Bitcoin Forum
October 17, 2019, 04:03:50 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.18.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 [50] 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 ... 131 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Health and Religion  (Read 191156 times)
BADecker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1124


View Profile
December 24, 2016, 09:10:59 PM
 #981

Icons full of all sorts of images. You believe them? For you this proof? Other evidence of the believers there. They are stupid people and take away useless to argue. They have no arguments. Their argument alone. There is a God because there is.

Maybe if you learn how to do scientific study, and how to look at nature, you will finally see the proof and evidence that God exists.

Cool

And you know? I asked you for the physical evidence.

Where is it?  Let's  do carbon dating on your God's bones, let's study him.

You want to do scientific studies?

Just because you ask me for something, doesn't mean I have to give it to you. I am not required because you are squirming.

Now, you. You show me the proof that God DOESN'T exist. Because if you don't have any proof, and if you say He doesn't exist, you are straight out a liar.

Cool

God does not exist because there is no proof he exist.

Nobody can present any physical evidence of his existence so no scientific studies can be done on him.

Here is the proof and evidence, again:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380.

If you don't look at or calculate out the proof and the evidence, then you are a liar, or at best dishonorable.

Show me where the proof fails. Certainly the evidence doesn't fail. You can't, because it doesn't fail.

Cool

Don't be afraid to donate Bitcoin >>> 1JDJotyxZLFF8akGCxHeqMkD4YrrTmEAwz !
1571285030
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1571285030

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1571285030
Reply with quote  #2

1571285030
Report to moderator
1571285030
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1571285030

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1571285030
Reply with quote  #2

1571285030
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1571285030
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1571285030

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1571285030
Reply with quote  #2

1571285030
Report to moderator
1571285030
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1571285030

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1571285030
Reply with quote  #2

1571285030
Report to moderator
BADecker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1124


View Profile
December 24, 2016, 09:29:30 PM
 #982

Icons full of all sorts of images. You believe them? For you this proof? Other evidence of the believers there. They are stupid people and take away useless to argue. They have no arguments. Their argument alone. There is a God because there is.

Maybe if you learn how to do scientific study, and how to look at nature, you will finally see the proof and evidence that God exists.

Cool

And you know? I asked you for the physical evidence.

Where is it?  Let's  do carbon dating on your God's bones, let's study him.

You want to do scientific studies?

Just because you ask me for something, doesn't mean I have to give it to you. I am not required because you are squirming.

Now, you. You show me the proof that God DOESN'T exist. Because if you don't have any proof, and if you say He doesn't exist, you are straight out a liar.

Cool

God does not exist because there is no proof he exist.

Nobody can present any physical evidence of his existence so no scientific studies can be done on him.

Here is the proof and evidence, again:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380.

If you don't look at or calculate out the proof and the evidence, then you are a liar, or at best dishonorable.

Show me where the proof fails. Certainly the evidence doesn't fail. You can't, because it doesn't fail.

Cool

These are metaphysical scribblings of a deluded man.

Show me the physical evidence so that it can be studied scientifically.  

You started talking about scientific studies about God.  And yet you got no physical evidence to begin your study.


There you go again. You can't debunk the proof and the evidence, so all you do is use the political science of picking on me to cover up the fact that you can't debunk the science that God exists. Come on, if you think that it is scribblings of a deluded man. Debunk it step by step. Or are you to dimwitted to even try?

Cool

Don't be afraid to donate Bitcoin >>> 1JDJotyxZLFF8akGCxHeqMkD4YrrTmEAwz !
BADecker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1124


View Profile
December 24, 2016, 10:12:38 PM
 #983


There you go again. You can't debunk the proof and the evidence, so all you do is use the political science of picking on me to cover up the fact that you can't debunk the science that God exists. Come on, if you think that it is scribblings of a deluded man. Debunk it step by step. Or are you to dimwitted to even try?

Cool

I already did many times over.  You just reject any reason.

Here you go again:

1. "Cause and effect": If we assume that God initiated the Big Bang, who initiated God?  If you assume that every effect has to have a cause, if God caused Big Bang, he needs a cause since he is the effect.   So cause and effect cannot be prove anything.
Big Bang is theory. Until we know it is fact, there is no need to consider it.

God made the universe. He made the physics of the universe. To make something like this, he needed to be outside of them, even though He may have placed Himself within them after He made them. His "physics" is not the physics of the universe. He may not have needed a beginning to exist. But if He did, there is no way we could understand any of it, since we still are having trouble even accepting God, Himself, in the face of the proof and evidence.



