Bitcoin Forum
December 09, 2024, 05:01:39 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 [178] 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 ... 1154 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [4+ EH] Slush Pool (slushpool.com); Overt AsicBoost; World First Mining Pool  (Read 4382712 times)
pekv2
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 502



View Profile
September 22, 2011, 12:11:34 AM
 #3541

We're on a biggie.

atm Current round duration:   7:35:22  Shocked
slush (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097



View Profile WWW
September 22, 2011, 01:12:02 AM
 #3542

We're on a biggie.

atm Current round duration:   7:35:22  Shocked

Yes, I checked pool status, but everything looks good and it's just unlucky round. Still not the worst round of pool history, but we aren't on the end yet Wink.

AniceInovation
Donator
Sr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 446
Merit: 262


Interesting.


View Profile
September 22, 2011, 02:37:42 AM
 #3543

10 hours, 1 minute and 17 seconds.
That was A block!
dishwara
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1855
Merit: 1016



View Profile
September 22, 2011, 03:47:43 AM
 #3544

10 hours, 1 minute and 17 seconds.
That was A block!

Reason is very simple.
So far LP not implemented & many left the pool.
The total hashing power of pool reduced to ~1500 GH/s. While deepbit still has 5000+ GH/s
pekv2
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 502



View Profile
September 22, 2011, 04:22:00 AM
 #3545

Despite this last 10 our block, on a normal bases of a good round block of 2 min to 1 hour, I make a shit load more at slush's versus deepbit.

For Slush's, I made 0:34:49    696301    0.02788551

If that was deepbit, same duration time, I would have pulled in something like 0.00325225

Don't know why it is like that, but I won't leave slush's.

AniceInovation
Donator
Sr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 446
Merit: 262


Interesting.


View Profile
September 23, 2011, 12:14:07 AM
 #3546

Me myself am waiting for the RollNtime  update, i have an unstable internet, and if my miners get some troubles to connect to the pool, they won't get idle and keep mining.
slush (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097



View Profile WWW
September 24, 2011, 09:24:52 PM
 #3547

Hello,

today I upgraded pool backends, maybe you noticed few extra "rejected" shares because of restarts. Now everything runs smoothly again.

Thanks to this update, you can now connect as many miners to one "worker account" as you wish; I finally reworked pool core so this stupid rule isn't needed anymore.

RobertRibbeck
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 221
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 25, 2011, 08:30:46 AM
 #3548

Hello,

today I upgraded pool backends, maybe you noticed few extra "rejected" shares because of restarts. Now everything runs smoothly again.

Thanks to this update, you can now connect as many miners to one "worker account" as you wish; I finally reworked pool core so this stupid rule isn't needed anymore.

A FEW -- try a lot -- and still commimg

Please "Clear your browser cookies" then use http://bitcoinpyramid.com/r/3360 to Join BitCoin Pyramid
  use my referral & I'll refund a % of your first deposit back to your account
  Deposit .5 BTC or more and I'll give back 50% of what I receive

First Deposit of 1 BTC will get 75% of what I get back
slush (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097



View Profile WWW
September 25, 2011, 11:17:55 AM
 #3549

A FEW -- try a lot -- and still commimg

I don't understand. Do you see some problems on your side? Higher stale ratio? What miner, what username/worker login, please?

RobertRibbeck
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 221
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 25, 2011, 03:58:55 PM
 #3550

A FEW -- try a lot -- and still commimg

I don't understand. Do you see some problems on your side? Higher stale ratio? What miner, what username/worker login, please?

I didn't before your change

phoenix.exe -u http://RobertRibbeck.  gt220 and gt430 :xxx@api.bitcoin.cz:8332/;askrate=15 -v -q 1 -a 25 -k poclbm platform=0 DEVICE=0 AGGRESSION=5  FASTLOOP BFI_INT

Please "Clear your browser cookies" then use http://bitcoinpyramid.com/r/3360 to Join BitCoin Pyramid
  use my referral & I'll refund a % of your first deposit back to your account
  Deposit .5 BTC or more and I'll give back 50% of what I receive

First Deposit of 1 BTC will get 75% of what I get back
slush (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097



View Profile WWW
September 26, 2011, 02:50:26 PM
 #3551

RobertRibbeck: How many stales did you receive?

I also reported to phoenix developers that phoenix is very unstable on some conditions. It has probably too short network timeout, so phoenix prints 'rejected' although pool accept that share without any problem. It is case of one my miner, where phoenix reports almost 10% stale, but I in fact all of them are accepted. Network latency was 60ms + pool response time under 10ms in case of debugging... I still don't have any response from developers about this issue, but I'm almost sure that phoenix is just too much sensitive to network quality.

slush (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097



View Profile WWW
September 26, 2011, 03:02:41 PM
 #3552

Beta testers wanted!

