Bitcoin Forum
November 10, 2024, 11:49:58 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 ... 1519 1520 1521 1522 1523 1524 1525 1526 1527 1528 1529 1530 1531 1532 1533 1534 1535 1536 1537 1538 1539 1540 1541 1542 1543 1544 1545 1546 1547 1548 1549 1550 1551 1552 1553 1554 1555 1556 1557 1558 1559 1560 1561 1562 1563 1564 1565 1566 1567 1568 [1569] 1570 1571 1572 1573 1574 1575 1576 1577 1578 1579 1580 1581 1582 1583 1584 1585 1586 1587 1588 1589 1590 1591 1592 1593 1594 1595 1596 1597 1598 1599 1600 1601 1602 1603 1604 1605 1606 1607 1608 1609 1610 1611 1612 1613 1614 1615 1616 1617 1618 1619 ... 2137 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Swedish ASIC miner company kncminer.com  (Read 3049514 times)
joeventura
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 500



View Profile
March 27, 2014, 06:24:21 PM
 #31361

So now they provide an update on Titan, but crickets regarding Neptune:

https://www.kncminer.com/news/news-80

Yeah, lend them $10k now and then get delivery in December. Maybe.

J


I will bet you 100 Bitcoins, KnC will ship Titan before December 2014.  Would like to retract your ridiculous statement now?

Retract the statement but DO NOT take that bet!~
RenHoek
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644
Merit: 500


*****


View Profile
March 27, 2014, 06:36:40 PM
 #31362

KnCMiner Network Protection Statement
 At KnCMiner we are aware of the service we are providing to our customers. We are also aware that we need our customers to have a return on their devices in order to purchase form us again. With the scale of the supply chains, agreements and factories we have access to, we need to be cautious we don’t ship too many devices and therefore reduce the return to our customers.  So with that in mind our plan is to do as follows:
  
 We will ship no devices in December 2013, January 2014 or  February 2014. Meaning that once we have taken the difficulty up at the end of November we will not release any more hashing power for 3 months. We will then release our new generation of devices, which will begin shipping in March 2014. These devices will also have a much higher GH/$ rating than any of our current offerings.  
 We would like to state that If any of our competitors continues to add large amounts of hashing power to the network during December, January or February. We will continue to release our devices as competitively priced as we can to protect our customers share of the network.
The Fact is:
As of April 1, KNC will be delay in delivery of Neptunes


Doesn't that statement predate the announcement of Neptunes?
It certainly doesn't form any part of the contract you agreed with KNC.

KnC itself, has also been associated with the statement after the announcement of the Neptunes.
and it thus verified to be valid
:

To repeat: It certainly doesn't form any part of the contract you agreed with KNC.


maybe i am silly and aq Kind naive but:

i only decidet to order neptunes in sight of this Statement above.


i only didn't spend BTC to other preorders, in sight of this:

"If we do have more items to place in the shop for our 28nm range, we will announce this via one of our newsletters which will contain the time and date that they will go on sale. So keep some coins handy as we expect them to go quick."

so i trusted them. too bad!

they screwed me, and i past the possiblity to order other Hardware wich was delivered allready.

they has to compensate me for thair faults!

Esst mehr Scheisse, millionen Fliegen können nicht irren!  Cool
For this valueable Tip your ฿ Donation to:
1DNbwKGmQytSY69TuK9fLFQVXQjnVw18pY
pedrosoft
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 500



View Profile
March 27, 2014, 06:42:45 PM
 #31363

KnCMiner Network Protection Statement
 At KnCMiner we are aware of the service we are providing to our customers. We are also aware that we need our customers to have a return on their devices in order to purchase form us again. With the scale of the supply chains, agreements and factories we have access to, we need to be cautious we don’t ship too many devices and therefore reduce the return to our customers.  So with that in mind our plan is to do as follows:
  
 We will ship no devices in December 2013, January 2014 or  February 2014. Meaning that once we have taken the difficulty up at the end of November we will not release any more hashing power for 3 months. We will then release our new generation of devices, which will begin shipping in March 2014. These devices will also have a much higher GH/$ rating than any of our current offerings.  
 We would like to state that If any of our competitors continues to add large amounts of hashing power to the network during December, January or February. We will continue to release our devices as competitively priced as we can to protect our customers share of the network.
The Fact is:
As of April 1, KNC will be delay in delivery of Neptunes


Doesn't that statement predate the announcement of Neptunes?
It certainly doesn't form any part of the contract you agreed with KNC.