2. "Entropy is increasing hence complexity is decreasing and if God created the universe, being the supreme complexity, the complexity decreases from the initial point of super-complexity aka God."
God, being not part of this universe, doesn't follow the physics of this universe. So, we don't know that entropy can be applied to God... or do you have evidence for this?


- your statement about complexity decreasing is invalid because the complexity actually increases, we are the very proof.  
In what way are we the proof? There are plenty of people who uderstand from science that we are devolving. Since there is no strong evidence for evolution, we are not the proof at all.


Evolution is the proof of it.  
Evolution is theory, which means that it is not fact. In fact, there are many people who have shown that evolution is mathematically impossible ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1454732.0 ). In addition, consider irreducible complexity. Evolution is not a consideration because it essentially doesn't exist.


Besides, entropy and complexity are not correlated.  Entropy is a measure of disorder at the molecular level.  it is a statistical measure.  You are having problems grasping the definition of entropy.
Yet, in the overall state of the universe, entropy is increasing while complexity is decreasing.



You got any other "scientific proofs"?  Bring it on!!!

You realise that any physical evidence would clear up any doubts, right?  But since there is no physical evidence, you got stuck with "metaphysical proofs".


The existence of the universe is the physical evidence. You forgot to attempt to rebut the machine and the Maker.

Nice try, though.

Cool

Don't be afraid to donate Bitcoin >>> 1JDJotyxZLFF8akGCxHeqMkD4YrrTmEAwz !
CoinCube
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1778
Merit: 1037



View Profile
December 24, 2016, 10:26:42 PM
 #984


If you dedicate your life to some false idea... No big deal, natural selection will take care of it.


On this point at least af_newbie we agree.

In that spirit I would advise you to read the demographic information provided in the OP.

CoinCube
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1778
Merit: 1037



View Profile
December 25, 2016, 02:20:46 AM
 #985


Why Loma Linda residents live longer than the rest of us: They treat the body like a temple
http://www.latimes.com/health/la-he-blue-zone-loma-linda-20150711-story.html
Quote
22,000 residents of Loma Linda, where as many as a third of the people are Seventh-day Adventists. Their faith instructs them to treat their bodies as temples: little or no meat or fish, no smoking or alcohol, plenty of exercise and a sense of purpose.

Spend a little time in Loma Linda, and what distinguishes it from, say, the adjacent city of San Bernardino becomes apparent...

On a residential street, tables piled with grapefruit and oranges for sale — on the honor system — sit outside houses. Sixteen-year-old Claire Fontoura says there are few overweight students at her Adventist high school. The cafeteria at Loma Linda University is vegetarian. Students attend chapel every Wednesday to, as the chaplain put it one recent morning, "stop stressing about tests, stop texting ... put away our to-do lists." And the campus fitness center, and its programs on diet and exercise, are open to the community.

Studies have shown that Seventh-day Adventists, who have a broad range of ethnic backgrounds, live as much as a decade longer than the rest of us, which led to Loma Linda being identified as one of five longevity spots, called Blue Zones, on the planet and the only one in the United States.

"I don't think we're so bold as to say that the only way to have this eight- to 10-year advantage is to be an Adventist," said Fontoura, vice president/chief wholeness officer at Loma Linda University Health. "We do view it as the core. But how people get there is up to them."

BADecker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1124


View Profile
December 25, 2016, 04:33:39 AM
 #986


There you go again. You can't debunk the proof and the evidence, so all you do is use the political science of picking on me to cover up the fact that you can't debunk the science that God exists. Come on, if you think that it is scribblings of a deluded man. Debunk it step by step. Or are you to dimwitted to even try?

Cool

I already did many times over.  You just reject any reason.

Here you go again:

1. "Cause and effect": If we assume that God initiated the Big Bang, who initiated God?  If you assume that every effect has to have a cause, if God caused Big Bang, he needs a cause since he is the effect.   So cause and effect cannot be prove anything.
Big Bang is theory. Until we know it is fact, there is no need to consider it.

God made the universe. He made the physics of the universe. To make something like this, he needed to be outside of them, even though He may have placed Himself within them after He made them. His "physics" is not the physics of the universe. He may not have needed a beginning to exist. But if He did, there is no way we could understand any of it, since we still are having trouble even accepting God, Himself, in the face of the proof and evidence.



