Bitcoin Forum
December 10, 2019, 12:22:11 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.19.0.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 [183] 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 ... 412 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [DVC]DevCoin - Official Thread - Moderated  (Read 958992 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
novacadian
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 223
Merit: 104



View Profile WWW
January 10, 2014, 03:36:40 AM
 #3641

Checking my wallet it is showing a credit for the transaction for +100000.00 with 9 confirmations to date. That cannot be the intention of the faucet is it? Let me know if something went amiss and once fixed the DVC will be returned to the faucet.

That's impossible. The donations don't even amount to 100k. And the balance available on the faucet is less than 20k (and they are still there).

That transaction is for sure from other source. Congrats! Cheesy

Wow, a secret benefactor! It makes me feel silly and grateful at the same time. Smiley

- Nova

DVC Address : 1EfsiVUECqmR5Qx7C4PkmwadDXYuSGzssL
1575937331
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1575937331

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1575937331
Reply with quote  #2

1575937331
Report to moderator
1575937331
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1575937331

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1575937331
Reply with quote  #2

1575937331
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1575937331
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1575937331

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1575937331
Reply with quote  #2

1575937331
Report to moderator
psybits
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1000


Crypto Addicto


View Profile WWW
January 10, 2014, 04:19:27 AM
Last edit: January 10, 2014, 04:45:36 AM by psybits
 #3642

You have probably considered all this already, please ignore if its of no use Smiley

Rather than attempt to put Devcoin on it's own page, could other Bitcoin/altcoin/digital currencies page be expanded to include a list of forks and show Devcoin as one? OR can you work it through the programmers bio about who developed the fork?...is he well known enough to have anything written about him/he or his/her work (universities etc?)

Also if I am using all the wrong jargon its because its not my stock in trade, bring back plain English I say!  Wink


It's a no from from wikipedia (from 2 sources)
Quote
The reason the article is proposed for deletion is that it does not prove wp:notability of the subject. Wikipedia's policy is to include only articles about notable subjects. Notability is proved by citing reliable sources that significantly cover the subject, and that are independent of the subject (see here: WP:42). You did not cite any such source. Sources you've cited are: Devtome.com and Devcoin.org (not independent of the subject), some web blogs (not reliable sources) and also some sources that barely mention Devcoin (no significant coverage).
Quote
For a company to be notable, it needs to be the subject of significant coverage by independent, secondary and reliable sources WP:CORP WP:RS. Using the company website for a reference is a primary source, its not independent therefore it can't be used to support most content.Devcoin, while it may be a worthwhile project, is not yet notable because it hasn't attracted widespread coverage, see WP:TOOSOON
'WP:TOOSOON' links to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:TOOSOON

This can't be resolved via the articles above
"Sources used to support a claim of notability include independent, reliable publications in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, television documentaries, websites, and published reports by consumer watchdog organizations[3] except for the following: press releases, press kits, or similar works;" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:CORP

This: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:42 is what I was told is the issue.

There's also the issue of 'conflict of interest', which again to be fair to them is true - particularly as I'm now writing this. But all with the best of intentions. Without notability and related content support it won't be added full stop.

Devcoin has a market cap of over 3 Million USD and is one of the oldest alternative cryptocurrencies - it is notable. It also has the primary innovation of receiver files, and the funding of open source projects worldwide.

It is notable - it is time to rewrite the article and make a complaint to someone higher up regarding this moderators actions / OPINION so that the page is not deleted.

Anyone can find some rule in Wikipedia to delete any page / part of an article.

We need to rewrite the page and make a formal complaint to someone higher, to get a secdond opinion regarding this moderator who is trying to destroy the page.

Coinmarketcap.com is not a "press releases, press kits, or similar works", neither is an online blog - so it is just that moderators OPINION that a blog is not suitable.

Everyone has a conflict of interest - the moderator probably despises alt coins - the same thing happened with the LTC Wikipedia page a year ago (we should probably use the LTC and BTC Wikipedia pages as a kind of template for the  DVC one).

The LTC page references bitcointalk, the LTC forums, Bitcoin whitepaper, Litecoin.org and similar sites - we can do the same and reference Devtome too.

