Bitcoin Forum
October 01, 2016, 03:13:38 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.0 (New!) [Torrent]. Make sure you verify it.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: What type of pool payouts do you prefer?
Bitcoins - 3152 (80.4%)
Bank transfer / USD - 407 (10.4%)
Gold/silver coins and bars - 359 (9.2%)
Total Voters: 3916

Pages: « 1 ... 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 [484] 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 ... 1104 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [40+ PH] SlushPool (slushpool.com); World's First Mining Pool  (Read 3859323 times)
vs3
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 622


View Profile WWW
June 06, 2013, 01:34:05 AM
 #9661

Does anyone know why I might be getting this while trying to start a miner on my new machine?

2013-06-05 19:21:41: Listener for "Default" started
2013-06-05 19:21:42: Listener for "Default": 05/06/2013 19:21:42, started OpenCL miner on platform 0, device 0 (Tahiti)
2013-06-05 19:21:42: Listener for "Default": api2.bitcoin.cz:8332 05/06/2013 19:21:42, checking for stratum...
2013-06-05 19:21:42: Listener for "Default": api2.bitcoin.cz:8332 05/06/2013 19:21:42, no response to getwork, using as stratum
2013-06-05 19:21:42: Listener for "Default": api2.bitcoin.cz:8332 05/06/2013 19:21:42,  No JSON object could be decoded
2013-06-05 19:21:52: Listener for "Default": api2.bitcoin.cz:8332 05/06/2013 19:21:52, Failed to subscribe
2013-06-05 19:21:54: Listener for "Default": api2.bitcoin.cz:8332 05/06/2013 19:21:54, IO errors - 1, tolerance 2


Port 8332 is the default for "getwork" protocol. Slush was talking about deprecating it completely and it seems this is already a fact.

I just looked at the stats page and it used to say so-and-so-% stratum vs getwork (lately was 97-98%) and now it doesn't say anything, which makes me think that getwork is gone completely.

In this case -
Solution 1: Set your miner to use "stratum".
Solution 2: if you can't do #1 just run the proxy on one of your machines and point your miners to the proxy.

1475291618
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1475291618

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1475291618
Reply with quote  #2

1475291618
Report to moderator
1475291618
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1475291618

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1475291618
Reply with quote  #2

1475291618
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1475291618
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1475291618

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1475291618
Reply with quote  #2

1475291618
Report to moderator
1475291618
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1475291618

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1475291618
Reply with quote  #2

1475291618
Report to moderator
1475291618
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1475291618

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1475291618
Reply with quote  #2

1475291618
Report to moderator
Psyrick
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 30



View Profile
June 06, 2013, 05:11:19 AM
 #9662

Just had a thought about the bitcoin network's dynamics. The increasing diffuculty to match the total hash rate offers the bitcoin end user greater security through harder levels of encryption within the blockchain. But not really, since a 51% attack is still a growing possibility. Meanwhile, the fact that blocks come out at the same average rate means transaction won't reach confirmations any faster. That doesn't seem fair enough to the users of a growing network. If block reward quantities were frequently adjusted for total network rate, while the difficulty increased at a more steady and easy rate, we could still be cutting from the same size of pie, and block solution rate could actually represent our total hashing power. Perhaps that would be a problem with all the <10s blocks we'd be getting, though. Thoughts on the matter?

BORG 1TA3CQfApBtHafdCRkXAUj2XiaHipPgVA
valladex
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 61



View Profile
June 06, 2013, 07:37:03 AM
 #9663

so with a 20-25% increase in difficulty the rewards have dropped 25-30% each round, can anyone tell me if their is always such correlation?
Lucko
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714



View Profile
June 06, 2013, 07:43:23 AM
 #9664

so with a 20-25% increase in difficulty the rewards have dropped 25-30% each round, can anyone tell me if their is always such correlation?
Difficulty has noting to do with round reword. Higher difficulty means that there are less rounds. What changes reword for round is your hash rate vs. pool hash rate...
McManus
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13



View Profile
June 06, 2013, 08:34:59 AM
 #9665

i have reward problem  with block #239996 and #239995
i hope slush fix this bug
bitjoint
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 330


Commander of the Hodl Legions


View Profile
June 06, 2013, 08:47:14 AM
 #9666

so with a 20-25% increase in difficulty the rewards have dropped 25-30% each round, can anyone tell me if their is always such correlation?
Difficulty has noting to do with round reword. Higher difficulty means that there are less rounds. What changes reword for round is your hash rate vs. pool hash rate...


What I find curious is that despite the increased difficulty, the additional hashrate on the pool (~13Thash/s right now) is having an impact on the pool's luck (increased frequency finding blocks).

Pool luck (1 day, 7 days, 30 days):   121%, 106%, 97%

I have noticed that my rewards are slightly smaller, but more frequent, so the overall earning is higher. Have you noticed the same?
Roland68
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 103



View Profile
June 06, 2013, 08:49:50 AM
 #9667

1:39:33    18787336    none    none    240045    25.03390000

why no reward Huh?

just fixed ....

