Bitcoin Forum
December 08, 2016, 06:15:57 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: What type of pool payouts do you prefer?
Bitcoins - 3160 (80.5%)
Bank transfer / USD - 407 (10.4%)
Gold/silver coins and bars - 359 (9.1%)
Total Voters: 3924

Pages: « 1 ... 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 [531] 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 ... 1105 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [40+ PH] SlushPool (slushpool.com); World's First Mining Pool  (Read 3929691 times)
trasla
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 664



View Profile
June 25, 2013, 08:22:24 AM
 #10601

Its the other way round, namecoins are no longer supported.
1481177757
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481177757

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481177757
Reply with quote  #2

1481177757
Report to moderator
1481177757
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481177757

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481177757
Reply with quote  #2

1481177757
Report to moderator
1481177757
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481177757

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481177757
Reply with quote  #2

1481177757
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1481177757
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481177757

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481177757
Reply with quote  #2

1481177757
Report to moderator
bondar
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 26


View Profile
June 25, 2013, 08:43:01 AM
 #10602

18758   2013-06-25 07:44:50   0:07:33   1987497   47   0.00062646
18757   2013-06-25 07:37:17   4:20:39   68184596   7268   0.00051845
That's not ok for me.
switched to another pool.
trasla
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 664



View Profile
June 25, 2013, 08:59:27 AM
 #10603

18758   2013-06-25 07:44:50   0:07:33   1987497   47   0.00062646
18757   2013-06-25 07:37:17   4:20:39   68184596   7268   0.00051845
That's not ok for me.
switched to another pool.

Whats your hashrate?
This looks like a single usb block erupter. Smiley
Curious where you get better rewards?
bondar
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 26


View Profile
June 25, 2013, 09:03:57 AM
 #10604


Whats your hashrate?
This looks like a single usb block erupter. Smiley
Curious where you get better rewards?

No, it's just oldstyle GPUs Smiley about 2.5Gh/s
It's not about better rewards it's about how to interpret such a huge diff in rewards for shares.
trasla
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 664



View Profile
June 25, 2013, 09:09:06 AM
 #10605


Whats your hashrate?
This looks like a single usb block erupter. Smiley
Curious where you get better rewards?

No, it's just oldstyle GPUs Smiley about 2.5Gh/s
It's not about better rewards it's about how to interpret such a huge diff in rewards for shares.

Actually, 47 shares in 7.5 minutes seems way to low for a 2.5 GH/s miner.
Ah, wait, your difficulty is set higher than 1, is it?

Later shares get higher scores, did you possibly have a little downtime near the end of that 4:20 round?
gourmet
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 311


View Profile
June 25, 2013, 09:11:58 AM
 #10606


Whats your hashrate?
This looks like a single usb block erupter. Smiley
Curious where you get better rewards?

No, it's just oldstyle GPUs Smiley about 2.5Gh/s
It's not about better rewards it's about how to interpret such a huge diff in rewards for shares.

1) Well that looks more like some 500 MH/s
2) You're not paid for shares. You're paid for your hashing power.
bondar
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 26


View Profile
June 25, 2013, 09:14:40 AM
 #10607


Later shares get higher scores, did you possibly have a little downtime near the end of that 4:20 round?
Maybe. I lost my biggest miner at that time.
So I do not understand how to estimate my rewards as statistics shows huge shares with little payout.
bondar
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 26


View Profile
June 25, 2013, 09:17:17 AM
 #10608


1) Well that looks more like some 500 MH/s
2) You're not paid for shares. You're paid for your hashing power.
1. That's right. Just one 7870 at home PC
2. Thank's for info.
BTW, just messed out with all that different pools statistics and payout algos Smiley
trasla
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 664



View Profile
June 25, 2013, 09:25:12 AM
 #10609

To explain the slush algo in short:
You earn score with the shares you submit, and the later in the round it is, the higher the score.
This is to prevent pool hopping, that is to encourage you to stay with the pool even if a round takes quite long.

This leads to a possible scenario, where you submitted many many shares, but still get low reward, cause you have not been there at the end of the round.
This should average out quite fast if you mine constantly.
bondar
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 26


View Profile
June 25, 2013, 10:24:26 AM
 #10610

To explain the slush algo in short:
You earn score with the shares you submit, and the later in the round it is, the higher the score.
This is to prevent pool hopping, that is to encourage you to stay with the pool even if a round takes quite long.

This leads to a possible scenario, where you submitted many many shares, but still get low reward, cause you have not been there at the end of the round.
This should average out quite fast if you mine constantly.
Got it. Thanks!
trasla
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 664



View Profile
June 25, 2013, 12:02:43 PM
 #10611

Its the other way round, namecoins are no longer supported.
Ugh, the website should reflect that then.
It's still advertising merged mining.

Yes, it should.
The information ist hard to find, and should definitely be updated on the page.
Have a look over here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1976.msg1524107#msg1524107
Lickman
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 8


View Profile
June 25, 2013, 12:51:52 PM
 #10612

Hello all.

Anyone able to say what 1600 MHash will net in 24 hours these days?

I went from over .1 BTC to around .025 in just a couple weeks, and that just seems really wrong.


I've been told by a couple members this drop in BTC production is probably because of the ASIC machines integration with the pool, but that doesn't make sense to me. In other words, if the extra GHashes find more blocks, faster, than the comparatively lower Ghash of any GPU miners producing, so what? Wouldn't the Ghash from the GPU, although being spread out over more blocks, produce the same net payout over more, but faster blocks, due to the help of the ASIC machines?


