Bitcoin Forum
November 23, 2017, 06:14:54 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: What type of pool payouts do you prefer?
Bitcoins - 3193 (80.5%)
Bank transfer / USD - 408 (10.3%)
Gold/silver coins and bars - 367 (9.2%)
Total Voters: 3966

Pages: « 1 ... 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 [1114] 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [150+ PH] SlushPool (slushpool.com); World's First Mining Pool  (Read 4296655 times)
adyb
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 22


View Profile
June 02, 2017, 09:54:16 AM
 #22261

2 blocks so far this morning, terrible show for the last 24ish hours though
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1511417694
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1511417694

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1511417694
Reply with quote  #2

1511417694
Report to moderator
allinvain
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2338



View Profile
June 02, 2017, 10:21:25 AM
 #22262

I think a more important topic to discuss right now is BIP148. Everyone please vote. I am also curious what the pool operators opinion is on this. 27% currently voted "pool decides" and 13% did not vote. So what is the pool decides option - support for BIP148 or not?

beltsniffer
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 264


View Profile
June 02, 2017, 04:51:24 PM
 #22263

If you change the parameters on top to 24 hours, it will change the hashrate distribution, right now the 24 hour hash rate is 0, so it doesn't even show slushpool.

Terahash/sec rate went from 4,500,000 to over 5,000,000 rather quickly. A difference of 500,000 TH/s is equivalent to about 37,000 S9s coming online.  I've linked the hashrate for 30 days below, very sporadic swings.  I'm not sure why the sporadic nature of the chart is like that, I would expect something more linear.

https://blockchain.info/charts/hash-rate?timespan=30days
Read the top line of that page "An estimation of hashrate distribution amongst the largest mining pools"

This chart is only an estimation of hashrate based on blocks found. It assumes that since your pool found 'x' number of blocks in a 'y' hour period, your hashrate is 'z'. The calculations are based on the pools having exactly 100% luck. Which we all know never happens. Take a look at Kano pools luck it says it went from 1.8% to 3.7% in the last 24hr period. The hashrate there did not double, the pool simply had a lucky streak. The same thing applies to slush when there is 900+% block, the short term calcs are wildly skewed since they are based on 100% luck. Fortunately blocks like this only happen 1 in ~8000 blocks.
VentMine
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 220


View Profile
June 02, 2017, 04:53:24 PM
 #22264

I think a more important topic to discuss right now is BIP148. Everyone please vote. I am also curious what the pool operators opinion is on this. 27% currently voted "pool decides" and 13% did not vote. So what is the pool decides option - support for BIP148 or not?

I agree, curious what fellow slushers are thinking. I doubt pool operators will commit to anything just yet but curious to hear as well. Personally I'm going for BIP 148 and came back to Slush yesterday due to the announcement.. I'm sick of this asicboost attack  ...

Also I don't get why people continually post about luck on these pool threads. You should expect periods of good luck and periods of bad luck... its called variance. Long run Slush has been great so why worry about day-to-day. These people probably play slot machines when they think the seat is 'hot'...

1ESSdoVYKm8sNtYMfdkFBajhAe2e6G8keH
allinvain
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2338



View Profile
June 02, 2017, 10:03:44 PM
 #22265

I think a more important topic to discuss right now is BIP148. Everyone please vote. I am also curious what the pool operators opinion is on this. 27% currently voted "pool decides" and 13% did not vote. So what is the pool decides option - support for BIP148 or not?

I agree, curious what fellow slushers are thinking. I doubt pool operators will commit to anything just yet but curious to hear as well. Personally I'm going for BIP 148 and came back to Slush yesterday due to the announcement.. I'm sick of this asicboost attack  ...

Also I don't get why people continually post about luck on these pool threads. You should expect periods of good luck and periods of bad luck... its called variance. Long run Slush has been great so why worry about day-to-day. These people probably play slot machines when they think the seat is 'hot'...

I too don't think Slush will commit to a publicly states opinion just yet. It's good that miners using this pool get a choice though.