2. "Entropy is increasing hence complexity is decreasing and if God created the universe, being the supreme complexity, the complexity decreases from the initial point of super-complexity aka God."
God, being not part of this universe, doesn't follow the physics of this universe. So, we don't know that entropy can be applied to God... or do you have evidence for this?


- your statement about complexity decreasing is invalid because the complexity actually increases, we are the very proof.  
In what way are we the proof? There are plenty of people who uderstand from science that we are devolving. Since there is no strong evidence for evolution, we are not the proof at all.


Evolution is the proof of it.  
Evolution is theory, which means that it is not fact. In fact, there are many people who have shown that evolution is mathematically impossible ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1454732.0 ). In addition, consider irreducible complexity. Evolution is not a consideration because it essentially doesn't exist.


Besides, entropy and complexity are not correlated.  Entropy is a measure of disorder at the molecular level.  it is a statistical measure.  You are having problems grasping the definition of entropy.
Yet, in the overall state of the universe, entropy is increasing while complexity is decreasing.



You got any other "scientific proofs"?  Bring it on!!!

You realise that any physical evidence would clear up any doubts, right?  But since there is no physical evidence, you got stuck with "metaphysical proofs".


The existence of the universe is the physical evidence. You forgot to attempt to rebut the machine and the Maker.

Nice try, though.

Cool

So you are using "God made the universe" assertion to prove your cause and effect "proof"?  By excluding God from causality you want to proof his existence.

You obviously know a diddly squat about a scientific method.  Stop spreading your bullshit and wrapping it into "science".


So, you are increasing the lie that God does not exist, to suggest that it is an assertion, when you know absolutely well that you have nothing that can rebut the evidence and proof I have shown at:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380.

As I have said, God, being the Creator of the universe, does not exist according to the physics of the universe, except in ways He wants.

Your assertion is like, because people make cars, people follow the laws of car engines. Not only are you warped in your thinking, but you are an intentional liar, because you know better, and yet express the opposite of the truth.

Cool

Don't be afraid to donate Bitcoin >>> 1JDJotyxZLFF8akGCxHeqMkD4YrrTmEAwz !
stats
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 25, 2016, 02:11:41 PM
 #987


There you go again. You can't debunk the proof and the evidence, so all you do is use the political science of picking on me to cover up the fact that you can't debunk the science that God exists. Come on, if you think that it is scribblings of a deluded man. Debunk it step by step. Or are you to dimwitted to even try?


God made the universe. He made the physics of the universe. To make something like this, he needed to be outside of them, even though He may have placed Himself within them after He made them. His "physics" is not the physics of the universe. He may not have needed a beginning to exist. But if He did, there is no way we could understand any of it, since we still are having trouble even accepting God, Himself, in the face of the proof and evidence.


Cool

Even your comments are stating that you have no evidence. He may this.... he may that.... You do not know so how can you attempt to use this as evidence.
BADecker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1124


View Profile
December 25, 2016, 03:20:48 PM
 #988


There you go again. You can't debunk the proof and the evidence, so all you do is use the political science of picking on me to cover up the fact that you can't debunk the science that God exists. Come on, if you think that it is scribblings of a deluded man. Debunk it step by step. Or are you to dimwitted to even try?


God made the universe. He made the physics of the universe. To make something like this, he needed to be outside of them, even though He may have placed Himself within them after He made them. His "physics" is not the physics of the universe. He may not have needed a beginning to exist. But if He did, there is no way we could understand any of it, since we still are having trouble even accepting God, Himself, in the face of the proof and evidence.


Cool

Even your comments are stating that you have no evidence. He may this.... he may that.... You do not know so how can you attempt to use this as evidence.


Consider the scientist. He writes up his paperwork, and publishes it. Then, when he gets on a forum like this, he doesn't post his paperwork in every last post he posts, especially if the paperwork is extensive.

I have posted my so-to-speak paperwork elsewhere in posts, over and over. You haven't posted any paperwork. Who are you trying to kid? You can barely even think. And here you are, attempting to use political science on me, without even realizing what you are doing.

Cool

Don't be afraid to donate Bitcoin >>> 1JDJotyxZLFF8akGCxHeqMkD4YrrTmEAwz !
stats
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 25, 2016, 11:55:33 PM
 #989


There you go again. You can't debunk the proof and the evidence, so all you do is use the political science of picking on me to cover up the fact that you can't debunk the science that God exists. Come on, if you think that it is scribblings of a deluded man. Debunk it step by step. Or are you to dimwitted to even try?


