Bitcoin Forum
December 09, 2016, 07:50:32 PM *
News: To be able to use the next phase of the beta forum software, please ensure that your email address is correct/functional.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: What type of pool payouts do you prefer?
Bitcoins - 3160 (80.5%)
Bank transfer / USD - 407 (10.4%)
Gold/silver coins and bars - 359 (9.1%)
Total Voters: 3924

Pages: « 1 ... 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 [514] 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 ... 1105 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [40+ PH] SlushPool (slushpool.com); World's First Mining Pool  (Read 3931593 times)
bspurloc
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 569


View Profile
June 18, 2013, 09:15:00 PM
 #10261

2013-06-17 22:37:11: Listener for "6850": stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333 17/06/2013 22:37:11, Verification failed, check hardware! (0:0:Barts, ce5273db)
2013-06-17 22:37:13: Listener for "5850": stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333 17/06/2013 22:37:13, Verification failed, check hardware! (0:1:Cypress, 727d93c7)
2013-06-17 22:37:20: Listener for "6850": stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333 17/06/2013 22:37:20, Verification failed, check hardware! (0:0:Barts, a2952421)
2013-06-17 22:37:29: Listener for "5850": stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333 17/06/2013 22:37:29, Verification failed, check hardware! (0:1:Cypress, 70fe5733)
2013-06-17 22:37:29: Listener for "6850": stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333 17/06/2013 22:37:29, Verification failed, check hardware! (0:0:Barts, 0df11781)
2013-06-17 22:37:31: Listener for "5850": stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333 17/06/2013 22:37:31, Verification failed, check hardware! (0:1:Cypress, 0558f90a)
2013-06-17 22:37:37: Listener for "5850": stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333 17/06/2013 22:37:37, Verification failed, check hardware! (0:1:Cypress, 1e22764a)
2013-06-17 22:37:40: Listener for "6750": stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333 17/06/2013 22:37:40, Verification failed, check hardware! (0:2:Juniper, 00d0bf18)
2013-06-17 22:37:44: Listener for "6750": stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333 17/06/2013 22:37:44, Verification failed, check hardware! (0:2:Juniper, a415432f)
2013-06-17 22:37:44: Listener for "6850": stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333 17/06/2013 22:37:44, Verification failed, check hardware! (0:0:Barts, fb1cb804)
2013-06-17 22:37:45: Listener for "5850": stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333 17/06/2013 22:37:45, Verification failed, check hardware! (0:1:Cypress, 9e719e0e)
  please help me diaganosis this


try starting the miner run AS ADMINISTRATOR
1481313032
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481313032

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481313032
Reply with quote  #2

1481313032
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1481313032
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481313032

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481313032
Reply with quote  #2

1481313032
Report to moderator
1481313032
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481313032

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481313032
Reply with quote  #2

1481313032
Report to moderator
1481313032
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481313032

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481313032
Reply with quote  #2

1481313032
Report to moderator
bspurloc
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 569


View Profile
June 18, 2013, 09:17:45 PM
 #10262

7 hours for a block.... lovely

As far as i am concerned, i would be fine with 7 blocks during the next hour, to balance that one out.

seems fine so far. today beat the day before the diff increase out regardless of a 7 hour block.
we need a nice 11 hour block so we can blame the diff and make believe that didnt happen 5+ diff increases ago
vs3
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 622


View Profile WWW
June 18, 2013, 09:48:03 PM
 #10263

If you're using a non-ATI (non-reference) card make sure to use the drivers from that card's manufacturer. I had the same issue with a non-reference MSI card - I had to use MSI's drivers.
.....they dont make there own drivers

I didn't say they made their own drivers entirely by themselves. They most likely started with ATI's drivers and customized them to work with their card's design.

What I said is that ATI's drivers will not work (since the card is not an ATI-reference one). So you have to use the drivers that are customized for that card.

not.you
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1266


View Profile
June 18, 2013, 09:52:39 PM
 #10264

2013-06-17 22:37:11: Listener for "6850": stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333 17/06/2013 22:37:11, Verification failed, check hardware! (0:0:Barts, ce5273db)
2013-06-17 22:37:13: Listener for "5850": stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333 17/06/2013 22:37:13, Verification failed, check hardware! (0:1:Cypress, 727d93c7)
2013-06-17 22:37:20: Listener for "6850": stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333 17/06/2013 22:37:20, Verification failed, check hardware! (0:0:Barts, a2952421)
2013-06-17 22:37:29: Listener for "5850": stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333 17/06/2013 22:37:29, Verification failed, check hardware! (0:1:Cypress, 70fe5733)
2013-06-17 22:37:29: Listener for "6850": stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333 17/06/2013 22:37:29, Verification failed, check hardware! (0:0:Barts, 0df11781)
2013-06-17 22:37:31: Listener for "5850": stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333 17/06/2013 22:37:31, Verification failed, check hardware! (0:1:Cypress, 0558f90a)
2013-06-17 22:37:37: Listener for "5850": stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333 17/06/2013 22:37:37, Verification failed, check hardware! (0:1:Cypress, 1e22764a)
2013-06-17 22:37:40: Listener for "6750": stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333 17/06/2013 22:37:40, Verification failed, check hardware! (0:2:Juniper, 00d0bf18)
2013-06-17 22:37:44: Listener for "6750": stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333 17/06/2013 22:37:44, Verification failed, check hardware! (0:2:Juniper, a415432f)
2013-06-17 22:37:44: Listener for "6850": stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333 17/06/2013 22:37:44, Verification failed, check hardware! (0:0:Barts, fb1cb804)
2013-06-17 22:37:45: Listener for "5850": stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333 17/06/2013 22:37:45, Verification failed, check hardware! (0:1:Cypress, 9e719e0e)
  please help me diaganosis this


