Vbs
|
 |
September 01, 2013, 01:31:10 AM |
|
So you have nothing to say but "lol" to valid concerns? And you're supposed to be the knowledgeable guy of this thread?  You didn't raise any "valid concern" that wasn't already replied before extensively. 
|
|
|
|
carpetbagger
Sr. Member
  
Offline
Activity: 258
Merit: 250
You can trust me, I have an avatar
|
 |
September 01, 2013, 01:39:11 AM |
|
Ken wants us to believe that he was "allowed to tell us" that he converted BTC to USD at the worst possible time, weeks after the fact. If that sounds plausible to you, Ken's *own finances* covered by NDA with eAsic, then Y U be hatin' on pones?
Edit: Why do you think eAsic made Ken sign such a sweeping NDA, and ... does he also have to put his hand in eAsic's back pocket, look pretty and keep his mouth shut?
Edit2: Did anyone even bother asking *the rate* at which your BTC was turned into fiat lol?
Thank you for raising this. I wasn't paying enough attention when it happened to detail it myself. Pretty obvious what went down there and it's the loving shareholders who got left holding the bag again. He fucked up the other big btc conversion too, didn't he? Personally I think everything behind the scenes in actm is quite possibly going fantastic. This is just yet another market play by Ken. He's been pulling stunts like this since the first IPO. Please don't anyone take that as advice to invest in actm either. It is quite, quite the opposite.
|
♔ Keep clam & hodl on
|
|
|
HuLaN
Member

Offline
Activity: 66
Merit: 10
|
 |
September 01, 2013, 01:47:50 AM |
|
28 nm isn't a magical thing. If your chip is a copy-paste of a FPGA, it's not going to be very good, 28 nm or not. For example, BitFury's chips, at 55 nm, might be better. And then there's the cost of production.
Vbs mentions that eAsic's 28 nm is "mature". Yet no one claimed it isn't. Classical fallacy: criticize what isn't the opinion of your opponents, to appear right.
BitFury's 3GH chip at 55nm is going to outperform ActM's 28nm eAsic chip? keep dreaming kiddo 
|
|
|
|
FloatesMcgoates
|
 |
September 01, 2013, 01:54:38 AM |
|
heheheh looks like .004 has been breached and all the support at .0038 has been pulled. In fact there is no support to be seen at all - looks like ActiveMining will continue to tank for the foreseeable future down to IPOv2 levels of .0025
|
|
|
|
discobean
Member

Offline
Activity: 105
Merit: 11
|
 |
September 01, 2013, 01:58:46 AM |
|
28 nm isn't a magical thing. If your chip is a copy-paste of a FPGA, it's not going to be very good, 28 nm or not. For example, BitFury's chips, at 55 nm, might be better. And then there's the cost of production.
Vbs mentions that eAsic's 28 nm is "mature". Yet no one claimed it isn't. Classical fallacy: criticize what isn't the opinion of your opponents, to appear right.
BitFury's 3GH chip at 55nm is going to outperform ActM's 28nm eAsic chip? keep dreaming kiddo  I wouldn't be so sure about that. My (little) understanding of eASIC tech, and the reason why ActM went for eASIC was fast build (to production) of the ASIC chip, be cheaper and more efficient than FPGA. Its as if eASIC has has 'APIs' built to go from requirements to build fast, unlike full custom. This means they would lack in other areas, such as performance and power usage compared to full custom. To me its eASIC is like .net or Java, vs full custom which is like C or assembler.
|
|
|
|
redbeans2012
|
 |
September 01, 2013, 01:59:50 AM |
|
heheheh looks like .004 has been breached and all the support at .0038 has been pulled. In fact there is no support to be seen at all - looks like ActiveMining will continue to tank for the foreseeable future down to IPOv2 levels of .0025
My only hope is to average out somewhere along the way I guess.
|
|
|
|
Vbs
|
 |
September 01, 2013, 02:25:08 AM |
|
28 nm isn't a magical thing. If your chip is a copy-paste of a FPGA, it's not going to be very good, 28 nm or not. For example, BitFury's chips, at 55 nm, might be better. And then there's the cost of production.
Vbs mentions that eAsic's 28 nm is "mature". Yet no one claimed it isn't. Classical fallacy: criticize what isn't the opinion of your opponents, to appear right.
BitFury's 3GH chip at 55nm is going to outperform ActM's 28nm eAsic chip? keep dreaming kiddo  I wouldn't be so sure about that. My (little) understanding of eASIC tech, and the reason why ActM went for eASIC was fast build (to production) of the ASIC chip, be cheaper and more efficient than FPGA. Its as if eASIC has has 'APIs' built to go from requirements to build fast, unlike full custom. This means they would lack in other areas, such as performance and power usage compared to full custom. To me its eASIC is like .net or Java, vs full custom which is like C or assembler. You have to take into consideration that they didn't grow 980% in 2012 out of speculation. Their process is very real and is efficient "enough" to have heavy tech partners wanting to do chips with them. If any of those weren't satisfied they would have jumped ship a long time ago. It's a semi-custom process more like "C vs ASM" and they are already on their 3rd chip design revision (Nextreme-3@28nm) with several patents on their process.
|
|
|
|
joele
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1022
Merit: 1000
|
 |
September 01, 2013, 03:08:38 AM |
|
Is Ken waiting for the avalon chips? because Avalon will be receiving 400k chips this Wednesday and will be delivering for orders made in June and later. http://imgur.com/vcI1PAC
|
|
|
|
afrotec
Full Member
 
