[POOL] Coinotron

[xelbyb]

pool is good, but there is a problem. 1 when the video card is the speed of the program and worker is the same. To pool 4 cards do not work loads. And the MSI Afterburner shows that the loading of the video card to coinotron not 99%. This can be seen and the GPU-Z. The video card does not work for 99% and miners lost profit. It's not just me. but others also write. the average loss is about 20%

with these settings nanopool / ethpool.org loud video card at 99%.

[1714105649]

1714105649

[1714105649]

1714105649

[1714105649]

1714105649

[1714105649]

1714105649

[1714105649]

1714105649

[1714105649]

1714105649

[coinotron]

pull is good, but there is a problem. 1 when the video card is the speed of the program and worker is the same. To pull 4 cards do not work loads. And the MSI Afterburner shows that the loading of the video card to coinotron not 99%. This can be seen and the GPU-Z. The video card does not work for 99% and miners lost profit. It's not just me. but others also write. the average loss is about 20%

with these settings nanopool / ethpool.org loud video card at 99%.

Thank you for detailed description of the issue. So it seems to be problem with multi-card rigs. I will investigate it.

[peteycamey]

worker update speed is incredibly slow. at least for etherium. takes forever to see the hash rate reflected. and update frequency is low too.

[xelbyb]

http://i.piccy.info/i9/1b686eab14d8a7fcd3e8c38ca479bc11/1441886698/23674/948512/Loud_GPU.png
The problem did not go away , Coinotron left. On the right the other pool.

[coinotron]

We have temporary solution. An hour ago we increased share difficulty 4x. Server's stats show that in case of fastest miners ( mostly multi GPU rigs ) their hashrate increased significantly (10%-20%)
There is disadvantage to this method. Slower miners will submit their shares less frequently, thus pool estimates of their hasrates will be less precise.

We are planning to introduce new, multi-port pool. It will provide special ports for slower miners. The only problem is, that ethminer must be modified to securely support this feature.

Meanwhile we extended our 0% fee promotion to Sep 15 !!!

[omnik]

I gave it a try again with 200Mhs but got only 0.4 eth in 2hours... switched back to other pool.

[coinotron]

I gave it a try again with 200Mhs but got only 0.4 eth in 2hours... switched back to other pool.

Coinotron uses PPLNS reward system in Ethereum pool.
Due to variance of that method 2 hours is not enough to properly assess payouts.

[omnik]

You are right. After giving it a go again after 6h got good results.

[coinotron]

FYI

Ethereum promotion has ended.

Ethereum PPLNS = 1%

[coinotron]

Today we added Expanse pool

[peteycamey]

how long will it be down?

[coinotron]

how long will it be down?

Server is up and running.

[peteycamey]

The requested URL /coinotron/AccountServlet was not found on this server.

[coinotron]

Please provide me with URL address you are using.

Meanwhile use just:  www.coinotron.com

[peteycamey]

https://www.dropbox.com/s/c7xjxuz8ngk419h/coinotron.jpg?dl=0

coinotron.com is still down.

and no its not only me.

[peteycamey]

http://178.217.186.125/

also doesnt work so its not a dns issue.

[coinotron]

http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/ says that coinotron.com in up

Clear your web browse cache, put www.coinotron.com in address bar and refresh page.

[peteycamey]

ok listen. your index.htm FORWARDS to coinotron.com/coinotron/AccountServlet?action=home

that web site only checks if index.htm is available (which it is)

[peteycamey]

check it with https://www.uptrends.com/tools/uptime

[peteycamey]

I also tried connecting with proxy and still fails

https://hide.me/en/proxy

there is obviously something wrong on your side.