Probably a Catalyst problem.  Are you using 12.8, and what driver version?

I would backoff to catalyst 11.11 for the older graphics cards.  This worked for me.

+1.  I had this when I updated drivers on my 6xxx series cards.  Easy fix steps are here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=177855.0
EasyQuest
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 198


Brony Bitcoin, Litecoin Miner


View Profile
June 19, 2013, 12:44:35 AM
 #10265

Glitchy sometimes but it fixes itself


guytechie
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 293


View Profile
June 19, 2013, 01:31:07 AM
 #10266

2013-06-17 22:37:11: Listener for "6850": stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333 17/06/2013 22:37:11, Verification failed, check hardware! (0:0:Barts, ce5273db)
2013-06-17 22:37:13: Listener for "5850": stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333 17/06/2013 22:37:13, Verification failed, check hardware! (0:1:Cypress, 727d93c7)
2013-06-17 22:37:20: Listener for "6850": stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333 17/06/2013 22:37:20, Verification failed, check hardware! (0:0:Barts, a2952421)
2013-06-17 22:37:29: Listener for "5850": stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333 17/06/2013 22:37:29, Verification failed, check hardware! (0:1:Cypress, 70fe5733)
2013-06-17 22:37:29: Listener for "6850": stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333 17/06/2013 22:37:29, Verification failed, check hardware! (0:0:Barts, 0df11781)
2013-06-17 22:37:31: Listener for "5850": stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333 17/06/2013 22:37:31, Verification failed, check hardware! (0:1:Cypress, 0558f90a)
2013-06-17 22:37:37: Listener for "5850": stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333 17/06/2013 22:37:37, Verification failed, check hardware! (0:1:Cypress, 1e22764a)
2013-06-17 22:37:40: Listener for "6750": stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333 17/06/2013 22:37:40, Verification failed, check hardware! (0:2:Juniper, 00d0bf18)
2013-06-17 22:37:44: Listener for "6750": stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333 17/06/2013 22:37:44, Verification failed, check hardware! (0:2:Juniper, a415432f)
2013-06-17 22:37:44: Listener for "6850": stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333 17/06/2013 22:37:44, Verification failed, check hardware! (0:0:Barts, fb1cb804)
2013-06-17 22:37:45: Listener for "5850": stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333 17/06/2013 22:37:45, Verification failed, check hardware! (0:1:Cypress, 9e719e0e)
  please help me diaganosis this


Probably a Catalyst problem.  Are you using 12.8, and what driver version?

I would backoff to catalyst 11.11 for the older graphics cards.  This worked for me.

+1.  I had this when I updated drivers on my 6xxx series cards.  Easy fix steps are here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=177855.0

I have the same problem, too.  I have a 6970 and found that reaper works fine with the newest driver and SDK.  If I want to use other miners, should I pair the newest SDK (2.Cool with driver version 11.11?

Put something in my tip jar if I made your day. Smiley
BTC:
1MkmBHDjonAFXui6JEx9ZmEemfMtUo9Cmu
stephengillon
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56



View Profile
June 19, 2013, 01:55:18 AM
 #10267

If you're using a non-ATI (non-reference) card make sure to use the drivers from that card's manufacturer. I had the same issue with a non-reference MSI card - I had to use MSI's drivers.
.....they dont make there own drivers

I didn't say they made their own drivers entirely by themselves. They most likely started with ATI's drivers and customized them to work with their card's design.

What I said is that ATI's drivers will not work (since the card is not an ATI-reference one). So you have to use the drivers that are customized for that card.

the drivers on there website are for idiots that dont know how to get them from amd nonrefrence has nothing to do with a driver

Accepting donations for help: 1GxiMYdPd4snJyNhwamwhx1Q2PGhNkhAFQ
vs3
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 622


View Profile WWW
June 19, 2013, 07:18:13 AM
 #10268

If you're using a non-ATI (non-reference) card make sure to use the drivers from that card's manufacturer. I had the same issue with a non-reference MSI card - I had to use MSI's drivers.
.....they dont make there own drivers

I didn't say they made their own drivers entirely by themselves. They most likely started with ATI's drivers and customized them to work with their card's design.