If anyone makes substantial changes to the DVC Wikipedia page - please make sure to keep a copy (as well as the history which Wikipedia keeps) so that if our moderator friend deletes the changes we can easily add them back in later.

EDIT: also isn't DVC on GitHub too? That can also be referenced

melodiem
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 232
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 10, 2014, 04:41:34 AM
 #3643

1) Wikipedia has been seeking donations lately, is it worth pointing out to then that in the future of Devcoin is a place for works like theirs to also be supported and that the Devcoin community would be very happy to help them setup for accepting Devcoin donations?

2) Does Wikipedia use open source code? (dummy question sorry) If they do, then they have an obligation to the community to support it (IMO)

Re reading that I hope it doesn't sound like a bribe, I just see all open source/public domain works benefiting from the long term outcomes from Devcoins, not sure how you communicate that to wikipedia though.


Blah blah.. These are random ideas but in truth, good luck with this, if you need an average visitor to add their two bits via email let me know Smiley


You have probably considered all this already, please ignore if its of no use Smiley

Rather than attempt to put Devcoin on it's own page, could other Bitcoin/altcoin/digital currencies page be expanded to include a list of forks and show Devcoin as one? OR can you work it through the programmers bio about who developed the fork?...is he well known enough to have anything written about him/he or his/her work (universities etc?)

Also if I am using all the wrong jargon its because its not my stock in trade, bring back plain English I say!  Wink


It's a no from from wikipedia (from 2 sources)
Quote
The reason the article is proposed for deletion is that it does not prove wp:notability of the subject. Wikipedia's policy is to include only articles about notable subjects. Notability is proved by citing reliable sources that significantly cover the subject, and that are independent of the subject (see here: WP:42). You did not cite any such source. Sources you've cited are: Devtome.com and Devcoin.org (not independent of the subject), some web blogs (not reliable sources) and also some sources that barely mention Devcoin (no significant coverage).
Quote
For a company to be notable, it needs to be the subject of significant coverage by independent, secondary and reliable sources WP:CORP WP:RS. Using the company website for a reference is a primary source, its not independent therefore it can't be used to support most content.Devcoin, while it may be a worthwhile project, is not yet notable because it hasn't attracted widespread coverage, see WP:TOOSOON
'WP:TOOSOON' links to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:TOOSOON

This can't be resolved via the articles above
"Sources used to support a claim of notability include independent, reliable publications in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, television documentaries, websites, and published reports by consumer watchdog organizations[3] except for the following: press releases, press kits, or similar works;" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:CORP

This: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:42 is what I was told is the issue.

There's also the issue of 'conflict of interest', which again to be fair to them is true - particularly as I'm now writing this. But all with the best of intentions. Without notability and related content support it won't be added full stop.

Devcoin has a market cap of over 3 Million USD and is one of the oldest alternative cryptocurrencies - it is notable. It also has the primary innovation of receiver files, and the funding of open source projects worldwide.

It is notable - it is time to rewrite the article and make a complaint to someone higher up regarding this moderators actions / OPINION so that the page is not deleted.

Anyone can find some rule in Wikipedia to delete any page / part of an article.

We need to rewrite the page and make a formal complaint to someone higher, to get a secdond opinion regarding this moderator who is trying to destroy the page.

Coinmarketcap.com is not a "press releases, press kits, or similar works", neither is an online blog - so it is just that moderators OPINION that a blog is not suitable.

Everyone has a conflict of interest - the moderator probably despises alt coins - the same thing happened with the LTC Wikipedia page a year ago (we should probably use the LTC and BTC Wikipedia pages as a kind of template for the  DVC one).

