Bitcoin Forum
May 25, 2018, 09:19:27 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.16.0  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: What type of pool payouts do you prefer?
Bitcoins - 3230 (80.4%)
Bank transfer / USD - 415 (10.3%)
Gold/silver coins and bars - 371 (9.2%)
Total Voters: 4014

Pages: « 1 ... 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 [514] 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 ... 1142 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [2.5+ EH] Slush Pool (slushpool.com); World's First Mining Pool  (Read 4326808 times)
EasyQuest
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 176
Merit: 100


Brony Bitcoin, Litecoin Miner


View Profile
June 19, 2013, 12:44:35 AM
 #10261

Glitchy sometimes but it fixes itself


Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1527283167
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1527283167

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1527283167
Reply with quote  #2

1527283167
Report to moderator
1527283167
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1527283167

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1527283167
Reply with quote  #2

1527283167
Report to moderator
1527283167
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1527283167

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1527283167
Reply with quote  #2

1527283167
Report to moderator
guytechie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 638
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 19, 2013, 01:31:07 AM
 #10262

2013-06-17 22:37:11: Listener for "6850": stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333 17/06/2013 22:37:11, Verification failed, check hardware! (0:0:Barts, ce5273db)
2013-06-17 22:37:13: Listener for "5850": stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333 17/06/2013 22:37:13, Verification failed, check hardware! (0:1:Cypress, 727d93c7)
2013-06-17 22:37:20: Listener for "6850": stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333 17/06/2013 22:37:20, Verification failed, check hardware! (0:0:Barts, a2952421)
2013-06-17 22:37:29: Listener for "5850": stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333 17/06/2013 22:37:29, Verification failed, check hardware! (0:1:Cypress, 70fe5733)
2013-06-17 22:37:29: Listener for "6850": stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333 17/06/2013 22:37:29, Verification failed, check hardware! (0:0:Barts, 0df11781)
2013-06-17 22:37:31: Listener for "5850": stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333 17/06/2013 22:37:31, Verification failed, check hardware! (0:1:Cypress, 0558f90a)
2013-06-17 22:37:37: Listener for "5850": stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333 17/06/2013 22:37:37, Verification failed, check hardware! (0:1:Cypress, 1e22764a)
2013-06-17 22:37:40: Listener for "6750": stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333 17/06/2013 22:37:40, Verification failed, check hardware! (0:2:Juniper, 00d0bf18)
2013-06-17 22:37:44: Listener for "6750": stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333 17/06/2013 22:37:44, Verification failed, check hardware! (0:2:Juniper, a415432f)
2013-06-17 22:37:44: Listener for "6850": stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333 17/06/2013 22:37:44, Verification failed, check hardware! (0:0:Barts, fb1cb804)
2013-06-17 22:37:45: Listener for "5850": stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333 17/06/2013 22:37:45, Verification failed, check hardware! (0:1:Cypress, 9e719e0e)
  please help me diaganosis this


Probably a Catalyst problem.  Are you using 12.8, and what driver version?

I would backoff to catalyst 11.11 for the older graphics cards.  This worked for me.

+1.  I had this when I updated drivers on my 6xxx series cards.  Easy fix steps are here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=177855.0

I have the same problem, too.  I have a 6970 and found that reaper works fine with the newest driver and SDK.  If I want to use other miners, should I pair the newest SDK (2.Cool with driver version 11.11?

Put something in my tip jar if I made your day. Smiley
BTC:
1MkmBHDjonAFXui6JEx9ZmEemfMtUo9Cmu
stephengillon
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0



View Profile
June 19, 2013, 01:55:18 AM
 #10263

If you're using a non-ATI (non-reference) card make sure to use the drivers from that card's manufacturer. I had the same issue with a non-reference MSI card - I had to use MSI's drivers.
.....they dont make there own drivers

I didn't say they made their own drivers entirely by themselves. They most likely started with ATI's drivers and customized them to work with their card's design.

What I said is that ATI's drivers will not work (since the card is not an ATI-reference one). So you have to use the drivers that are customized for that card.

the drivers on there website are for idiots that dont know how to get them from amd nonrefrence has nothing to do with a driver

Accepting donations for help: 1GxiMYdPd4snJyNhwamwhx1Q2PGhNkhAFQ
vs3
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 622
Merit: 500


View Profile WWW
June 19, 2013, 07:18:13 AM
 #10264

If you're using a non-ATI (non-reference) card make sure to use the drivers from that card's manufacturer. I had the same issue with a non-reference MSI card - I had to use MSI's drivers.
.....they dont make there own drivers

I didn't say they made their own drivers entirely by themselves. They most likely started with ATI's drivers and customized them to work with their card's design.

What I said is that ATI's drivers will not work (since the card is not an ATI-reference one). So you have to use the drivers that are customized for that card.

the drivers on there website are for idiots that dont know how to get them from amd nonrefrence has nothing to do with a driver

Well, I guess I'm an idiot then. I tried every driver available from AMD and none of them worked until I installed the one from MSI.