KnC itself, has also been associated with the statement after the announcement of the Neptunes.
and it thus verified to be valid
:

To repeat: It certainly doesn't form any part of the contract you agreed with KNC.


maybe i am silly and aq Kind naive but:

i only decidet to order neptunes in sight of this Statement above.


i only didn't spend BTC to other preorders, in sight of this:

"If we do have more items to place in the shop for our 28nm range, we will announce this via one of our newsletters which will contain the time and date that they will go on sale. So keep some coins handy as we expect them to go quick."

so i trusted them. too bad!

they screwed me, and i past the possiblity to order other Hardware wich was delivered allready.

they has to compensate this!


I'm worried about BicoinOrama... His personal twitter account has no tweets from a long time. Here he's a gosth. Has BitcoinOrama been eaten from MEGASYPSUPERSEXYEXTRAPOWERTOP Knc mining farm ? Tongue Tongue
jimmothy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 509



View Profile
March 27, 2014, 06:47:35 PM
 #31364

KnCMiner Network Protection Statement
 At KnCMiner we are aware of the service we are providing to our customers. We are also aware that we need our customers to have a return on their devices in order to purchase form us again. With the scale of the supply chains, agreements and factories we have access to, we need to be cautious we don’t ship too many devices and therefore reduce the return to our customers.  So with that in mind our plan is to do as follows:
  
 We will ship no devices in December 2013, January 2014 or  February 2014. Meaning that once we have taken the difficulty up at the end of November we will not release any more hashing power for 3 months. We will then release our new generation of devices, which will begin shipping in March 2014. These devices will also have a much higher GH/$ rating than any of our current offerings.  
 We would like to state that If any of our competitors continues to add large amounts of hashing power to the network during December, January or February. We will continue to release our devices as competitively priced as we can to protect our customers share of the network.
The Fact is:
As of April 1, KNC will be delay in delivery of Neptunes


Doesn't that statement predate the announcement of Neptunes?
It certainly doesn't form any part of the contract you agreed with KNC.

KnC itself, has also been associated with the statement after the announcement of the Neptunes.
and it thus verified to be valid
:

To repeat: It certainly doesn't form any part of the contract you agreed with KNC.


maybe i am silly and aq Kind naive but:

i only decidet to order neptunes in sight of this Statement above.

That is not only naive but most likely not true.

I find it hard to believe that you would believe a statement made in JULY would mean a guaranteed shipping date of unannounced next gen hardware.

You didn't question the fact that when the neptune was announced and preorders opened there was no mention of march shipping date?
RenHoek
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644
Merit: 500


*****


View Profile
March 27, 2014, 06:54:27 PM
 #31365

KnCMiner Network Protection Statement
 At KnCMiner we are aware of the service we are providing to our customers. We are also aware that we need our customers to have a return on their devices in order to purchase form us again. With the scale of the supply chains, agreements and factories we have access to, we need to be cautious we don’t ship too many devices and therefore reduce the return to our customers.  So with that in mind our plan is to do as follows:
  
 We will ship no devices in December 2013, January 2014 or  February 2014. Meaning that once we have taken the difficulty up at the end of November we will not release any more hashing power for 3 months. We will then release our new generation of devices, which will begin shipping in March 2014. These devices will also have a much higher GH/$ rating than any of our current offerings.  
 We would like to state that If any of our competitors continues to add large amounts of hashing power to the network during December, January or February. We will continue to release our devices as competitively priced as we can to protect our customers share of the network.
The Fact is:
As of April 1, KNC will be delay in delivery of Neptunes


Doesn't that statement predate the announcement of Neptunes?
It certainly doesn't form any part of the contract you agreed with KNC.

KnC itself, has also been associated with the statement after the announcement of the Neptunes.
and it thus verified to be valid
:

To repeat: It certainly doesn't form any part of the contract you agreed with KNC.


maybe i am silly and aq Kind naive but:

i only decidet to order neptunes in sight of this Statement above.

That is not only naive but most likely not true.

I find it hard to believe that you would believe a statement made in JULY would mean a guaranteed shipping date of unannounced next gen hardware.

You didn't question the fact that when the neptune was announced and preorders opened there was no mention of march shipping date?

they have never taken back this Statement! they broken thair promises!

maybe we civilisated european ppl are different to us ppl. for us, a contract or Statement is valid till it officially taken back! this is a unwritten law!

sweden is european. why u think they deleted this post in thair Forum, instead of reacting with a answer?