Unthinkingbit
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 935
Merit: 1008



View Profile
January 10, 2014, 08:05:40 AM
Last edit: January 10, 2014, 08:10:20 PM by Unthinkingbit
 #3644

The round 31 rating word earnings are pasted below and at:
https://raw.github.com/Unthinkingbit/charity/master/rating_earnings_31.csv

Alyssa85,1ERn5JRTm5P47LzhiLCbKtduwj9M3cPE81,5-Rating Comments(http://devtome.com/doku.php?id=rating_alyssa85_31)
Dinkleberg,1Mnd6HGYcoNryKT2bkaT55BPsVK1a8o49u,5-Rating Comments(http://devtome.com/doku.php?id=rating_dinkleberg_31)
Eeharris,1CfWWyDNUeioJc7TBnqDBDyQKJUYwT7S2Z,5-Rating Comments(http://devtome.com/doku.php?id=rating_eeharris_31)
Fheenix,1JvdsgxiJQYAJSE4Tjs3BWbXZk6Kw9mxnB,5-Rating Comments(http://devtome.com/doku.php?id=rating_fheenix_31)
Giftculturewriting,16GGzGGsTtzvUdTHoWFJtWXXWdpPWwxr3u,5-Rating Comments(http://devtome.com/doku.php?id=rating_giftculturewriting_31)
Hunterbunter,1LHVxAkzcN8BzSdrT7J2W3CCpiz5Rgj72E,5-Rating Comments(http://devtome.com/doku.php?id=rating_hunterbunter_31)
Raptorak,1ASdsZ1JUwtVXDfYBx7MRNMeHQ8J51pSRw,5-Rating Comments(http://devtome.com/doku.php?id=rating_raptorak_31)
Smeagol,1SMEAGqpm9JSpJ6JZaM5dEBptPTNahpFa,5-Rating Comments(http://devtome.com/doku.php?id=rating_smeagol_31)
Weisoq,1Cy9e1Yuwboj63XRkMkT6W6YsGDtYDrsUp,5-Rating Comments(http://devtome.com/doku.php?id=rating_weisoq_31)


People who rate after will go into the round 32 bounty file.

They are generated by rating.py:
https://raw.github.com/Unthinkingbit/charity/master/rating.py

Unthinkingbit
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 935
Merit: 1008



View Profile
January 10, 2014, 08:06:50 AM
 #3645

The round 31 marketing earnings are pasted below and at:
https://raw.github.com/Unthinkingbit/charity/master/marketing_earnings_31.csv