If what I was experiencing was just a hiccup, I'd love to fire up the cards again, and of course always on the look out for a new ASIC machine.

 
Lickman

threedrules
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 96


View Profile
June 25, 2013, 01:01:45 PM
 #10613

check http://www.coinish.com/calc/#
1200Mh/sec gives you about 0.03Btc per day, its the difficulty that has risen.
next rise you go to about 0.029
trasla
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 664



View Profile
June 25, 2013, 01:07:26 PM
 #10614

0.038/day for 1600 MHash/s would be your income interpolated from my earnings.
You are correct, just plugging ASICs into the pool right now would not change your income at once.
But every two weeks approx the difficulty is adjusted to keep the total network at one block per ten minutes.
Additional hashing power causes the block frequency to rise -> difficulty rises -> same hashing power finds less blocks -> block frequency drops back to  one per ten minutes.

As long as you do not increase your own hashing power in the same rate the total network hashing power rises, your earnings will drop with every difficulty increment.
bspurloc
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 569


View Profile
June 25, 2013, 01:40:52 PM
 #10615

Hello all.

Anyone able to say what 1600 MHash will net in 24 hours these days?

I went from over .1 BTC to around .025 in just a couple weeks, and that just seems really wrong.


I've been told by a couple members this drop in BTC production is probably because of the ASIC machines integration with the pool, but that doesn't make sense to me. In other words, if the extra GHashes find more blocks, faster, than the comparatively lower Ghash of any GPU miners producing, so what? Wouldn't the Ghash from the GPU, although being spread out over more blocks, produce the same net payout over more, but faster blocks, due to the help of the ASIC machines?


If what I was experiencing was just a hiccup, I'd love to fire up the cards again, and of course always on the look out for a new ASIC machine.

 
Lickman




the drop is from mining with 12th/s to now mining with 19th/s
trasla
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 664



View Profile
June 25, 2013, 01:46:03 PM
 #10616

the drop is from mining with 12th/s to now mining with 19th/s

If he was talking about his reward per block, then: yes.
But since he is talking about his reward per time: no.
EasyQuest
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 198


Brony Bitcoin, Litecoin Miner


View Profile
June 25, 2013, 02:06:03 PM
 #10617

Just check the TOP 50 miner and not a surprise that one user has more than 2 TH/s of brute force hashing powers.... meh
ibfr33k
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 75


View Profile
June 25, 2013, 02:19:07 PM
 #10618

Hello all.

Anyone able to say what 1600 MHash will net in 24 hours these days?

I went from over .1 BTC to around .025 in just a couple weeks, and that just seems really wrong.


Lickman



Wow! I wish I had your 1600MH/s.  Mine averages between 1600-1700MH/s and I hardly ever see mine go over .040/day. This week makes a full month for me mining so your .1 might of been before the last few difficulty changes. Using Slush's charts page I average .036-.042/ day.  With the really lucky day we had a day or two ago I got .053.

I'm a noob just starting, all donations are welcome.  13DXKRXQncUnWAFtemSwNH7boRZfEfsg5a
Its About Sharing
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1064


Antifragile


View Profile
June 25, 2013, 02:31:51 PM
 #10619

I'm curious, can anyone help interpret the following?:

Quote
[minepeon@minepeon ~]$ systemctl status cgminer.service
cgminer.service - cgminer
   Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/cgminer.service; enabled)
   Active: active (running) since Tue 2013-06-25 15:11:42 BST; 5s ago
  Process: 2582 ExecStop=/usr/bin/screen -S cgminer -X quit (code=exited, status=1/FAILURE)
  Process: 2584 ExecStart=/usr/bin/screen -dmS cgminer /opt/minepeon/bin/cgminer --api-listen --api-allow W:127.0.0.1 --sharelog /opt/minepeon/log/share.log -c /opt/minepeon/etc/miner.conf (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS)
 Main PID: 2585 (screen)
   CGroup: name=systemd:/system/cgminer.service
           ├─2585 /usr/bin/SCREEN -dmS cgminer /opt/minepeon/bin/cgminer --ap...
           └─2586 /opt/minepeon/bin/cgminer --api-listen --api-allow W:127.0....

Is the failure just a normal part (perhaps some rejected work or the like)?
Overall, things seem humming along with my erupter, until my Jalapeno arrives.

IAS

BTC = Black Swan.
BTC = Antifragile - "Some things benefit from shocks; they thrive and grow when exposed to volatility, randomness, disorder, and stressors and love adventure, risk, and uncertainty. Robust is not the opposite of fragile.
bspurloc
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 569


View Profile
June 25, 2013, 06:07:29 PM
 #10620

the drop is from mining with 12th/s to now mining with 19th/s

If he was talking about his reward per block, then: yes.
But since he is talking about his reward per time: no.

since he is talking about 1600mh/s he wasn't making .1 a day for 1+ months so he is in error as
Average hashrate in last 10 rounds: 3640 Mhash/s does .1 a day....
 so since he is in error he is talking about his reward in the last weeks going from .05ish to .025 so yeah that was directly caused by
"the drop is from mining with 12th/s to now mining with 19th/s"

oh and that diff increase of course. mostly that of course. yeah mostly that.
Pages: « 1 ... 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 [531] 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 ... 1105 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!