Bitcoin Forum
September 20, 2018, 05:42:51 PM *
News: ♦♦ Bitcoin Core users must update to 0.16.3 [Torrent]. More info.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 [173] 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 ... 1145 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [4+ EH] Slush Pool (slushpool.com); Overt AsicBoost; World First Mining Pool  (Read 4341881 times)
allinvain
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2618
Merit: 1052



View Profile
August 14, 2011, 10:27:34 PM
 #3441

Umm, this seems odd to me. The round lasted nearly 2 hours and all I got was 0.01??? In previous rounds of the nearly the same length the reward was 2 to 3 times that much.

1:59:54   3094337   0.01812518


Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1537465371
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1537465371

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1537465371
Reply with quote  #2

1537465371
Report to moderator
1537465371
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1537465371

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1537465371
Reply with quote  #2

1537465371
Report to moderator
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 1019



View Profile WWW
August 15, 2011, 08:46:57 AM
 #3442

Umm, this seems odd to me. The round lasted nearly 2 hours and all I got was 0.01??? In previous rounds of the nearly the same length the reward was 2 to 3 times that much.

Well, round reward isn't related to round length. How much you have _usually_ for one round in last day or two? And was you connected in the end of the round? Significantly lower round reward may happen when you disconnect few minutes before round finish,

allinvain
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2618
Merit: 1052



View Profile
August 15, 2011, 12:18:57 PM
 #3443

Umm, this seems odd to me. The round lasted nearly 2 hours and all I got was 0.01??? In previous rounds of the nearly the same length the reward was 2 to 3 times that much.

Well, round reward isn't related to round length. How much you have _usually_ for one round in last day or two? And was you connected in the end of the round? Significantly lower round reward may happen when you disconnect few minutes before round finish,

Hmm I see your point. I cannot be sure I was connected before the end of the round. My net connection may have dropped before the end.

I usually get 0.06 to 0.08 per round. For that 0.01 round I submitted 3094337 shares. I dunno I just figured even if my net connection dropped before the round end shouldn't the total round reward be a tad bit higher?

kohlersc
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 11
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 15, 2011, 07:04:41 PM
 #3444

Everyonce and a while I get a bad round.  Figure that is just like getting a long block.  Random chance.  Low chance for it to happen, but it has.  If your average payout per round starts going down considerably while your contribution stays roughly the same, then it might be worth looking into.
Spadowsky
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 15
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 16, 2011, 12:13:13 AM
 #3445

Hi,
I recently got an new ISP(cable) wich doesnt seem to like mining. the connection only lasts minutes when connection to server is lost or i get "Warning: work queue empty, miner is idle." I've checked connection to ISP with http://www.tarosoft.com/IsItUp.htm and it never goes down so that doesnt seem to be the problem. I returnd using my old ISP(adsl, lasts until end of month) wich works like a charm so gpu and all should be fine. Anyone got an idea what i might be?

For the new ISP, are you using a router? If so you might have to port forward. Have you tired pinging slush's with new ISP?

Old an new ISP are both on routers pinging slush works. Port is not forwarded ,trying now.

Port forwarding doesn't get the thing done. End of the line is that mining on Slush's pool get my rig thrown of the home network. Other devices and connection to ISP stays up. Tried an athor pool and got no problem at all. Must be something with the new modem/router or ISP blocking things?
zx9r
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 152
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 16, 2011, 09:46:27 AM
 #3446

It is obvious that the pool have some issues with the rejected/invalid shares. Too much people concerning with the same problem this days.

I have moved 50% of my 2 Ghash to another pool, will move also the other 50% or come back again depending if the problem gets solved.

gr0bi42
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 158
Merit: 100


View Profile WWW
August 16, 2011, 03:24:39 PM
 #3447

It is obvious that the pool have some issues with the rejected/invalid shares. Too much people concerning with the same problem this days.

I have moved 50% of my 2 Ghash to another pool, will move also the other 50% or come back again depending if the problem gets solved.


@slush

Still have this high reject ratio using phoenix/cgminer with your pool. Come on... your are unable to tell the reason? Why do I have to stick with the *slower* poclbm then I'm mining with your pool? With poclbm I'm loosing about 250MH/s. I cannot believe that I'm the only one.

Once again: with the lastes cgminer or phoenix I have tons of rejects. With poclbm not. I get the rejects only with your pool. Deepbit, Arsbit, Eligius, Guild, mtred... all are working. It's NOT a network issue. I guess your pool is in some way not compatible with some optimization of the more recent miner-software.

What is the cause of the reject???

