Bitcoin Forum
December 07, 2016, 08:50:35 AM *
News: To be able to use the next phase of the beta forum software, please ensure that your email address is correct/functional.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 [300] 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 ... 426 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [CLOSED] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+NMC, Stratum, VarDiff, Private Servers  (Read 829023 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
MoreBloodWine
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924


I rule with an iron fist !


View Profile WWW
February 11, 2014, 02:37:42 AM
 #5981

I'll have to pass on that invite. I doubt that i'll live that long. Tongue
Me too if your avatars any indication of ur age lol

Want a chance at winning some BTC, LTC or another crypto currency ?
Then be sure to check out our Weekly Crypto Lotteries: Crypto Lottos

1481100635
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481100635

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481100635
Reply with quote  #2

1481100635
Report to moderator
1481100635
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481100635

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481100635
Reply with quote  #2

1481100635
Report to moderator
1481100635
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481100635

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481100635
Reply with quote  #2

1481100635
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
BrandonMcPherson
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 205


View Profile
February 11, 2014, 05:04:43 AM
 #5982

heh
DrG
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1456



View Profile
February 11, 2014, 06:57:35 AM
 #5983

I'll have to pass on that invite. I doubt that i'll live that long. Tongue
Me too if your avatars any indication of ur age lol

Never troll a troll trolololol

ericisback
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 35


View Profile
February 11, 2014, 01:01:08 PM
 #5984



OMG what is up with the bad luck....   Been mining for over 6 months on BTC Guild and have not seen any period of time like the last few weeks....   Am I wrong?

Now we're talking:



BTC:  152kxHXJEZpQPvsB2iaQfWHT2DMMYnn8dD
Aexcu
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 122


View Profile
February 11, 2014, 03:32:16 PM
 #5985

btcguild.com uses an invalid security certificate. The certificate is only valid for the following names: ssl2587.cloudflare.com , sendinc.com , *.appea.com.au , *.rxwiki.com , *.rapidvideo.com , gulli.com , *.sendinc.com , millenium-servers.com , *.snyggastchatten.se , pandashan.com , rapidvideo.com , rxwiki.com , *.gulli.com , appea.com.au , *.applenberry.com , *.erincofund.com , teamspeak.com , applenberry.com , erincofund.com , *.teamspeak.com , *.thisisanfield.com , *.millenium-servers.com , vinofil.no , *.myvirpus.com , thisisanfield.com , myvirpus.com , *.pandashan.com , *.fanfiction.com.br , snyggastchatten.se , fanfiction.com.br , *.addongaming.com , *.hcraid.com , hcraid.com , addongaming.com , *.vinofil.no


Didn't see this before, what changed?
seljo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1077


Hodling.


View Profile
February 11, 2014, 03:32:40 PM
 #5986

OK this poped up today!


Hodling since 2011.®
NicholasB54
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 51


View Profile
February 11, 2014, 04:16:22 PM
 #5987

OK this poped up today!


Me too just now ...
EDIT : But only on Firefox ... connected ok with Chrome

Hodling Optimist : 1 BTC could eventually be worth $34,000 should bitcoin grow to account for even 1% of the global money supply (http://www.coindesk.com/venture-capital-bullish-bitcoin-risks/)
eleuthria
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750


BTC Guild Owner


View Profile WWW
February 11, 2014, 04:48:45 PM
 #5988

The above error(s) happen once in a while with Cloudflare.  It normally goes away in under an hour.

R.I.P. BTC Guild, 2011 - 2015.
BTC Guild Forum Thread
hurricandave
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 868



View Profile
February 11, 2014, 04:50:27 PM
 #5989

IE has been flagging secure connection for the better part of the last 6 weeks wonder why Firefox finally jumped on the same issue.
eleuthria
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750


BTC Guild Owner


View Profile WWW
February 11, 2014, 04:53:47 PM
 #5990

IE has been flagging secure connection for the better part of the last 6 weeks wonder why Firefox finally jumped on the same issue.

The error above happens when Cloudflare updates an SSL cert on a proxy (or starts a new proxy).  They need to add all the domains to the cert, so for a brief period the certificate pops up that error.

R.I.P. BTC Guild, 2011 - 2015.
BTC Guild Forum Thread
NicholasB54
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 51


View Profile
February 11, 2014, 07:00:05 PM
 #5991

IE has been flagging secure connection for the better part of the last 6 weeks wonder why Firefox finally jumped on the same issue.

The error above happens when Cloudflare updates an SSL cert on a proxy (or starts a new proxy).  They need to add all the domains to the cert, so for a brief period the certificate pops up that error.
Thanks. Good to know

Hodling Optimist : 1 BTC could eventually be worth $34,000 should bitcoin grow to account for even 1% of the global money supply (http://www.coindesk.com/venture-capital-bullish-bitcoin-risks/)
MoreBloodWine
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924


I rule with an iron fist !


View Profile WWW
February 11, 2014, 10:58:24 PM
 #5992

Because of the inability to reorder workers, I had to rename and move some around. Well, it seems the rename didn't work the way I wanted it.