Alyssa85,1ERn5JRTm5P47LzhiLCbKtduwj9M3cPE81,1/5-Marketing(http://devtome.com/doku.php?id=wiki:user:alyssa85)
Ashleysly,1Mdu9MbAEsUm81NzEPQR7GCkUxbG39pWMy,1/5-Marketing(http://devtome.com/doku.php?id=wiki:user:ashleysly)
Bittzy78,1Pz1K3res89p4GF3N26gz93CzbyWUcjEAb,12/5-Marketing(http://devtome.com/doku.php?id=wiki:user:bittzy78)
Cryptoaddicto,1DKhy7jj8oB53iGZYrWzDSfcVoKHjsuxaa,2/5-Marketing(http://devtome.com/doku.php?id=wiki:user:cryptoaddicto)
Dalamar96,1BXH2Xida1orS5GpXdniMrwZFbi5iznM92,4/5-Marketing(http://devtome.com/doku.php?id=wiki:user:dalamar96)
Eeharris,1CfWWyDNUeioJc7TBnqDBDyQKJUYwT7S2Z,4/5-Marketing(http://devtome.com/doku.php?id=wiki:user:eeharris)
Emfox,1Emfox1WswYcd2YucUskRzqfRWKkcm1Jut,34/5-Marketing(http://devtome.com/doku.php?id=wiki:user:emfox)
Fheenix,1JvdsgxiJQYAJSE4Tjs3BWbXZk6Kw9mxnB,16/5-Marketing(http://devtome.com/doku.php?id=wiki:user:fheenix)
Fuzzybear,18xskifRMWUtMzbHSzQi7rEWF5upmktgF2,26/5-Marketing(http://devtome.com/doku.php?id=wiki:user:fuzzybear)
Hunterbunter,17qBxPE1e84se785Yn3BupFRPPekEc15Pv,5/5-Marketing(http://devtome.com/doku.php?id=wiki:user:hunterbunter)
Iluveunc,199BUHDPHwpzyzVzmTw6V2jeqYfEpVuwMu,1/5-Marketing(http://devtome.com/doku.php?id=wiki:user:iluveunc)
Jasinlee,1Ahu957fXXwhJ5LqmpxMFHVWwSQ7h4PkXb,22/5-Marketing(http://devtome.com/doku.php?id=wiki:user:jasinlee)
Knotwork,121Pb2BBrU7C61vBdWCKVuFFmaEZr6xFAX,6/5-Marketing(http://devtome.com/doku.php?id=wiki:user:knotwork)
Leojane,15szdWSCEVAvXVEKsrEtcKNtCfmo69drZ9,2/5-Marketing(http://devtome.com/doku.php?id=wiki:user:leojane)
Mabtc,1NqxTQ7D9w3oukfpYda8GHnXSYxr9xFoQS,3/5-Marketing(http://devtome.com/doku.php?id=wiki:user:mabtc)
Matt608,1Ks4roXAZj45sXRsWMfGqmAPmDoWZ9TAko,1/5-Marketing(http://devtome.com/doku.php?id=wiki:user:matt608)
Melodiemuse,1GJt2nDUrVinYyDFJuWMkkK1Urod5nH72F,1/5-Marketing(http://devtome.com/doku.php?id=wiki:user:melodiemuse)
Meta-p02,1Q4wj8JfZNGgRFYrk2bfWvqcqH1Y9YVNn9,1/5-Marketing(http://devtome.com/doku.php?id=wiki:user:meta-p02)
Metazilla,1CJSRunQtPQsiZRK7vznyeCfyDTb2kxGA8,1/5-Marketing(http://devtome.com/doku.php?id=wiki:user:metazilla)
Papacrusher,13mtCyZTnMJRJw9nt7xqbiGU7tXrvkeAJB,1/5-Marketing(http://devtome.com/doku.php?id=wiki:user:papacrusher)
Paul3,1MPPHP3TLvD4mph9z1GpM5BamB5Pcx5HuT,1/5-Marketing(http://devtome.com/doku.php?id=wiki:user:paul3)
Penguinwriter,1LNL1Zrg5h2z8m9c48fgdMx2uXmN3S5Kch,1/5-Marketing(http://devtome.com/doku.php?id=wiki:user:penguinwriter)
Raptorak,1ASdsZ1JUwtVXDfYBx7MRNMeHQ8J51pSRw,19/5-Marketing(http://devtome.com/doku.php?id=wiki:user:raptorak)
Smeagol,1SMEAGqpm9JSpJ6JZaM5dEBptPTNahpFa,7/5-Marketing(http://devtome.com/doku.php?id=wiki:user:smeagol)
Twobits,13A2e3wX9MVMtP1JMxGFcbd2ZuSeVLe8uZ,1/5-Marketing(http://devtome.com/doku.php?id=wiki:user:twobits)
Unthinkingbit,17vec4jQGCzMEsTnivizHPaowE715tu2CB,6/5-Marketing(http://devtome.com/doku.php?id=wiki:user:unthinkingbit)
Weisoq,1Cy9e1Yuwboj63XRkMkT6W6YsGDtYDrsUp,2/5-Marketing(http://devtome.com/doku.php?id=wiki:user:weisoq)
Wiser,1LpoMowMPEVWk2LaJUdAUNaK7gBDRA1r7F,2/5-Marketing(http://devtome.com/doku.php?id=wiki:user:wiser)

Total payout is 183/5 = 36.6.

The earnings are generated by marketing.py:
https://raw.github.com/Unthinkingbit/charity/master/marketing.py


weisoq
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 718
Merit: 500


View Profile
January 10, 2014, 10:35:04 AM
 #3646

You have probably considered all this already, please ignore if its of no use Smiley

Rather than attempt to put Devcoin on it's own page, could other Bitcoin/altcoin/digital currencies page be expanded to include a list of forks and show Devcoin as one? OR can you work it through the programmers bio about who developed the fork?...is he well known enough to have anything written about him/he or his/her work (universities etc?)

Also if I am using all the wrong jargon its because its not my stock in trade, bring back plain English I say!  Wink
Yeah once upon a time a fork was something you used to be put food in your mouth...

