Bitcoin Forum
December 01, 2022, 04:49:10 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 23.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 [171] 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 ... 1155 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [4+ EH] Slush Pool (slushpool.com); Overt AsicBoost; World First Mining Pool  (Read 4380593 times)
Spadowsky
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 15
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 06, 2011, 08:44:18 PM
Last edit: August 06, 2011, 09:07:48 PM by Spadowsky
 #3401

I'm trying to set askrate since there's no longpolling but it fails. This is what i do:

python phoenix.py -u http://xxxx.xxxx:xxxx@api2.bitcoin.cz:8332/;askrate=10 -k phatk DEVICE=1 VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false

Then i get this:

phoenix$ python phoenix.py -u http://XXXX.XXXX:XXXX@api2.bitcoin.cz:8332/;askrate=10 -k phatk DEVICE=1 VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false
No device specified or device not found, use DEVICE=ID to specify one of the following

    
  • AMD Athlon(tm) II X2 250 Processor
  • [1] Cypress                        
        [2] Cypress                        
[0 Khash/sec] [0 Accepted] [0 Rejected]-k: command not found

Anyone knows what i got wrong here?
1669913350
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1669913350

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1669913350
Reply with quote  #2

1669913350
Report to moderator
1669913350
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1669913350

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1669913350
Reply with quote  #2

1669913350
Report to moderator
1669913350
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1669913350

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1669913350
Reply with quote  #2

1669913350
Report to moderator
According to NIST and ECRYPT II, the cryptographic algorithms used in Bitcoin are expected to be strong until at least 2030. (After that, it will not be too difficult to transition to different algorithms.)
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
zard_cz
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 16
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 06, 2011, 10:43:01 PM
 #3402

replace the ; in the command with \;
all semicolons need to be escaped, otherwise bash treats them as separate commands
Spadowsky
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 15
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 06, 2011, 11:23:49 PM
Last edit: August 07, 2011, 12:05:15 AM by Spadowsky
 #3403

replace the ; in the command with \;
all semicolons need to be escaped, otherwise bash treats them as separate commands


Like this? api2.bitcoin.cz:8332/\;askrate=10 -k  let me try

That does it thanks a lot
bitpop
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2730
Merit: 1059



View Profile WWW
August 07, 2011, 10:59:58 AM
 #3404

I cant connect!
api is only taking 2 connections and api2 is taking 10.
I need 2 more!

zx9r
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 153
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 07, 2011, 11:34:16 AM
 #3405

I cant connect!
api is only taking 2 connections and api2 is taking 10.
I need 2 more!


I have 3 workers, each one running in a 5850 with phoenix/phatk and all pointing to api2.

I have just seen that two of them have the same amount of submitted shares after 48 hours (last reboot), but one of them have 3 times less than the other two in the same time. May be a problem connecting to the pool ?

BTW, what is an approximate "right" value for stale/invalid shares ? I'm having about 1.5%



bitpop
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2730
Merit: 1059



View Profile WWW
August 08, 2011, 07:21:29 AM
 #3406

bump

slush (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1070



View Profile WWW
August 08, 2011, 08:42:46 AM
 #3407

api2.bitcoin.cz isn't letting all of my miners connect. it took me hours to figure out to try api.bitcoin.cz
you should really say why api2 exists, newer server vs second server for more connections

Actually there's no difference between api.bitcoin.cz and api2.bitcoin.cz. Your miners should work with both URLs. Can you try some network tools to analyze connection between you and servers? Ping, traceroute, telnet (mainly if server let you open the connection to put any request).

slush (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1070



View Profile WWW
August 08, 2011, 08:46:24 AM
 #3408

I have 3 workers, each one running in a 5850 with phoenix/phatk and all pointing to api2.

I have just seen that two of them have the same amount of submitted shares after 48 hours (last reboot), but one of them have 3 times less than the other two in the same time. May be a problem connecting to the pool ?

BTW, what is an approximate "right" value for stale/invalid shares ? I'm having about 1.5%

Do you see any error messages in the 'bad' miner? Idling messages or higher stale ratio? If it is just lower miner performance, it might be some hardware issue. But hard to say without more info...

1.5% is in expected range.

zx9r
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 153
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 08, 2011, 10:42:40 AM
 #3409

I have 3 workers, each one running in a 5850 with phoenix/phatk and all pointing to api2.