Esst mehr Scheisse, millionen Fliegen können nicht irren!  Cool
For this valueable Tip your ฿ Donation to:
1DNbwKGmQytSY69TuK9fLFQVXQjnVw18pY
jimmothy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 509



View Profile
March 27, 2014, 07:02:15 PM
 #31366

they have never taken back this Statement!

maybe we european ppl are different to us ppl. for us, a contract or Statement is valid till it officially taken back! this is a unwritten law!

Here in the real world unwritten laws are imaginary.

They actually did take back the statement when they replaced it with the statement " Shipment begins in Q1/Q2 of 2014"

So they will not be late until July 1st
RenHoek
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644
Merit: 500


*****


View Profile
March 27, 2014, 07:10:38 PM
 #31367

they have never taken back this Statement!

maybe we european ppl are different to us ppl. for us, a contract or Statement is valid till it officially taken back! this is a unwritten law!

Here in the real world unwritten laws are imaginary.

They actually did take back the statement when they replaced it with the statement " Shipment begins in Q1/Q2 of 2014"
So they will not be late until July 1st

in fact, exactly this do not mean that "beginning of shippment is on march" is taken back! both are possible together, the old one is not broken!


Esst mehr Scheisse, millionen Fliegen können nicht irren!  Cool
For this valueable Tip your ฿ Donation to:
1DNbwKGmQytSY69TuK9fLFQVXQjnVw18pY
murraypaul
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 27, 2014, 07:11:35 PM
 #31368

maybe i am silly and aq Kind naive but:

i only decidet to order neptunes in sight of this Statement above.
Even though the actual Neptune announcement clearly said Q1/Q2?

Quote
i only didn't spend BTC to other preorders, in sight of this:

"If we do have more items to place in the shop for our 28nm range, we will announce this via one of our newsletters which will contain the time and date that they will go on sale. So keep some coins handy as we expect them to go quick."

so i trusted them. too bad!

they screwed me, and i past the possiblity to order other Hardware wich was delivered allready.

they has to compensate me for thair faults!

Not a chance in hell, I'm afraid.
You can get a refund if you want, but they bear no financial responsibility for your actions.

BTC: 16TgAGdiTSsTWSsBDphebNJCFr1NT78xFW
SRC: scefi1XMhq91n3oF5FrE3HqddVvvCZP9KB
murraypaul
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 27, 2014, 07:15:01 PM
 #31369

they have never taken back this Statement!

maybe we european ppl are different to us ppl. for us, a contract or Statement is valid till it officially taken back! this is a unwritten law!

Here in the real world unwritten laws are imaginary.

They actually did take back the statement when they replaced it with the statement " Shipment begins in Q1/Q2 of 2014"
So they will not be late until July 1st

in fact, exactly this do not mean that "beginning of shippment is on march" is taken back! both are possible together, the old one is not broken!

March in in Q1.
Saying shipping in Q1/Q2 says (to anybody other than you, apparently) that they are not promising to ship in March.
I don't think anyone could sensibly read 'Shipment begins in Q1/Q2 of 2014' as actually meaning 'Shipment begins in March 2014'

BTC: 16TgAGdiTSsTWSsBDphebNJCFr1NT78xFW
SRC: scefi1XMhq91n3oF5FrE3HqddVvvCZP9KB
RenHoek
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644
Merit: 500


*****


View Profile
March 27, 2014, 07:18:59 PM
Last edit: March 27, 2014, 07:43:18 PM by RenHoek
 #31370

they have never taken back this Statement!

maybe we european ppl are different to us ppl. for us, a contract or Statement is valid till it officially taken back! this is a unwritten law!

Here in the real world unwritten laws are imaginary.

They actually did take back the statement when they replaced it with the statement " Shipment begins in Q1/Q2 of 2014"
So they will not be late until July 1st

in fact, exactly this do not mean that "beginning of shippment is on march" is taken back! both are possible together, the old one is not broken!

March in in Q1.
Saying shipping in Q1/Q2 says (to anybody other than you, apparently) that they are not promising to ship in March.

