Bitcoin Forum
October 17, 2017, 11:04:12 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.0.1  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: What type of pool payouts do you prefer?
Bitcoins - 3187 (80.5%)
Bank transfer / USD - 408 (10.3%)
Gold/silver coins and bars - 366 (9.2%)
Total Voters: 3959

Pages: « 1 ... 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 [536] 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 ... 1120 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [150+ PH] SlushPool (slushpool.com); World's First Mining Pool  (Read 4265105 times)
STT
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1512


¯\_(ツ)_/¯


View Profile WWW
June 26, 2013, 10:47:41 PM
 #10701

You can buy BTC with plain old dollars, then you can buy anywhere that asks for BTC.    In theory a person can meet up with you to sell the BTC in person even and take cash.  The main problem with ASIC BTC miner is the waiting time, its a theoretical product because by the time they deliver it could be pointless  (probably not but nobody can tell when it'll arrive and we don't know the BTC price a year from now)

Stick with what you got, at least a gpu can be used for other things.   Once you have some experience then decide on big bucks.
  If BTC price rises enough then even awfully high difficulty and terrible luck on the pool wont stop GPU being worth it and vice versa of course -
I agree in general the trend is away from amateur operations if/when BTC matures further

         ▄ 
       ▄██████▄
     ▄██████████▄
   ▄██████████████▄
 ▄██████████████████▄
█████████████████████
█████████████████████
██████████████████████
 ▀██████████████████▀
   ▀██████████████▀
     ▀█████████▀
       ▀██████▀
         ▀ 
FLIP       
  █   
██   
██   
██   
██   
██   
██   
██   
██   
██
██

    █
    ██
    ██
    ██
    ██
    ██
    ██
    ██
    ██
      ██
        █
      ▄▄███████████▄▄
   ▄██  ███████████  ██▄
  ██      ███████  ██  ██
 █████  ███▀▀▀▀▀███  █████
██████▀▀           ▀▀██████
███▀                   ▀███
▄  ▄█         █████████▄▄▄
█████          ▀███████████
█████▄              ███████
 █████▄            ▄███████
  ███████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██████████
   ▀███████████████████████
      ▀▀███████████▀▀  ▀███
|❖  Twitter
❖  Telegram
❖  Github
1508281452
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508281452

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508281452
Reply with quote  #2

1508281452
Report to moderator
1508281452
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508281452

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508281452
Reply with quote  #2

1508281452
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
RangerK
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 93



View Profile WWW
June 26, 2013, 11:14:32 PM
 #10702


Hmmm.  I'm only getting 350 - 380 out of mine.  Though I haven't tried all those scary options in the BIOS -- sending extra power to the cards and stuff like that.

Cool ---> Who will mine the next 777 Block??? Place your bets at block777.com!!!
macsheadroom
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 103


Computer Service Tech


View Profile
June 26, 2013, 11:28:19 PM
 #10703


Hmmm.  I'm only getting 350 - 380 out of mine.  Though I haven't tried all those scary options in the BIOS -- sending extra power to the cards and stuff like that.

I am getting 415 Mhash/s @ 1150 core, 625 RAM, @ 65 on mine running GUIminer, Afterburner and Win 7. GUIminer flags are -v -w256 -f10

YMMV

1FQkmrwQ7yf9MKGLsAUhY2jgMT8WjepwL7
RangerK
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 93



View Profile WWW
June 27, 2013, 12:36:07 AM
 #10704


I am getting 415 Mhash/s @ 1150 core, 625 RAM, @ 65 on mine running GUIminer, Afterburner and Win 7. GUIminer flags are -v -w256 -f10

YMMV

Adding "-k poclbm" takes me up to 390 Mh/s.  Can anyone explain what that flag does?  I've researched a bit but couldn't figure it out.

Cool ---> Who will mine the next 777 Block??? Place your bets at block777.com!!!
n0creativity
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 65


Sys Admin


View Profile
June 27, 2013, 01:01:06 AM
 #10705


I am getting 415 Mhash/s @ 1150 core, 625 RAM, @ 65 on mine running GUIminer, Afterburner and Win 7. GUIminer flags are -v -w256 -f10

YMMV

Adding "-k poclbm" takes me up to 390 Mh/s.  Can anyone explain what that flag does?  I've researched a bit but couldn't figure it out.

It changes what kernel the app mines with. Which app are you using?

~~~~~~~~
Software is like sex: it's better when it's free... Linus Torvalds
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If I helped ya, feel free to drop me some coins... 1JF91kFQWnVAkwG1chn2fnrzotNyg1TxDQ
~~~~~~~~
macsheadroom
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 103


Computer Service Tech


View Profile
June 27, 2013, 01:10:52 AM
 #10706


I am getting 415 Mhash/s @ 1150 core, 625 RAM, @ 65 on mine running GUIminer, Afterburner and Win 7. GUIminer flags are -v -w256 -f10

YMMV

Adding "-k poclbm" takes me up to 390 Mh/s.  Can anyone explain what that flag does?  I've researched a bit but couldn't figure it out.

