AzzAz
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1030
Merit: 1006
|
 |
December 27, 2016, 01:47:39 AM |
|
Strix OC, MSI X, Gigabyte G1 (1070): all stock clocks EWBF = NH for me
might be true, because ewbf use a bit less of power and cards will/might boost more, my results were done on fixed frequency Well, Power @ 65% and 3 rigs stable for 3-4 hours without single glitch. Stable on small OC ( +70/150 ) all also. |
|
|
|
|
AzzAz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1030
Merit: 1006
|
|
December 27, 2016, 02:20:47 AM |
|
Strix OC, MSI X, Gigabyte G1 (1070): all stock clocks EWBF = NH for me
might be true, because ewbf use a bit less of power and cards will/might boost more, my results were done on fixed frequency Well, Power @ 65% and 3 rigs stable for 3-4 hours without single glitch. Stable on small OC ( +70/150 ) all also. Just as I posted - miner stopped on 2 rigs. Same happened with NH miner, will test next hours... |
|
|
|
|
|
Psynthax
|
|
December 27, 2016, 02:22:02 AM |
|
The miner crashed on me and failed to restart... had to manually turn it off and back on...
|
|
|
|
bason
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 58
Merit: 10
|
|
December 27, 2016, 03:04:27 AM |
|
CUDA: Device: 3 Thread exited with code: 77
CUDA: Device: 4 Thread exited with code: 77
CUDA: Device: 2 Thread exited with code: 77
CUDA: Device: 1 Thread exited with code: 77
CUDA: Device: 0 Thread exited with code: 77
ERROR: Some workers are stopped. Attempt to restart: 1
CUDA: Device: 0 GeForce GTX 1070, 8192 MB M0
CUDA: Device: 1 GeForce GTX 1070, 8192 MB M0
CUDA: Device: 2 GeForce GTX 1070, 8192 MB M0
CUDA: Device: 3 GeForce GTX 1070, 8192 MB M0
CUDA: Device: 4 GeForce GTX 1070, 8192 MB M0
CUDA: Device: 0 Thread exited with code: 46
CUDA: Device: 1 Thread exited with code: 46
CUDA: Device: 2 Thread exited with code: 46
CUDA: Device: 3 Thread exited with code: 46
CUDA: Device: 4 Thread exited with code: 46
ERROR: Some workers are stopped. Attempt to restart: 2
CUDA: Device: 0 GeForce GTX 1070, 8192 MB M0
CUDA: Device: 0 Thread exited with code: 46
CUDA: Device: 1 GeForce GTX 1070, 8192 MB M0
CUDA: Device: 1 Thread exited with code: 46
CUDA: Device: 2 GeForce GTX 1070, 8192 MB M0
CUDA: Device: 2 Thread exited with code: 46
CUDA: Device: 3 GeForce GTX 1070, 8192 MB M0
CUDA: Device: 3 Thread exited with code: 46
CUDA: Device: 4 GeForce GTX 1070, 8192 MB M0
CUDA: Device: 4 Thread exited with code: 46 |
|
|
|
|
|
Psynthax
|
|
December 27, 2016, 03:19:52 AM |
|
CUDA: Device: 3 Thread exited with code: 77
CUDA: Device: 4 Thread exited with code: 77
CUDA: Device: 2 Thread exited with code: 77
CUDA: Device: 1 Thread exited with code: 77
CUDA: Device: 0 Thread exited with code: 77
ERROR: Some workers are stopped. Attempt to restart: 1
CUDA: Device: 0 GeForce GTX 1070, 8192 MB M0
CUDA: Device: 1 GeForce GTX 1070, 8192 MB M0
CUDA: Device: 2 GeForce GTX 1070, 8192 MB M0
CUDA: Device: 3 GeForce GTX 1070, 8192 MB M0
CUDA: Device: 4 GeForce GTX 1070, 8192 MB M0
CUDA: Device: 0 Thread exited with code: 46
CUDA: Device: 1 Thread exited with code: 46
CUDA: Device: 2 Thread exited with code: 46
CUDA: Device: 3 Thread exited with code: 46
CUDA: Device: 4 Thread exited with code: 46
ERROR: Some workers are stopped. Attempt to restart: 2
CUDA: Device: 0 GeForce GTX 1070, 8192 MB M0
CUDA: Device: 0 Thread exited with code: 46
CUDA: Device: 1 GeForce GTX 1070, 8192 MB M0
CUDA: Device: 1 Thread exited with code: 46
CUDA: Device: 2 GeForce GTX 1070, 8192 MB M0
CUDA: Device: 2 Thread exited with code: 46
CUDA: Device: 3 GeForce GTX 1070, 8192 MB M0
CUDA: Device: 3 Thread exited with code: 46
CUDA: Device: 4 GeForce GTX 1070, 8192 MB M0
CUDA: Device: 4 Thread exited with code: 46 Yeah, the same thing is happening over here..  |
|
|
|
|
gaalx
|
|
December 27, 2016, 04:46:58 AM |
|
It is possible to run multiple threads in the miner from nicehash (eqm_v1.0.4a_Win64) on command - _-cd 0 0_ or _-ca -ca_
|
|
|
|
vs.crypt
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
|
December 27, 2016, 05:34:19 AM |
|
~200 Sol/s on GTX 970 stock
Thanks man!
