Bitcoin Forum
December 04, 2016, 12:08:36 AM *
News: To be able to use the next phase of the beta forum software, please ensure that your email address is correct/functional.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: What type of pool payouts do you prefer?
Bitcoins - 3160 (80.5%)
Bank transfer / USD - 407 (10.4%)
Gold/silver coins and bars - 359 (9.1%)
Total Voters: 3924

Pages: « 1 ... 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 [168] 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 ... 1105 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [40+ PH] SlushPool (slushpool.com); World's First Mining Pool  (Read 3926647 times)
cosurgi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 298


View Profile
July 26, 2011, 08:59:26 PM
 #3341

And we have just found another block! A short round after a long one. Actually there should be few short rounds after this record 5 hours round.

I happily keep mining, I'm sure that rewards will be all fine after this is all sorted out Cheesy

1480810116
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480810116

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480810116
Reply with quote  #2

1480810116
Report to moderator
1480810116
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480810116

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480810116
Reply with quote  #2

1480810116
Report to moderator
1480810116
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480810116

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480810116
Reply with quote  #2

1480810116
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
sniper_sniperson
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 124


View Profile
July 26, 2011, 09:03:27 PM
 #3342

Probably Slush will recalculate the rewards again, but with missing count of submited shares I think this will be hard to be done  Roll Eyes
Alex AXe
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1162



View Profile
July 26, 2011, 09:03:48 PM
 #3343

Same problems there. 5 hours at 370 mhs and only 0.00000011   Shocked

And now more then 30 shares was sent and nothing is displaying in statistic

฿: 199fcvPVNyCmrDRfKwfzitSkTmi9Yr1DnD  |  ₦: 4aAXeW6qJRWTLvrx9WyGJsNV4v4nDeq7Qz  |  Украинская биржа криптовалют
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
July 26, 2011, 09:09:36 PM
 #3344

It is a problem with SQL, after so long use the share table reached its all time limit. This is not related to 5 hour round, but to total pool uptime (starting from december). Those shares were not counted in database in fact. Fortunately all shares are also counted separately on each backend, so I only need to merge this data from backends now.

sniper_sniperson
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 124


View Profile
July 26, 2011, 09:14:02 PM
 #3345

Fortunately all shares are also couned separately on each backend, so I only need to merge this data from backends now.

Hoooooooraaaaaaaaaaaaay  Cheesy
zx9r
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 115


View Profile
July 26, 2011, 09:19:50 PM
 #3346

It is a problem with SQL, after so long use the share table reached its all time limit. This is not related to 5 hour round, but to total pool uptime (starting from december). Those shares were not counted in database in fact. Fortunately all shares are also counted separately on each backend, so I only need to merge this data from backends now.


Good job
zzyyxx
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 12


View Profile
July 26, 2011, 09:30:01 PM
 #3347

you guys fly off the handle awful easy over nothing... a 5 hour block a 5 minute block.
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
July 26, 2011, 09:56:02 PM
 #3348

OK, the rewards were recalculated. To compansate all moral damages I don't take 2% fee for rounds 6933 and 6934, but instead I give you 1 BTC extra. Those rounds are worth for you 51 BTC each.

If for anyone the rewards for those two rounds were not recalculated correctly, please report here and I will fix this tomorrow.

CyberPhunk
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 124


View Profile
July 26, 2011, 10:29:26 PM
 #3349

you guys fly off the handle awful easy over nothing... a 5 hour block a 5 minute block.

The issue wasn't that we were in a 5 hour block, it was that for over 2 hours the account page wasn't showing a true total of shares submitted. It just stopped counting them, or so it appeared.

Looks good now, Slush.  Smiley

List of client download mirrors / Older Catalyst drivers/SDK
13dRbbqBpfZEmZiXXdLM4NKNoJYsgHbuFJ  <- might as well, in case someone feels generous. Wink
allinvain
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1988



View Profile
July 26, 2011, 11:33:19 PM
 #3350

Thanks for fixing it slush. It seems all is well now.

smudo
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2


View Profile
July 27, 2011, 08:02:35 AM
 #3351

If I go to https://mining.bitcoin.cz/ or https://mining.bitcoin.cz/accounts/login/?next=/accounts/profile/ , it stays secure but when I login, the website takes me to my account unencrypted. Could you please implement a certified SSL Server Certificate to your site? Also to stick to HTTPS at any given time connected to mining.bitcoin.cz? Or an option to stay connect securely after logging in?

Hi pekv2,

I worked around this bug with the Firefox extension "HTTPS Everywhere" (https://www.eff.org/https-everywhere). In order to work with the pool's site you have to create a custom ruleset (as described at https://www.eff.org/https-everywhere/rulesets).

For mining.bitcoin.cz it looks like this:
Code:
<ruleset name="mining.bitcoin.cz">
  <target host="mining.bitcoin.cz" />

  <rule from="^http://mining.bitcoin.cz/" to="https://mining.bitcoin.cz/" />
  <securecookie host="^mining\.bitcoin\.cz$" name=".*" />
</ruleset>

Put this in a file called mining.bitcoin.cz.xml in the HTTPSEverywhereUserRules folder in your Firefox profile. After restart you will only ever see https for the site. Also your cookie will be marked  as secure and thus only be sent over https. Maybe you have to log out and in again to have this take effect.

HTH
CBBlackWolf
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 7


View Profile
July 27, 2011, 03:36:14 PM
 #3352

For the two rounds in question, I am still not seeing any reward. I believe I started mining for the day fairly early during the 5 hour round.

Thanks for looking into this issue and all the other work you've put into this pool.


