Hey, is it possible for me to mine just Fantomcoin without having to mine Bytecoin? and if so how do I do it? I want to focus all my Hash rate for Fantomcoin only. Sure. Simply start a fantomcoind and launch mining as usual - using start_mining command - throughout the wallet or in daemon. Note: don't forget to point out the address if you're starting mining in daemon.
|
|
|
Heres my submission. Click on the image to see it in a dark background. Hope you like it! +1 show a bit more of the F at the top maybe, other than that great thinking outside the square Agreed. More F on the top is necessity.
|
|
|
There is no pool for this coin yet... I think that it's a matter of time
For those of you with the time, resources, and knowledge, here's the source code which you can use to make a Fantomcoin pool: https://github.com/zone117x/node-cryptonote-pool For me, time is my biggest constraint. But whoever makes the first FCN pool that is well-run, you're going to make some coin As you can see from these posts, the need is there. As they say in marketing, "See a need and fill it." Maybe dev or us should make up a reward like MRO did for catalysing developpement of a FCN pool . cheers Yeah, I already made a post about it: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=637261.0
|
|
|
I think a user friendly wallet is very important. Currently I have to check, double check and triple check if I want to do a transfer - especially to the exchanges with payment ID. A graphical wallet can reduce errors substantially, where you can assign a new recipient address as well as payment IDs a name and then you can just select the names to do a payment. eg. in the amount block type the amount of coins and in the recipient address you select the name eg Bittrex and then you select the name Bittrex payment ID.
Proving a payment or identity with CN coins sort of against the principles of anonymous coins. If it is possible, the recipient could have a "confirm" option which sends the originator some kind of proof that he got the money, but I don't think it is possible.
I actually think that's GUI wallet/miner are a little overrated. Yes it will bring more people to the coin but there is a chance (and not a small one) that all this people won't be as qualified as one would like. After all, community is always build around 3-4 leaders with a strong tech background and often forum online. I think we should focus on finding those - or becoming those. Regarding the payment proving - I agree with you, I highly doubt that such functions are possible and if they were possible how would it effect anonymity. EDIT: Forgot to mention Spekulatius version of slogan - I actually really like it. I was thinking that current version is too long and this one is just perfect. "Merge the future, mine FCN." Thank you! Going to talk to amphibian about implementing it on website. Maybe instead of "1st merged mining cryptonote coin".
|
|
|
Hello boys and girls I bring good news. First of all I would like to say you that There are changes in the Logo contest.
1. New prize pool - 500 FCN and 0.5 BTC 2. Prize pool is splitted between 3 winners - 1st place - 0.25 BTC and 250 FCN, 2nd place - 0.15 BTC and 150 FCN, 3rd place - 0.1 BTC and 100 FCN. 3. Works are being accepted until Friday (just to clarify - all previous works are accepted by default)On weekend me and amphibian are going to select 3 most awesome looking works and present it to public. Let the best contender win. poll? sadface recently made a valid point about the huge amount of sock puppets on BitcoinTalk. I think a lot of people would like to receive the reward for the 1st (and even 2nd/3rd) place and they won't hesitate to use multiple newbie accounts to vote and since I can't restrict poll to something like "Vote only for Member+" I think that dev should make the final decision. I always open for the ideas tho how to make it more public and open.
|
|
|
Hey boys and girls
Directly to business - since no one is implementing MM in their pool for free I'm putting a bounty on it.
Bounty for the open source pool is 1000 FCN and 0.7 BTC
Seems reasonable enough.
|
|
|
Hello boys and girls I bring good news. First of all I would like to say you that There are changes in the Logo contest.
1. New prize pool - 500 FCN and 0.5 BTC 2. Prize pool is splitted between 3 winners - 1st place - 0.25 BTC and 250 FCN, 2nd place - 0.15 BTC and 150 FCN, 3rd place - 0.1 BTC and 100 FCN. 3. Works are being accepted until Friday (just to clarify - all previous works are accepted by default)On weekend me and amphibian are going to select 3 most awesome looking works and present it to public. Let the best contender win.
|
|
|
Is there a specific link for coin adding? Couldn't find one.
|
|
|
Thank you for the idea. Tried to fill out the application for it but there must be a logo. I think I'll raise the reward for the logo to 0.5 BTC. There are a lot of good logo works atm but maybe 0.5 BTC reward will attract more artist (and people in general) to the FCN. I'll surely make announce later today. What was the drama all about? I kinda missed it.
Maybe you can contact some of the Namecoin people and get them interested in this project so they join our ranks. That would do wonders for pushing our legitimacy as well.