God made the universe. He made the physics of the universe. To make something like this, he needed to be outside of them, even though He may have placed Himself within them after He made them. His "physics" is not the physics of the universe. He may not have needed a beginning to exist. But if He did, there is no way we could understand any of it, since we still are having trouble even accepting God, Himself, in the face of the proof and evidence.


Cool

Even your comments are stating that you have no evidence. He may this.... he may that.... You do not know so how can you attempt to use this as evidence.


Consider the scientist. He writes up his paperwork, and publishes it. Then, when he gets on a forum like this, he doesn't post his paperwork in every last post he posts, especially if the paperwork is extensive.

I have posted my so-to-speak paperwork elsewhere in posts, over and over. You haven't posted any paperwork. Who are you trying to kid? You can barely even think. And here you are, attempting to use political science on me, without even realizing what you are doing.

Cool

I am not the one making "claims". I have never said anything apart from show me the proof in physical form.

Do not confuse your limited ability to prove with my questions of proof.
BADecker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1124


View Profile
December 26, 2016, 01:28:01 AM
 #990


There you go again. You can't debunk the proof and the evidence, so all you do is use the political science of picking on me to cover up the fact that you can't debunk the science that God exists. Come on, if you think that it is scribblings of a deluded man. Debunk it step by step. Or are you to dimwitted to even try?


God made the universe. He made the physics of the universe. To make something like this, he needed to be outside of them, even though He may have placed Himself within them after He made them. His "physics" is not the physics of the universe. He may not have needed a beginning to exist. But if He did, there is no way we could understand any of it, since we still are having trouble even accepting God, Himself, in the face of the proof and evidence.


Cool

Even your comments are stating that you have no evidence. He may this.... he may that.... You do not know so how can you attempt to use this as evidence.


Consider the scientist. He writes up his paperwork, and publishes it. Then, when he gets on a forum like this, he doesn't post his paperwork in every last post he posts, especially if the paperwork is extensive.

I have posted my so-to-speak paperwork elsewhere in posts, over and over. You haven't posted any paperwork. Who are you trying to kid? You can barely even think. And here you are, attempting to use political science on me, without even realizing what you are doing.

Cool

I am not the one making "claims". I have never said anything apart from show me the proof in physical form.

Do not confuse your limited ability to prove with my questions of proof.

What a joker you have turned out to be. The world is kinda gigantic. And yet it isn't enough physical proof for you.

No claims? All you do is claim that there isn't any physical evidence. Wake up.

Cool

Don't be afraid to donate Bitcoin >>> 1JDJotyxZLFF8akGCxHeqMkD4YrrTmEAwz !
stats
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 26, 2016, 05:39:03 AM
 #991


There you go again. You can't debunk the proof and the evidence, so all you do is use the political science of picking on me to cover up the fact that you can't debunk the science that God exists. Come on, if you think that it is scribblings of a deluded man. Debunk it step by step. Or are you to dimwitted to even try?


God made the universe. He made the physics of the universe. To make something like this, he needed to be outside of them, even though He may have placed Himself within them after He made them. His "physics" is not the physics of the universe. He may not have needed a beginning to exist. But if He did, there is no way we could understand any of it, since we still are having trouble even accepting God, Himself, in the face of the proof and evidence.


Cool

Even your comments are stating that you have no evidence. He may this.... he may that.... You do not know so how can you attempt to use this as evidence.


Consider the scientist. He writes up his paperwork, and publishes it. Then, when he gets on a forum like this, he doesn't post his paperwork in every last post he posts, especially if the paperwork is extensive.

I have posted my so-to-speak paperwork elsewhere in posts, over and over. You haven't posted any paperwork. Who are you trying to kid? You can barely even think. And here you are, attempting to use political science on me, without even realizing what you are doing.

Cool

I am not the one making "claims". I have never said anything apart from show me the proof in physical form.

Do not confuse your limited ability to prove with my questions of proof.

What a joker you have turned out to be. The world is kinda gigantic. And yet it isn't enough physical proof for you.

No claims? All you do is claim that there isn't any physical evidence. Wake up.

Cool

No it is not enough proof. Because I do not believe the evidence which you provide. This is the basis of my belief.... it's different to your's so I do not expect you to understand. You are a little lamb who follows the rules of an ancient fictional book blindly.

You have already been asked in a previous thread to ask your god to post a selfie. So please talk with him about this!

