Bitcoin Forum
April 27, 2024, 11:06:53 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 [251] 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 ... 425 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [CLOSED] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+NMC, Stratum, VarDiff, Private Servers  (Read 902902 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
JKBtCn
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 16, 2013, 02:22:29 AM
 #5001

Is there an advantage of increasing difficulty from 2 Gh/s default to a threshold closer to my worker's hash rate? This would improve which variable? Sorry I'm sure this has been answered in previous thread but thought I'd ask anyway. Thanks Smiley

No advantage.  The pool adjusts your difficulty based on worker speeder.  Higher difficulty == higher variance. 

M

Thanks again mdude!

NXT-XFAH-7N9C-6AS6-B3GLZ                BTC: 1MMzqYNNqQMMhY524Z9ThuQrRQW2whCmGk
NHZ: 8709719431783299770                 QORA | 2ND GEN | NEW SOURCE CODE | Qi24ssRqmEo3Wepv9pgdmqNuTDKQByiEfd
1714216013
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714216013

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714216013
Reply with quote  #2

1714216013
Report to moderator
BitcoinCleanup.com: Learn why Bitcoin isn't bad for the environment
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
guytechie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 677
Merit: 500


View Profile
December 16, 2013, 03:21:16 AM
 #5002

Such bad luck lately... brought our average down to 102%.

Put something in my tip jar if I made your day. Smiley
BTC:
1MkmBHDjonAFXui6JEx9ZmEemfMtUo9Cmu
opentoe
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000

Personal text my ass....


View Profile WWW
December 16, 2013, 10:47:20 PM
 #5003

My father locked his wallet. The BTC address he is using is tied to an Electrum client wallet. We recently updated his Electrum client and that program removed all the old receive addresses and made up all new ones. The obvious question, how do we work around in getting his payout address changed if it is locked? If the answer is you cannot change it (which is what I think it is), he would have to create a new account or something, correct? Since he would be unable to continue to use his original Electrum address.

I'm still waiting for the Electrum devs to answer on where all the receive addresses went to after the update. All the transaction history is still there, and even in the details of the transactions you can see the original BTC address, just don't know how to get the originals back.


Need help with your Newznab usenet indexer? http://www.newznabforums.com
kjj
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1302
Merit: 1024



View Profile
December 16, 2013, 11:12:25 PM
 #5004

My father locked his wallet. The BTC address he is using is tied to an Electrum client wallet. We recently updated his Electrum client and that program removed all the old receive addresses and made up all new ones. The obvious question, how do we work around in getting his payout address changed if it is locked? If the answer is you cannot change it (which is what I think it is), he would have to create a new account or something, correct? Since he would be unable to continue to use his original Electrum address.

I'm still waiting for the Electrum devs to answer on where all the receive addresses went to after the update. All the transaction history is still there, and even in the details of the transactions you can see the original BTC address, just don't know how to get the originals back.

I don't know Electrum, but I have a hard time believing that they'd throw away the keys to old addresses.  Try doing a manual payout that is small enough that you won't be upset if it vanishes into a black hole.

17Np17BSrpnHCZ2pgtiMNnhjnsWJ2TMqq8
I routinely ignore posters with paid advertising in their sigs.  You should too.
eleuthria (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750
Merit: 1007



View Profile
December 16, 2013, 11:16:23 PM
 #5005

My father locked his wallet. The BTC address he is using is tied to an Electrum client wallet. We recently updated his Electrum client and that program removed all the old receive addresses and made up all new ones. The obvious question, how do we work around in getting his payout address changed if it is locked? If the answer is you cannot change it (which is what I think it is), he would have to create a new account or something, correct? Since he would be unable to continue to use his original Electrum address.

I'm still waiting for the Electrum devs to answer on where all the receive addresses went to after the update. All the transaction history is still there, and even in the details of the transactions you can see the original BTC address, just don't know how to get the originals back.



If the transaction history is still there and you can still see your wallet balance, I can't imagine the keys to that wallet were lost (otherwise you wouldn't be able to spend anything).

RIP BTC Guild, April 2011 - June 2015
opentoe
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000

Personal text my ass....


View Profile WWW
December 16, 2013, 11:17:51 PM
 #5006

My father locked his wallet. The BTC address he is using is tied to an Electrum client wallet. We recently updated his Electrum client and that program removed all the old receive addresses and made up all new ones. The obvious question, how do we work around in getting his payout address changed if it is locked? If the answer is you cannot change it (which is what I think it is), he would have to create a new account or something, correct? Since he would be unable to continue to use his original Electrum address.

I'm still waiting for the Electrum devs to answer on where all the receive addresses went to after the update. All the transaction history is still there, and even in the details of the transactions you can see the original BTC address, just don't know how to get the originals back.



If the transaction history is still there and you can still see your wallet balance, I can't imagine the keys to that wallet were lost (otherwise you wouldn't be able to spend anything).



