Bitcoin Forum
December 07, 2016, 10:55:45 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 [310] 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 ... 376 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [1050 TH] BitMinter.com [1% PPLNS,Pays TxFees +MergedMining,Stratum,GBT,vardiff]  (Read 775605 times)
DrHaribo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1960


Bitminter.com Operator


View Profile WWW
March 25, 2014, 04:45:35 PM
 #6181

and hey Doc, done any thinking about adding new merge coins?

At the moment I think only namecoin is worth anything (of the coins that support merged mining with bitcoin).

▶▶▶ Bitminter.com - Your trusted mining pool since 2011.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1481108145
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481108145

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481108145
Reply with quote  #2

1481108145
Report to moderator
1481108145
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481108145

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481108145
Reply with quote  #2

1481108145
Report to moderator
Flashman
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518


Hodl!


View Profile
March 25, 2014, 06:04:50 PM
 #6182

Yah but we were mining it when it was worth pennies, huntercoin and mazacoin were two of the new mergables that were mentioned earlier, would just be nice to have a stash in case they reach higher levels of popularity, before world+dog is in on it.

TL;DR See Spot run. Run Spot run. .... .... Freelance interweb comedian, for teh lulz >>> 1MqAAR4XkJWfDt367hVTv5SstPZ54Fwse6

Bitcoin Custodian: Keeping BTC away from weak heads since Feb '13, adopter of homeless bitcoins.
bcm2013
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 21


View Profile
March 25, 2014, 06:20:09 PM
 #6183

Hi, Doc removed the page that you are on about. I found it really handy to see where I was for my hash power coins wise. I knew what I got per block at my hash level and if I say doubled it I could look at someones stats that were at the hash level I was thinking of increasing to and see what a difference it would make.

I moved pools to keep this feature from another pool provider. Shame as I liked Bitminter. But I liked this feature as I am always expanding my gear.
I did the same thing with those pages.  Since I've just added a AntMiner S1, I've moved up into the 250-275 Ghps range; would have liked to see how that ranked with everyone else.  I found it quite useful.

It was the slowest loading page on the website. Someone noticed this and started hammering it from an amazon cloud server.

I've been thinking of adding something else instead. Maybe show the 10 shifts that were used to calculate payments, with the same info that is on the shifts page today for each shift. Maybe add in some sort of summary of the shifts at the end, and show somewhere how much you got paid for that block.

That's just an idea so far. What kind of information would you like to see on the block page (which you get when clicking a block on the blocks list)?

That idea is good.  Alternatively, some pools show the top 50 contributors (like you do today), but also with "my ranking" (depending on who you are).  For example, 1-50 are shown as they are today, then say, I might be #1250 at my latest GHash rate, if I'm logged in.  That could be similarly useful, although, not as much as the original ranking of all users.  I get it that it was slow and unfortunately exploited.  Statistics / reporting / analysis is always good.

Mining with 2 AntMiner S3s, 1 S1
gizza2
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3


View Profile
March 25, 2014, 11:52:55 PM
 #6184

Hiya, Doc.

This may have been clarified previously but I'm compelled to ask based on your recent comment about difficulty.

If I understand difficulty correctly it's the sole corrective factor available to the Bitcoin mining algorithm to offset ever-increasing hashing power.  Changes in difficulty result from a review of total hashing power every 2160 blocks so difficulty is reactive not proactive and throttling not punitive.  The authors' goal was to produce/release one block of 25 BTC every 10 mins through the year 2140 so why, other than imbalances in hashing power among individuals and pools, would reward blocks decrease with increases in difficulty?  Don't those steps downward on the rewards page primarily indicate a disproportionate increase of hashing power elsewhere rather than an increase in the difficulty factor itself?  Someone or some pool will receive 25BTC every 10 mins for 126 more years so I'm confused by your reward graph's asymptotic approach toward zero in the short time I've participated here.

Again forgive me if I'm splitting hairs or if I'm just plain wrong but I'm trying to get the sequence of events straight and better understand the value proposition of long-term mining. Where do you predict Bitminter will be in 20 years?

Thanks for your work on Bitminter and for your active participation in this forum.

=G=
DrHaribo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1960


Bitminter.com Operator


View Profile WWW
March 26, 2014, 07:00:58 AM
 #6185

Difficulty adjustment happens every 2016 blocks. At difficulty adjustment it looks at how fast the blocks were found, not at the hashpower which is unknown to everyone including the bitcoin system itself.

Reward halving happens every 210 000 blocks. It's a separate process from difficulty adjustments. We've had the first reward halving from 50 BTC to 25 BTC per block already.

