Bitcoin Forum
April 26, 2024, 06:34:17 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 [59] 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 ... 225 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [1200 TH] EMC: 0 Fee DGM. Anonymous PPS. US & EU servers. No Registration!  (Read 499434 times)
ThiagoCMC
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204
Merit: 1000

฿itcoin: Currency of Resistance!


View Profile
December 13, 2011, 09:04:12 PM
 #1161

Removed... sorry about that!!!
1714156457
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714156457

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714156457
Reply with quote  #2

1714156457
Report to moderator
"Governments are good at cutting off the heads of a centrally controlled networks like Napster, but pure P2P networks like Gnutella and Tor seem to be holding their own." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714156457
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714156457

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714156457
Reply with quote  #2

1714156457
Report to moderator
1714156457
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714156457

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714156457
Reply with quote  #2

1714156457
Report to moderator
1714156457
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714156457

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714156457
Reply with quote  #2

1714156457
Report to moderator
Inaba (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000



View Profile WWW
December 14, 2011, 04:42:19 PM
 #1162

No problem, Thiago. 

I plan on focusing on some user statistics improvements in then next week or so.  Teams is on that list - what other top 10 lists, stats, graphs, etc... type things would people like to see?

I also plan on changing the way alerts are handled, which will speed up block processing and alert deployment via SMS primarily, as that is realllly slow and slows down block processing a great deal.

I also plan on opening up another port for mining, such that I would like people to split between the two instances.  This should alleviate any potential bottlenecks we might start to see when/if the pool hashrate starts to rise.  I keep meaning to evaluate PoolserverJ, but then I keep hearing about instability and I don't want to put the time required into modifying the code to be compatible if it's going to be ultimately discarded due to stability issues.  I should probably just bite the bullet and make it happen, though.

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
BitServers
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 32
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
December 15, 2011, 12:24:08 AM
 #1163

No problem, Thiago. 

I plan on focusing on some user statistics improvements in then next week or so.  Teams is on that list - what other top 10 lists, stats, graphs, etc... type things would people like to see?

I also plan on changing the way alerts are handled, which will speed up block processing and alert deployment via SMS primarily, as that is realllly slow and slows down block processing a great deal.

I also plan on opening up another port for mining, such that I would like people to split between the two instances.  This should alleviate any potential bottlenecks we might start to see when/if the pool hashrate starts to rise.  I keep meaning to evaluate PoolserverJ, but then I keep hearing about instability and I don't want to put the time required into modifying the code to be compatible if it's going to be ultimately discarded due to stability issues.  I should probably just bite the bullet and make it happen, though.


I presume you've rejected the offer that I PM'd you? As I've not even received a word of acknowledgement.

Thanks, Marc
jjshabadoo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 535
Merit: 500



View Profile
December 15, 2011, 12:25:54 AM
 #1164

Can anyone give me any feedback? I have about 2.8 g/hash right now and will be bringing on about 6 g/hash total in a few weeks. I have dedicated miners going 24/7 at yourbtc.net. Anyone mining this pool that formerly mined at yourbtc ?

Please don't take offense Inaba as i am not asking for negative feedback here, would rather here what pool members have to say about usability, bitcoin rewards/systems, etc. I have read many of your posts and find them helpful and courteous.

For the record, I would also like to see you get rewarded for your pool as I believe this leads to long-term stability. I suggest you create a minimum contribution or at least create a premium membership that requires a minimum donation. Pool owners deserve to rewarded, it's good for the pool and all users.
Inaba (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000



View Profile WWW
December 15, 2011, 12:26:58 AM
 #1165

Hi Marc,

No, I haven't been able to address it as of yet.  I am trying to figure out exactly how I will handle the configuration before I give a definitive answer.

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
BitServers
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 32
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
December 15, 2011, 12:29:23 AM
 #1166

Hi Marc,

No, I haven't been able to address it as of yet.  I am trying to figure out exactly how I will handle the configuration before I give a definitive answer.

Okay no problem, Just wasn't sure as you hadn't replied or anything, Keep me updated.

Thank you for the response. Smiley
Inaba (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000



View Profile WWW
December 15, 2011, 01:11:05 AM
 #1167

Yeah I'm really sorry Marc and Thiago both - I will respond to both your PMs, I have just been so slammed this week (and last, and probably next) that it's hard to give the thought it deserves to a reply and I don't want to just fire off something half heartedly.

I should be almost finished launching a new project we have at work this week, so hopefully things will quiet down. 

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
Inaba (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000



View Profile WWW
December 15, 2011, 01:15:35 AM
 #1168

Can anyone give me any feedback? I have about 2.8 g/hash right now and will be bringing on about 6 g/hash total in a few weeks. I have dedicated miners going 24/7 at yourbtc.net. Anyone mining this pool that formerly mined at yourbtc ?

Please don't take offense Inaba as i am not asking for negative feedback here, would rather here what pool members have to say about usability, bitcoin rewards/systems, etc. I have read many of your posts and find them helpful and courteous.

For the record, I would also like to see you get rewarded for your pool as I believe this leads to long-term stability. I suggest you create a minimum contribution or at least create a premium membership that requires a minimum donation. Pool owners deserve to rewarded, it's good for the pool and all users.