I will go on record publicly to say that I support BIP 148. I spent the past 2 days looking into the possible repercussions and I think what is best for the users of Bitcoin is best for bitcoin itself. I am a miner, but I have at heart what is best for Bitcoin. The current state of affairs is unsatisfactory. Something needs to be done and both miners and users need to go in the path that is best for _everyone_ . The wise move would be for miners to signal SegWit early before the BIP 148 deadline. It pains me to see that some people are willing to risk the reputation and integrity of Bitcoin because of their own stubborn self interest. But anyways, such is how life works. Whatever scenario plays out I hope the damage (if there is any to either bitcoin itself or to its users via lost coins etc) is minimal or non-existent.

Vegasdude
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 19


View Profile
June 14, 2017, 02:06:47 AM
 #22266

How do you go about getting a payment that was never received?.... Ive never had a payment issue before and today about 6 hours ago I got an email saying i received a deposit from slushpool....No big deal I get deposits about every 2 days....This deposit today has not showed up in my wallet at all...usually it sits there waiting for confirmations but this time nothing.... transaction id is    b7a14a5f0e0a41759f80b8b73069d08470d6e35423a191c7640bc16db745ea91    it also said this... Warning! this transaction is a double spend. You should be extremely careful when trusting any transactions to/from this sender. What is going on?
cris12821
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 148


View Profile
June 19, 2017, 04:56:13 PM
 #22267

Hey.  

Not sure if this is the right place.  Just not sure where else to post this.

Regarding Zcash mining on Slush pool.  

Why is it that on average we don't find a Zcash block for about 1-24hrs?  We have a fairly high hashrate.  
Other pools with lower hashrate can find them every few hours.    

For slush it varies between 1hr and 24 hrs.  


I live by slush's pool.   Just wondering why it can take us longer than some pools to mine zcash blocks.



Can anyone explain?



At this rate and cost for BTC miners I've almost come to a conclusion that I should just do BTC mining on the side and zcash mining (GPU mining) as my main as spending $1000-$5000 can give a quicker ROI and sweeter profit with GPU mining than spending $1000-$5000 on btc miners.   Infact spending $1000-$5000 I feel your lucky if you can make your money back in a year, let alone make any profit, unless your not paying for hydro.


  

Give Respect , Get Respect
KNK
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 665


View Profile
June 20, 2017, 01:29:45 PM
 #22268

When it will be possible to vote for SegWit2x ?

BTC tips: 1KNK1akhpethhtcyhKTF2d3PWTQDUWUzHE
VentMine
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 220


View Profile
June 20, 2017, 04:37:27 PM
 #22269

When it will be possible to vote for SegWit2x ?

^^ Lol, hopefully never

1ESSdoVYKm8sNtYMfdkFBajhAe2e6G8keH
KNK
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 665


View Profile
June 20, 2017, 08:09:57 PM
 #22270

When it will be possible to vote for SegWit2x ?

^^ Lol, hopefully never

I was planning not to reply, but couldn't resist ...

IMHO: It is better to move (even if not in the best possible direction) than marking time for years and going nowhere.
To became widely used (and rise in price) BTC needs stability not volatility and the never ending scalability debate is working against that for too long.
Yes, we will need to fix this 'fix' latter, but better latter than never.

I suggested some time ago (before BTU) to have dynamic block-size at 75% on daily basis (with each difficulty change), which was latter confirmed as the optimal fee point from someone's research (apologies for not remembering names and dates, but will try to find the facts if requested with reason).

On the other hand I agree that it is impossible to handle ALL and EVERY transaction(s) 'on-chain', so there should be some other mechanism to offload it/them ... I liked the idea (few years ago) of merged mining for such a second layer network (say LTC being the silver of BTC's gold and merged mined ... some how), but LN has some other advantages, so SegWit (and LN) is not bad either and easier to implement.

In the end we (may) have the best from both worlds ... well ... also the problems from both worlds, but after all it will be more positive than negative, so i would like to vote for it!

