Bitcoin Forum
November 13, 2024, 07:13:46 AM *
News: Check out the artwork 1Dq created to commemorate this forum's 15th anniversary
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 ... 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 [91] 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 ... 225 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [1200 TH] EMC: 0 Fee DGM. Anonymous PPS. US & EU servers. No Registration!  (Read 499692 times)
village.idiot
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 270
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 05, 2012, 06:11:10 PM
 #1801

Yes, your guide.  It's the only one I've used.

Wow, I like easy.  Sorry I still don't know what I'm doing.

Thanks a bunch
Inaba (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000



View Profile WWW
February 05, 2012, 06:16:34 PM
 #1802

No problem. Smiley

For those not able to update or not use git for whatever reason, here's the fix:

Find this in Transport.py (around line 92):

Code:
bits = hex(difficulty)
bits = bits[2:len(bits) - 1]
bits += ('0' * (8 - len(bits)))
bits = ''.join(list(chunks(bits, 2))[::-1])

Replace those four lines with this one line:

Code:
bits = '%08x' % difficulty.byteswap()

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
NetworkerZ
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 114
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 05, 2012, 09:21:47 PM
 #1803

A windows binary update will be there too!

Greetz
NetworkerZ
Inaba (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000



View Profile WWW
February 06, 2012, 12:10:49 AM
 #1804

Ok folks - because BIP 16 and 17 are such a hot topic, I have enabled your ability to vote for whichever BIP you want.  Mining on US3 will be a vote for BIP 17, mining on US2 will be a vote for BIP 16 and mining on US1 will be an abstain.

US 1 - Abstain from voting
US 2 - BIP 16
US 3 - BIP 17

When and if an official decision is made and the blockchain is irrevocably modified to support one or the other, all servers will converge to support the appropriate change (if any).  

If none of this makes any sense to you, don't worry about it and just keep on doing what you're doing as it probably doesn't affect you for the most part and is really a technical matter for those interested.  You can read more about it here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=61125.0

Though I suggest you read more than just that thread, the BIP 16 and BIP 17 threads for instance, before jumping to any decisions.  Ultimately, though, for most people, it's an academic argument, so I wouldn't worry too much about it.


If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
Math Man
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 150
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 06, 2012, 12:21:53 AM
 #1805

Thanks for making this democratic.
gnar1ta$
Donator
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 500


View Profile
February 06, 2012, 12:38:19 AM
Last edit: February 06, 2012, 12:51:23 AM by gnar1ta$
 #1806

Great job with BIP voting inaba, one more reason for miners to use this pool. If this is the only pool offering voting, you should put an post on the discussion board, see if brings in more miners until it gets moved.

Losing hundreds of Bitcoins with the best scammers in the business - BFL, Avalon, KNC, HashFast.
village.idiot
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 270
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 06, 2012, 12:58:00 AM
 #1807

I understood nails, screws and glue but didn't get SHIT beyond that.
Math Man
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 150
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 06, 2012, 01:19:46 AM
 #1808

Great job with BIP voting inaba, one more reason for miners to use this pool. If this is the only pool offering voting, you should put an post on the discussion board, see if brings in more miners until it gets moved.

I put a plug in for us.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=61125.msg733217#msg733217
GenTarkin
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2450
Merit: 1002


View Profile
February 06, 2012, 04:53:20 AM
 #1809

I'm not sure what was up w/ the last round but my mining output was the same and pool gh was same but my payout was less then half of what been gettin last week.....
my estimated reward also reflects this low amount... Why?
is the votin system messin it up? Cuz I mine both us2 and us3 equally.

GenTarkin's MOD Kncminer Titan custom firmware! v1.0.4! -- !!NO LONGER AVAILABLE!!
Donations: bitcoin- 1Px71mWNQNKW19xuARqrmnbcem1dXqJ3At || litecoin- LYXrLis3ik6TRn8tdvzAyJ264DRvwYVeEw
Inaba (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000



View Profile WWW
February 06, 2012, 05:08:17 AM
 #1810

Are you using poclbm?  There was a substantial bug that just showed up in it a few days ago where it will keep hashing and getting work, but it fails to actually submit the shares.  I had two machines running like that for two days before I realized it.

The voting is pretty much separate from share submittal, so it shouldn't have anything to do with it.