|
|
|
|
|
ivan1975
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1169
|
|
December 27, 2016, 06:17:20 AM |
|
Thx for miner.
gtx1070 - 390, gtx970 - 220.
|
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
|
|
December 27, 2016, 06:58:59 AM |
|
this version is a bit slower for me than nicehash last version, getting 3% less speed compated to nicehash even with the two instances
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr_Victor
|
|
December 27, 2016, 07:09:41 AM |
|
We should support such miner developer to achieve acceptable speed in competition.
|
yobit.net is banned from signatures
|
|
|
Toxic_Cat
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
|
|
December 27, 2016, 07:16:13 AM |
|
Miner Zec miner 0.0.6b have DevFee inside? I don't see when hes mining DevFee on screen. Can you do some output?
|
|
|
|
|
anorganix
Copper Member
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 970
Merit: 287
Per aspera ad astra
|
|
December 27, 2016, 07:23:12 AM |
|
Version 0.0.7 gives me 270-275 sol/s per GTX 1060 @ 100W each, almost 15% increase.
Thanks EWBF!
|
I will never send private messages with payment requests for my auctions. I only communicate transparently via the forum (not Telegram, Discord, Skype & others). Please be wary of scammers.
|
|
|
|
reelen
|
|
December 27, 2016, 07:27:56 AM |
|
Getting 445~ on 1080, thank you so much!
|
|
|
|
|
ioglnx
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 574
Merit: 250
Fighting mob law and inquisition in this forum
|
|
December 27, 2016, 07:29:36 AM |
|
The crashes occurred randomly and without connection to current clock speeds.
I had this night 10 blue screen, 38 crashes..some times directly at start, sometimes 5min after and then after 2h sometimes.
Profit for me due to these crashes and bluescreen halved ..switching back to 0.0.6b meanwhile
|
GTX 1080Ti rocks da house... seriously... this card is a beast³
Owning by now 18x GTX1080Ti :-D @serious love of efficiency
|
|
|
|
muchoman
|
|
December 27, 2016, 07:30:35 AM |
|
Working fine for me, thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
giagge
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1001
|
|
December 27, 2016, 08:13:40 AM |
|
Thanks dev  . The best setting for nvidia gtx 1070 with version 7 ? . Now i have gpu clock +150 , mem clock +700 , Power Limit 55% for 360 sol . |
|
|
|
|
ioglnx
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 574
Merit: 250
Fighting mob law and inquisition in this forum
|
|
December 27, 2016, 08:57:02 AM |
|
@EWBF_
I noticed your worker thread don't drop the share from old when a new job is send from statrum..results in higher count of invalid shares.
|
GTX 1080Ti rocks da house... seriously... this card is a beast³
Owning by now 18x GTX1080Ti :-D @serious love of efficiency
|
|
|
joniosbra
Member
Offline
Activity: 83
Merit: 10
|
|
December 27, 2016, 09:01:09 AM |
|
Thanks dev . The best setting for nvidia gtx 1070 with version 7 ? . Now i have gpu clock +150 , mem clock +700 , Power Limit 55% for 360 sol . With these settings I'm doing 300-310 sols. What am I doing wrong??? 5 x evga gtx 1070 sc h81 pro btc celeron 1820 windows 10 64 nvidia driver 376.19 tks!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
Kompik
|
|
December 27, 2016, 09:35:58 AM |
|
Thanks dev . The best setting for nvidia gtx 1070 with version 7 ? . Now i have gpu clock +150 , mem clock +700 , Power Limit 55% for 360 sol . With these settings I'm doing 300-310 sols. What am I doing wrong??? 5 x evga gtx 1070 sc h81 pro btc celeron 1820 windows 10 64 nvidia driver 376.19 tks!!! The power limits and voltages at those power limits are different for each type of card, do not copy setting of others and test your own best settings. You need over 65% of Power limit for EVGA to achieve 360-370 sols. |
Bitrated user: Kompik.
|
|
|
xPwnK
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 41
Merit: 0
|
|
December 27, 2016, 09:44:33 AM |
|
The crashes occurred randomly and without connection to current clock speeds.
I had this night 10 blue screen, 38 crashes..some times directly at start, sometimes 5min after and then after 2h sometimes.
Profit for me due to these crashes and bluescreen halved ..switching back to 0.0.6b meanwhile
Use linux and you won't get bluescreens lol |
|
|
|
|
|