I want to make an update on this....my original receive address was there. I never clicked on the little tick mark that opens up the "used" address list. That is where my old address was hiding on me. I indicated to the Electrum dev that it was a mistake on my part. Thanks for the suggestion, I was just about to do that but found the old address. Yes, I feel stupid but humble enough to admit it to the world.

Need help with your Newznab usenet indexer? http://www.newznabforums.com
jojo69
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3150
Merit: 4309


diamond-handed zealot


View Profile
December 17, 2013, 12:16:12 AM
 #5007

My father locked his wallet. The BTC address he is using is tied to an Electrum client wallet. We recently updated his Electrum client and that program removed all the old receive addresses and made up all new ones. The obvious question, how do we work around in getting his payout address changed if it is locked? If the answer is you cannot change it (which is what I think it is), he would have to create a new account or something, correct? Since he would be unable to continue to use his original Electrum address.

I'm still waiting for the Electrum devs to answer on where all the receive addresses went to after the update. All the transaction history is still there, and even in the details of the transactions you can see the original BTC address, just don't know how to get the originals back.



If the transaction history is still there and you can still see your wallet balance, I can't imagine the keys to that wallet were lost (otherwise you wouldn't be able to spend anything).



I want to make an update on this....my original receive address was there. I never clicked on the little tick mark that opens up the "used" address list. That is where my old address was hiding on me. I indicated to the Electrum dev that it was a mistake on my part. Thanks for the suggestion, I was just about to do that but found the old address. Yes, I feel stupid but humble enough to admit it to the world.


sounds like a rather opaque UI, I hate stuff like that

This is not some pseudoeconomic post-modern Libertarian cult, it's an un-led, crowd-sourced mega startup organized around mutual self-interest where problems, whether of the theoretical or purely practical variety, are treated as temporary and, ultimately, solvable.
Censorship of e-gold was easy. Censorship of Bitcoin will be… entertaining.
JKBtCn
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 17, 2013, 03:23:19 AM
 #5008

Anyone else unable to connect to guild website??  Attack, maintainance, other? Huh

NXT-XFAH-7N9C-6AS6-B3GLZ                BTC: 1MMzqYNNqQMMhY524Z9ThuQrRQW2whCmGk
NHZ: 8709719431783299770                 QORA | 2ND GEN | NEW SOURCE CODE | Qi24ssRqmEo3Wepv9pgdmqNuTDKQByiEfd
eleuthria (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750
Merit: 1007



View Profile
December 17, 2013, 03:49:48 AM
 #5009

Anyone else unable to connect to guild website??  Attack, maintainance, other? Huh

My guess:  'Other - Local Problem'.  No reports of an outage in IRC, and haven't had any problem loading it from my phone or PC all day.

RIP BTC Guild, April 2011 - June 2015
JKBtCn
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 17, 2013, 04:03:21 AM
 #5010

Anyone else unable to connect to guild website??  Attack, maintainance, other? Huh

My guess:  'Other - Local Problem'.  No reports of an outage in IRC, and haven't had any problem loading it from my phone or PC all day.

Thank you sir. Back online.

NXT-XFAH-7N9C-6AS6-B3GLZ                BTC: 1MMzqYNNqQMMhY524Z9ThuQrRQW2whCmGk
NHZ: 8709719431783299770                 QORA | 2ND GEN | NEW SOURCE CODE | Qi24ssRqmEo3Wepv9pgdmqNuTDKQByiEfd
JKBtCn
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 17, 2013, 05:29:45 AM
Last edit: December 17, 2013, 05:50:48 AM by JKBtCn
 #5011

Does PPS payout NMC or only PPNS? Or must I point miner to merged stratum for PPS NMC mining...which one? Miner currently NOT pointing to merged. thanks

NXT-XFAH-7N9C-6AS6-B3GLZ                BTC: 1MMzqYNNqQMMhY524Z9ThuQrRQW2whCmGk
NHZ: 8709719431783299770                 QORA | 2ND GEN | NEW SOURCE CODE | Qi24ssRqmEo3Wepv9pgdmqNuTDKQByiEfd
eleuthria (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750
Merit: 1007



View Profile
December 17, 2013, 06:22:30 AM
 #5012

Does PPS payout NMC or only PPNS? Or must I point miner to merged stratum for PPS NMC mining...which one? Miner currently NOT pointing to merged. thanks

NMC is only awarded to PPLNS.  There is no option to earn NMC when mining under PPS on BTC Guild.

RIP BTC Guild, April 2011 - June 2015
JKBtCn
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 17, 2013, 08:52:57 AM
 #5013

Does PPS payout NMC or only PPNS? Or must I point miner to merged stratum for PPS NMC mining...which one? Miner currently NOT pointing to merged. thanks

NMC is only awarded to PPLNS.  There is no option to earn NMC when mining under PPS on BTC Guild.

Got it, thanks!