Edit: they worked sufficiently well for Windows. Just not for mining (no matter which client - I tried about a dozen). For mining though I had to use MSI's (or enjoy looking at "hardware error" messages).

Frizi
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 14
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 19, 2013, 10:33:44 AM
 #10265

The miner's Mhash/s calculation is based on number of shares. When i jump in during the round, it stays low because of that, but my score is OK after a short time. Shouldn't the calculation be based on score? It would be much more trustworthy.
trasla
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 713
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 19, 2013, 10:49:40 AM
 #10266

If i got this right, later shares give higher scores, to prevent pool hopping.
Calculating the hashing speed based on score would not be correct.
If its the way you state, maybe the current hashing speed should not be calculated via shares/round but lets say shares/last five minutes.
sundownz
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 505


View Profile WWW
June 19, 2013, 12:20:52 PM
 #10267

Does Slush's pool support CPU miners ? I have 10 dedicated machines currently on electricity that is included in my rent -- so I'd like to go ahead and activate most of the cores for mining. I started 7 of 8 cores on my office computer on mining (I use it for e-mails mostly) but it doesn't seem to be getting any shares in about 15 minutes; just keep waiting perhaps ?

- Jacob Fuller
- President, Sundown Audio LLC
- GPUs Mining : 266 (Updated 3/19/18) // CPUs Mining : 163 (Updated 3/19/18)
EasyQuest
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 176
Merit: 100


Brony Bitcoin, Litecoin Miner


View Profile
June 19, 2013, 12:23:01 PM
 #10268

Does Slush's pool support CPU miners ? I have 10 dedicated machines currently on electricity that is included in my rent -- so I'd like to go ahead and activate most of the cores for mining. I started 7 of 8 cores on my office computer on mining (I use it for e-mails mostly) but it doesn't seem to be getting any shares in about 15 minutes; just keep waiting perhaps ?

CPU mining is pointless now that ASICs is dominating the market and shares are far and between with CPU so 15 minutes is normal.
sundownz
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 505


View Profile WWW
June 19, 2013, 12:34:42 PM
 #10269

Okay thanks. It did just get one share a minute ago Smiley

Already running these systems + no cost for power so figure it won't hurt !

- Jacob Fuller
- President, Sundown Audio LLC
- GPUs Mining : 266 (Updated 3/19/18) // CPUs Mining : 163 (Updated 3/19/18)
diskodasa
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 258
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 19, 2013, 01:03:00 PM
 #10270

Really!?  Pool luck (1 day, 7 days, 30 days):   44%, 84%, 95%

            ██
         ▄▄▀  ▀▄
        ▄▀▀▄▄▄  ▀▄
      ▄██▄▄▄▄▄██▄▄▀▄
    ▄▀ █  ▄▄▀▀ █  █ ▀▄▄
  ▄▀  ██▀█ ▄▀▀▄ █ █  █▀▄
██   █ █▐▌█ ██ █ ██ █   ██
  ▀▄█  █ █ ▀▄▄▀▄▄███  ▄▀
   ▀▀▄ █▄▄█▄█▀▀   █ ▄▀
      ▀▄▀▀▄▄ ▀▀▀▀██▀
        ▀▄  ▀▀▄▄▄▀
          ▀▄  ▄▀▀
            ██
.
    ▄▄███████▄▄
  ▄███▀▀   ▀▀███▄
 ███▀         ▀▀
███
███
███
 ███▄         ▄▄
  ▀███▄▄   ▄▄███▀
    ▀▀███████▀▀
██████████▄
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀███▄
          ▀██▌
          ▄██▌
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███▀
██████████▀
██▌    ▀███▄
██▌      ▀███▄
██▌        ▀███
█████████████



█████████████



█████████████
        ██
       ████
      ██▌▐██
     ██▌  ▐██
    ██▌    ▐██
   ██▌      ▐██
  ██▌        ▐██
 ██▌          ▐██
██▌    ███████████
██████████████▌
      ██▌
      ██▌
      ██▌
      ██▌
      ██▌
      ██▌
      ██▌
      ██▌
    ▄▄███████▄▄
  ▄███▀▀   ▀▀███▄
 ███▀         ▀███
███             ███
███             ███
███             ███
 ███▄         ▄███
  ▀███▄▄   ▄▄███▀
    ▀▀███████▀▀
██████████▄
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀███▄
          ▀██▌
          ▄██▌
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███▀
██████████▀
██▌    ▀███▄
██▌      ▀███▄
██▌        ▀███



 ▄▄
████
 ▀▀
        ██
       ████
      ██▌▐██
     ██▌  ▐██
    ██▌    ▐██
   ██▌      ▐██
  ██▌        ▐██
 ██▌          ▐██
██▌    ███████████
██▌
██▌
██▌
██▌
██▌
██▌
██▌
██▌
██▌
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███

