Pitabred
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
June 10, 2011, 08:15:42 PM |
|
I'm mining at around 900MH/s with my two 6970's and my mobile 5830. I shouldn't be slow at all. But your explanation makes sense. Just missed my shares of it
|
|
|
|
metalphreak
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
|
June 10, 2011, 08:47:04 PM |
|
I'm mining at around 900MH/s with my two 6970's and my mobile 5830. I shouldn't be slow at all. But your explanation makes sense. Just missed my shares of it 1459 is the total number of shares submitted by everyone. Did you really think you calculated that many shares in 9 seconds? Your reward was none because you didn't get a chance to submit a completed share in such a short period. BTW, Slush's response was to Kyubi but the explanation is good
|
|
|
|
sniper_sniperson
|
|
June 10, 2011, 08:48:01 PM |
|
Slush, is there a problem with the pool right now?
|
|
|
|
lumberjack4
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
|
June 10, 2011, 08:53:17 PM |
|
I had a problem for about 5 minutes, but I seem to be back up and running again.
|
|
|
|
slush (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
|
June 10, 2011, 09:06:28 PM |
|
Slush, is there a problem with the pool right now?
Yes, pool was DoSed (actually not DDoSed). It is already solved. I have theory that mtgox price drop and attack to two pools (my pool and currently deepbit) were orchestrated by single entity .
|
|
|
|
SchizophrenicX
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 100
"I'm not psychic; I'm just damn good"
|
|
June 10, 2011, 09:21:28 PM |
|
I'm not getting my expected BTC /day despite after watching for 2 days in case of any discrepancy or bad averages. What stats do I need to know?
in fact I'm seeing 5358 2011-06-10 06:31:53 0:20:40 420292 none 129749 confirmed 5357 2011-06-10 06:11:14 0:18:04 375608 none 129742 confirmed 5356 2011-06-10 05:53:10 0:22:06 450287 none 129740 confirmed 5355 2011-06-10 05:31:05 0:26:18 527152 none 129735 confirmed 5354 2011-06-10 05:04:48 0:05:55 115379 none 129729 confirmed 5353 2011-06-10 04:58:53 0:09:16 182845 none 129726 confirmed 5352 2011-06-10 04:49:37 0:25:39 513560 none 129723 confirmed 5351 2011-06-10 04:23:58 2:23:22 2822786 0.00773412 129718 confirmed 5350 2011-06-10 02:00:36 0:22:17 443021 0.01277802 129698 confirmed 5349 2011-06-10 01:38:19 0:01:08 20238 0.00702678 129695 confirmed 5348 2011-06-10 01:37:11 1:13:44 1480418 0.00770668 129694 confirmed 5347 2011-06-10 00:23:27 0:05:30 108655 0.01107585 129691 confirmed 5346 2011-06-10 00:17:57 0:08:49 175803 0.01317870 129690 confirmed 5345 2011-06-10 00:09:08 2:00:51 2402734 0.00899105 129689 confirmed 5344 2011-06-09 22:08:18 0:17:45 348633 0.00943176 129673 confirmed 5343 2011-06-09 21:50:34 0:29:29 591032 0.01487927 129668 confirmed in graphs, I get only close to 75% of my expected rewards.
|
|
|
|
sniper_sniperson
|
|
June 10, 2011, 09:29:41 PM |
|
Yeah, my statement about mtgox was always clear - dark pools must be closed and enable maximum amount of 50BTC that can be sold per day from unique address. Too many BTCs from soloing are sold there for little money and their buyer will offer them at high prices to the normal market. He just only need lower current price to sold more against to sold less or nothing at higher price.
|
|
|
|
Dunbar
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
|
|
June 10, 2011, 11:04:18 PM |
|
A three hour block with 1.5 THash? Guess the ddos broke this block or something
|
|
|
|
pokermon919
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
June 10, 2011, 11:07:44 PM |
|
A three hour block with 1.5 THash? Guess the ddos broke this block or something
|
|
|
|
slush (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
|
June 10, 2011, 11:10:45 PM |
|
A three hour block with 1.5 THash? Guess the ddos broke this block or something I hate such long rounds, but no, this is not affected by attack.
|
|
|
|
relmeas
|
|
June 10, 2011, 11:11:00 PM |
|
shutting down all miners until this one is over. what a waste of energy
|
|
|
|
Jarredm
Member
Offline
Activity: 63
Merit: 10
|
|
June 10, 2011, 11:14:49 PM |
|
shutting down all miners until this one is over. what a waste of energy
Yea! More for me.
|
|
|
|
Dunbar
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
|
|
June 10, 2011, 11:17:33 PM |
|
Ow wow, a 1 second round?
|
|
|
|
relmeas
|
|
June 10, 2011, 11:19:42 PM |
|
oh well, 1 sec is about the same as network latency so would be none anyway
|
|
|
|
lumberjack4
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
|
June 10, 2011, 11:20:06 PM |
|
Ow wow, a 1 second round?
Funny how that works. Probability wins again!
|
|
|
|
|
slush (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
|
June 10, 2011, 11:24:11 PM |
|
Ow wow, a 1 second round?
Unfortunately invalid one. Actually two servers found solution for the same block almost at same time (heh, after 3 hours of trying), but only one can count. 1 sec is too short to synchronize over bitcoin p2p...
|
|
|
|
relmeas
|
|
June 10, 2011, 11:25:11 PM |
|
"other" raising fast ... 3 hour 1.5 thash block .. that makes me wondering ...
|
|
|
|
slush (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
|
June 10, 2011, 11:27:02 PM |
|
"other" raising fast ... 3 hour 1 thash block .. that makes me wondering ...
I have no reason to think that this 3hour round was caused by some p2p network attack (except that pool hashrate was lower for some time because of that DoS). Also keep in mind that 'other' are just estimation. There is no way to measure 'other' hashrate exactly.
|
|
|
|
Dunbar
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
|
|
June 10, 2011, 11:35:54 PM |
|
Ow wow, a 1 second round?
Unfortunately invalid one. Actually two servers found solution for the same block almost at same time (heh, after 3 hours of trying), but only one can count. 1 sec is too short to synchronize over bitcoin p2p... Lets hope the 1 second one is invalid then. Would suck to crunch for 3 hours and then have it divided between 52 shares in the end (of which I had none of course ).
|
|
|
|
|