The goal with difficulty adjustments is that somewhere a block should be mined every 10 minutes on average, not exactly every 10 minutes. If you are lucky you find two blocks in a row in 1 second. And as long as hashpower keeps rising it will be more often than every 10 minutes - that's why the difficulty goes up.

The reward graph at Bitminter shows a single proof of work being worth less and less as the difficulty goes up. That's because the chance to create a block with one proof of work is 1 divided by the current difficulty. As difficulty goes up the work becomes less valuable because it is less likely to actually create a block. Put another way, the average amount of work needed to create a block goes up, so the value of work goes down. At the next reward halving the value of a proof of work will also be halved (if we ignore income from transaction fees).

I have no idea what the world will look like in 20 years.

▶▶▶ Bitminter.com - Your trusted mining pool since 2011.
gizza2
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3


View Profile
March 26, 2014, 01:29:42 PM
 #6186

Thanks for correcting my sloppy numbers (2016 blocks and ~10 mins) and I wasn't even aware of reward halving.  Your perspective helped a great deal, Doc, and I didn't mean to put you on the spot with the 20 year projection question as nobody has a crystal ball.  I guess I'm just wondering, all else being equal in the world, if mining will remain worthwhile long-term in light of what appears to be a rapidly decreasing and dispersing reward allotment.  I have only two months of mining under my belt and understand that I'm getting into this WAY late but doesn't it feel a bit early in the Bitcoin scheme (5 of131 years) for things to feel this way?  Like others I'm just struggling to justify additional hardware investment in this arms race and I'm guessing I'm not alone. 

In any event I remain intrigued by cryptocurrency as it seems to have greater intrinsic value than legal tender issued by the stupid Fed or other non-US equivalents.

Much appreciated.

=G=
Cascaders28
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 193


View Profile
March 26, 2014, 02:37:17 PM
 #6187

I know many people are taking mining as an excuse to experiment with water or solar energy and intend to keep their hardware running for as long as it works. The difficultly scales dynamically so while I don't think this has been seen in quite some time it can technically go down if a bunch of miners start being taken offline. Hardware is becoming outdated at an alarming rate but hashing has to continue not only for block discovery and payouts but also to verify transactions. There are some excellent calculators available online that will help you factor in power cost and approx. difficulty increases to guage profitability. I made a small initial investment in some mining hardware and started around 10GH/s. I then jumped to a little over 100 but I've since sold a bit of the gear and right now I have 2 simple Chili miners hashing at around 72GH/s combined. In a few months when they have made me enough coin I might purchase an AntMiner to more than double my hashing power. I'd absolutely love to be one of the big miners with 40TH but I'm approaching this as a hobby and appreciating the decentralized nature of the currency.

I've only been in the game for about 10 months but in that time I've seen the price go from $70 to $1100+ and right back down. If BTC are worth 1 million 20 years from now then even .00001 would probably buy you a coffee somewhere. Right now you can make that off pimping out your signature and faucets.
botolo86
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 186


View Profile
March 26, 2014, 07:36:49 PM
 #6188

I love BitMinter for its community and I love the full stat page more than anything else. But I can't avoid noticing that this pool is getting smaller and smaller and that luck is getting higher and higher. My question is: is this just related to hash power or is it also related to the way BitMinter chooses transactions and put them together to form a block? Maybe other pool's algorithm is better at this?
DrHaribo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1960


Bitminter.com Operator


View Profile WWW
March 26, 2014, 08:40:19 PM
 #6189

Luck goes up and down. It's been fairly average lately.

Variance has gone up. That's because the pool is a smaller part of the global hashpower now.

No, you can't improve your average luck by including certain transactions. Take a look at the sha-256 algorithm on wikipedia. See if you can find ways to predict how certain inputs will affect the output. Noone has been able to do it so far.

▶▶▶ Bitminter.com - Your trusted mining pool since 2011.
botolo86
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 186


View Profile
March 26, 2014, 09:21:52 PM
 #6190

No, you can't improve your average luck by including certain transactions. Take a look at the sha-256 algorithm on wikipedia. See if you can find ways to predict how certain inputs will affect the output. Noone has been able to do it so far.

Thanks for your reply, Doc. So basically this means that pools put together transactions randomly (taking into account transactions' fees). Why for example some blocks have more transactions than others? I thought this was because the pools chose those particular transactions because easier to hash but now I understand that this is not true.

Thanks for your clarifications!
DrHaribo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1960


Bitminter.com Operator


View Profile WWW
March 27, 2014, 06:31:32 AM
 #6191

Thanks for your reply, Doc. So basically this means that pools put together transactions randomly (taking into account transactions' fees). Why for example some blocks have more transactions than others? I thought this was because the pools chose those particular transactions because easier to hash but now I understand that this is not true.