I think other pages could write about devcoin but it would take them to agree to do that. If you look at other crypto pages (stablecoin/mastercoin) they have same issue with deletion. Wiki open source support - that's what I thought, but it's not how wikipedia works. The main criteria is notability, not content or subject or worth. For example there's a dogecoin article - that's simply on basis that there are loads of news reports about it by mainstream 'trusted' sources.
weisoq
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 718
Merit: 500


View Profile
January 10, 2014, 10:46:40 AM
 #3647

Devcoin has a market cap of over 3 Million USD and is one of the oldest alternative cryptocurrencies - it is notable. It also has the primary innovation of receiver files, and the funding of open source projects worldwide.

It is notable - it is time to rewrite the article and make a complaint to someone higher up regarding this moderators actions / OPINION so that the page is not deleted.

Anyone can find some rule in Wikipedia to delete any page / part of an article.

We need to rewrite the page and make a formal complaint to someone higher, to get a secdond opinion regarding this moderator who is trying to destroy the page.

Coinmarketcap.com is not a "press releases, press kits, or similar works", neither is an online blog - so it is just that moderators OPINION that a blog is not suitable.

Everyone has a conflict of interest - the moderator probably despises alt coins - the same thing happened with the LTC Wikipedia page a year ago (we should probably use the LTC and BTC Wikipedia pages as a kind of template for the  DVC one).

The LTC page references bitcointalk, the LTC forums, Bitcoin whitepaper, Litecoin.org and similar sites - we can do the same and reference Devtome too.

If anyone makes substantial changes to the DVC Wikipedia page - please make sure to keep a copy (as well as the history which Wikipedia keeps) so that if our moderator friend deletes the changes we can easily add them back in later.

EDIT: also isn't DVC on GitHub too? That can also be referenced
I quoted the market cap, references to age, receiver files, devtome, github, gitorious.

I used the bitcoin, litecoin, peercoin pages as templates.

I already rewrote the page from the initial post to make it as neutral as possible. It's not the 'content' that's the problem now, it's just the 'notability'. If you want to make a complaint then go for it although I'd recommend you first read the article/some of the links I posted before taking a viewpoint.
melodiem
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 232
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 10, 2014, 11:01:47 AM
 #3648

You have probably considered all this already, please ignore if its of no use Smiley

Rather than attempt to put Devcoin on it's own page, could other Bitcoin/altcoin/digital currencies page be expanded to include a list of forks and show Devcoin as one? OR can you work it through the programmers bio about who developed the fork?...is he well known enough to have anything written about him/he or his/her work (universities etc?)

Also if I am using all the wrong jargon its because its not my stock in trade, bring back plain English I say!  Wink
Yeah once upon a time a fork was something you used to be put food in your mouth...

I think other pages could write about devcoin but it would take them to agree to do that. If you look at other crypto pages (stablecoin/mastercoin) they have same issue with deletion. Wiki open source support - that's what I thought, but it's not how wikipedia works. The main criteria is notability, not content or subject or worth. For example there's a dogecoin article - that's simply on basis that there are loads of news reports about it by mainstream 'trusted' sources.

I think you might be right that there is some personal opinion going on there. Ive run out of suggestions Sad Good luck with this

psybits
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1000


Crypto Addicto


View Profile WWW
January 10, 2014, 12:27:50 PM
 #3649

Devcoin has a market cap of over 3 Million USD and is one of the oldest alternative cryptocurrencies - it is notable. It also has the primary innovation of receiver files, and the funding of open source projects worldwide.

It is notable - it is time to rewrite the article and make a complaint to someone higher up regarding this moderators actions / OPINION so that the page is not deleted.

Anyone can find some rule in Wikipedia to delete any page / part of an article.

We need to rewrite the page and make a formal complaint to someone higher, to get a secdond opinion regarding this moderator who is trying to destroy the page.

Coinmarketcap.com is not a "press releases, press kits, or similar works", neither is an online blog - so it is just that moderators OPINION that a blog is not suitable.

Everyone has a conflict of interest - the moderator probably despises alt coins - the same thing happened with the LTC Wikipedia page a year ago (we should probably use the LTC and BTC Wikipedia pages as a kind of template for the  DVC one).

The LTC page references bitcointalk, the LTC forums, Bitcoin whitepaper, Litecoin.org and similar sites - we can do the same and reference Devtome too.

