Bitcoin Forum
December 09, 2016, 09:45:50 PM *
News: To be able to use the next phase of the beta forum software, please ensure that your email address is correct/functional.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: What type of pool payouts do you prefer?
Bitcoins - 3160 (80.5%)
Bank transfer / USD - 407 (10.4%)
Gold/silver coins and bars - 359 (9.1%)
Total Voters: 3924

Pages: « 1 ... 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 [483] 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 ... 1105 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [40+ PH] SlushPool (slushpool.com); World's First Mining Pool  (Read 3931800 times)
Tamis
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448



View Profile
June 05, 2013, 11:34:38 PM
 #9641

Same here no shares...
1481319950
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481319950

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481319950
Reply with quote  #2

1481319950
Report to moderator
1481319950
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481319950

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481319950
Reply with quote  #2

1481319950
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1481319950
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481319950

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481319950
Reply with quote  #2

1481319950
Report to moderator
1481319950
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481319950

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481319950
Reply with quote  #2

1481319950
Report to moderator
1481319950
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481319950

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481319950
Reply with quote  #2

1481319950
Report to moderator
vs3
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 622


View Profile WWW
June 05, 2013, 11:37:16 PM
 #9642

Something is definatlly screwed up, i just got no shares on 239969

Give it some time - the 'none none' usually appears while it is recalculating the shares and scores. I've seen it take up to 15-20min after a block has been found until it finishes, and for longer-duration blocks it may take even longer. So - patience ...

nottm28
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574



View Profile
June 05, 2013, 11:40:02 PM
 #9643

Same here no shares...

2 options:

1) slush will see it and force a recount of these shares.
2) it will go unnoticed and you will lose out, there will be a lucky few slush miners who will win and who are hoping right now that the block will go unnoticed - one time that is likely to be you.

Overall we are all winners (for the record I have 0.00000003 -but I don't care either way whether it's fixed).


donations not accepted
xempew
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112



View Profile
June 05, 2013, 11:40:15 PM
 #9644

I also have noticed the same...  for block #239957 I have "none" for shares/reward.  But it took about about 2.5 hours to find that block, so I will wait as vs3 suggested.

In Satoshi We Trust.
aurel57
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1064



View Profile
June 05, 2013, 11:47:34 PM
 #9645

wow are GH/s just went up another 1000? I guess maybe a lucky day made some asic miner move to us?
diskodasa
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84


BTC 1Hek4mF4sHcpEJpQdeKwN2i1rVrK5JcZuy


View Profile
June 05, 2013, 11:49:50 PM
 #9646

I also have noticed the same...  for block #239957 I have "none" for shares/reward.  But it took about about 2.5 hours to find that block, so I will wait as vs3 suggested.

Or else, you wil start to panick?!

1Hek4mF4sHcpEJpQdeKwN2i1rVrK5JcZuy
vs3
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 622


View Profile WWW
June 05, 2013, 11:54:20 PM
 #9647

I also have noticed the same...  for block #239957 I have "none" for shares/reward.  But it took about about 2.5 hours to find that block, so I will wait as vs3 suggested.

Or else, you wil start to panick?!

Seems things are about to change - the 0.00000001 is now:

18419    2013-06-05 22:10:11    2:13:41    23972744    none    none    239957    25.05265005    84 confirmations left

EDIT: WOW - and while I was typing it changed yet again:
18419    2013-06-05 22:10:11    2:13:41    23972744    2664    0.00272833    239957    25.05265005    84 confirmations left

Smiley

bspurloc
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 569


View Profile
June 05, 2013, 11:58:13 PM
 #9648

I dont like when Slush doesn't fix blocks where I get a reward for 1/6 my miners.

I dont like when Slush fixes blocks where I had a reward as if I had 3+ miners.

HOWEVER I do like to know he noticed a problem and fixed it more than those 2!

Thanks Slush...  Wink
xempew
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112



View Profile
June 06, 2013, 12:10:57 AM
 #9649


Give it some time - the 'none none' usually appears while it is recalculating the shares and scores. I've seen it take up to 15-20min after a block has been found until it finishes, and for longer-duration blocks it may take even longer. So - patience ...

As vs3 stated... this ended up resolving itself.

In Satoshi We Trust.
nottm28
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574



View Profile
June 06, 2013, 12:32:14 AM
 #9650

I dont like when Slush doesn't fix blocks where I get a reward for 1/6 my miners.

I dont like when Slush fixes blocks where I had a reward as if I had 3+ miners.

HOWEVER I do like to know he noticed a problem and fixed it more than those 2!

Thanks Slush...  Wink

Yeah he seen it and I know he is watching Smiley

donations not accepted
Gleason
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 204


View Profile WWW
June 06, 2013, 12:39:52 AM
 #9651

It looks to be fixed and corrected for me now!

Thanks!

Find one of a kind BTC, LTC and more Cryptomemorabilia at
http://www.cryptomemorabilia.com/
OlgaA524
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 54



View Profile
June 06, 2013, 01:22:27 AM
 #9652

Does anyone know why I might be getting this while trying to start a miner on my new machine?