Offline
Activity: 127
Merit: 100
Coinnoisseur
|
 |
September 01, 2013, 03:14:24 AM |
|
Is Ken waiting for the avalon chips? because Avalon will be receiving 400k chips this Wednesday and will be delivering for orders made in June and later. http://imgur.com/vcI1PACRefund
|
|
|
|
joele
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1022
Merit: 1000
|
 |
September 01, 2013, 03:17:14 AM |
|
Is Ken waiting for the avalon chips? because Avalon will be receiving 400k chips this Wednesday and will be delivering for orders made in June and later. http://imgur.com/vcI1PACRefund Read the other news, for those who decided to wait.
|
|
|
|
somestranger
|
 |
September 01, 2013, 03:34:03 AM |
|
To me its eASIC is like .net or Java, vs full custom which is like C or assembler.
Interesting comparison since Java runs nearly as fast (50-105%) as C in many applications. The JVM is very efficient. http://benchmarksgame.alioth.debian.org/u64q/java.phpAlso, assembly is rarely faster than C because the compilers know more optimizations than most programmers.
|
|
|
|
FloatesMcgoates
|
 |
September 01, 2013, 06:16:26 AM |
|
What activemining needs is some good ol' cheerleading from stuart, come on guy where are you? Kenneth needs you to spam "NDA" every time the share price goes down.
|
|
|
|
iCEBREAKER
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1072
Crypto is the separation of Power and State.
|
 |
September 01, 2013, 06:18:50 AM |
|
What activemining needs is some good ol' cheerleading from stuart, come on guy where are you? Kenneth needs you to spam "NDA" every time the share price goes down.
Where is Stuart? Under NDA. 
|
██████████ ██████████████████ ██████████████████████ ██████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████████ ██████████████ ██████████████ ████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████ ██████████████████████ ██████████████████ ██████████ Monero
|
| "The difference between bad and well-developed digital cash will determine whether we have a dictatorship or a real democracy." David Chaum 1996 "Fungibility provides privacy as a side effect." Adam Back 2014
|
| | |
|
|
|
superduh
|
 |
September 01, 2013, 06:38:23 AM |
|
it's kind of weird. they need to be putting out: more real, news etc their competitors are putting more info about their progress than AMC is and this can't go on forever under "NDA" there must be some kind of progress reporting happening
|
ok
|
|
|
aquarius
|
 |
September 01, 2013, 07:47:24 AM |
|
it seems that some people are very good at posting troll posts in the top slots of each page.
that must be good for business for you. how much extra do you get for top posts vs. post lower on the page?
|
|
|
|
zumzero
|
 |
September 01, 2013, 07:48:13 AM |
|
I think it may be a good idea that following the soon to be released news announcement, someone collates a pile of questions from shareholders and presents them to Ken for his attention.
It's unclear how much info will be made available and what topics will be covered by this announcement, so I suggest we start the Q & A immediately following.
For people to offer up questions at this stage may not be such a good idea given how little we know about the content of this annoucement.
Also, given this threads ability to mask important information perhaps we should also post the Q & A on the first page?
Cheers.
|
|
|
|
bigdude
|
 |
September 01, 2013, 07:56:17 AM |
|
I think it may be a good idea that following the soon to be released news announcement, someone collates a pile of questions from shareholders and presents them to Ken for his attention.
It's unclear how much info will be made available and what topics will be covered by this announcement, so I suggest we start the Q & A immediately following.
For people to offer up questions at this stage may not be such a good idea given how little we know about the content of this annoucement.
Also, given this threads ability to mask important information perhaps we should also post the Q & A on the first page?
Cheers.
Now that! is an excellent suggestion my friend *thumbs up*
|
|
|
|
Mabsark
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 826
Merit: 1004
|
 |
September 01, 2013, 09:17:54 AM |
|
So, now ActM's share price has dropped below Labcoin's and it looks like it will drop down to around 0.0025, whereas Labcoin will be heading up to 0.01 BTC when they start hashing within the next 2 weeks. I told you guys this was going to happen when the price was about 0.0045-0.005 BTC. It was blatantly obvious.
It's also blatantly obvious that Labcoin will have their 50TH/s online before ActM even have ASIC samples. Those of you holding ActM at this point are just being sycophantic fanboys and that fanboyism is leading you to ignore a great opportunity to make a hell of a lot of profit.
01. Sell ActM 02. Buy Laboin 03. Wait 04. Sell Labcoin 05. Profit 06. Buy ActM 07. Wait 08. Sell ActM 09. Profit 10. Invest in new IPO or existing successful assets.
|
|
|
|
zumzero
|
 |
September 01, 2013, 09:25:54 AM |
|
Sell ActM
Buy Labcoin
Miss the boat
Erm...?
|
|
|
|
bobboooiie
|
 |
September 01, 2013, 09:42:54 AM |
|
Sell ActM
Buy Labcoin
Miss the boat
Erm...?
Missing the titanic woudlnt be that bad
|
|
|
|
|