If anyone makes substantial changes to the DVC Wikipedia page - please make sure to keep a copy (as well as the history which Wikipedia keeps) so that if our moderator friend deletes the changes we can easily add them back in later.

EDIT: also isn't DVC on GitHub too? That can also be referenced
I quoted the market cap, references to age, receiver files, devtome, github, gitorious.

I used the bitcoin, litecoin, peercoin pages as templates.

I already rewrote the page from the initial post to make it as neutral as possible. It's not the 'content' that's the problem now, it's just the 'notability'. If you want to make a complaint then go for it although I'd recommend you first read the article/some of the links I posted before taking a viewpoint.

I think it looks great - thanks for all of your work. When I have time I may make some more changes / add some more refs.

When the LTC page was first started there was not a lot of media coverage and the page survived - after a fight for it!

I advise anyone reading this who wants DVC on Wikipedia to join the discussion surrounding the Devcoin page on Wikipedia - and also go through the proper channels to raise objections to the article deletion (I think you can do this from the discussion page on Wikipedia).

If enough of us add more references / content to the Devcoin page on Wikipedia - and raise objections to the deletion the page will survive.

We shouldn't just give up - let's keep DVC on Wikipedia where it belongs!

psybits
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1000


Crypto Addicto


View Profile WWW
January 10, 2014, 01:06:01 PM
 #3650

As the most popular alt coin exchange I believe having DVC / BTC trading on Cryptsy will benefit our very special coin immensely.

Everyone please vote for the suggestion on Cryptsy to add DVC / BTC trading and leave a comment too!

https://cryptsy.freshdesk.com/support/discussions/topics/63863


novacadian
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 223
Merit: 104



View Profile WWW
January 10, 2014, 01:57:34 PM
 #3651

As the most popular alt coin exchange I believe having DVC / BTC trading on Cryptsy will benefit our very special coin immensely.

Everyone please vote for the suggestion on Cryptsy to add DVC / BTC trading and leave a comment too!

https://cryptsy.freshdesk.com/support/discussions/topics/63863



Done

DVC Address : 1EfsiVUECqmR5Qx7C4PkmwadDXYuSGzssL
eeh
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 185
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 10, 2014, 02:04:02 PM
 #3652

The round 31 rating word earnings are pasted below and at:
https://raw.github.com/Unthinkingbit/charity/master/rating_earnings_31.csv

Dinkleberg,1Mnd6HGYcoNryKT2bkaT55BPsVK1a8o49u,5-Rating Comments(http://devtome.com/doku.php?id=rating_dinkleberg_31)
Fheenix,1JvdsgxiJQYAJSE4Tjs3BWbXZk6Kw9mxnB,5-Rating Comments(http://devtome.com/doku.php?id=rating_fheenix_31)
Giftculturewriting,16GGzGGsTtzvUdTHoWFJtWXXWdpPWwxr3u,5-Rating Comments(http://devtome.com/doku.php?id=rating_giftculturewriting_31)
Hunterbunter,1LHVxAkzcN8BzSdrT7J2W3CCpiz5Rgj72E,5-Rating Comments(http://devtome.com/doku.php?id=rating_hunterbunter_31)
Raptorak,1ASdsZ1JUwtVXDfYBx7MRNMeHQ8J51pSRw,5-Rating Comments(http://devtome.com/doku.php?id=rating_raptorak_31)
Smeagol,1SMEAGqpm9JSpJ6JZaM5dEBptPTNahpFa,3-Rating Comments(http://devtome.com/doku.php?id=rating_smeagol_31)
Weisoq,1Cy9e1Yuwboj63XRkMkT6W6YsGDtYDrsUp,5-Rating Comments(http://devtome.com/doku.php?id=rating_weisoq_31)

People who rate after will go into the round 32 bounty file.

They are generated by rating.py:
https://raw.github.com/Unthinkingbit/charity/master/rating.py


I rated a few days ago. Can you recheck that?
melodiem
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 232
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 10, 2014, 02:15:32 PM
 #3653

As the most popular alt coin exchange I believe having DVC / BTC trading on Cryptsy will benefit our very special coin immensely.
Everyone please vote for the suggestion on Cryptsy to add DVC / BTC trading and leave a comment too!
https://cryptsy.freshdesk.com/support/discussions/topics/63863

I voted but I had no idea what to say so I bolted... sorry x

matt608
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 952
Merit: 1000


Gambling Investment Fund


View Profile
January 10, 2014, 02:45:26 PM
 #3654

Anyone know why people are dumping their DVC? 