Well, I had intended to offer premium features in the beginning, but I never feel the pool is "done" or adequate to charge anyone money for something.  One of my primary motivators in the beginning was to stabilize my own variance and have all the features I found lacking in other pools available (SMS, etc...).  Maybe at some point, if I ever feel it's adequate, I will include some premium features at a small donation rate... but not at least until I get everything the way I want it.

I'm open to negative feedback as well as positive feedback, I always want to improve the pool - some changes are harder than others and I would make a lot of things different if I had to do it over again of course.  (I mean, who the heck saw merged mining back when I started coding this pool? jeez!)  ...  I'll be happy to answer any questions you have.

PS - looks like we got gimped by BTC Guild on that last block.  Fortunately it was only a 50 minute block, so not a lot of pain there.  Would be a painful block if it were a 24 hour block or something.

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
ThiagoCMC
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204
Merit: 1000

฿itcoin: Currency of Resistance!


View Profile
December 15, 2011, 03:32:39 AM
 #1169

Can anyone give me any feedback? I have about 2.8 g/hash right now and will be bringing on about 6 g/hash total in a few weeks. I have dedicated miners going 24/7 at yourbtc.net. Anyone mining this pool that formerly mined at yourbtc ?

Please don't take offense Inaba as i am not asking for negative feedback here, would rather here what pool members have to say about usability, bitcoin rewards/systems, etc. I have read many of your posts and find them helpful and courteous.

For the record, I would also like to see you get rewarded for your pool as I believe this leads to long-term stability. I suggest you create a minimum contribution or at least create a premium membership that requires a minimum donation. Pool owners deserve to rewarded, it's good for the pool and all users.

Hi!

 I have 10GHash/s and I can assure you: EclipseMC is the best pool out there!

 The SMS alerts and PayPal payout system are to me, "killer features"!

 I was before at Deeptbit, BTCGuild, ArsBitcoin... But, EclipseMC is much better...

 There is only one thing that needs to be done within EclipseMC: some kind of H.A., so, if one server fails, another brings up and takeover its IP, or something like that.

 Good noted: activating some donations now.

Best!
Thiago
ThiagoCMC
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204
Merit: 1000

฿itcoin: Currency of Resistance!


View Profile
December 15, 2011, 05:33:41 AM
 #1170

EclipseMC website is down Inaba?!
My miner are still online but, can't access the site...

Thanks!
Thiago
Inaba (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000



View Profile WWW
December 15, 2011, 01:29:52 PM
 #1171

It's up for me?  Is it still down for you?  Anyone else having trouble?

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
ThiagoCMC
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204
Merit: 1000

฿itcoin: Currency of Resistance!


View Profile
December 15, 2011, 02:21:40 PM
 #1172

FASTEST ROUND EVER! http://blockexplorer.com/b/157618   Grin

00:01:51 to find this block! hihihi
ThiagoCMC
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204
Merit: 1000

฿itcoin: Currency of Resistance!


View Profile
December 15, 2011, 02:22:08 PM
 #1173

It's up for me?  Is it still down for you?  Anyone else having trouble?

Maybe it is my DNS at home... It is working here at my company...

Thanks!
Thiago
Inaba (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000



View Profile WWW
December 15, 2011, 02:30:04 PM
 #1174

Makes up for that invalid yesterday! Smiley

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
ThiagoCMC
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204
Merit: 1000

฿itcoin: Currency of Resistance!


View Profile
December 15, 2011, 02:32:40 PM
 #1175

Makes up for that invalid yesterday! Smiley

Absolutely!!!   Grin
Inaba (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000



View Profile WWW
December 15, 2011, 03:32:49 PM
Last edit: December 15, 2011, 03:44:45 PM by Inaba
 #1176

Just added the option to set your miner hashrate calculation window in minutes, from 1 - 60.  You can set this on the My Accounts page, on the bottom left.

*EDIT*

Whoops.. the change made the system think the miners went idle.  They did not, it was purely a table data issue... nothing happened to the pool or the miners if you got notified of a failed miner.

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
ThiagoCMC
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204
Merit: 1000

฿itcoin: Currency of Resistance!


View Profile
December 15, 2011, 03:49:37 PM
 #1177

Well... False alarm! lol
ThiagoCMC
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204
Merit: 1000

฿itcoin: Currency of Resistance!


View Profile
December 15, 2011, 03:51:51 PM
 #1178

That's why I propose you the test and production environment...
We/you should never change the production environment. Not before tons of tests in the proper test environment.

Best!
Thiago
Inaba (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000



View Profile WWW
December 15, 2011, 03:56:33 PM
 #1179

The problem with a test environment is that fact that there are no miners on a test environment so most of the problems won't show up.

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
ThiagoCMC
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204
Merit: 1000

฿itcoin: Currency of Resistance!


View Profile
December 15, 2011, 04:03:34 PM
 #1180

And this is impossible to simulate?! I guess not...

About this: http://poolserverj.org/performance-testing/ ?

Maybe we can use something like that to simulate miners...

Best,
Thiago
Pages: « 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 [59] 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 ... 225 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!