Maybe you should try waking up.
Hannu
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 813
Merit: 500

RIP: S5, A faithful device long time


View Profile
December 26, 2016, 06:35:11 AM
 #992

I rather eat those pills, it makes me feel better.
Poorness and work what you dont get money at all. Forces you to live on cheap rent houses.
Im not bad person or sadistic

BTC: 3Qnnx4cu45Gx4WcksNCnBPu3TaUZ5sKkLo
LTC: LYX1ZH7f4qcXq52AzA6grUYDfDngVz7BEi
XRP: rLrbZMJDdL8eQd7HsW314bCtvE16LTLYkM?dt=1113
BADecker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1124


View Profile
December 26, 2016, 08:15:25 AM
 #993


There you go again. You can't debunk the proof and the evidence, so all you do is use the political science of picking on me to cover up the fact that you can't debunk the science that God exists. Come on, if you think that it is scribblings of a deluded man. Debunk it step by step. Or are you to dimwitted to even try?


God made the universe. He made the physics of the universe. To make something like this, he needed to be outside of them, even though He may have placed Himself within them after He made them. His "physics" is not the physics of the universe. He may not have needed a beginning to exist. But if He did, there is no way we could understand any of it, since we still are having trouble even accepting God, Himself, in the face of the proof and evidence.


Cool

Even your comments are stating that you have no evidence. He may this.... he may that.... You do not know so how can you attempt to use this as evidence.


Consider the scientist. He writes up his paperwork, and publishes it. Then, when he gets on a forum like this, he doesn't post his paperwork in every last post he posts, especially if the paperwork is extensive.

I have posted my so-to-speak paperwork elsewhere in posts, over and over. You haven't posted any paperwork. Who are you trying to kid? You can barely even think. And here you are, attempting to use political science on me, without even realizing what you are doing.

Cool

I am not the one making "claims". I have never said anything apart from show me the proof in physical form.

Do not confuse your limited ability to prove with my questions of proof.

What a joker you have turned out to be. The world is kinda gigantic. And yet it isn't enough physical proof for you.

No claims? All you do is claim that there isn't any physical evidence. Wake up.

Cool

No it is not enough proof. Because I do not believe the evidence which you provide.
Where in the world do you live? If you aren't aware of the greatness of the machine universe around you, nothing you say can ever make any sense.


This is the basis of my belief.... it's different to your's so I do not expect you to understand. You are a little lamb who follows the rules of an ancient fictional book blindly.
You follow things that don't make any sense. They seem to make sense to you. But you haven't investigated them deeply enough to find out that they don't make sense.

In addition, how in the world do you know that I follow the rules of some ancient fictional book? If you are that close to me in my life, let me in on who you are.



You have already been asked in a previous thread to ask your god to post a selfie. So please talk with him about this!

Maybe you should try waking up.

As I have already expressed, God is having mercy on you by not posting a selfie. How is this? God is so great that if you saw a selfie of Him, it would kill you on the spot.

When are you going to wake up and see that you essentially know nothing at all?

Cool

Don't be afraid to donate Bitcoin >>> 1JDJotyxZLFF8akGCxHeqMkD4YrrTmEAwz !
stats
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 26, 2016, 10:07:39 AM
 #994


I am not the one making "claims". I have never said anything apart from show me the proof in physical form.

Do not confuse your limited ability to prove with my questions of proof.

What a joker you have turned out to be. The world is kinda gigantic. And yet it isn't enough physical proof for you.

No claims? All you do is claim that there isn't any physical evidence. Wake up.

Cool
[/quote]

No it is not enough proof. Because I do not believe the evidence which you provide. [/quote]Where in the world do you live? If you aren't aware of the greatness of the machine universe around you, nothing you say can ever make any sense.


This is the basis of my belief.... it's different to your's so I do not expect you to understand. You are a little lamb who follows the rules of an ancient fictional book blindly.
You follow things that don't make any sense. They seem to make sense to you. But you haven't investigated them deeply enough to find out that they don't make sense.

In addition, how in the world do you know that I follow the rules of some ancient fictional book? If you are that close to me in my life, let me in on who you are.



You have already been asked in a previous thread to ask your god to post a selfie. So please talk with him about this!

Maybe you should try waking up.

As I have already expressed, God is having mercy on you by not posting a selfie. How is this? God is so great that if you saw a selfie of Him, it would kill you on the spot.

When are you going to wake up and see that you essentially know nothing at all?