GIFcoin




.
Gambling
Investment Fund
  Invest in a working business  .......        ✔︎ 
  80% of the net profits are shared .....      ✔︎ 
  Profit share token     ✔︎ 
Follow us & check out the .      whitepaper     .
.
Website    Announcement    Twitter    Telegram    Facebook
eeh
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 185
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 10, 2014, 02:48:00 PM
 #3655

Converting to BTC makes the sensible choice for selling. Especially since we've signed up a lot of new users and BTC prices are high. However, even at this price, BTC's recent highs are being offset so much that sellers of DVC may as well be dumping for around 20-30 satoshi. Really not a wise choice. It seems best to me to sell at the end of a DVC round or after a massive BTC dump as coins move into alts.

Just my two bits.
markm
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2464
Merit: 1032



View Profile WWW
January 10, 2014, 02:50:55 PM
 #3656

People are dumping bitcoins too. Both bitcoins and devcoins have been available cheap lately.

A great time to be a buyer.

Place buy orders below current prices in steps downward, and as they sell put them back on the sell side above current prices going up in steps.

Nice income to be made that way.

It goes in waves, a while back all my sell orders up through 193 Satoshis per coin got bought, then came this downward move where more and more cheaper and cheaper buy orders are getting taken up giving me more devcoins with which to replenish my sell orders ready for the next upswing.

-MarkM-

Browser-launched Crossfire client now online (select CrossCiv server for Galactic  Milieu)
Free website hosting with PHP, MySQL etc: http://hosting.knotwork.com/
melodiem
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 232
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 10, 2014, 02:56:13 PM
 #3657

Anyone know why people are dumping their DVC? 

Round 31 just finished, so round 30 got paid? (I think) so it is probably more a reflection of Devtomes payout than dumping.. but I dont trade so I dont know its just a guess  Wink

psybits
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1000


Crypto Addicto


View Profile WWW
January 10, 2014, 02:57:45 PM
 #3658

Anyone know why people are dumping their DVC?  

Some of them are probably new Devcoiners who really need the money.

Everyone should sell responsibly (across all 3 exchanges- Cryptsy, Crypto-trade and Vircurex) to spread out their sell orders.

They should also place sell orders on the sell side - instead of dumping into the buy orders and lowering the price - this way they would actually get a higher price for their DVC too.

If everyone did this it would actually benefit us all - as the DVC exchange rate would stay more stable.

Don't worry though - I have seen DVC increase immensely in popularity this last month - I believe DVC will see new highs this coming year Smiley

smeagol
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 966
Merit: 1000


bitclicker.ga


View Profile WWW
January 10, 2014, 03:34:32 PM
 #3659

Smeagol,1SMEAGqpm9JSpJ6JZaM5dEBptPTNahpFa,3-Rating Comments(http://devtome.com/doku.php?id=rating_smeagol_31)

How many characters are required to get 5 shares?  (I think I still have one page to go for rating anyway, sorry)

  BITMIXER.IO   High Volume Bitcoin MIXER  
BTC: 1JH2jybjWruvDD23wSe5PCY9Epmr45u6nQ - DVC: 1SMEAGqpm9JSpJ6JZaM5dEBptPTNahpFa - Earn Devcoins by Writing | Devcoin Official Site  | SAT
tenthirtyone
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 49
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 10, 2014, 04:34:11 PM
 #3660

Weekend Board Updates

Site will be in a weird spot for DNS a short period while I migrate servers. Currently it's on a test server and it's conflicting with the domain for some folks. Since the site isn't technically *live* as it's unfinished I wasn't too worried but this needs to happen so I may as well do it now.

I'll be working on thread moderators appointed by OP

Nova was working on the email portion of the site but has released his code. TMK it is half finished. If anyone wants to pick that up please do so. Otherwise if enough time goes on I'll jump on this. I'm plenty busy without it though.

Pages: « 1 ... 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 [183] 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 ... 412 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!