Bitcoin Forum
September 25, 2016, 03:41:20 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.0 (New!) [Torrent]. Make sure you verify it.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: What type of pool payouts do you prefer?
Bitcoins - 3151 (80.4%)
Bank transfer / USD - 407 (10.4%)
Gold/silver coins and bars - 359 (9.2%)
Total Voters: 3915

Pages: « 1 ... 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 [165] 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 ... 1103 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [40+ PH] SlushPool (slushpool.com); World's First Mining Pool  (Read 3852792 times)
yrral
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 79


View Profile
July 14, 2011, 12:06:17 PM
 #3281

When did the scoring system change to proportional?
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
dishwara
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358


Truth may get delay, but NEVER fails


View Profile
July 14, 2011, 02:14:10 PM
 #3282

never.
In my post i said it for deepbit, not slush.
yrral
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 79


View Profile
July 14, 2011, 09:12:04 PM
 #3283

never.
In my post i said it for deepbit, not slush.

No, look

http://mining.bitcoin.cz/
This 50 BTC is divided among all of the users that contributed to that round, weighted by the number of shares that they earned. Therefore, the reward earned by a given user is given by the following formula:

(50 BTC - 1 BTC fee) * (shares found by user's workers) / (total shares in current round)

It doesn't say anything about a score system anymore
dietwice
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 58


View Profile
July 15, 2011, 03:05:48 AM
 #3284

Is the pool running smooth?

We have an extrabad luck and a lot of looong blocks.
Of course it's a probability, but can it also be some kind of hidden attack aimed not pool servers itself but provider infrastructure, gateways or something, and making it operate slower and the pool be less effective than it should?

Or it's just my paranoia?)

Donations appreciated at 1DZ6PVjnV8zRdvtgKSqzpAYhifxP1XKhwM
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
July 15, 2011, 06:53:32 AM
 #3285

never.
In my post i said it for deepbit, not slush.

No, look

Pool is running in score mode.

slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
July 15, 2011, 07:12:40 AM
 #3286

Is the pool running smooth?

We have an extrabad luck and a lot of looong blocks.
Of course it's a probability, but can it also be some kind of hidden attack aimed not pool servers itself but provider infrastructure, gateways or something, and making it operate slower and the pool be less effective than it should?

Or it's just my paranoia?)

Well, I checked everything and it actually looks fine, no reason to think there's an attack. My experience is talking me that it's just bad luck.

kiwiasian
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168


View Profile
July 15, 2011, 06:16:16 PM
 #3287

I just submitted 250 shares in a round and my reward is none???

Tradehill referral link, save 10% | http://www.tradehill.com/?r=TH-R12328
www.payb.tc/kiwiasian | 1LHNW1JGMBo2e7rKiiFz7KJPKE57bqCdEC
finnthecelt
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140


View Profile
July 15, 2011, 08:39:28 PM
 #3288

I just submitted 250 shares in a round and my reward is none???

Check again
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
July 15, 2011, 09:30:36 PM
 #3289

I just submitted 250 shares in a round and my reward is none???

Processing of shares can take some time, so it is pretty normal that you see 'none' for freshly mined blocks. So - yes - check again.

digger
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322


View Profile WWW
July 15, 2011, 10:13:16 PM
 #3290

you site has been included in this site

who find the bitcoin blocks?

http://digbtc.com


doge pool: http://dog.ltcoin.net ,yac pool: http://yac.ltcoin.net ,bbq pool: http://bbq.ltcoin.net ,Litecoin pool, http://ltcoin.net dig feathercoin , http://fc.ltcoin.net bitbar pool: http://btb.ltcoin.net wdc pool: http://wdc.ltcoin.net
kiwiasian
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168


View Profile
July 16, 2011, 09:53:12 PM
 #3291

Ok well it showed up. But in our recent 140 minute block I mined for the first 120 minutes before my PC crashed, during which I submitted about 1300 shares. My reward per block is normally 0.015 BTC but this blockI was only rewarded 0.0012 (10x less)?? Why isn't my work being counted?

Tradehill referral link, save 10% | http://www.tradehill.com/?r=TH-R12328
www.payb.tc/kiwiasian | 1LHNW1JGMBo2e7rKiiFz7KJPKE57bqCdEC
snabby
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2


View Profile
July 16, 2011, 11:42:55 PM
 #3292

Ok well it showed up. But in our recent 140 minute block I mined for the first 120 minutes before my PC crashed, during which I submitted about 1300 shares. My reward per block is normally 0.015 BTC but this blockI was only rewarded 0.0012 (10x less)?? Why isn't my work being counted?

Because of the score based system.  Each share is worth more than the previous one, on an exponential curve.
kiwiasian
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168


View Profile
July 17, 2011, 12:24:29 AM
 #3293

Ok well it showed up. But in our recent 140 minute block I mined for the first 120 minutes before my PC crashed, during which I submitted about 1300 shares. My reward per block is normally 0.015 BTC but this blockI was only rewarded 0.0012 (10x less)?? Why isn't my work being counted?