EDIT: Slush credited my account for what was lost during these rounds. In fact, he gave me more than I probably would've earned. Thanks.
dacoinminster
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1106


Rational Exuberance


View Profile WWW
July 28, 2011, 03:36:03 PM
 #3353

slush,

I haven't seen any discussion of merged mining on other block chains like namecoin here yet (at least, no hits on a search of this thread). Are you working on this?

https://github.com/vinced/namecoin/blob/mergedmine/doc/README_merged-mining.md
http://dot-bit.org/Merged_Mining

Basically, we can earn namecoins and bitcoins at the same time. It sounds crazy, but it appears that there is no loss of bitcoin hashing power when adding namecoin mining. Just additional free profits. The only thing needed to enable this is changes on your end.

Or are we already mining namecoins for you?

Thanks!

cosurgi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 298


View Profile
July 28, 2011, 05:05:19 PM
 #3354

I haven't seen any discussion of merged mining on other block chains like namecoin here yet (at least, no hits on a search of this thread). Are you working on this?

https://github.com/vinced/namecoin/blob/mergedmine/doc/README_merged-mining.md
http://dot-bit.org/Merged_Mining

Basically, we can earn namecoins and bitcoins at the same time. It sounds crazy, but it appears that there is no loss of bitcoin hashing power when adding namecoin mining. Just additional free profits. The only thing needed to enable this is changes on your end.

Or are we already mining namecoins for you?

This will start working at namecoin block 24000. Current namecoin block is http://explorer.dot-bit.org/  18000. So still plenty of time - it is impossible for pool to mine minecoin right now.

Also, mining is finding a nonce against a hash of merkle tree of whole block chain. It is not possible that two different chains (namecoin, bitcoin) will have the same hash of merkle tree. You cannot look for a nonce against two different hashes of merkle tree, it must be one of them. Can you point me to the exact description of implementation and math involved, how namecoin has to be modified to get this to work?

Because currently it would be for example spending some percent of total power on minecoin and the rest on bitcoins, which isn't what people want (less hashing power going to bitcoins?).

dacoinminster
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1106


Rational Exuberance


View Profile WWW
July 28, 2011, 05:30:17 PM
 #3355

I haven't seen any discussion of merged mining on other block chains like namecoin here yet (at least, no hits on a search of this thread). Are you working on this?

https://github.com/vinced/namecoin/blob/mergedmine/doc/README_merged-mining.md
http://dot-bit.org/Merged_Mining

Basically, we can earn namecoins and bitcoins at the same time. It sounds crazy, but it appears that there is no loss of bitcoin hashing power when adding namecoin mining. Just additional free profits. The only thing needed to enable this is changes on your end.

Or are we already mining namecoins for you?

This will start working at namecoin block 24000. Current namecoin block is http://explorer.dot-bit.org/  18000. So still plenty of time - it is impossible for pool to mine minecoin right now.

Also, mining is finding a nonce against a hash of merkle tree of whole block chain. It is not possible that two different chains (namecoin, bitcoin) will have the same hash of merkle tree. You cannot look for a nonce against two different hashes of merkle tree, it must be one of them. Can you point me to the exact description of implementation and math involved, how namecoin has to be modified to get this to work?

Because currently it would be for example spending some percent of total power on minecoin and the rest on bitcoins, which isn't what people want (less hashing power going to bitcoins?).


Ah, so we have about 42 days (1000 hours) before this is possible if namecoin averages 6 blocks/hour.

That's exactly what I thought (that you couldn't have one hash work for both), but I was wrong. I'm not an expert on this, but my understanding is that they will both accept the same hash if it meets their current difficulty requirements. I had to read lots and lots of posts and wiki pages before I finally understood this. One post which helped was here: http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=30294.msg393412#msg393412

Basically, namecoin has been modified to accept bitcoin hashes which contain the namecoin merkle root hash in the bitcoin block. The bitcoin protocol doesn't care, and you get free namecoins for the bitcoin hashing you were already doing.

There will be more and more alternative chains, and miners are going to want to get as much value out of their hashing as they can, so this will become an essential feature. The pools will probably just sell the namecoins for bitcoins, take their cut, and distribute the rest of the extra bitcoins to the miners.

zx9r
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 115


View Profile
July 28, 2011, 06:27:47 PM
 #3356

Ah, so we have about 42 days (1000 hours) before this is possible if namecoin averages 6 blocks/hour.


1 block each 6 hours is closer to the reality nowadays  Grin

Block 20160 is estimated to get reached on 30th November, so block 24k is supposed to get reached more more long than 42 days...

slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
July 28, 2011, 09:09:38 PM
 #3357

We are under attack, bear for the fight. One backend just had loadavg above 12.0.

EDIT: ok, I think that problem is fixed now. But I will keep an eye on that. Some of you might have lost connections, but your miners should reconnect automatically.

kimmeriets
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078


View Profile
July 29, 2011, 11:46:06 AM
 #3358

my IP blocked: no site, no work. why?

http://bitcoin.cz - yes
http://mining.bitcoin.cz - no
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
July 29, 2011, 11:58:57 AM
 #3359

my IP blocked: no site, no work. why?

http://bitcoin.cz - yes
http://mining.bitcoin.cz - no
Please PM me your IP and pool user name, I will double check whitelisting.
How long it is blocked?

Supercrit
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 41


View Profile
July 29, 2011, 09:27:59 PM
 #3360

So unlucky lately, so many blocks over 1-2 hours and some over 3! Isn't the average share number around the difficulty number?
Pages: « 1 ... 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 [168] 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 ... 1105 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!