NXT-XFAH-7N9C-6AS6-B3GLZ                BTC: 1MMzqYNNqQMMhY524Z9ThuQrRQW2whCmGk
NHZ: 8709719431783299770                 QORA | 2ND GEN | NEW SOURCE CODE | Qi24ssRqmEo3Wepv9pgdmqNuTDKQByiEfd
Bismarckbkk
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 17, 2013, 09:34:00 AM
 #5014

Is there an advantage of increasing difficulty from 2 Gh/s default to a threshold closer to my worker's hash rate? This would improve which variable? Sorry I'm sure this has been answered in previous thread but thought I'd ask anyway. Thanks Smiley

The only advantage in doing so is if you have high end equipment.  Lots of high end ASIC miners tend to have a few problems when running at very low difficulties due to the amount of communication required when running at hundreds of GH/s at a low difficulty.  The pool will automatically adjust your difficulty if it's not high enough, but it takes a minute or two to find the sweet spot.  By setting a minimum difficulty, you can bypass this startup phase which will save you a few rejects early on.  It also cuts down on bandwidth, though that isn't a huge deal for anybody with broadband access due to how little bandwidth it requires in general.

Higher difficulties do have higher variance, but the recommended speeds in the drop-down are set to levels where the variance is minimal as long as you have that much speed or better.

Thx for that bro,

Im having 100% accepted shares over 3 miners/workers now. About 0.4% improvement. Smiley

1EPhcyv9GPcCwwbtVt3a3nwC1o4pn67bax
allinvain
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3080
Merit: 1080



View Profile WWW
December 18, 2013, 12:56:28 AM
 #5015

Any chance of introducing other merged mining coins, kinda like ghash.io is doing?

kendog77
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 500


View Profile
December 18, 2013, 01:00:16 AM
 #5016

Such bad luck lately... brought our average down to 102%.

The luck today has been really good, so things are turning around!
eleuthria (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750
Merit: 1007



View Profile
December 18, 2013, 03:09:16 AM
 #5017

Any chance of introducing other merged mining coins, kinda like ghash.io is doing?

DVC/IXC are truly worthless.  They would be even more worthless if BTC Guild bothered to merge mine them and roughly doubled their difficulty again.

Knowing the load that altcoin daemons put on servers (because they all use extremely old bitcoin forks), I'm pretty convinced that you end up hurting your earnings more than they will add to them just due to the increased rate of stales/time to perform longpolls/work restarts.  Combined they don't even add up to 0.1% additional earnings *at current difficulty*.

Of all the scamcoins/altcoins out there, the only one that is actually something new/useful is Namecoin, even though I'm personally not a major fan of it.  But all the others are mindless clones of Bitcoin that bring nothing worthwhile to the table.  At least Namecoin was designed to do something outside of a cash grab.

RIP BTC Guild, April 2011 - June 2015
Gyrsur
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2856
Merit: 1518


Bitcoin Legal Tender Countries: 2 of 206


View Profile WWW
December 18, 2013, 04:02:13 AM
 #5018

Such bad luck lately... brought our average down to 102%.

The luck today has been really good, so things are turning around!
don't mention luck in any case. Wink

allinvain
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3080
Merit: 1080



View Profile WWW
December 18, 2013, 05:33:37 AM
 #5019

Any chance of introducing other merged mining coins, kinda like ghash.io is doing?

DVC/IXC are truly worthless.  They would be even more worthless if BTC Guild bothered to merge mine them and roughly doubled their difficulty again.

Knowing the load that altcoin daemons put on servers (because they all use extremely old bitcoin forks), I'm pretty convinced that you end up hurting your earnings more than they will add to them just due to the increased rate of stales/time to perform longpolls/work restarts.  Combined they don't even add up to 0.1% additional earnings *at current difficulty*.

Of all the scamcoins/altcoins out there, the only one that is actually something new/useful is Namecoin, even though I'm personally not a major fan of it.  But all the others are mindless clones of Bitcoin that bring nothing worthwhile to the table.  At least Namecoin was designed to do something outside of a cash grab.

Yeah I guess you're right. But I'm wondering what you think about PPC (aka peercoin). Useless?

DrG
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2086
Merit: 1035


View Profile
December 18, 2013, 08:34:21 AM
 #5020

Any chance of introducing other merged mining coins, kinda like ghash.io is doing?

DVC/IXC are truly worthless.  They would be even more worthless if BTC Guild bothered to merge mine them and roughly doubled their difficulty again.

Knowing the load that altcoin daemons put on servers (because they all use extremely old bitcoin forks), I'm pretty convinced that you end up hurting your earnings more than they will add to them just due to the increased rate of stales/time to perform longpolls/work restarts.  Combined they don't even add up to 0.1% additional earnings *at current difficulty*.

Of all the scamcoins/altcoins out there, the only one that is actually something new/useful is Namecoin, even though I'm personally not a major fan of it.  But all the others are mindless clones of Bitcoin that bring nothing worthwhile to the table.  At least Namecoin was designed to do something outside of a cash grab.

Yeah I guess you're right. But I'm wondering what you think about PPC (aka peercoin). Useless?

Don't believe that can be piggybacked onto BTC.
Pages: « 1 ... 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 [251] 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 ... 425 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!