BTC tips: 1KNK1akhpethhtcyhKTF2d3PWTQDUWUzHE
Vegasdude
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 19


View Profile
June 22, 2017, 08:36:42 AM
 #22271

I was wondering why almost every block being found has the tag NYA...New York Agreement?...Slushpool blocks being found dont have that tag...is that why we only getting 1 block every 6 hours now?..Or is it just the luck has been bad.
gio3442
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 176



View Profile
June 22, 2017, 09:08:00 AM
 #22272

Slush should IMO allow their miners to VOTE on what block flag each block should have instead of choosing to only flag Core dev SegWit for all their miners.

tfeagle
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 34


View Profile
July 05, 2017, 04:39:34 PM
 #22273

I was posting in another thread.  Senior member suggested that I post something here. 

I have been mining bitcoin with slushpool for years.  Recently I started to mine zec. 

On the 4th of July, my slushpool account was hijacked.  I used the ticket system, described in post #1 in this thread.  Slushpool customer service sent only one message back.  Told me that my coins are stolen, and I should start a new account.  Very brief.  After that, they ignore all my messages.  They will not give my account back, and will not share info on the hack.  After one message, there is no response from customer service.  No interest from the slushpool IRC group. 

Feels to me that slushpool has become too big to care much about small miners.  If user's account is hijacked, the thief gets all user's coins and gets to keep the account as well.  Slushpool is too big now, to work with users.  Also, if original user cannot login to his/her account, and thief never comes back, then slushpool will take any leftover coins after one year.  (This is in the ToS, described as a stale account.)  So, Slushpool has no motivation to restore a hijacked account. 

Quote
It was only about 1.75 to 1.8 bitcoin.  Well below the interest threshold of a slushpool manager.  Few thousand dollars, USD.  But the big deal for me is that they won't give my account back, and they won't share info on the hack.  I use a unique password for slushpool.  Eleven characters.  Unlikely that it was found elsewhere on the internet.  I've scanned my desktop hard drive, and no malware was found.  (No obvious keystroke logger.  Although some malware can elude existing scanners.)  I am asking slushpool for time and date stamps of password changes, login from Budapest, and email (recovery address) changes.  I'm pretty certain that these events are all logged.  There is no reason for them to withhold this info.  There is no reason to keep me locked out of my account.  There is no reason to completely ignore me after sending a short email message that says approximately, "You were hacked.  Too bad.  Create a new account." 
tfeagle
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 34


View Profile
July 06, 2017, 10:11:18 AM
 #22274

I finally heard back from slushpool.  New service agent.  It seems that the customer service goal is to respond to all issues/questions within 24-hours.  This is good for the first report of a hack.  But is cumbersome when trying to hold a conversation or ask questions.  Every time I ask a question or send a file, I must wait roughly 20 hours for a reply. 

The new agent gave me additional info.  Some of it...particularly email addresses...is very important.  I have asked for more info, including specific details on time and date stamps.

Waiting now for the reply.   

If the agent is correct (and I assume this is the case) then the email address on the hijacked account is actually one of my other email addys.  It is one of my older addresses.  Difficult to explain how it is now on the hacked account. 

Slushpool will still not reset my password, and allow me to login.  I have asked about this many times.  They won't do it, but they never say yes or no, either. 
VentMine
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 220


View Profile
July 06, 2017, 03:47:31 PM
 #22275

When it will be possible to vote for SegWit2x ?

^^ Lol, hopefully never

I was planning not to reply, but couldn't resist ...

IMHO: It is better to move (even if not in the best possible direction) than marking time for years and going nowhere.
To became widely used (and rise in price) BTC needs stability not volatility and the never ending scalability debate is working against that for too long.
Yes, we will need to fix this 'fix' latter, but better latter than never.

I suggested some time ago (before BTU) to have dynamic block-size at 75% on daily basis (with each difficulty change), which was latter confirmed as the optimal fee point from someone's research (apologies for not remembering names and dates, but will try to find the facts if requested with reason).