Because of the score based system.  Each share is worth more than the previous one, on an exponential curve.

That's ridiculous, I legitimately submitted shares in 120/140 minutes because of a BSOD and I get 10 times less?

I may as well just not have mined for 2 hours at all...all of the money that I worked for is getting paid to everyone else who didn't legitimately work for it...

Tradehill referral link, save 10% | http://www.tradehill.com/?r=TH-R12328
www.payb.tc/kiwiasian | 1LHNW1JGMBo2e7rKiiFz7KJPKE57bqCdEC
zzyyxx
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 12


View Profile
July 17, 2011, 06:28:39 AM
 #3294

fricking waaa
pennytrader
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 253


View Profile
July 18, 2011, 04:14:22 AM
 #3295

Ok well it showed up. But in our recent 140 minute block I mined for the first 120 minutes before my PC crashed, during which I submitted about 1300 shares. My reward per block is normally 0.015 BTC but this blockI was only rewarded 0.0012 (10x less)?? Why isn't my work being counted?

Because of the score based system.  Each share is worth more than the previous one, on an exponential curve.

That's ridiculous, I legitimately submitted shares in 120/140 minutes because of a BSOD and I get 10 times less?

I may as well just not have mined for 2 hours at all...all of the money that I worked for is getting paid to everyone else who didn't legitimately work for it...

That's the reason I switched to deepbit. I like slush but my computer network is not always stable.

To be fair, slush implemented the score based system to prevent pool hopping (which is bad to the pool). I just wish they implement a different method such as delayed stats.

please donate to 1P3m2resGCP2o2sFX324DP1mfqHgGPA8BL
JinTu
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 132


Hopping down the bunny trail


View Profile
July 18, 2011, 04:05:34 PM
 #3296

Ok well it showed up. But in our recent 140 minute block I mined for the first 120 minutes before my PC crashed, during which I submitted about 1300 shares. My reward per block is normally 0.015 BTC but this blockI was only rewarded 0.0012 (10x less)?? Why isn't my work being counted?

Because of the score based system.  Each share is worth more than the previous one, on an exponential curve.

That's ridiculous, I legitimately submitted shares in 120/140 minutes because of a BSOD and I get 10 times less?

I may as well just not have mined for 2 hours at all...all of the money that I worked for is getting paid to everyone else who didn't legitimately work for it...

That's the reason I switched to deepbit. I like slush but my computer network is not always stable.

To be fair, slush implemented the score based system to prevent pool hopping (which is bad to the pool). I just wish they implement a different method such as delayed stats.

BTC Guild just implemented delayed stats within the past week. The jury is still out on whether things have improved for those of us who don't pool hop, but time will tell.

Please donate if this was helpful: 14CLqCNphUJ54ro2PtqQWJDmW3Eic1WmUd
Cacti templates for pool, GPU and CGMINER monitoring.
GPU monitoring with SNMP
pekv2
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770



View Profile
July 18, 2011, 04:16:44 PM
 #3297

I have decided, I like this pool the best. The greasemonkey script is a major +. GUIMiner shows 322 Mhash/s & bitcoin.cz shows nearly identical rate, plus all the other features is really cool.

Cannot wait for 6-8 more months to get moar gear to mine. Addicting & Fantastic!
JinTu
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 132


Hopping down the bunny trail


View Profile
July 18, 2011, 04:35:35 PM
 #3298

Hi Slush,

After watching my worker stats for the past few days with my Cacti template that uses the JSON API, I noticed the last share times seemed to jump around for the running workers.



The following graph shows another worker that was shut down late Thursday night and stopped submitting shares. The initial jump to ~9600 seconds at ~22:40 (the time I shut the worker down) is odd given the previous values, but the growth rate from then to the end of the graph on the right looks normal.


Since the JSON API provides the last_share time in UNIX time format, my script simply subtracts the last_time value for the worker from the current time to get the elapsed time in seconds. It seems to work most of the time, save the weird spikes shown in the first graph.

Is it possible one or more of the servers providing the last share data aren't synced time-wise resulting in these jumps as load balancing shifts the JSON API query to one of the affected servers?

Still no response on this eh? Just for reference, this is what it looks like when the time is reported correctly (from BTC Guild):

Please donate if this was helpful: 14CLqCNphUJ54ro2PtqQWJDmW3Eic1WmUd
Cacti templates for pool, GPU and CGMINER monitoring.
GPU monitoring with SNMP
yuancraft
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 63



View Profile
July 19, 2011, 10:38:00 AM
 #3299

pool is under attack  Huh
naypalm
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1205


uberbills.com


View Profile WWW
July 19, 2011, 10:39:38 AM
 #3300

MSG1: Call to bitcoind failed: [Errno socket error] [Errno 111] Connection refused
MSG2: Backend is not connected!

Looks like the backend crashed about 20-30 mins ago. Sad

EDIT: Looks like its back up again!

Pages: « 1 ... 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 [165] 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 ... 1103 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!