Bitcoin Forum
July 13, 2020, 10:29:48 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.20.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 ... 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 [178] 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 ... 1151 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [4+ EH] Slush Pool (slushpool.com); Overt AsicBoost; World First Mining Pool  (Read 4373008 times)
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1024



View Profile WWW
September 20, 2011, 01:44:48 PM
 #3541

Always getting ~85% Rejected

Hello, there's no reason to have 85% rejected, of course it isn't normal and there must be something specific in your config. Please send me your miner settings to email together with your pool login.

For example yesterday one guy contacted me because he had very high rejected ratio. Then we found that he was using wrong domain on his side for some miners (api1.bitcoin.cz instead api.bitcoin.cz or api2. bitcoin.cz). So there might be some stupid mistake, too.

1594679388
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1594679388

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1594679388
Reply with quote  #2

1594679388
Report to moderator
1594679388
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1594679388

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1594679388
Reply with quote  #2

1594679388
Report to moderator
1594679388
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1594679388

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1594679388
Reply with quote  #2

1594679388
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
2weiX
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1974
Merit: 1000

bitcoincommodities.com


View Profile
September 20, 2011, 02:43:21 PM
 #3542

Always getting ~85% Rejected

Hello, there's no reason to have 85% rejected, of course it isn't normal and there must be something specific in your config. Please send me your miner settings to email together with your pool login.

For example yesterday one guy contacted me because he had very high rejected ratio. Then we found that he was using wrong domain on his side for some miners (api1.bitcoin.cz instead api.bitcoin.cz or api2. bitcoin.cz). So there might be some stupid mistake, too.


shalom!

will you please implement MergedMining soon?
flower1024
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1428
Merit: 1000


View Profile
September 20, 2011, 02:46:49 PM
 #3543


shalom!

will you please implement MergedMining soon?

+1
please implement lp and nrolltime also. (merged mining could be discussed here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=44546.msg531934#msg531934)
pekv2
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 502



View Profile
September 22, 2011, 12:11:34 AM
 #3544

We're on a biggie.

atm Current round duration:   7:35:22  Shocked
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1024



View Profile WWW
September 22, 2011, 01:12:02 AM
 #3545

We're on a biggie.

atm Current round duration:   7:35:22  Shocked

Yes, I checked pool status, but everything looks good and it's just unlucky round. Still not the worst round of pool history, but we aren't on the end yet Wink.

AniceInovation
Donator
Sr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 394
Merit: 253


Interesting.


View Profile
September 22, 2011, 02:37:42 AM
 #3546

10 hours, 1 minute and 17 seconds.
That was A block!

dishwara
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1855
Merit: 1016



View Profile
September 22, 2011, 03:47:43 AM
 #3547

10 hours, 1 minute and 17 seconds.
That was A block!

Reason is very simple.
So far LP not implemented & many left the pool.
The total hashing power of pool reduced to ~1500 GH/s. While deepbit still has 5000+ GH/s

ACCOUNT WAS HACKED FROM 2016-2019. NOW RECLAIMED BY ORIGINAL USER D.ISHWARA
SORRY IF ANYONE GOT CHEATED BY THE IMPOSTOR
ALL POSTS AFTER MARCH 2016 BECOMES OBSOLETE & WILL BE DELETED AFTER I READ IT.
pekv2
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 502



View Profile
September 22, 2011, 04:22:00 AM
 #3548

Despite this last 10 our block, on a normal bases of a good round block of 2 min to 1 hour, I make a shit load more at slush's versus deepbit.

For Slush's, I made 0:34:49    696301    0.02788551

If that was deepbit, same duration time, I would have pulled in something like 0.00325225

Don't know why it is like that, but I won't leave slush's.

AniceInovation
Donator
Sr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 394
Merit: 253


Interesting.


View Profile
September 23, 2011, 12:14:07 AM
 #3549

Me myself am waiting for the RollNtime  update, i have an unstable internet, and if my miners get some troubles to connect to the pool, they won't get idle and keep mining.

slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1024



View Profile WWW
September 24, 2011, 09:24:52 PM
 #3550

Hello,

today I upgraded pool backends, maybe you noticed few extra "rejected" shares because of restarts. Now everything runs smoothly again.

Thanks to this update, you can now connect as many miners to one "worker account" as you wish; I finally reworked pool core so this stupid rule isn't needed anymore.

RobertRibbeck
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 221
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 25, 2011, 08:30:46 AM
 #3551

Hello,

today I upgraded pool backends, maybe you noticed few extra "rejected" shares because of restarts. Now everything runs smoothly again.

Thanks to this update, you can now connect as many miners to one "worker account" as you wish; I finally reworked pool core so this stupid rule isn't needed anymore.

A FEW -- try a lot -- and still commimg

Please "Clear your browser cookies" then use http://bitcoinpyramid.com/r/3360 to Join BitCoin Pyramid
  use my referral & I'll refund a % of your first deposit back to your account
  Deposit .5 BTC or more and I'll give back 50% of what I receive

First Deposit of 1 BTC will get 75% of what I get back
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1024



View Profile WWW
September 25, 2011, 11:17:55 AM
 #3552

A FEW -- try a lot -- and still commimg

I don't understand. Do you see some problems on your side? Higher stale ratio? What miner, what username/worker login, please?