On the other hand I agree that it is impossible to handle ALL and EVERY transaction(s) 'on-chain', so there should be some other mechanism to offload it/them ... I liked the idea (few years ago) of merged mining for such a second layer network (say LTC being the silver of BTC's gold and merged mined ... some how), but LN has some other advantages, so SegWit (and LN) is not bad either and easier to implement.

In the end we (may) have the best from both worlds ... well ... also the problems from both worlds, but after all it will be more positive than negative, so i would like to vote for it!

I'm not exactly against Segwit2x as an upgrade path (although I think the HF part is not gonna fly, it will be way too contentious to succeed), I'm more against how it came to be - with back-room deals made by businesses and w/o Core Devs. The big problem with businesses trying to influence protocol changes is that they don't really care about the protocol itself, they just care about their own businesses interests. Take Shapeshift.io for example. Segwit and the LN atomic swapping concept has the potential to kill their business model. So clearly, they are going to support anything other than BIP 141 / 148, direct paths to SegWit.

Also, the fact is that Bitmain has too much influence due to their mining monopoly. They control well over 51% of the hash, if you consider the pools they influence and the farms they influence with their hosting contracts. They are directly influencing many of the businesses in the Segwit2x NYA. The sooner we kill covert Asicboost (Segwit will do that), the sooner the ecosystem will return to natural competition. I like BIP 148 personally, because it forces Bitmain / big blockers / anti-segwit supports hand. They can no longer keep stalling. If they want their protocol upgrade path, they are free to fork off and do it.

Smiley

1ESSdoVYKm8sNtYMfdkFBajhAe2e6G8keH
SkydiverFL
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2


View Profile
July 11, 2017, 10:08:37 PM
 #22276

What am I missing?  I just setup my first mining rig with a rate of 7 TH/S on SlushPool.  Their dashboard shows my "Estimated Daily Reward" at 0.00062122 BTC ... which is only $1.46/day with today's rate.  Crypto Compare's calculator shows that I should be grossing about $5.86/day at my current hash rate.

Please be gentile.  I'm a complete noob.  What am I missing?

Here's a link to the calculator:
https://www.cryptocompare.com/mining/calculator/btc?HashingPower=7&HashingUnit=TH%2Fs&PowerConsumption=1293&CostPerkWh=0
Biffa
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile
July 11, 2017, 11:32:42 PM
 #22277

What am I missing?  I just setup my first mining rig with a rate of 7 TH/S on SlushPool.  Their dashboard shows my "Estimated Daily Reward" at 0.00062122 BTC ... which is only $1.46/day with today's rate.  Crypto Compare's calculator shows that I should be grossing about $5.86/day at my current hash rate.

Please be gentile.  I'm a complete noob.  What am I missing?

Here's a link to the calculator:
https://www.cryptocompare.com/mining/calculator/btc?HashingPower=7&HashingUnit=TH%2Fs&PowerConsumption=1293&CostPerkWh=0

Didn't you like my answer last time?

Quote from: Biffa
The thing you are missing is patience.

Its all about the luck of the pool, most good pools should "average" close to the calculators level of found blocks over a given period of time, but that luck can vary from day to day, week to week and month to month.

Wait for a month, then see what you have averaged over that time.


allinvain
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2338



View Profile
July 11, 2017, 11:46:47 PM
 #22278

Patience, mining padawan, is a virtue that must be cultivated!  Wink

ramboacdc
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 18


View Profile
July 13, 2017, 09:24:45 AM
 #22279

any reason i cannot get my gridseed through BFGminer to have shares accepted? tried upping the difficulty on my workers but every time i just get "rejected, difficulty too low"
allinvain
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2338



View Profile
July 13, 2017, 09:49:21 AM
 #22280

any reason i cannot get my gridseed through BFGminer to have shares accepted? tried upping the difficulty on my workers but every time i just get "rejected, difficulty too low"

Is this even a stratum capable miner? What is its hashrate?

Pages: « 1 ... 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 [1114] 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!