Drama was about MRO not wanting to be a merged mining coin. (super short version) About the Namecoin people - that's a valid idea. Probably going to look into people who were behind initial merged mining release - maybe they will be able to help or at least advice something. Also, I'm working on a slogan or something like that for a FCN, so far the best I got was: "Merge with the future. Mine FCN."
|
|
|
Merged mining is FCNs main feature right now. What do we need to make it the most profitable coin to mine? Im not a techie, but in my understanding the main issues are pools that support MM with FCN and competitors and a very timely update of the code base to keep up with the merged coins, right? Maybe we can learn from Namecoin Yea, I thought so too but it looks like that merged mining itself was a BIG surprise addition to the Bitcoin and marketing wasn't needed. I think we should re-introduce MM to the people. Last time it was discussed there was big BCN/MRO drama and people didn't actually learn anything. Also, I actually wonder if pools are going to change the situation. People seem to be downed after the merged mining drama and think that it's bad but it, surely, isn't.
|
|
|
Hey guys, Recently we’ve talked with bitcoinbear about the marketing of the coin and he made a lot of valid points regarding the coin’s current state. Unfortunately ATM I don’t have enough time for developing and marketing. I’ll surely visit forum once/twice per day to answer technical questions if there will be any. So that’s pretty much it, don’t hesitate to contact bitcoinbear in case of any questions and also feel free to help him out. Cheers! I’ll try my best. Merged mining is a great feature and hopefully I will be able to deliver it’s greatness to more and more people. As the first step in marketing campaign (lol) I would like to ask the community it’s opinion: What would you change/introduce in FCN to make it more valuable?I’ve made a couple of points in that thread but I would love to hear from you.
|
|
|
Hello boys and girls, As a topic header clearly states I would really love to hear from you about the things in FCN you would change/introduce to make it more valuable/interesting for the masses. Probably the most popular topic will be the pool. MM coins are super dependent from their “parents” - at this moment all main coins are being mined _mostly_ on pools. (by regular folks with one-two PC’s at home) And since MM is not implemented in it - FCN struggles. I know that you’re able to mine FCN like all other coins but then all MM features are going to hell. Also, I know that MRO folks were agains the MM and they’ve declined the hard fork proposal from TFT, okay, they are the part of the main coins now but still not really supportive of MM. I would really like to hear their points about it since I missed the initial discussion. Personally, I love the MM idea, yes - difficulty will rise in all networks and you won’t get so much of a profit from it but you will be more protected from the theoretical attacks on the network. Less dependent from big miners that currently control the difficulty and price of all CN coins. In theory, FCN can be and should be the most difficult the coin to mine but along side with difficulty will come protection from the attacks - it will be the most safe CN coin. Well, I guess that’s all I wanted to tell you folks. /discuss
|
|
|
Price is also mostly set by the market supply and demand. It's seems the demand is low as the volume on exchanges are lows. I guess FCN need advertising for more traders / investors and pools for more miners.
cheers
Agreed. Going to talk to amphibian about the coin marketing since I have plenty of free time atm and it will also free him from the forum.
|
|
|
Looks like LAN configuration is a popular request here. Probably should make an instruction for it.
|
|
|
Guys, wanted to address the pool issue - current difficulty is only 2.3m. There is essentially no need for the pool, if you're not getting much using pool mining of QCN/MRO/BCN you always can solo mine FCN. With 100 h/s it will take you only 6 hours to find a block.
I know that other currencies have slightly bigger exchange rate atm but that's because FCN is so undervalued. Merged mining is a first true tech innovation in CN - no other currency have introduced anything new to the CN except the FCN.
|
|
|
Hi, I have two questions: -how can I tell that minerc is actually mining? Are there any accepted shares or something like that? Mine shows only hash rate, and mining( height, diff etc) and it is all. -Are this nodes from first post (--node1=127.0.0.1:8081 --node2=127.0.0.1:24081) right? I'm afraid that my miner is not mining because there's no output from minerc (like accepted shares in cudaminer).
Also, in first post there is information that you need translation, I can offer you translation to polish (pm me if you're interested).
Thanks for any help
1. Hashrate, height and diff is all you will get from minerc. As long as you see this data - you're good. 2. This nodes are using your local daemons and they are for BCN (8081) and FCN (24081). If you want to mine FCN with QCN/MRO you should use their ports. (18081 for MRO and 23081 for QCN) Also, minerc is a tool for solo mining, not pooled mining.
|
|
|
How do I MM via Quazar mining pool with FCN? Or is MM only available via solo mining?
AFAIK there are no pools for FCN yet. So the only possibility for now is to solomine QCN with FCN.
|
|
|
Is the minerc working in LAN? When I tryied to use IP adress of deamon instead of 127.0.0.1 it's now working... Is there anyone who have configured LAN mining for FCN?
On the 17/18th page wedgy2k was struggling with the LAN config, as far as I know he succeeded in this, try to PM him.
|
|
|
|