RobertRibbeck
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 221
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 25, 2011, 03:58:55 PM
 #3553

A FEW -- try a lot -- and still commimg

I don't understand. Do you see some problems on your side? Higher stale ratio? What miner, what username/worker login, please?

I didn't before your change

phoenix.exe -u http://RobertRibbeck.  gt220 and gt430 :xxx@api.bitcoin.cz:8332/;askrate=15 -v -q 1 -a 25 -k poclbm platform=0 DEVICE=0 AGGRESSION=5  FASTLOOP BFI_INT

Please "Clear your browser cookies" then use http://bitcoinpyramid.com/r/3360 to Join BitCoin Pyramid
  use my referral & I'll refund a % of your first deposit back to your account
  Deposit .5 BTC or more and I'll give back 50% of what I receive

First Deposit of 1 BTC will get 75% of what I get back
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1024



View Profile WWW
September 26, 2011, 02:50:26 PM
 #3554

RobertRibbeck: How many stales did you receive?

I also reported to phoenix developers that phoenix is very unstable on some conditions. It has probably too short network timeout, so phoenix prints 'rejected' although pool accept that share without any problem. It is case of one my miner, where phoenix reports almost 10% stale, but I in fact all of them are accepted. Network latency was 60ms + pool response time under 10ms in case of debugging... I still don't have any response from developers about this issue, but I'm almost sure that phoenix is just too much sensitive to network quality.

slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1024



View Profile WWW
September 26, 2011, 03:02:41 PM
 #3555

Beta testers wanted!

I'm proud to announce public beta of long polling and ntime rolling on my pool. This update should lower stale ratio and reduce network overhead for your miners.

Because all of that code is pretty fresh and isn't tested under heavy load, I don't want to turn it on for everybody right now. It is also impossible to carefully test all miner versions and other special tools which some of you are using. Now you have a chance to test your miners and report any problems to me (please contact me directly to info@bitcoin.cz instead of writing to forum to keep this thread sane).

Beta version is running on one backend only, so it can become quite unresponsive in case of big interest. I recommend you to connect only one GPU core to test. Also keep on mind that it's beta and backend might be restarted few times to fix some minor issues.

If you're interested to help me with testing, connect your miner to api.bitcoin.cz, port 8331 (not api2.bitcoin.cz!). Of course all submited shares are calculated to your reward, beta environment is *not* a standalone pool.

slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1024



View Profile WWW
September 26, 2011, 03:08:27 PM
 #3556

Notice to miners: I tested beta version heavily with poclbm, diablo, phoenix and cgminer. There is only one known issue with phoenix (latest SVN version) as is described also in previous post:

Phoenix is very sensitive to some conditions and may print many 'rejected' although those shares are perfectly valid and accepted by pool. I have such problem on one my machine and also one other user confirmed this. On the other hand, I know about many phoenix instances which run without any problem.

I'm trying to discuss that issue with developers, but currently I'm waiting to their response. If you see higher stale ratio on your phoenix, please check number of accepted shares on your profile page before you'll report that problem.

RobertRibbeck
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 221
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 26, 2011, 04:17:53 PM
 #3557

RobertRibbeck: How many stales did you receive?

I also reported to phoenix developers that phoenix is very unstable on some conditions. It has probably too short network timeout, so phoenix prints 'rejected' although pool accept that share without any problem. It is case of one my miner, where phoenix reports almost 10% stale, but I in fact all of them are accepted. Network latency was 60ms + pool response time under 10ms in case of debugging... I still don't have any response from developers about this issue, but I'm almost sure that phoenix is just too much sensitive to network quality.

Where I saw 5% in the past now it's near %40
and they are not accepted on your listing

Please "Clear your browser cookies" then use http://bitcoinpyramid.com/r/3360 to Join BitCoin Pyramid
  use my referral & I'll refund a % of your first deposit back to your account
  Deposit .5 BTC or more and I'll give back 50% of what I receive

First Deposit of 1 BTC will get 75% of what I get back
cosurgi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 298
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 26, 2011, 05:19:34 PM
 #3558

Where I saw 5% in the past now it's near %40
and they are not accepted on your listing
On beta test (LP+ntime) I have 0.1% rejects so far (only 7000 shares submitted so far), and I use latest phoenix version r116. On regular pool without LP (not-beta) I have about 1.2% rejects.

Did you try beta pool?

pekv2
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 502



View Profile
September 26, 2011, 08:55:15 PM
 #3559

Thanks Slush, I've joined the beta testing just now. Using GUIminer v2011-08-24, openCL.

As I am using the newest guiminer, I don't think it reports any rejects/stales even if there are any. So I would not know on how to report if any happen or not.
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1024



View Profile WWW
September 26, 2011, 09:08:00 PM
 #3560

As I am using the newest guiminer, I don't think it reports any rejects/stales even if there are any.

Menu -> View -> Summary :-)

Pages: « 1 ... 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 [178] 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 ... 1151 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!