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
GenTarkin
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2450
Merit: 1002


View Profile
February 06, 2012, 06:42:48 AM
 #1811

nope, I use phatk on cgminer
gonna try just mining on us1 and not splitting shares between any of the servers. See if that fixes the problem, if not then I dont know whats going on. Nothing has changed on my end.
Cuz even eclipsemc my worker status says its the same as it was but my payout is less then half it was =( this has been 3 blocks in a row now.

Even my share ratio to entire pool share count for the last 3 blocks remains the same as it did before. I dont understand

GenTarkin's MOD Kncminer Titan custom firmware! v1.0.4! -- !!NO LONGER AVAILABLE!!
Donations: bitcoin- 1Px71mWNQNKW19xuARqrmnbcem1dXqJ3At || litecoin- LYXrLis3ik6TRn8tdvzAyJ264DRvwYVeEw
cuz0882
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 06, 2012, 07:58:59 AM
Last edit: February 06, 2012, 10:03:56 AM by cuz0882
 #1812

nope, I use phatk on cgminer
gonna try just mining on us1 and not splitting shares between any of the servers. See if that fixes the problem, if not then I dont know whats going on. Nothing has changed on my end.
Cuz even eclipsemc my worker status says its the same as it was but my payout is less then half it was =( this has been 3 blocks in a row now.

Even my share ratio to entire pool share count for the last 3 blocks remains the same as it did before. I dont understand

I think something is wrong also. I have over 11gh, and I received .5745 as a reward. Which is .01149 of the total pool. That would mean the pool's hash rate was around 970gh. The hash rate was actually 580gh. The reward should be more like .94 I also use cgminer but in windows.
NetworkerZ
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 114
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 06, 2012, 09:52:12 AM
 #1813

Your reward belongs to the shares you submitted, not the MHash!

Greetz
NetworkerZ
cuz0882
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 06, 2012, 10:05:35 AM
 #1814

Your reward belongs to the shares you submitted, not the MHash!

Greetz
NetworkerZ

The Mhash should match up pretty close unless you have a low hash rate or the block was solved really quickly. Regardless I had 22867 shares in the block I was using for a example with 1215505 Total shares for the block which is .018812 % multiplied by 50 is .94 total reward. I don't see how it could be correct at .57 reward.
kano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4620
Merit: 1851


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
February 06, 2012, 10:27:10 AM
 #1815

Your reward belongs to the shares you submitted, not the MHash!

Greetz
NetworkerZ

The Mhash should match up pretty close unless you have a low hash rate or the block was solved really quickly. Regardless I had 22867 shares in the block I was using for a example with 1215505 Total shares for the block which is .018812 % multiplied by 50 is .94 total reward. I don't see how it could be correct at .57 reward.
DGM does that for 2 reasons:
1) Your "capacitor" isn't fully charged
2) The pool got lucky

Pool: https://kano.is - low 0.5% fee PPLNS 3 Days - Most reliable Solo with ONLY 0.5% fee   Bitcointalk thread: Forum
Discord support invite at https://kano.is/ Majority developer of the ckpool code - k for kano
The ONLY active original developer of cgminer. Original master git: https://github.com/kanoi/cgminer
Inaba (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000



View Profile WWW
February 06, 2012, 01:42:48 PM
 #1816

I really need to find some way to graphically illustrate how DGM works for payouts, as it's not intuitive without investigating it thoroughly. 

Cuz0882: How many blocks have you been mining?

GenTarking: How are you splitting the shares between servers? Just different instances of cgminer?  Also, have you used the cashout option?


If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
cuz0882
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 06, 2012, 02:57:22 PM
 #1817

I really need to find some way to graphically illustrate how DGM works for payouts, as it's not intuitive without investigating it thoroughly. 

Cuz0882: How many blocks have you been mining?

GenTarking: How are you splitting the shares between servers? Just different instances of cgminer?  Also, have you used the cashout option?



Only 21 blocks in this pool.
Inaba (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000



View Profile WWW
February 06, 2012, 02:59:20 PM
 #1818

What is your user name?  Also, have you used the cashout option?

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
cuz0882
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 06, 2012, 03:25:23 PM
 #1819

What is your user name?  Also, have you used the cashout option?
cuz72
No, its set to auto pay in bitcoins.
Inaba (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000



View Profile WWW
February 06, 2012, 03:45:38 PM
 #1820

Looks like you  (and everyone else) are seeing the effects of the large hashrate increase.  You should see a corresponding increase in your payout over the next few blocks after the hashrate stabilizes.

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
Pages: « 1 ... 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 [91] 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 ... 225 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!