1:39:33    18787336    402    0.00078557    240045    25.03390000 Kiss

thanks
vs3
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 622


View Profile WWW
June 06, 2013, 08:50:03 AM
 #9668

so with a 20-25% increase in difficulty the rewards have dropped 25-30% each round, can anyone tell me if their is always such correlation?
Difficulty has noting to do with round reword. Higher difficulty means that there are less rounds. What changes reword for round is your hash rate vs. pool hash rate...


What I find amusing is that despite the increased difficulty, the additional hashrate on the pool (~13Thash/s right now) is having an impact on the pool's luck (increased frequency finding blocks).

Pool luck (1 day, 7 days, 30 days):   121%, 106%, 97%

I have noticed that my rewards are slightly smaller, but more frequent, so the overall earning is higher. Have you noticed the same?

Yup, and that's exactly the expected outcome - and I quite like it as well! Smiley

valladex
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 61



View Profile
June 06, 2013, 08:52:59 AM
 #9669

so with a 20-25% increase in difficulty the rewards have dropped 25-30% each round, can anyone tell me if their is always such correlation?
Difficulty has noting to do with round reword. Higher difficulty means that there are less rounds. What changes reword for round is your hash rate vs. pool hash rate...

I realise pool hash rate affects rewards but the pool has increased by around 20% in the last 2 weeks, my rewards dropped by as much as 30% per round in 1 day. I just cant work it out.
vs3
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 622


View Profile WWW
June 06, 2013, 08:54:24 AM
 #9670

1:39:33    18787336    none    none    240045    25.03390000

why no reward Huh?


Dude - make at least a little effort to research before you post - THE ANSWER WAS ON THE SAME PAGE!

I hate to quote myself but had you noticed those posts you would've known:

Something is definatlly screwed up, i just got no shares on 239969

Give it some time - the 'none none' usually appears while it is recalculating the shares and scores. I've seen it take up to 15-20min after a block has been found until it finishes, and for longer-duration blocks it may take even longer. So - patience ...

As vs3 stated... this ended up resolving itself.

nristovski
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 25


View Profile
BFL
June 06, 2013, 09:44:56 AM
 #9671

I`m wondering what is stopping BFL to "TEST"  the units for a month before the ship to the customers. And by that earning millions of dollars raising the difficulty and lowering the profitability of the unit for the customers that buy them.
NoStr0m0
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 22


View Profile
June 06, 2013, 10:46:27 AM
 #9672

You haven't been reading all the forums. Someone said they actually are doing just that.

if by some chance someone has made your day better, feel free to pass it forward:
1P8PHirMoc4uZGT48gLnrUCCj7GSgrRynq
ewitte
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98


View Profile
June 06, 2013, 11:00:31 AM
 #9673


I have noticed that my rewards are slightly smaller, but more frequent, so the overall earning is higher. Have you noticed the same?

Luck is luck its all theoretical I went to a certain pool that had 30-50TH/s (depending on a certain person mining lol) 50+ blocks a day.  Determined even with the lower blocks I tend to make more on this pool.

Donations
BTC - 13Lgy6fb4d3nSYEf2nkgBgyBkkhPw8zkPd
LTC - LegzRwyc2Xhu8cqvaW2jwRrqSnhyaYU6gZ
Behemot
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 152



View Profile WWW
June 06, 2013, 12:09:08 PM
 #9674

I am curious, since website responds are slow last weeks, any problems with webserver or? Right now I get

Quote
504 Gateway Time-out
The server didn't respond in time.

stephengillon
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56



View Profile
June 06, 2013, 12:10:35 PM
 #9675

Website seems slow past 2 days and payout calculations are taking atleast half hour now

Accepting donations for help: 1GxiMYdPd4snJyNhwamwhx1Q2PGhNkhAFQ
weevil
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 36


View Profile
June 06, 2013, 12:52:53 PM
 #9676

I am showing NONE for 240070/18434 - anyone else?
mikimoto
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 93


View Profile
June 06, 2013, 12:54:19 PM
 #9677

hello slush, can check this block?:

18434   2013-06-06 11:37:05   0:17:08   3276321   none   none   240070   25.07310000    88 confirmaciones pendientes


none share of mi miners???

thankss
stephengillon
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56



View Profile
June 06, 2013, 01:01:07 PM
 #9678

Dont worry about the None shares, they will eventually process the server is being very sluggish right now.

im assuming it may need a reboot.

Accepting donations for help: 1GxiMYdPd4snJyNhwamwhx1Q2PGhNkhAFQ
weevil
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 36


View Profile
June 06, 2013, 01:05:50 PM
 #9679

Thank you - corrected now. Not panicking but it was 77 mins after start of next block.
Thanks
mikimoto
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 93


View Profile
June 06, 2013, 01:09:46 PM
 #9680

jejeje.. ok thanks for all..

 Cheesy
Pages: « 1 ... 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 [484] 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 ... 1104 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!