laterbreh
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 14, 2014, 09:28:12 AM |
|
i am on leetpool ... and i have 4 R 9 290 ... I GET 1200 K/hash hash rate for them ...
in every hour i can mine 3 utc but coinwarz report to me that i can mine 9 utc in every hour ... for what exist the this different ?
Hi, I can almost guarantee you are getting hardware errors, if you look in CGMiner if your HW: does not = 0 you are pushing your cards too hard and its not registering shares. You will need to back down your Khs. Typical 290 gets about 140khs. Once you have HW: 0 your shares and Khs will be correctly identified on the pool. So check over your config. thanks for your explanation ... hw is always 0 ... whats the probable another problem ? of course 120 K/hash report by cgminer for each card ... maybe real hash on pool decrease ? Okay you said 1200Khs total? Ok so you get a report of 120Khs per card with HW: 0 You should be getting a WU approx 90% of total WU is this the case? The pool under reports and over reports hashrates but eventually levels out (within 10 minutes) to what your hashrate should be. If the pool is not giving you something close to your hashrate, there is an issue on your end, shares are not getting properly submitted.
|
|
|
|
laterbreh
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 14, 2014, 09:28:59 AM |
|
http://Ultra.Leetpools.com is announcing the begining of its promo period!Phase 1: 0% Fees STARTING NOW!Phase 2: 1.337 UTC Block finder bonus + 0% Fees starting in: (3pm Pacific Standard time 3/14/2014) ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fgifcountdown.com%2Famerica-los_angeles%2F1394809200%2F141414%2F0f0f0f%2Faaaaaa%2Ffdfdfd%2Ffaedad%2Ftrue%2Fcounter.gif&t=665&c=CkDlUYNvm1cuGg) Phase 3: Random active miner will receive 100 UTC Saturday 3/15/2014 @ 6PM PACIFIC STANDARD TIME!!! Countdown to winner: ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fgifcountdown.com%2Famerica-los_angeles%2F1394906400%2F141414%2F0f0f0f%2Faaaaaa%2Ffdfdfd%2Ffaedad%2Ftrue%2Fcounter.gif&t=665&c=vdiz3tzOQw4rRA)
|
|
|
|
stewart2012
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 14, 2014, 09:41:11 AM |
|
i am on leetpool ... and i have 4 R 9 290 ... I GET 1200 K/hash hash rate for them ...
in every hour i can mine 3 utc but coinwarz report to me that i can mine 9 utc in every hour ... for what exist the this different ?
Hi, I can almost guarantee you are getting hardware errors, if you look in CGMiner if your HW: does not = 0 you are pushing your cards too hard and its not registering shares. You will need to back down your Khs. Typical 290 gets about 140khs. Once you have HW: 0 your shares and Khs will be correctly identified on the pool. So check over your config. thanks for your explanation ... hw is always 0 ... whats the probable another problem ? of course 120 K/hash report by cgminer for each card ... maybe real hash on pool decrease ? Okay you said 1200Khs total? Ok so you get a report of 120Khs per card with HW: 0 You should be getting a WU approx 90% of total WU is this the case? The pool under reports and over reports hashrates but eventually levels out (within 10 minutes) to what your hashrate should be. If the pool is not giving you something close to your hashrate, there is an issue on your end, shares are not getting properly submitted. thanks dear it was my wrong ... i calculated with 1200 K/hash but true hash is 4*120 = 480
|
|
|
|
laterbreh
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 14, 2014, 09:42:17 AM |
|
i am on leetpool ... and i have 4 R 9 290 ... I GET 1200 K/hash hash rate for them ...
in every hour i can mine 3 utc but coinwarz report to me that i can mine 9 utc in every hour ... for what exist the this different ?
Hi, I can almost guarantee you are getting hardware errors, if you look in CGMiner if your HW: does not = 0 you are pushing your cards too hard and its not registering shares. You will need to back down your Khs. Typical 290 gets about 140khs. Once you have HW: 0 your shares and Khs will be correctly identified on the pool. So check over your config. thanks for your explanation ... hw is always 0 ... whats the probable another problem ? of course 120 K/hash report by cgminer for each card ... maybe real hash on pool decrease ? Okay you said 1200Khs total? Ok so you get a report of 120Khs per card with HW: 0 You should be getting a WU approx 90% of total WU is this the case? The pool under reports and over reports hashrates but eventually levels out (within 10 minutes) to what your hashrate should be. If the pool is not giving you something close to your hashrate, there is an issue on your end, shares are not getting properly submitted. thanks dear it was my wrong ... i calculated with 1200 K/hash but true hash is 4*120 = 480 Not a problem, if you have any questions Ill be happy to answer them! Please PM me here or contact me in IRC. Thanks for mining with us!
|
|
|
|
derBruchpilotPro
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 14, 2014, 09:51:41 AM |
|
laterbreh, I'm not sure if it helps, but I read that on another coin thread, they had problems with orphans too. They added the pools wallet to the node list to strengthen the network, of corse the port must be open.
|
NEM/XEM!!!
|
|
|
AceCobra1
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 14, 2014, 10:14:19 AM |
|
My 290 generates 30-75 utc/day on current trends and variables. 170kh. so using maximum figure of 75 x 30 = 2250utc per month, about .5 btc so you'd get around 1 btc for 2 x 290's per month. Where do you mine? How are you getting 30-75 UTC a day from 170kh/s? I have a 1.2MH/s rig on this and I am barely breaking the 150 UTC mark
|
|
|
|
vizique
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2431
Merit: 1642
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 14, 2014, 10:16:14 AM |
|
Just a suggestion,
move the crypto sex toys banner ad down the list so it isnt the very first thing people see.