I don't think anyone could sensibly read 'Shipment begins in Q1/Q2 of 2014' as actually meaning 'Shipment begins in March 2014'

exactly shipping IN q1/q2 is meanig:  shipping beginns between januar1. and march 30., and ends between april1. and juny31.!

or 1. Batch in q1 and following in q2

or between q1 and q2, what exactly is march 30. at 12 pm.

nothing else!

only shipping  in 1. half of 2014  means beginnig and end  till Juni. 31

only q2 means exactly q2

Esst mehr Scheisse, millionen Fliegen können nicht irren!  Cool
For this valueable Tip your ฿ Donation to:
1DNbwKGmQytSY69TuK9fLFQVXQjnVw18pY
murraypaul
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 27, 2014, 07:25:29 PM
 #31371

in fact, exactly this do not mean that "beginning of shippment is on march" is taken back! both are possible together, the old one is not broken!
March in in Q1.
Saying shipping in Q1/Q2 says (to anybody other than you, apparently) that they are not promising to ship in March.
I don't think anyone could sensibly read 'Shipment begins in Q1/Q2 of 2014' as actually meaning 'Shipment begins in March 2014'
exactly shipping IN q1/q2 is meanig:  shipping beginns between januar1. and march 30., and ends between april1. and juny31.!

or bettween q1 and q2 what exactly is march 30. at 12 pm.

No, it doesn't.
You can say it as much as you like, but no native English speaker would agree with you.
Shipping in Q1/Q2 means shipping in Q1 or Q2, that is anywhere from January 1st to June 30th.
That is simply what it means

BTC: 16TgAGdiTSsTWSsBDphebNJCFr1NT78xFW
SRC: scefi1XMhq91n3oF5FrE3HqddVvvCZP9KB
Biffa
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3234
Merit: 1220



View Profile
March 27, 2014, 07:28:01 PM
 #31372

Could you stop quoting him please? Ta   Kiss

Mine @ pools that pay Tx fees & don't mine empty blocks :: kanopool :: ckpool ::
Should bitmain create LPM for all models?
:: Dalcore's Crypto Mining H/W Hosting Directory & Reputation ::
thomashrev89
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 190
Merit: 100



View Profile
March 27, 2014, 07:47:00 PM
 #31373

in fact, exactly this do not mean that "beginning of shippment is on march" is taken back! both are possible together, the old one is not broken!
March in in Q1.
Saying shipping in Q1/Q2 says (to anybody other than you, apparently) that they are not promising to ship in March.
I don't think anyone could sensibly read 'Shipment begins in Q1/Q2 of 2014' as actually meaning 'Shipment begins in March 2014'
exactly shipping IN q1/q2 is meanig:  shipping beginns between januar1. and march 30., and ends between april1. and juny31.!

or bettween q1 and q2 what exactly is march 30. at 12 pm.

No, it doesn't.
You can say it as much as you like, but no native English speaker would agree with you.
Shipping in Q1/Q2 means shipping in Q1 or Q2, that is anywhere from January 1st to June 30th.
That is simply what it means

One thing you can agree on is that KNC F'ed you hard.

mo_mo
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 194
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 27, 2014, 09:02:08 PM
 #31374

anyone still holding the first customer batch neptune order?
RoadStress
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1007


View Profile
March 27, 2014, 09:18:58 PM
 #31375

anyone still holding the first customer batch neptune order?

I am!

lemonte
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 624
Merit: 502


View Profile
March 27, 2014, 09:21:35 PM
 #31376

Me too. Waiting for the specs before I make a decision.

mo_mo
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 194
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 27, 2014, 09:25:00 PM
 #31377

I feel the same, more details need to be announced but then again difficulty is going up so fast...
Zelek Uther
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 700
Merit: 504


Run a Bitcoin node.


View Profile
March 27, 2014, 09:25:18 PM
 #31378

anyone still holding the first customer batch neptune order?
Yep

Run a Bitcoin node, support the network.
lemonte
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 624
Merit: 502


View Profile
March 27, 2014, 09:28:09 PM
 #31379

I feel the same, more details need to be announced but then again difficulty is going up so fast...

I wish they'd be a bit more forthcoming with information, fingers crossed things start to look up.

pedrosoft
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 500



View Profile
March 27, 2014, 09:35:22 PM
 #31380

I have a second batch order.... Your opinion... Have I to request a refund ? Smiley
Pages: « 1 ... 1519 1520 1521 1522 1523 1524 1525 1526 1527 1528 1529 1530 1531 1532 1533 1534 1535 1536 1537 1538 1539 1540 1541 1542 1543 1544 1545 1546 1547 1548 1549 1550 1551 1552 1553 1554 1555 1556 1557 1558 1559 1560 1561 1562 1563 1564 1565 1566 1567 1568 [1569] 1570 1571 1572 1573 1574 1575 1576 1577 1578 1579 1580 1581 1582 1583 1584 1585 1586 1587 1588 1589 1590 1591 1592 1593 1594 1595 1596 1597 1598 1599 1600 1601 1602 1603 1604 1605 1606 1607 1608 1609 1610 1611 1612 1613 1614 1615 1616 1617 1618 1619 ... 2137 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!