I have just seen that two of them have the same amount of submitted shares after 48 hours (last reboot), but one of them have 3 times less than the other two in the same time. May be a problem connecting to the pool ?

BTW, what is an approximate "right" value for stale/invalid shares ? I'm having about 1.5%

Do you see any error messages in the 'bad' miner? Idling messages or higher stale ratio? If it is just lower miner performance, it might be some hardware issue. But hard to say without more info...

1.5% is in expected range.


Seems to be more stable for the las 24 hours. No idea what happened before:

  Temp    Fan% (rpm)    Load  Rate     Accept/Invalid   Status
0: 70.5c   80% (3744-)   97%   383 Mhs  7312/109 (1.47%) api2.bitcoin.cz
1: 67.5c   70% (3400+)   99%   389 Mhs  7529/132 (1.72%) api2.bitcoin.cz
2: 68.5c   70% (3466+)   99%   389 Mhs  7500/104 (1.37%) api2.bitcoin.cz

Total: 1162.54 Mhash/s  22341 accepted, 345 invalid (1.52%)


EskimoBob
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1000


Quality Printing Services by Federal Reserve Bank


View Profile
August 09, 2011, 10:22:47 AM
 #3410

I can not figure out why I can't  access http://mining.bitcoin.cz/ web page from my laptop but it works OK from my PC (same network)
I can access http://www.bitcoin.cz/ from both computers (and all the other web pages out there too).

Any ideas?

While reading what I wrote, use the most friendliest and relaxing voice in your head.
BTW, Things in BTC bubble universes are getting ugly....
bitpop
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2730
Merit: 1059



View Profile WWW
August 09, 2011, 11:12:18 AM
 #3411

I have 3 workers, each one running in a 5850 with phoenix/phatk and all pointing to api2.

I have just seen that two of them have the same amount of submitted shares after 48 hours (last reboot), but one of them have 3 times less than the other two in the same time. May be a problem connecting to the pool ?

BTW, what is an approximate "right" value for stale/invalid shares ? I'm having about 1.5%

Do you see any error messages in the 'bad' miner? Idling messages or higher stale ratio? If it is just lower miner performance, it might be some hardware issue. But hard to say without more info...

1.5% is in expected range.

Bad miners simply do not connect at all. Ever. Miner before that would get ZERO connection until i switched from api2 to api.. Pinging them works great though.

progre55
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 25
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 10, 2011, 09:43:38 AM
 #3412

Why is the reject rate THAT hight? so far, I have 49 accepted and 39 rejected!
slush (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1070



View Profile WWW
August 10, 2011, 10:06:38 AM
 #3413

Bad miners simply do not connect at all. Ever. Miner before that would get ZERO connection until i switched from api2 to api.. Pinging them works great though.

What miner are you using? There were such troubles with phoenix older than 1.50...

slush (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1070



View Profile WWW
August 10, 2011, 10:08:39 AM
 #3414

Why is the reject rate THAT hight? so far, I have 49 accepted and 39 rejected!

I don't have enough info, but - of course - it does not sounds healthy Smiley. What miner parameters are you using? Something might be wrong here...

progre55
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 25
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 10, 2011, 10:50:46 AM
 #3415

Why is the reject rate THAT hight? so far, I have 49 accepted and 39 rejected!

I don't have enough info, but - of course - it does not sounds healthy Smiley. What miner parameters are you using? Something might be wrong here...

Using diablo linux, with -f 10 -v 2 -w 128
got two 6950 cards, with a combined hashrate of 666 Mh/s
had to switch to a different pool after mining for several minutes on your pool with a ratio of 82 accepts / 74 rejects
slush (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1070



View Profile WWW
August 10, 2011, 03:54:09 PM
 #3416

Using diablo linux, with -f 10 -v 2 -w 128
got two 6950 cards, with a combined hashrate of 666 Mh/s
had to switch to a different pool after mining for several minutes on your pool with a ratio of 82 accepts / 74 rejects

Oh well... Diablo isn't working properly for some technical reasons; Diablo changed some stuff in his miner few weeks ago and refused to "fix" it to be backward compatible. Please use another miner (I recommend phoenix or poclbm).

Litt
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 10, 2011, 10:22:56 PM
 #3417

Using diablo linux, with -f 10 -v 2 -w 128
got two 6950 cards, with a combined hashrate of 666 Mh/s
had to switch to a different pool after mining for several minutes on your pool with a ratio of 82 accepts / 74 rejects

Oh well... Diablo isn't working properly for some technical reasons; Diablo changed some stuff in his miner few weeks ago and refused to "fix" it to be backward compatible. Please use another miner (I recommend phoenix or poclbm).