I am surprised how little this is discussed in the forums. I was mining without flags for awhile, then about shit when I figured out what a few little "flags" could do.
-k poclbm gave me error as no such option.

Good ole'   https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Mining_hardware_comparison   is the only central resource I have found for flags.

1FQkmrwQ7yf9MKGLsAUhY2jgMT8WjepwL7
n0creativity
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 65


Sys Admin


View Profile
June 27, 2013, 03:01:33 AM
 #10707


I am getting 415 Mhash/s @ 1150 core, 625 RAM, @ 65 on mine running GUIminer, Afterburner and Win 7. GUIminer flags are -v -w256 -f10

YMMV

Adding "-k poclbm" takes me up to 390 Mh/s.  Can anyone explain what that flag does?  I've researched a bit but couldn't figure it out.

I am surprised how little this is discussed in the forums. I was mining without flags for awhile, then about shit when I figured out what a few little "flags" could do.
-k poclbm gave me error as no such option.

Good ole'   https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Mining_hardware_comparison   is the only central resource I have found for flags.

 Every mining app ive used has a readme or some documentation that lays out the switches\flags available to use with the app. 

~~~~~~~~
Software is like sex: it's better when it's free... Linus Torvalds
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If I helped ya, feel free to drop me some coins... 1JF91kFQWnVAkwG1chn2fnrzotNyg1TxDQ
~~~~~~~~
macsheadroom
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 103


Computer Service Tech


View Profile
June 27, 2013, 03:20:10 AM
 #10708


I am getting 415 Mhash/s @ 1150 core, 625 RAM, @ 65 on mine running GUIminer, Afterburner and Win 7. GUIminer flags are -v -w256 -f10

YMMV

Adding "-k poclbm" takes me up to 390 Mh/s.  Can anyone explain what that flag does?  I've researched a bit but couldn't figure it out.

I am surprised how little this is discussed in the forums. I was mining without flags for awhile, then about shit when I figured out what a few little "flags" could do.
-k poclbm gave me error as no such option.

Good ole'   https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Mining_hardware_comparison   is the only central resource I have found for flags.

 Every mining app ive used has a readme or some documentation that lays out the switches\flags available to use with the app. 

Right there in the read me,
http://forum.bitcoin.org/?topic=4122.0
Thank you n0creativity, someone has to point out the obvious to us noobs sometimes.

1FQkmrwQ7yf9MKGLsAUhY2jgMT8WjepwL7
gourmet
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 311


View Profile
June 27, 2013, 06:50:46 AM
 #10709

Hello, i think that this block is not correct for me shareds:

18786   2013-06-26 14:57:53   4:08:08   64417408   10137   0.00000000   243441   25.24291746    92 confirmaciones pendientes


Thanks..

For what? Have you asked for anything?
I can see no "please", no question mark here... Just an announcement.
gourmet
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 311


View Profile
June 27, 2013, 06:59:26 AM
 #10710

what's wrong with a higher hash rate? don't you get less of a payout, but more frequent?
no u get lower payout same frequency. it isnt enough of an increase.
but then again this is that question where u r going to get the ones trying to increase their post count to push a pointless point of it is when it isnt.

I wish you lower payout same frequency really applied to you, when you believe in it. And that we others who don't and who have to read this nonsense again and again, got the difference... :-)
gourmet
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 311


View Profile
June 27, 2013, 07:17:16 AM
 #10711

I wonder who gets the reward or how will it be calculated if no one can connect?  Huh I'm a bit confused...

In short, when no one can connect, there's no reward, as there are no blocks...

But,  what looks a bit strange to me, that you care about the reward, when the pool is down. I'd care more why it was down, what happened, and when it would be back again... Well, it's on everyones' nature...
RangerK
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 93



View Profile WWW
June 27, 2013, 09:10:44 AM
 #10712


I am getting 415 Mhash/s @ 1150 core, 625 RAM, @ 65 on mine running GUIminer, Afterburner and Win 7. GUIminer flags are -v -w256 -f10

YMMV

Adding "-k poclbm" takes me up to 390 Mh/s.  Can anyone explain what that flag does?  I've researched a bit but couldn't figure it out.

It changes what kernel the app mines with. Which app are you using?

cgminer

Cool ---> Who will mine the next 777 Block??? Place your bets at block777.com!!!
gourmet
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 311


View Profile
June 27, 2013, 10:14:22 AM
 #10713

Its the other way round, namecoins are no longer supported.
Ugh, the website should reflect that then.
It's still advertising merged mining.
Yes, it should.
The information ist hard to find, and should definitely be updated on the page.
Have a look over here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1976.msg1524107#msg1524107

The information about namecoin maining tied to getwork appeared in this thread at least 20 times in last several weeks...