Donations are welcome: 1Btf3BqUegfe5iFdWsgfBf1Ew3YsAvsrLT
Gabi
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1008


If you want to walk on water, get out of the boat


View Profile
August 16, 2011, 06:02:18 PM
 #3448

Time to tell my experience with slush and stale

Now guiminer is saying 1902 shares accepted and 7 invalid. That make like 0.03% of stale with slush. An AWESOME thing

gr0bi42
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 158
Merit: 100


View Profile WWW
August 16, 2011, 06:46:01 PM
 #3449

Time to tell my experience with slush and stale

Now guiminer is saying 1902 shares accepted and 7 invalid. That make like 0.03% of stale with slush. An AWESOME thing

You forgot to mention one important thing... the guiminer backend! If I'm mining at slush with poclbm I have the same very low reject ratio. I have only problems with "newer" mining software like phoenix (svn 118) or cgminer 1.5.4. Both are a lot faster than poclbm... for instance: 5870: poclbm 432 MH/s, phoenix 451 MH/s, cgminer ~445MH/s.

Donations are welcome: 1Btf3BqUegfe5iFdWsgfBf1Ew3YsAvsrLT
jkminkov
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 698
Merit: 500


View Profile
August 17, 2011, 06:28:43 AM
 #3450

Umm, this seems odd to me. The round lasted nearly 2 hours and all I got was 0.01??? In previous rounds of the nearly the same length the reward was 2 to 3 times that much.

1:59:54   3094337   0.01812518

you would not ask that question if pool had normal stats, like submited shares column after duration on block history

Bleutrade
10,000 dollars in one place talking - Dudes, hooray, Bitcoin against us just one, but we are growing in numbers!
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 1019



View Profile WWW
August 17, 2011, 07:32:20 AM
 #3451

What is the cause of the reject???

gr0bi42, I don't know why you have such high stale ratio. There isn't anything what I'm hiding... What phoenix version _exactly_ do you use? I'll try this version on my machines, maybe there is some change in phoenix...

gr0bi42
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 158
Merit: 100


View Profile WWW
August 17, 2011, 10:04:10 AM
 #3452

What is the cause of the reject???

gr0bi42, I don't know why you have such high stale ratio. There isn't anything what I'm hiding... What phoenix version _exactly_ do you use? I'll try this version on my machines, maybe there is some change in phoenix...

I'm using the latest version from SVN-repository. It's revision 118. With cgminer 1.5.3 or 1.5.4 I have the same problems. Sometimes it works for some time, but at some moment things get worse...

With poclbm I have an estimated reward of ~0.12. The I use cgminer or phoenix the reward is about 0.08,  if the reject ratio is *normal* bad. But sometimes the reject ratio goes up to 80-90% rejects on some of my miners, while others still perform well. It's strange.

Donations are welcome: 1Btf3BqUegfe5iFdWsgfBf1Ew3YsAvsrLT
zx9r
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 152
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 17, 2011, 10:18:34 AM
 #3453

I think you should try stable version that is 116 at the moment and see what happens. Try with phatk2 also.
zx9r
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 152
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 17, 2011, 10:24:24 AM
 #3454

I would like to show info for one of my rigs for the last 24 hours:

   Temp    Fan% (rpm)    Load  Rate     Accept/Invalid   Status
0: 74c     82% (3858+)   98%   392 Mhs  7550/110 (1.44%) api2.bitcoin.cz
1: 73.5c   70% (3458+)   99%   394 Mhs  5038/18 (0.36%)  bitcoins.lc
2: 72.5c+  70% (3491+)   99%   393 Mhs  5059/19 (0.37%)  bitcoins.lc


The reject/invalid shares are as usual... 1.44% for slush, 0.37% for bitcoins.lc... ok, nothing new

BUT the total number of submitted shares are about 50% higher in favor of slush. I dont think it had been some network issue or bitcoins.lc downtime but I can be 100% sure of that. Am I the only one ?

pekv2
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 502



View Profile
August 17, 2011, 02:53:14 PM
 #3455

Time to tell my experience with slush and stale

Now guiminer is saying 1902 shares accepted and 7 invalid. That make like 0.03% of stale with slush. An AWESOME thing

Yea! Ain't it. I'm lovin it. 2968 accepted 13 stale.
allinvain
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2618
Merit: 1052



View Profile
August 18, 2011, 07:48:19 AM
 #3456

So I take it guiminer with poclbm is still the best to use for this pool?

Callius
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 25
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 18, 2011, 10:24:23 AM
 #3457

never mind I fixed my problem.
CyberPhunk
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 124
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 18, 2011, 11:59:45 PM
 #3458

What's the status on 8 decimal payouts?

Just wondering

List of client download mirrors / Older Catalyst drivers/SDK
13dRbbqBpfZEmZiXXdLM4NKNoJYsgHbuFJ  <- might as well, in case someone feels generous. Wink
lxFlasHxl
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 19, 2011, 12:17:16 AM
 #3459

not a bad mining pool.
allinvain
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2618
Merit: 1052



View Profile
August 19, 2011, 01:35:41 PM
 #3460

 Undecided Today my total reward (unconfirmed + confirmed) actually went down! I thought this was not possible. Slush, did you recalculate round rewards or something?

Pages: « 1 ... 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 [173] 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 ... 1145 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!