I'm using poclbm and I'm getting ridiculously high reject ratio as well. Is there a limit to how much work can be turned in per worker?

I'm showing at least 60% or so of my work that is being turned in rejected by the server. It wasn't this bad when I mined at slush while back, but I then I had it with separated to each gpu per worker for monitoring at the time. Now that I'm back and trying to setup slush again, it's giving me massive rejections because I am trying to turn in work to a single worker instead.
noob_jul11
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 119
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 11, 2011, 02:45:05 AM
 #3418

I'm new to SLUSH. How do I withdraw immediate? Before I continue to mine at SLUSH, I need to know if
1) If I can withdraw immediate
2) if I can withdraw all 8 decimal places of btc.

I have set it at 1.0 btc for auto payout; but now I just set it at 0.01 btc. I have more confirmed btc than the 0.01 threshold but the payout was not initiated. HELP!
FoxMURDER
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 49
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 11, 2011, 12:10:09 PM
 #3419

just fyi diablo works just fine for me ...


mhash: 389,5/388,7 | accept: 528 | reject: 1 | hw error: 4
gr0bi42
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 158
Merit: 100


View Profile WWW
August 11, 2011, 08:25:20 PM
 #3420

...
Please use another miner (I recommend phoenix or poclbm).

Hmm... something is wrong with your pool.

Using cgminer or even the latest phoenix, which i turn you do recommend,  gives a very high reject ratio. Here a sample of phoenix:

Code:
[11/08/2011 22:10:40] Result: 8de61579 accepted   
[11/08/2011 22:10:40] Result: 5db3749b accepted   
[11/08/2011 22:10:53] Result: 8d544c0e rejected   
[11/08/2011 22:11:04] Result: 2c6441e8 accepted   
[11/08/2011 22:11:19] Result: 96316e6b accepted   
[11/08/2011 22:11:48] Result: 538cf092 rejected   
[11/08/2011 22:11:59] Result: b54181b1 rejected   
[11/08/2011 22:12:30] Result: 2e4c4c9c accepted   
[11/08/2011 22:12:33] Result: d3539822 accepted   
[11/08/2011 22:12:58] Result: 281068ea accepted   
[11/08/2011 22:13:05] Result: c8aa1ac6 rejected   
[11/08/2011 22:13:24] Result: 51fb1ca1 rejected   
[11/08/2011 22:13:31] Result: 37c7b8e4 accepted   
[11/08/2011 22:13:33] Result: 66ceb98a rejected   
[11/08/2011 22:13:58] Result: a8ae8e09 accepted   
[11/08/2011 22:14:03] Result: 820cb009 rejected   
[11/08/2011 22:14:04] Result: 6193ed32 accepted   
[11/08/2011 22:14:14] Result: 22feb555 accepted   
[11/08/2011 22:14:22] Result: 5318a11a rejected   
[11/08/2011 22:14:23] Result: e61b1c56 accepted   
[11/08/2011 22:14:25] Result: f3cd4c22 accepted   
[11/08/2011 22:14:26] Result: fb35e3df accepted   
[11/08/2011 22:14:31] Result: db9690de rejected   
[11/08/2011 22:15:03] Result: b2d6b790 accepted   
[11/08/2011 22:15:09] Result: 57159855 rejected   
[11/08/2011 22:15:22] Result: 1b373f95 accepted     
[11/08/2011 22:15:24] Result: a134167c accepted     
[11/08/2011 22:15:40] Result: 09c99be7 accepted     
[11/08/2011 22:15:43] Result: a6f5f619 accepted     
[11/08/2011 22:15:50] Result: fc2c5c20 accepted     
[11/08/2011 22:16:01] Result: 7c495db8 accepted     
[450.57 Mhash/sec] [54 Accepted] [10 Rejected] [RPC]

Your pool works well only with poclbm but with poclbm I have over 20Mhases/sec less. I don't know what is wrong with your pool, but it occurs only mining with your pool. Btcguild, deepbit, arsbitcoin, eligius and other smaller pools, all are working very well with reject ratios about or less than 1 percent.

Donations are welcome: 1Btf3BqUegfe5iFdWsgfBf1Ew3YsAvsrLT
Pages: « 1 ... 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 [171] 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 ... 1155 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!