This is Slush's announcement from June 6th about getwork removal just comming:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1976.msg2393725;topicseen#msg2393725
Paulizei
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56



View Profile
June 27, 2013, 10:52:58 AM
 #10714

Most importantly the webpage should be updated, since slush is advertising this pool with merged mining which is not true anymore

Key features

    Service lifetime & operator trust - Users have to trust pool operators, because pools aren't cheat-proof from the side of the operator. mining.bitcoin.cz was the first Bitcoin mining pool, has been operating consistently since December 2010 and has a long history of stable and accurate payouts.
    Stratum protocol support - Mining protocol with very low network overhead has been designed for high-speed ASIC miners.
    Namecoin Merged Mining - The pool has been mining Bitcoins and Namecoins since October 2011. Thanks to this, users have higher mining income than mining on another Bitcoin-only pool.
    Score-based reward system - Pool uses a fair distribution of rewards between members, making the pool hop-resistant. This has been mathematicaly proven.
RangerK
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 93



View Profile WWW
June 27, 2013, 11:32:41 AM
 #10715

I've been mining for about four day, so I'm not sure what is strange and what is not. But it seems Slush hasn't found a block in a very long time.  Is this normal?  Something new?

Cool ---> Who will mine the next 777 Block??? Place your bets at block777.com!!!
trasla
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 713



View Profile
June 27, 2013, 11:35:06 AM
 #10716

I've been mining for about four day, so I'm not sure what is strange and what is not. But it seems Slush hasn't found a block in a very long time.  Is this normal?  Something new?
Tha last block found by slush was about half an hour ago?
But yes, at the moment, we are a little down on luck, but that averages out usually.
Tsunamirain
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 217

Incakoin= Incagold


View Profile WWW
June 27, 2013, 11:40:11 AM
 #10717

I've been mining for about four day, so I'm not sure what is strange and what is not. But it seems Slush hasn't found a block in a very long time.  Is this normal?  Something new?
Tha last block found by slush was about half an hour ago?
But yes, at the moment, we are a little down on luck, but that averages out usually.
you answered my question before I even asked "psychic".!
Thanks.

Kruncha
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420


Winter is coming...


View Profile
June 27, 2013, 02:15:26 PM
 #10718

I've been mining for about four day, so I'm not sure what is strange and what is not. But it seems Slush hasn't found a block in a very long time.  Is this normal?  Something new?
Tha last block found by slush was about half an hour ago?
But yes, at the moment, we are a little down on luck, but that averages out usually.
you answered my question before I even asked "psychic".!
Thanks.

lol.

I don't mind the bad luck, as it suggests a lucky strike is imminent - it has to even out some how Grin.

K.
n0creativity
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 65


Sys Admin


View Profile
June 27, 2013, 03:00:31 PM
 #10719

I've been mining for about four day, so I'm not sure what is strange and what is not. But it seems Slush hasn't found a block in a very long time.  Is this normal?  Something new?
Tha last block found by slush was about half an hour ago?
But yes, at the moment, we are a little down on luck, but that averages out usually.
you answered my question before I even asked "psychic".!
Thanks.

lol.

I don't mind the bad luck, as it suggests a lucky strike is imminent - it has to even out some how Grin.

K.

Plus it scares off some of the pool jumpers for a bit so when we hit that triple set of blocks in short succession, we all get a bit bigger payout... But thats just me being selfish...  Grin

~~~~~~~~
Software is like sex: it's better when it's free... Linus Torvalds
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If I helped ya, feel free to drop me some coins... 1JF91kFQWnVAkwG1chn2fnrzotNyg1TxDQ
~~~~~~~~
Kruncha
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420


Winter is coming...


View Profile
June 27, 2013, 03:29:43 PM
 #10720

I've been mining for about four day, so I'm not sure what is strange and what is not. But it seems Slush hasn't found a block in a very long time.  Is this normal?  Something new?
Tha last block found by slush was about half an hour ago?
But yes, at the moment, we are a little down on luck, but that averages out usually.
you answered my question before I even asked "psychic".!
Thanks.

lol.

I don't mind the bad luck, as it suggests a lucky strike is imminent - it has to even out some how Grin.

K.

Plus it scares off some of the pool jumpers for a bit so when we hit that triple set of blocks in short succession, we all get a bit bigger payout... But thats just me being selfish...  Grin

Not selfish, rewards for being loyal (all loyal pool members benefit) Grin

K.
Pages: « 1 ... 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 [536] 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 ... 1120 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!