[4+ EH] Slush Pool (slushpool.com); Overt AsicBoost; World First Mining Pool

[kobo_eth]

I'm new to slushpool.  If I withdraw a balance higher than .01 btc, there is no fee correct?  How long will it take to arrive in my wallet at bittrex?

Correct, there are only two types of fees that are incorporated in slush payment system. The first one is stable (pool fee 2% per block) and is used to cover the pool expenses. The second one is introduced only if you set your payout threshold below 0.01 BTC and it equals 0.0001 BTC.
Transaction fees for threshold equal to or higher than the limit value are covered by the pool.

How long, it might take more than a few hours depending on the cold and hot wallet movements in slush.

[ogombii]

Apologies, I'd like some help with my question.

Whats the benefit of changing the default diff set to 128 on slushpool higher or lower?

Thanks in advance.

[kobo_eth]

Apologies, I'd like some help with my question.

Whats the benefit of changing the default diff set to 128 on slushpool higher or lower?

Thanks in advance.

Take a look at this help article:
https://slushpool.com/help/first-aid/troubleshooting

Also if your machines show near the hardware specs hash power and there is no big fluctuation in it, I wouldn't play with the difficulty setting. Let us know.

[DPoS2]

Apologies, I'd like some help with my question.

Whats the benefit of changing the default diff set to 128 on slushpool higher or lower?

Thanks in advance.

Take a look at this help article:
https://slushpool.com/help/first-aid/troubleshooting

Also if your machines show near the hardware specs hash power and there is no big fluctuation in it, I wouldn't play with the difficulty setting. Let us know.

Upping the diff mattered more back when you had GPU & USB miners in the same pool with bigger miners. The lower miners could shoot for lower diff and at least complete some shares before the next block so they get some kind of payment.   If a weak miner tries to do a huge diff and takes the whole time doing one share and never completes they don't get anything

And on the other side, huge miner farms don't want to have tons of small network traffic doing tiny diff so pools weigh the diff of the share as part of the payout system.. higher diff and less shares can pay more than many shares of lower diff

[xcergy]

I have 4 BFL Monarch miners (750Gh).  Two of them are performing @ 95% (hashrate/poolrate) and the other two have problems. One is @ 360Gh (94%) (hashrate/poolrate), and the other is pushing 950Gh, but on slushpool, it's only showing 315Gh (32%).  It does not matter which computer I'm using the cgminer software.

'puter: Win 7 Desktop & Win8.3 laptop
software: CGMiner 4.10.0
Pool: SlushPool

How do I go about diagnosing the problem?

TIA

[DPoS2]

I have 4 BFL Monarch miners (750Gh).  Two of them are performing @ 95% (hashrate/poolrate) and the other two have problems. One is @ 360Gh (94%) (hashrate/poolrate), and the other is pushing 950Gh, but on slushpool, it's only showing 315Gh (32%).  It does not matter which computer I'm using the cgminer software.

'puter: Win 7 Desktop & Win8.3 laptop
software: CGMiner 4.10.0
Pool: SlushPool

How do I go about diagnosing the problem?

TIA

Seems one is running on less chips since some might be dead and the other seems faulty and throwing errors like crazy since you may see high hashing but the pool tells the tale that most of it is bull

[xcergy]

I have 4 BFL Monarch miners (750Gh).  Two of them are performing @ 95% (hashrate/poolrate) and the other two have problems. One is @ 360Gh (94%) (hashrate/poolrate), and the other is pushing 950Gh, but on slushpool, it's only showing 315Gh (32%).  It does not matter which computer I'm using the cgminer software.

'puter: Win 7 Desktop & Win8.3 laptop
software: CGMiner 4.10.0
Pool: SlushPool

How do I go about diagnosing the problem?

TIA

Seems one is running on less chips since some might be dead and the other seems faulty and throwing errors like crazy since you may see high hashing but the pool tells the tale that most of it is bull

Agreed (possible dead chips).

I don't see generated errors on the miner pushing 900Gh (32% return on slush).

What next?

[xcergy]

I have 4 BFL Monarch miners (750Gh).  Two of them are performing @ 95% (hashrate/poolrate) and the other two have problems. One is @ 360Gh (94%) (hashrate/poolrate), and the other is pushing 950Gh, but on slushpool, it's only showing 315Gh (32%).  It does not matter which computer I'm using the cgminer software.

'puter: Win 7 Desktop & Win8.3 laptop
software: CGMiner 4.10.0
Pool: SlushPool

How do I go about diagnosing the problem?

TIA

Seems one is running on less chips since some might be dead and the other seems faulty and throwing errors like crazy since you may see high hashing but the pool tells the tale that most of it is bull

Agreed (possible dead chips).

I don't see generated errors on the miner pushing 900Gh (32% return on slush).

What next?

Correction .... there are errors, but they come in 'clumps'.  I would expect more for a 600Gh difference, but it's not there. Does CGMiner generate a .log file?

Silly questions from a newbie miner.

[throwaway2]

what happened with block 32759? 

https://imgur.com/a/pAHVA

[rifleman74]

what happened with block 32759? 

https://imgur.com/a/pAHVA

Probably a stale or orphan?

[Thetaj]

Dang shit luck for 4 days straight

[TGJ]

Dang shit luck for 4 days straight

I just started mining a few weeks ago with two S9’s. The pool luck seemed to be great when I started but now like you said has been shit for four days. Is this normal?

[rifleman74]

what happened with block 32759? 

https://imgur.com/a/pAHVA

Looks like it matured.  Probably website error. 

[DPoS2]

what happened with block 32759? 

https://imgur.com/a/pAHVA

Looks like it matured.  Probably website error. 

I guess you left Kano.... you must of matured too

[rifleman74]

what happened with block 32759? 

https://imgur.com/a/pAHVA

Looks like it matured.  Probably website error. 

I guess you left Kano.... you must of matured too

Nope, still at kano.  Pretty easy to log into an account and check things out.

[manduul]

.0014 daily for a single S9 from BTC.com

How's yours at Slush at this luck? Had to leave Kano, I need to make quick BTC so I can get some altcoins at their dip

[bitbybitby]

.0014 daily for a single S9 from BTC.com

How's yours at Slush at this luck? Had to leave Kano, I need to make quick BTC so I can get some altcoins at their dip

0.000116882 average per terahash in the past two weeks.

But past five days has been horrible, 0.0000747 per terahash

[manduul]

.0014 daily for a single S9 from BTC.com

How's yours at Slush at this luck? Had to leave Kano, I need to make quick BTC so I can get some altcoins at their dip

0.000116882 average per terahash in the past two weeks.

But past five days has been horrible, 0.0000747 per terahash

Jeez, that's horrible. Somebody needs to drop a bomb on Bitmain manufacturing center anyways, no wonder why BTC.com is getting so much power these days. They reward the TX fees like Slush, unlike Antpoo. Man, next diff is gonna jump another 11% and our rewards are gonna be even lower. Damn.

[kobo_eth]

Guys, a little help will be appreciated. I have 2 S9's connected to Slush, so far they have been working with no issues. As of 2 hours ago, I got a notification of miners being offline from Slush pool dashboard. I went to check the machines physically, they are all green, they can be accessed via IP, also ping in their Network diagnostics works fine.

However Slush dashboard still shows them offline with has power of some ridiculous MH/s.

Anyone experienced something similar before?

[hurricandave]

Slush pool sent out an e-mail earlier this week stating the pool servers would go under maintenance and the dbase as well. Usually the mining is not affected but you will see the wrong info at the website till everything has updated.