Ex:

MoreBloodWine_Avalon - Bottom of list, I wanted up top.
MoreBloodWine_Whatever - Top of list.

So I switched the names around and now Avalons on top but the mining data is still showing on the old, renamed worker at the bottom. I rebooted the machine to no avail. So I suspect something server side with the site is still still showing workers under the original name.

Any idea whats up assuming your following me Eleuthria ?

Want a chance at winning some BTC, LTC or another crypto currency ?
Then be sure to check out our Weekly Crypto Lotteries: Crypto Lottos

Asinine
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 62


View Profile
February 12, 2014, 01:37:57 AM
 #5993

I nearly birthed bricks when I saw that cert error with the Coinbase thefts recently and now the bad transaction DDoS.
eleuthria
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750


BTC Guild Owner


View Profile WWW
February 12, 2014, 03:55:22 AM
 #5994

Because of the inability to reorder workers, I had to rename and move some around. Well, it seems the rename didn't work the way I wanted it.

Ex:

MoreBloodWine_Avalon - Bottom of list, I wanted up top.
MoreBloodWine_Whatever - Top of list.

So I switched the names around and now Avalons on top but the mining data is still showing on the old, renamed worker at the bottom. I rebooted the machine to no avail. So I suspect something server side with the site is still still showing workers under the original name.

Any idea whats up assuming your following me Eleuthria ?


The renaming wasn't designed assuming you're going to rename workers into the same name of a previous worker.  The pool servers have your old names cached to a specific worker ID, to avoid repetitive worker lookup queries to the database.  That old information can't be cleared until the next time the pool servers are restarted.

You do know that all the tables can be sorted by clicking on the headers, right?


UPDATE:  I'm not dismissing the problem itself, it is on the list of things I'm working to change.  ScryptGuild is seeing some changes to how workers are cached in order to fix problems like this, and the occasional problem where an update fails to post to one server and the old settings remain cached.  Unfortunately, right now there is no "fix" for a Name<->WorkerID association being stuck when you reuse a worker name.  The only way to force that cache update is restarting the pools.

R.I.P. BTC Guild, 2011 - 2015.
BTC Guild Forum Thread
sconklin321
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 109


View Profile
February 12, 2014, 08:46:30 PM
 #5995

Wow!!  That's a string of good luck.  We just hit 6 of the last 7 blocks inside of 12 minutes!!!
opentoe
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1190

Personal text my ass....


View Profile WWW
February 12, 2014, 11:29:14 PM
 #5996

I expect commercial interests to take over the role of mining once the number of coins per block diminishes enough—the value of BTC will define was "diminishes enough" means. Certainly within 20 years, probably sooner.

Mining for transactions fees will become a low margin business, and as such will be handled by corporate interests who can invest enough on the infrastructure side to maximize profits. I could definitely see exchanges (or whatever replaces the exchanges) engaging in this as not only a side business, but a service for their users to ensures fast transactions.

So say I from my Throne of Prognostication™.

Once the commercial interests take over it won't be the same. It'll be just another venture for greedy CEO's to scam as much as they can. Just like they do with the US government today.

Need help with your Newznab usenet indexer? http://www.newznabforums.com
HLF
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 9


View Profile
February 12, 2014, 11:53:55 PM
 #5997

Im considering switching to BTC Guild from another pool, but I am still new.

Do most miners in this pool use CGminer? If so, why? Why not BFGminer?

I am currently using BFGminer and it works well. I have BFL equipment.
eleuthria
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750


BTC Guild Owner


View Profile WWW
February 13, 2014, 12:05:35 AM
 #5998

Im considering switching to BTC Guild from another pool, but I am still new.

Do most miners in this pool use CGminer? If so, why? Why not BFGminer?

I am currently using BFGminer and it works well. I have BFL equipment.

I personally recommend bfgminer over cgminer for ASIC users, but both are in the recommended clients.  I've switched my preference back and forth over the last year, but in general I prefer bfgminer for ASICs.

I don't know for sure what the split is, but I'd bet it's fairly even between bfgminer and cgminer.

R.I.P. BTC Guild, 2011 - 2015.
BTC Guild Forum Thread
HLF
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 9


View Profile
February 13, 2014, 12:57:27 AM
 #5999

Is this what you bat file looks like?

./bfgminer -o stratum+tcp://stratum.btcguild.com:3333 -u username -p password -S all --icarus-options 115200:1:1 --icarus-timing 3.0=100
eleuthria
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750


BTC Guild Owner


View Profile WWW
February 13, 2014, 01:43:36 AM
 #6000

Is this what you bat file looks like?

./bfgminer -o stratum+tcp://stratum.btcguild.com:3333 -u username -p password -S all --icarus-options 115200:1:1 --icarus-timing 3.0=100

That looks pretty close to what I used on my old ASICMINER USBs.  I know the arguments have changed with newer versions of bfgminer though (now you just use -S erupter:all and ignore the --icarus stuff).

R.I.P. BTC Guild, 2011 - 2015.
BTC Guild Forum Thread
Pages: « 1 ... 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 [300] 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 ... 426 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!