 monero's, but i think it is more profitable if i sell them and buy any other cheap alts that are so down right now, almost all the market is bleeding at the moment.
I dont know what to do
Jerk off. Bitcoin is taking punches, monero is not immune to it, do whatever you want, sell now and take a loss, all alts are dropping. |
|
|
|
I think this is hinting at something much deeper here. Something far more profound. Yea yea monetizing websites without add blocker. Don't get me wrong that is cool. But did he just say practical micro-payments!? By doing proof of work for the benefit of someone else you can send small amounts of value to anyone you want for any reason you want for ~0 transaction cost. The scope of this surely must be greater than the article alludes to. It's far from ~0 transaction cost, they skim 30% of the hashes. Fair Payouts
We pay per solved hash. The payout rate is adjusted automatically every few hours based on the global difficulty of the network and the average reward per block. The payout rate is calculated like this:
(<solved_hashes>/<global_difficulty>) * <block_reward> * 0.7
With the current network difficulty of 28.963G (updated Sep 19, 2017 - 19:39:40 GMT) and average block reward of 6.82 XMR:
(<solved_hashes>/28962598531) * 6.82 XMR * 0.7 = 0.000165 XMR per 1M hashes
I.e. you get 70% of the average XMR we earn. Unlike a traditional mining pool, this rate is fixed, regardless of actual blocks found and the luck involved finding them. We keep 30% for us to operate this service and to (hopefully) turn a profit.
We try to run this service with as much transparency as possible. If your users solve hashes, you get paid. Period. The minimum payout threshold is 0.5 XMR (~$43).
Please understand that we are still testing the waters. At the moment all payouts have to be approved manually from our side, but we promise to do so at least once a day. We will offer automatic payments down the line, once we have determined that our systems are stable and sound.
I find it hilarious they captioned this "Fair payouts" |
|
|
|
Any country that accept and supports cryptocurrency will become home of it. So I guess Ireland will be one of the country that will produce high volume trading in Bitcoin. Aside from that, if Ireland really released their first ICO then it will be but I checked all the link in ther and I my browser cant find the DNS. Is this a hoax trying to get attention towards this mingocoin?
#2 |
|
|
|
It wont be regarded as legitimate since some retards working for uncle sam subpoenaed a student project? Fail to see the logic in that Anyway monero is far superior for mining in browser than bitcoin, the nethash rate at this time is "only" 248,380,000 that's "just" 24.8 million browsers doing 10 h/s |
|
|
|
I'm not satisfied with the Monero clients. I would like to have something similar to Electrum
You want something not private and secure then, so fuck off. |
|
|
|
I just went to send some xmr and the cli wallet told me there's a backlog. So I bumped the priority one notch above normal (whatever it's called) and the transaction fee is around .071 xmr or so. Ouch.
What's happening to cause so many transactions?
It is because you had so many tiny inputs. Normally fee should be at least 10 times lower then yours. The little guy always loses most  |
|
|
|
|
Never sell, buy all altcoins and ICOs and tokens and fucknuggets. Buy them all and keep them for 100 years, pet them, look at them, masturbate on them, open the wallet, close the wallet, check the balance, check the price, jerk off, balance, close, price, jerk off.
God forbid you live a little.
|
|
|
|
Mine77 is fixing this pool bug, we will report when it is fixed and send you updates on how to fix. All pool payments are being stored in pool wallet, so nothing is being lost.
I find it hilarious that due to the nature of IRD we can never know if all payments are stored on the pool wallet's address  |
|
|
|
|
Yeah if we give children to solve 1 hash a day for homework at lowest difficulty, we're bound to find a block. Mining with children, I like it, best of all they eat very little and you don't have to pay them. Way better than dealing with ASIC manufacturers pre-orders.
|
|
|
|
I believe they are changing the alogrithm to memory bound or something, mining on a CPU negatively affects the performance of every device. There was a post about this
We encourage users to code their own miners. However we are looking into Memmory Bound PoW algorithms so Browsers always stand a chance while having less power consumption
That's a load of horse manure. Use your heads people. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