Pools have different settings for the total size of transactions they will take in a block overall, and how much space is reserved for free transactions. And of course the amount of paid transactions varies over time, both in number and size.

There is no known way (yet) to change the data to make it easier to hash.

▶▶▶ Bitminter.com - Your trusted mining pool since 2011.
Flashman
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518


Hodl!


View Profile
March 27, 2014, 10:15:43 AM
 #6192

What about one of them Blendtec blenders? They can mash up a brick until it's easy to chew Cheesy

TL;DR See Spot run. Run Spot run. .... .... Freelance interweb comedian, for teh lulz >>> 1MqAAR4XkJWfDt367hVTv5SstPZ54Fwse6

Bitcoin Custodian: Keeping BTC away from weak heads since Feb '13, adopter of homeless bitcoins.
kano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
March 27, 2014, 01:32:40 PM
 #6193

Luck goes up and down. It's been fairly average lately.

Variance has gone up. That's because the pool is a smaller part of the global hashpower now.

No, you can't improve your average luck by including certain transactions. Take a look at the sha-256 algorithm on wikipedia. See if you can find ways to predict how certain inputs will affect the output. Noone has been able to do it so far.

You did notice that a little over 1/3 of all work has no 1diff nonces right? Cheesy

Pool: https://kano.is BTC: 1KanoiBupPiZfkwqB7rfLXAzPnoTshAVmb
CKPool and CGMiner developer, IRC FreeNode #ckpool and #cgminer kanoi
Help keep Bitcoin secure by mining on pools with Stratum, the best protocol to mine Bitcoins with ASIC hardware
DrHaribo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1960


Bitminter.com Operator


View Profile WWW
March 27, 2014, 07:05:23 PM
 #6194

You did notice that a little over 1/3 of all work has no 1diff nonces right? Cheesy

Some work has 3 valid diff-1 nonces, and some has none at all. I haven't found a way to predict this without checking all possible nonce values though.

▶▶▶ Bitminter.com - Your trusted mining pool since 2011.
Fefox
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 161



View Profile
March 29, 2014, 01:09:34 AM
 #6195

Yah, WTG Fefox, he done brung it.

Curious as to what hardware it is though, Cointerra?


Mostly Cointerra... little bit of KNC and a dash of BFL.


Power usage and heat is off the hook...


 Fox.
Isuearl
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 63


View Profile
March 29, 2014, 06:30:38 PM
 #6196

Looks like some else has brung it too...23 TH/s, Hot damn....

donations:
1Mnn794j5pXMUNzz5WpQtmk2FndZXmTMCk
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1582


I charge NOTHING for current signature.


View Profile
March 30, 2014, 08:13:17 PM
 #6197

I just moved 800gh from btcguild

 4 antminers.

██     Please support sidehack with his new miner project Send to :

1BURGERAXHH6Yi6LRybRJK7ybEm5m5HwTr

 
 ██
freddyfarnsworth
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238


View Profile
March 30, 2014, 08:34:04 PM
 #6198

Looks like some else has brung it too...23 TH/s, Hot damn....

Go Koi !

BTC: 1F1X9dN2PRortYaDkq89YJDbQ72i3F5N3h MEOW: KAbvy9jrrajvN5WLo7RWBsYqYfJKyN9WLf DOGE: DAyKSrTiVeRZaReTu1Cyf5Je6qPdKTuKKE
Jacko
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182


View Profile
March 30, 2014, 08:46:58 PM
 #6199

I brought 2.5TH/s yesterday. From Eligius.

Just halfway through the 10 shifts to get the average up to max. I'm at position 31. Hopefully move up soon with more gear.

Not a massive amount but we are proud of ourselves for getting this far.

Jacko
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1582


I charge NOTHING for current signature.


View Profile
March 30, 2014, 09:14:19 PM
 #6200

I brought 2.5TH/s yesterday. From Eligius.

Just halfway through the 10 shifts to get the average up to max. I'm at position 31. Hopefully move up soon with more gear.

Not a massive amount but we are proud of ourselves for getting this far.

Jacko

2.5 is nice.  I  will be up to  6 s-1's  clocked to 200GH ON MONDAY.  THAT would be about 1.2th pulling around 2500watts .  that is the most I can do due to heat issues that will start the end of april or mid may.



  maybe I will  sell the 6 s-1' in late april then order 3 ant miner  s-2's in late april .   

that would be 3th  should pool 2700-2800 watts   

 these are my max watts due to heating.

  it the winter I can push to 4500 watts

██     Please support sidehack with his new miner project Send to :

1BURGERAXHH6Yi6LRybRJK7ybEm5m5HwTr

 
 ██
Pages: « 1 ... 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 [310] 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 ... 376 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!