Cool
[/quote]

So because I don't believe your so called evidence.... whereby you provide your own ramblings as evidence, this is wrong? Hmmmm

I follow things which make sense to me. You follow things which make sense to you. I only ask you to prove the things which you consider truth. Proof in the form of physical evidence.

You have told me many times you follow the words of your bible.... maybe you should re-read all of your ramblings!

If your God is all so powerful, he can kill me. At least it would be proof. He certainly instructs people to do this in your bible. But once again, your own comments point to the fact your bible is a fictional piece of work.

When are you going to wake up for your delusions?

 Cool
BADecker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1124


View Profile
December 26, 2016, 03:48:39 PM
 #995


There you go again. You can't debunk the proof and the evidence, so all you do is use the political science of picking on me to cover up the fact that you can't debunk the science that God exists. Come on, if you think that it is scribblings of a deluded man. Debunk it step by step. Or are you to dimwitted to even try?


God made the universe. He made the physics of the universe. To make something like this, he needed to be outside of them, even though He may have placed Himself within them after He made them. His "physics" is not the physics of the universe. He may not have needed a beginning to exist. But if He did, there is no way we could understand any of it, since we still are having trouble even accepting God, Himself, in the face of the proof and evidence.


Cool

Even your comments are stating that you have no evidence. He may this.... he may that.... You do not know so how can you attempt to use this as evidence.


Consider the scientist. He writes up his paperwork, and publishes it. Then, when he gets on a forum like this, he doesn't post his paperwork in every last post he posts, especially if the paperwork is extensive.

I have posted my so-to-speak paperwork elsewhere in posts, over and over. You haven't posted any paperwork. Who are you trying to kid? You can barely even think. And here you are, attempting to use political science on me, without even realizing what you are doing.

Cool

I am not the one making "claims". I have never said anything apart from show me the proof in physical form.

Do not confuse your limited ability to prove with my questions of proof.

What a joker you have turned out to be. The world is kinda gigantic. And yet it isn't enough physical proof for you.

No claims? All you do is claim that there isn't any physical evidence. Wake up.

Cool

No it is not enough proof. Because I do not believe the evidence which you provide.
Where in the world do you live? If you aren't aware of the greatness of the machine universe around you, nothing you say can ever make any sense.


This is the basis of my belief.... it's different to your's so I do not expect you to understand. You are a little lamb who follows the rules of an ancient fictional book blindly.
You follow things that don't make any sense. They seem to make sense to you. But you haven't investigated them deeply enough to find out that they don't make sense.

In addition, how in the world do you know that I follow the rules of some ancient fictional book? If you are that close to me in my life, let me in on who you are.



You have already been asked in a previous thread to ask your god to post a selfie. So please talk with him about this!

Maybe you should try waking up.

As I have already expressed, God is having mercy on you by not posting a selfie. How is this? God is so great that if you saw a selfie of Him, it would kill you on the spot.

When are you going to wake up and see that you essentially know nothing at all?

Cool

So because I don't believe your so called evidence.... whereby you provide your own ramblings as evidence, this is wrong? Hmmmm

I follow things which make sense to me. You follow things which make sense to you. I only ask you to prove the things which you consider truth. Proof in the form of physical evidence.

You have told me many times you follow the words of your bible.... maybe you should re-read all of your ramblings!

If your God is all so powerful, he can kill me. At least it would be proof. He certainly instructs people to do this in your bible. But once again, your own comments point to the fact your bible is a fictional piece of work.

When are you going to wake up for your delusions?

 Cool

You believe the evidence and the proof as well. You can't refute it, even in your own mind. In fact, the proof is so strong that ALL science is based on cause and effect.

You might follow things that make sense to you, but that doesn't mean they are accurate things. Not everything is physical. Consider sunlight. There is energy involved. Consider Newton's 3rd Law. It doesn't state that only physical things operate by it.

I haven't made any ramblings. But, if any of my writings are close to ramblings, they are still more logical that the things you write.

God made you to exist and live. Why would He want to kill you? The real question is, Why are you trying to avoid the truth? Are you trying to kill yourself?

When are you going to wake up regarding your delusions?

Cool

Don't be afraid to donate Bitcoin >>> 1JDJotyxZLFF8akGCxHeqMkD4YrrTmEAwz !
BADecker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1124


View Profile
December 26, 2016, 04:21:41 PM
 #996

...BSDecker nonsense....