I'm proud to announce public beta of long polling and ntime rolling on my pool. This update should lower stale ratio and reduce network overhead for your miners.

Because all of that code is pretty fresh and isn't tested under heavy load, I don't want to turn it on for everybody right now. It is also impossible to carefully test all miner versions and other special tools which some of you are using. Now you have a chance to test your miners and report any problems to me (please contact me directly to info@bitcoin.cz instead of writing to forum to keep this thread sane).

Beta version is running on one backend only, so it can become quite unresponsive in case of big interest. I recommend you to connect only one GPU core to test. Also keep on mind that it's beta and backend might be restarted few times to fix some minor issues.

If you're interested to help me with testing, connect your miner to api.bitcoin.cz, port 8331 (not api2.bitcoin.cz!). Of course all submited shares are calculated to your reward, beta environment is *not* a standalone pool.

slush (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097



View Profile WWW
September 26, 2011, 03:08:27 PM
 #3553

Notice to miners: I tested beta version heavily with poclbm, diablo, phoenix and cgminer. There is only one known issue with phoenix (latest SVN version) as is described also in previous post:

Phoenix is very sensitive to some conditions and may print many 'rejected' although those shares are perfectly valid and accepted by pool. I have such problem on one my machine and also one other user confirmed this. On the other hand, I know about many phoenix instances which run without any problem.

I'm trying to discuss that issue with developers, but currently I'm waiting to their response. If you see higher stale ratio on your phoenix, please check number of accepted shares on your profile page before you'll report that problem.

RobertRibbeck
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 221
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 26, 2011, 04:17:53 PM
 #3554

RobertRibbeck: How many stales did you receive?

I also reported to phoenix developers that phoenix is very unstable on some conditions. It has probably too short network timeout, so phoenix prints 'rejected' although pool accept that share without any problem. It is case of one my miner, where phoenix reports almost 10% stale, but I in fact all of them are accepted. Network latency was 60ms + pool response time under 10ms in case of debugging... I still don't have any response from developers about this issue, but I'm almost sure that phoenix is just too much sensitive to network quality.

Where I saw 5% in the past now it's near %40
and they are not accepted on your listing

Please "Clear your browser cookies" then use http://bitcoinpyramid.com/r/3360 to Join BitCoin Pyramid
  use my referral & I'll refund a % of your first deposit back to your account
  Deposit .5 BTC or more and I'll give back 50% of what I receive

First Deposit of 1 BTC will get 75% of what I get back
cosurgi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 298
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 26, 2011, 05:19:34 PM
 #3555

Where I saw 5% in the past now it's near %40
and they are not accepted on your listing
On beta test (LP+ntime) I have 0.1% rejects so far (only 7000 shares submitted so far), and I use latest phoenix version r116. On regular pool without LP (not-beta) I have about 1.2% rejects.

Did you try beta pool?

pekv2
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 502



View Profile
September 26, 2011, 08:55:15 PM
 #3556

Thanks Slush, I've joined the beta testing just now. Using GUIminer v2011-08-24, openCL.

As I am using the newest guiminer, I don't think it reports any rejects/stales even if there are any. So I would not know on how to report if any happen or not.
slush (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097



View Profile WWW
September 26, 2011, 09:08:00 PM
 #3557

As I am using the newest guiminer, I don't think it reports any rejects/stales even if there are any.

Menu -> View -> Summary :-)

pekv2
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 502



View Profile
September 26, 2011, 09:29:56 PM
 #3558

As I am using the newest guiminer, I don't think it reports any rejects/stales even if there are any.

Menu -> View -> Summary :-)

Yea, they are at 0 but I could have sworn I've seen that the new guiminer does not display correctly for stales "somewhere in GUIminer thread, when it was released" , if I am wrong please correct me. If it does display correctly I have received 0 stales since the newest guiminer was released.
slush (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097



View Profile WWW
September 26, 2011, 09:36:26 PM
 #3559

Yea, they are at 0 but I could have sworn I've seen that the new guiminer does not display correctly for stales "somewhere in GUIminer thread, when it was released" , if I am wrong please correct me.

I'm not regular guiminer user, maybe you're right. But there should be also console view showing raw miner output, including stales. But that's thin ice for me, I didn't tried it...

cosurgi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 298
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 27, 2011, 06:08:19 AM
 #3560

after whole night of mining on beta pool I have:
- 0.04% rejects with phoenix r116 (13 rejects on 34028 shares)
- 0.2% rejects with cgminer 2.0.4 (22 rejects on 10693 shares)

Pages: « 1 ... 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 [178] 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 ... 1154 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!