2013-06-05 19:21:41: Listener for "Default" started
2013-06-05 19:21:42: Listener for "Default": 05/06/2013 19:21:42, started OpenCL miner on platform 0, device 0 (Tahiti)
2013-06-05 19:21:42: Listener for "Default": api2.bitcoin.cz:8332 05/06/2013 19:21:42, checking for stratum...
2013-06-05 19:21:42: Listener for "Default": api2.bitcoin.cz:8332 05/06/2013 19:21:42, no response to getwork, using as stratum
2013-06-05 19:21:42: Listener for "Default": api2.bitcoin.cz:8332 05/06/2013 19:21:42,  No JSON object could be decoded
2013-06-05 19:21:52: Listener for "Default": api2.bitcoin.cz:8332 05/06/2013 19:21:52, Failed to subscribe
2013-06-05 19:21:54: Listener for "Default": api2.bitcoin.cz:8332 05/06/2013 19:21:54, IO errors - 1, tolerance 2

18rWR6S4onARe8AQ1RgG4iGWKas3R97k4T - donations are most welcome
vs3
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 622


View Profile WWW
June 06, 2013, 01:34:05 AM
 #9653

Does anyone know why I might be getting this while trying to start a miner on my new machine?

2013-06-05 19:21:41: Listener for "Default" started
2013-06-05 19:21:42: Listener for "Default": 05/06/2013 19:21:42, started OpenCL miner on platform 0, device 0 (Tahiti)
2013-06-05 19:21:42: Listener for "Default": api2.bitcoin.cz:8332 05/06/2013 19:21:42, checking for stratum...
2013-06-05 19:21:42: Listener for "Default": api2.bitcoin.cz:8332 05/06/2013 19:21:42, no response to getwork, using as stratum
2013-06-05 19:21:42: Listener for "Default": api2.bitcoin.cz:8332 05/06/2013 19:21:42,  No JSON object could be decoded
2013-06-05 19:21:52: Listener for "Default": api2.bitcoin.cz:8332 05/06/2013 19:21:52, Failed to subscribe
2013-06-05 19:21:54: Listener for "Default": api2.bitcoin.cz:8332 05/06/2013 19:21:54, IO errors - 1, tolerance 2


Port 8332 is the default for "getwork" protocol. Slush was talking about deprecating it completely and it seems this is already a fact.

I just looked at the stats page and it used to say so-and-so-% stratum vs getwork (lately was 97-98%) and now it doesn't say anything, which makes me think that getwork is gone completely.

In this case -
Solution 1: Set your miner to use "stratum".
Solution 2: if you can't do #1 just run the proxy on one of your machines and point your miners to the proxy.

Psyrick
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 30



View Profile
June 06, 2013, 05:11:19 AM
 #9654

Just had a thought about the bitcoin network's dynamics. The increasing diffuculty to match the total hash rate offers the bitcoin end user greater security through harder levels of encryption within the blockchain. But not really, since a 51% attack is still a growing possibility. Meanwhile, the fact that blocks come out at the same average rate means transaction won't reach confirmations any faster. That doesn't seem fair enough to the users of a growing network. If block reward quantities were frequently adjusted for total network rate, while the difficulty increased at a more steady and easy rate, we could still be cutting from the same size of pie, and block solution rate could actually represent our total hashing power. Perhaps that would be a problem with all the <10s blocks we'd be getting, though. Thoughts on the matter?

BORG 1TA3CQfApBtHafdCRkXAUj2XiaHipPgVA
valladex
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 61



View Profile
June 06, 2013, 07:37:03 AM
 #9655

so with a 20-25% increase in difficulty the rewards have dropped 25-30% each round, can anyone tell me if their is always such correlation?
Lucko
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714



View Profile
June 06, 2013, 07:43:23 AM
 #9656

so with a 20-25% increase in difficulty the rewards have dropped 25-30% each round, can anyone tell me if their is always such correlation?
Difficulty has noting to do with round reword. Higher difficulty means that there are less rounds. What changes reword for round is your hash rate vs. pool hash rate...
McManus
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13



View Profile
June 06, 2013, 08:34:59 AM
 #9657

i have reward problem  with block #239996 and #239995
i hope slush fix this bug
bitjoint
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 330


Commander of the Hodl Legions


View Profile
June 06, 2013, 08:47:14 AM
 #9658

so with a 20-25% increase in difficulty the rewards have dropped 25-30% each round, can anyone tell me if their is always such correlation?
Difficulty has noting to do with round reword. Higher difficulty means that there are less rounds. What changes reword for round is your hash rate vs. pool hash rate...


What I find curious is that despite the increased difficulty, the additional hashrate on the pool (~13Thash/s right now) is having an impact on the pool's luck (increased frequency finding blocks).

Pool luck (1 day, 7 days, 30 days):   121%, 106%, 97%

I have noticed that my rewards are slightly smaller, but more frequent, so the overall earning is higher. Have you noticed the same?
Roland68
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 103



View Profile
June 06, 2013, 08:49:50 AM
 #9659

1:39:33    18787336    none    none    240045    25.03390000

why no reward Huh?

just fixed ....

1:39:33    18787336    402    0.00078557    240045    25.03390000 Kiss

thanks
vs3
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 622


View Profile WWW
June 06, 2013, 08:50:03 AM
 #9660

so with a 20-25% increase in difficulty the rewards have dropped 25-30% each round, can anyone tell me if their is always such correlation?
Difficulty has noting to do with round reword. Higher difficulty means that there are less rounds. What changes reword for round is your hash rate vs. pool hash rate...


What I find amusing is that despite the increased difficulty, the additional hashrate on the pool (~13Thash/s right now) is having an impact on the pool's luck (increased frequency finding blocks).

Pool luck (1 day, 7 days, 30 days):   121%, 106%, 97%

I have noticed that my rewards are slightly smaller, but more frequent, so the overall earning is higher. Have you noticed the same?

Yup, and that's exactly the expected outcome - and I quite like it as well! Smiley

Pages: « 1 ... 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 [483] 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 ... 1105 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!