Bitcoin Forum
December 14, 2024, 10:09:53 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 [173] 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 ... 1154 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [4+ EH] Slush Pool (slushpool.com); Overt AsicBoost; World First Mining Pool  (Read 4382725 times)
gr0bi42
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 158
Merit: 100


View Profile WWW
August 16, 2011, 03:24:39 PM
 #3441

It is obvious that the pool have some issues with the rejected/invalid shares. Too much people concerning with the same problem this days.

I have moved 50% of my 2 Ghash to another pool, will move also the other 50% or come back again depending if the problem gets solved.


@slush

Still have this high reject ratio using phoenix/cgminer with your pool. Come on... your are unable to tell the reason? Why do I have to stick with the *slower* poclbm then I'm mining with your pool? With poclbm I'm loosing about 250MH/s. I cannot believe that I'm the only one.

Once again: with the lastes cgminer or phoenix I have tons of rejects. With poclbm not. I get the rejects only with your pool. Deepbit, Arsbit, Eligius, Guild, mtred... all are working. It's NOT a network issue. I guess your pool is in some way not compatible with some optimization of the more recent miner-software.

What is the cause of the reject???

Donations are welcome: 1Btf3BqUegfe5iFdWsgfBf1Ew3YsAvsrLT
Gabi
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1008


If you want to walk on water, get out of the boat


View Profile
August 16, 2011, 06:02:18 PM
 #3442

Time to tell my experience with slush and stale

Now guiminer is saying 1902 shares accepted and 7 invalid. That make like 0.03% of stale with slush. An AWESOME thing

gr0bi42
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 158
Merit: 100


View Profile WWW
August 16, 2011, 06:46:01 PM
 #3443

Time to tell my experience with slush and stale

Now guiminer is saying 1902 shares accepted and 7 invalid. That make like 0.03% of stale with slush. An AWESOME thing

You forgot to mention one important thing... the guiminer backend! If I'm mining at slush with poclbm I have the same very low reject ratio. I have only problems with "newer" mining software like phoenix (svn 118) or cgminer 1.5.4. Both are a lot faster than poclbm... for instance: 5870: poclbm 432 MH/s, phoenix 451 MH/s, cgminer ~445MH/s.

Donations are welcome: 1Btf3BqUegfe5iFdWsgfBf1Ew3YsAvsrLT
jkminkov
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 698
Merit: 500


View Profile
August 17, 2011, 06:28:43 AM
 #3444

Umm, this seems odd to me. The round lasted nearly 2 hours and all I got was 0.01??? In previous rounds of the nearly the same length the reward was 2 to 3 times that much.

1:59:54   3094337   0.01812518

you would not ask that question if pool had normal stats, like submited shares column after duration on block history

.:31211457:. 100 dollars in one place talking - Dudes, hooray, Bitcoin against us just one, but we are growing in numbers!
slush (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097



View Profile WWW
August 17, 2011, 07:32:20 AM
 #3445

What is the cause of the reject???

gr0bi42, I don't know why you have such high stale ratio. There isn't anything what I'm hiding... What phoenix version _exactly_ do you use? I'll try this version on my machines, maybe there is some change in phoenix...

gr0bi42
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 158
Merit: 100


View Profile WWW
August 17, 2011, 10:04:10 AM
 #3446

What is the cause of the reject???

gr0bi42, I don't know why you have such high stale ratio. There isn't anything what I'm hiding... What phoenix version _exactly_ do you use? I'll try this version on my machines, maybe there is some change in phoenix...

I'm using the latest version from SVN-repository. It's revision 118. With cgminer 1.5.3 or 1.5.4 I have the same problems. Sometimes it works for some time, but at some moment things get worse...

With poclbm I have an estimated reward of ~0.12. The I use cgminer or phoenix the reward is about 0.08,  if the reject ratio is *normal* bad. But sometimes the reject ratio goes up to 80-90% rejects on some of my miners, while others still perform well. It's strange.