What I said is that ATI's drivers will not work (since the card is not an ATI-reference one). So you have to use the drivers that are customized for that card.

the drivers on there website are for idiots that dont know how to get them from amd nonrefrence has nothing to do with a driver

Well, I guess I'm an idiot then. I tried every driver available from AMD and none of them worked until I installed the one from MSI.

Edit: they worked sufficiently well for Windows. Just not for mining (no matter which client - I tried about a dozen). For mining though I had to use MSI's (or enjoy looking at "hardware error" messages).

Frizi
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 14


View Profile
June 19, 2013, 10:33:44 AM
 #10269

The miner's Mhash/s calculation is based on number of shares. When i jump in during the round, it stays low because of that, but my score is OK after a short time. Shouldn't the calculation be based on score? It would be much more trustworthy.
trasla
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 664



View Profile
June 19, 2013, 10:49:40 AM
 #10270

If i got this right, later shares give higher scores, to prevent pool hopping.
Calculating the hashing speed based on score would not be correct.
If its the way you state, maybe the current hashing speed should not be calculated via shares/round but lets say shares/last five minutes.
sundownz
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 116


View Profile
June 19, 2013, 12:20:52 PM
 #10271

Does Slush's pool support CPU miners ? I have 10 dedicated machines currently on electricity that is included in my rent -- so I'd like to go ahead and activate most of the cores for mining. I started 7 of 8 cores on my office computer on mining (I use it for e-mails mostly) but it doesn't seem to be getting any shares in about 15 minutes; just keep waiting perhaps ?
EasyQuest
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 198


Brony Bitcoin, Litecoin Miner


View Profile
June 19, 2013, 12:23:01 PM
 #10272

Does Slush's pool support CPU miners ? I have 10 dedicated machines currently on electricity that is included in my rent -- so I'd like to go ahead and activate most of the cores for mining. I started 7 of 8 cores on my office computer on mining (I use it for e-mails mostly) but it doesn't seem to be getting any shares in about 15 minutes; just keep waiting perhaps ?

CPU mining is pointless now that ASICs is dominating the market and shares are far and between with CPU so 15 minutes is normal.
sundownz
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 116


View Profile
June 19, 2013, 12:34:42 PM
 #10273

Okay thanks. It did just get one share a minute ago Smiley

Already running these systems + no cost for power so figure it won't hurt !
diskodasa
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84


BTC 1Hek4mF4sHcpEJpQdeKwN2i1rVrK5JcZuy


View Profile
June 19, 2013, 01:03:00 PM
 #10274

Really!?  Pool luck (1 day, 7 days, 30 days):   44%, 84%, 95%

1Hek4mF4sHcpEJpQdeKwN2i1rVrK5JcZuy
ZipTheRip
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 75


View Profile
June 19, 2013, 01:11:04 PM
 #10275

it was a catalyst/ driver prob..  reinstalled OS and just rebuilt my rig from there..  hashing away now again!!!  thanks for all of the help!!
gourmet
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 311


View Profile
June 19, 2013, 01:30:24 PM
 #10276

If i got this right, later shares give higher scores, to prevent pool hopping.
Calculating the hashing speed based on score would not be correct.
If its the way you state, maybe the current hashing speed should not be calculated via shares/round but lets say shares/last five minutes.

This would raise the variance/inaccuracy especially for slow miners. I believe it's better to keep it as it is, it works fine for full-time miners, and for the others - they have to remember that non-complete round just displays false speed.
DryMartini
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 37



View Profile
June 19, 2013, 01:30:33 PM
 #10277

This is interesting. If no new ASICs are plugged into the ecosystem, difficulty might go down next time:
http://dot-bit.org/tools/nextDifficulty.php

Like that's ever gonna happen...
gourmet
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 311


View Profile
June 19, 2013, 01:41:26 PM
 #10278

This is interesting. If no new ASICs are plugged into the ecosystem, difficulty might go down next time:
http://dot-bit.org/tools/nextDifficulty.php

Like that's ever gonna happen...

It's too early to predict...
Graph says, just for now, network rate is going down. But I don't believe this will last for a long time, it looks more like a fluctuation. Maybe whole network is now so "lucky" as our pool is... ;-)



http://bitcoin.sipa.be/

I'd be very glad if the difficulty did not go up too much next time. Just not believing it will go down.
gourmet
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 311


View Profile
June 19, 2013, 01:43:17 PM
 #10279

Really!?  Pool luck (1 day, 7 days, 30 days):   44%, 84%, 95%

I was just about to post this.
Yes, luck is really compensating us for the last days... :-))))))))
Tamis
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448



View Profile
June 19, 2013, 02:19:05 PM
 #10280

I was wondering too about the lowering of the total network hashrate !

Anyone knows what is happening ? I'm really surprised about this...
Pages: « 1 ... 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 [514] 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 ... 1105 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!