Consider Newton's 3rd Law. It doesn't state that only physical things operate by it.
...


That is simply not true.  Newton's laws of motion apply to physical things.  You took Physics in school, didn't you?  Or it was just in your Church?


Third law:   When one body exerts a force on a second body, the second body simultaneously exerts a force equal in magnitude and opposite in direction on the first body.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton's_laws_of_motion

You really know shit about science.  Stop pretending you do.  The third law works in classical mechanics.  Fails in quantum mechanics.


Photons are material and energy at the same time. Newton's law applies to energy. Wake up.

Cool

Don't be afraid to donate Bitcoin >>> 1JDJotyxZLFF8akGCxHeqMkD4YrrTmEAwz !
BADecker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1124


View Profile
December 26, 2016, 04:33:24 PM
 #997

...BSDecker nonsense....

Consider Newton's 3rd Law. It doesn't state that only physical things operate by it.
...


That is simply not true.  Newton's laws of motion apply to physical things.  You took Physics in school, didn't you?  Or it was just in your Church?


Third law:   When one body exerts a force on a second body, the second body simultaneously exerts a force equal in magnitude and opposite in direction on the first body.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton's_laws_of_motion

You really know shit about science.  Stop pretending you do.  The third law works in classical mechanics.  Fails in quantum mechanics.



Photons are material and energy at the same time. Newton's law applies to energy. Wake up.

Cool

Photons are massless.  Their wave and quanta qualities cannot be explained by the mechanical Newton's laws.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon

Keep them coming, maybe you'll learn something.  

You know, it is not your fault entirely, it is probably your US Christian education system that is at fault.



Oh sure. That's why big science and astronomy are talking about making solar sails.

However, cause and effect is simply upheld by Newton's 3rd Law. Cause and effect doesn't require Newton to exist.

Cool

Don't be afraid to donate Bitcoin >>> 1JDJotyxZLFF8akGCxHeqMkD4YrrTmEAwz !
BADecker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1124


View Profile
December 26, 2016, 08:03:16 PM
 #998

...BSDecker nonsense....

Consider Newton's 3rd Law. It doesn't state that only physical things operate by it.
...


That is simply not true.  Newton's laws of motion apply to physical things.  You took Physics in school, didn't you?  Or it was just in your Church?


Third law:   When one body exerts a force on a second body, the second body simultaneously exerts a force equal in magnitude and opposite in direction on the first body.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton's_laws_of_motion

You really know shit about science.  Stop pretending you do.  The third law works in classical mechanics.  Fails in quantum mechanics.



Photons are material and energy at the same time. Newton's law applies to energy. Wake up.

Cool

Photons are massless.  Their wave and quanta qualities cannot be explained by the mechanical Newton's laws.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon

Keep them coming, maybe you'll learn something.  

You know, it is not your fault entirely, it is probably your US Christian education system that is at fault.



Oh sure. That's why big science and astronomy are talking about making solar sails.

However, cause and effect is simply upheld by Newton's 3rd Law. Cause and effect doesn't require Newton to exist.

Cool

I'm not following your bullshit anymore.  You are contradicting yourself.

You don't understand any Physics, Biology, History etc, not sure you understand any subjects and that includes your Bible.


Generally it would be standard understanding that when you state that I am contradicting myself, without anything to back up what you state... generally that would be a contradiction for a person like you. But in your case, it isn't a contradiction, since contradiction is your nature. So, contradicting yourself is not a contradiction for you. It's normal and natural for you.

Cool

Don't be afraid to donate Bitcoin >>> 1JDJotyxZLFF8akGCxHeqMkD4YrrTmEAwz !
Tyrantt
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008
Merit: 564


View Profile
December 27, 2016, 01:05:58 AM
 #999


If you dedicate your life to some false idea... No big deal, natural selection will take care of it.


On this point at least af_newbie we agree.

In that spirit I would advise you to read the demographic information provided in the OP.

What defines a false idea? Good and Evil like Normal and abnormal are both subjective.
stats
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 27, 2016, 02:35:19 AM
 #1000


I'm not following your bullshit anymore.  You are contradicting yourself.

You don't understand any Physics, Biology, History etc, not sure you understand any subjects and that includes your Bible.


Mate I am not sure that we ever followed his shit.

We developed intelligence which instantly surpassed his ideals and false statements.

When cornered he twists wording to suit his own agenda.

But it is funny to watch.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 [50] 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 ... 131 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!