I have no issues with sex toys in the slightest but from a new viewer perspective it associates the coin with sex instantly and thats not always a good thing. And should bigger media magazines/vendors take an interest and look a the site, they may not see this favorably as a first impression.
Its not a critique of the vendor or the website creator. I'm no puritan but with marketing you only get one chance to capture your viewer and anything that can tilt your favor has to be worth noting
|
|
|
|
Halofire
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 14, 2014, 10:25:41 AM |
|
Just a suggestion,
move the crypto sex toys banner ad down the list so it isnt the very first thing people see.
I have no issues with sex toys in the slightest but from a new viewer perspective it associates the coin with sex instantly and thats not always a good thing. And should bigger media magazines/vendors take an interest and look a the site, they may not see this favorably as a first impression.
Its not a critique of the vendor or the website creator. I'm no puritan but with marketing you only get one chance to capture your viewer and anything that can tilt your favor has to be worth noting
lol, I picture having an 18 or older section in the back of the store... errrm website.
|
OC Development - oZwWbQwz6LAkDLa2pHsEH8WSD2Y3LsTgFt SMC Development - SgpYdoVz946nLBF2hF3PYCVQYnuYDeQTGu Friendly reminder: Back up your wallet.dat files!!
|
|
|
GambleX
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
GambleX Exchange/Gambling
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 14, 2014, 10:41:20 AM |
|
Hey guys!
Gamblex has added Ultracoin to our exchange and our gambling site. It will be fully implemented, that means we will also sell shares that distribute a part of the Ultracoin fee revenue to stakeholders.
Check out our thread and maybe Invest!
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=498311.msg5676745#msg5676745
|
|
|
|
Uggle
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 14, 2014, 10:49:22 AM |
|
Been mining at utc.pool.pm since the start, I'm never switching. ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
UTC UTC UTC
|
|
|
vizique
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2431
Merit: 1642
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 14, 2014, 10:57:57 AM |
|
Just a suggestion,
move the crypto sex toys banner ad down the list so it isnt the very first thing people see.
I have no issues with sex toys in the slightest but from a new viewer perspective it associates the coin with sex instantly and thats not always a good thing. And should bigger media magazines/vendors take an interest and look a the site, they may not see this favorably as a first impression.
Its not a critique of the vendor or the website creator. I'm no puritan but with marketing you only get one chance to capture your viewer and anything that can tilt your favor has to be worth noting
lol, I picture having an 18 or older section in the back of the store... errrm website. ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
|
Shizof
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 61
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 14, 2014, 11:20:04 AM |
|
Been mining at utc.pool.pm since the start, I'm never switching. ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) It's the best. Very low rejects!
|
|
|
|
c-cex
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1001
CryptoCurrency EXchange: https://c-cex.com
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 14, 2014, 11:51:33 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
minip
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 14, 2014, 01:10:00 PM |
|
Hi fellow UTC people, I have been following this thread silently since the start, doing lots of reading etc. I need some help implementing UTC with stratum on a pool that im currently building, I am willing to pay in UTC and other cryptos for help getting this working. If you are interested in helping me out send me a PM. Thanks ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
Navyman47
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 96
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 14, 2014, 01:19:21 PM |
|
Just a suggestion,
move the crypto sex toys banner ad down the list so it isnt the very first thing people see.
I have no issues with sex toys in the slightest but from a new viewer perspective it associates the coin with sex instantly and thats not always a good thing. And should bigger media magazines/vendors take an interest and look a the site, they may not see this favorably as a first impression.
Its not a critique of the vendor or the website creator. I'm no puritan but with marketing you only get one chance to capture your viewer and anything that can tilt your favor has to be worth noting
+1 I thought the same thing when I saw it.
|
|
|
|
kr00t0n
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 14, 2014, 02:10:10 PM |
|
Come on Nitro, you are still screwing things up for all the other pools, is there nothing else you can do to spread the hash?
|
|
|
|
|
noobyonekenobi
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 14, 2014, 02:31:24 PM |
|
why utc.pool.pm has less orphan than leet?
|
PS4 Funds for my brother. Help me get it. Thanks! ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) BTC: 1MqhiNvDfSBRzFuXLkdvUfve4zavoFw2f8 UTC: UdGz8AS2tzTnf5qZ59uYbCRbVqEQJZrQC2 LTC: LTUMKwRAkqtvbyA5s8TeNHduvWk9t3DvkN WDC: WjMWs8GUAyJXXtPJRXQXzJ9yjkda1GBbYs
|
|
|
TheStuhlman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1059
Merit: 1020
https://twitter.com/JStuhlman
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 14, 2014, 02:35:15 PM |
|
Come on Nitro, you are still screwing things up for all the other pools, is there nothing else you can do to spread the hash?
Interesting, You registered an account to say this!!! See BumFace, Navyman, this is the kind of trash I was talking to you about. Now I hope you deal with him yourself as well as others in the community ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
|
kr00t0n
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 14, 2014, 02:40:01 PM |
|
Come on Nitro, you are still screwing things up for all the other pools, is there nothing else you can do to spread the hash?
Interesting, You registered an account to say this!!! See BumFace, Navyman, this is the kind of trash I was talking to you about. Now I hope you deal with him yourself as well as others in the community ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) Actually I registered a while ago, this is just my first post. I've been mining UTC since early Feb, bouncing between leet and greek. I also have faith in this coin, and have only put 30% of what I have up on exchanges at higher sell walls, not making a quick buck like the pump n dumpers. And I am not blaming you for what is happening with your pool, but it isn't healthy to have such a large chunk of the nethash.
|
|
|
|
|