Donations are welcome: 1Btf3BqUegfe5iFdWsgfBf1Ew3YsAvsrLT
zx9r
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 153
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 17, 2011, 10:18:34 AM
 #3447

I think you should try stable version that is 116 at the moment and see what happens. Try with phatk2 also.
zx9r
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 153
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 17, 2011, 10:24:24 AM
 #3448

I would like to show info for one of my rigs for the last 24 hours:

   Temp    Fan% (rpm)    Load  Rate     Accept/Invalid   Status
0: 74c     82% (3858+)   98%   392 Mhs  7550/110 (1.44%) api2.bitcoin.cz
1: 73.5c   70% (3458+)   99%   394 Mhs  5038/18 (0.36%)  bitcoins.lc
2: 72.5c+  70% (3491+)   99%   393 Mhs  5059/19 (0.37%)  bitcoins.lc


The reject/invalid shares are as usual... 1.44% for slush, 0.37% for bitcoins.lc... ok, nothing new

BUT the total number of submitted shares are about 50% higher in favor of slush. I dont think it had been some network issue or bitcoins.lc downtime but I can be 100% sure of that. Am I the only one ?

pekv2
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 502



View Profile
August 17, 2011, 02:53:14 PM
 #3449

Time to tell my experience with slush and stale

Now guiminer is saying 1902 shares accepted and 7 invalid. That make like 0.03% of stale with slush. An AWESOME thing

Yea! Ain't it. I'm lovin it. 2968 accepted 13 stale.
allinvain
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3080
Merit: 1083



View Profile WWW
August 18, 2011, 07:48:19 AM
 #3450

So I take it guiminer with poclbm is still the best to use for this pool?

Callius
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 25
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 18, 2011, 10:24:23 AM
Last edit: August 18, 2011, 11:09:24 AM by Callius
 #3451

never mind I fixed my problem.
CyberPhunk
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 124
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 18, 2011, 11:59:45 PM
 #3452

What's the status on 8 decimal payouts?

Just wondering

List of client download mirrors / Older Catalyst drivers/SDK
13dRbbqBpfZEmZiXXdLM4NKNoJYsgHbuFJ  <- might as well, in case someone feels generous. Wink
lxFlasHxl
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 19, 2011, 12:17:16 AM
 #3453

not a bad mining pool.
allinvain
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3080
Merit: 1083



View Profile WWW
August 19, 2011, 01:35:41 PM
 #3454

 Undecided Today my total reward (unconfirmed + confirmed) actually went down! I thought this was not possible. Slush, did you recalculate round rewards or something?

CyberPhunk
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 124
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 19, 2011, 04:28:40 PM
 #3455

there was an invalid block, so that might have caused it.

List of client download mirrors / Older Catalyst drivers/SDK
13dRbbqBpfZEmZiXXdLM4NKNoJYsgHbuFJ  <- might as well, in case someone feels generous. Wink
slush (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097



View Profile WWW
August 19, 2011, 11:39:23 PM
 #3456

Undecided Today my total reward (unconfirmed + confirmed) actually went down! I thought this was not possible. Slush, did you recalculate round rewards or something?

As CyberPhunk said, "unconfirmed" reward dropped a bit because of invalid block.

m3ta
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 435
Merit: 250



View Profile WWW
August 20, 2011, 01:45:55 AM
 #3457

There's definitely something wrong, and not only the rejections.
Block 141689 just took more than 3 hours, I was looking at it, and made sure everything was fine until it finished.
My "estimated" varied between 0.010 and 0.016 while it was ongoing, but when i checked stats a while after it finished, my reward is 0.

Really?....


Why the frell so many retards spell "ect" as an abbreviation of "Et Cetera"? "ETC", DAMMIT! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Et_cetera

Host:/# rm -rf /var/forum/trolls
kohlersc
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 11
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 21, 2011, 11:36:36 PM
 #3458

Was it 0 immediately after?  There is about a 20 minute lag time from the end of one block finishing before the processing and the amount shown is correct.  If you are refreshing a lot you will see processing, followed by none, then your award going up and up till about 20-25 minutes total after that block has been found.
CyberPhunk
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 124
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 22, 2011, 12:44:29 AM
 #3459

hmm, can't access the site atm, issues?

List of client download mirrors / Older Catalyst drivers/SDK
13dRbbqBpfZEmZiXXdLM4NKNoJYsgHbuFJ  <- might as well, in case someone feels generous. Wink
fassadlr
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 89
Merit: 10


View Profile
August 22, 2011, 06:50:23 AM
 #3460

I've been getting a lot miner idle messages since last Friday, anyone else experiencing the same issues?
Pages: « 1 ... 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 [173] 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 ... 1154 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!