███
███

███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███

███
███

███
███
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀     WHITEPAPER    ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
FACEBOOK       REDDIT       TELEGRAM
BITCOINTALK   TWITTER   INSTAGRAM
ZipTheRip
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 75
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 19, 2013, 01:11:04 PM
 #10271

it was a catalyst/ driver prob..  reinstalled OS and just rebuilt my rig from there..  hashing away now again!!!  thanks for all of the help!!
gourmet
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 311
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 19, 2013, 01:30:24 PM
 #10272

If i got this right, later shares give higher scores, to prevent pool hopping.
Calculating the hashing speed based on score would not be correct.
If its the way you state, maybe the current hashing speed should not be calculated via shares/round but lets say shares/last five minutes.

This would raise the variance/inaccuracy especially for slow miners. I believe it's better to keep it as it is, it works fine for full-time miners, and for the others - they have to remember that non-complete round just displays false speed.
DryMartini
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 37
Merit: 0



View Profile
June 19, 2013, 01:30:33 PM
 #10273

This is interesting. If no new ASICs are plugged into the ecosystem, difficulty might go down next time:
http://dot-bit.org/tools/nextDifficulty.php

Like that's ever gonna happen...
gourmet
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 311
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 19, 2013, 01:41:26 PM
 #10274

This is interesting. If no new ASICs are plugged into the ecosystem, difficulty might go down next time:
http://dot-bit.org/tools/nextDifficulty.php

Like that's ever gonna happen...

It's too early to predict...
Graph says, just for now, network rate is going down. But I don't believe this will last for a long time, it looks more like a fluctuation. Maybe whole network is now so "lucky" as our pool is... ;-)



http://bitcoin.sipa.be/

I'd be very glad if the difficulty did not go up too much next time. Just not believing it will go down.
gourmet
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 311
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 19, 2013, 01:43:17 PM
 #10275

Really!?  Pool luck (1 day, 7 days, 30 days):   44%, 84%, 95%

I was just about to post this.
Yes, luck is really compensating us for the last days... :-))))))))
Tamis
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 19, 2013, 02:19:05 PM
 #10276

I was wondering too about the lowering of the total network hashrate !

Anyone knows what is happening ? I'm really surprised about this...
Trongersoll
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 19, 2013, 02:27:43 PM
 #10277

I was wondering too about the lowering of the total network hashrate !

Anyone knows what is happening ? I'm really surprised about this...

Well, based on what i've read on the forums here, Avalon has stopped using customer's rigs for mining. Also, i saw that, i think it is BFL is playing with a 500 Gh/s rig, no sure how much difference that makes.
n0creativity
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 65
Merit: 10


Sys Admin


View Profile
June 19, 2013, 02:51:16 PM
 #10278

I was wondering too about the lowering of the total network hashrate !

Anyone knows what is happening ? I'm really surprised about this...

Well, based on what i've read on the forums here, Avalon has stopped using customer's rigs for mining. Also, i saw that, i think it is BFL is playing with a 500 Gh/s rig, no sure how much difference that makes.

Well that's just obnoxious...  I may be wrong here but from what I understand, the difficulty jumps as a method of keeping found blocks at about 10 minutes apart. The higher the network hashrate, the quicker the blocks are found (at any single given difficulty).  So the network hashrate being around 125,000-140,000 caused the difficulty to jump significantly in attempt to reduce block frequency and then whatever\whoever accounted for the 15,000-30,000 drops out and we are left with too high of a difficulty for the current hashrate.  Hence the find rate is about 12.5 minutes right now according to blockchain.info.   I know network hashrate with grow again, maybe naturally or maybe when that 15,000-25,000 come back but it really screws with the rest of us.  I would hope there would be some level of self-imposed responsibility when people have enough hashing power at their disposal to significantly affect the entire network...  Then again, I'm not too surprised that hope is in vain.

Whatever, I'll keep plugging away with my 1.5GH/s and continue to catch the scraps off the table of the huge miners.


-n0c

~~~~~~~~
Software is like sex: it's better when it's free... Linus Torvalds
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If I helped ya, feel free to drop me some coins... 1JF91kFQWnVAkwG1chn2fnrzotNyg1TxDQ
~~~~~~~~
DryMartini
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 37
Merit: 0



View Profile
June 19, 2013, 02:57:54 PM
 #10279

It's possible and even likely the lowered hash rate is caused by cpu/gpu miners giving up.
Jcw188
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 500

Carpe Diem


View Profile
June 19, 2013, 03:02:55 PM
 #10280

It's possible and even likely the lowered hash rate is caused by cpu/gpu miners giving up.

throw in my 2 cents here, bitminter is under heavy ddos attack for several days now, and I know slush had a problem about a month ago.  Wonder who is behind all these ddos attacks, seems worse lately
Pages: « 1 ... 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 [514] 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 ... 1142 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!