Bitcoin Forum
December 10, 2016, 11:12:46 AM *
News: To be able to use the next phase of the beta forum software, please ensure that your email address is correct/functional.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 [297] 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 ... 426 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [CLOSED] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+NMC, Stratum, VarDiff, Private Servers  (Read 829598 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
MoreBloodWine
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924


I rule with an iron fist !


View Profile WWW
February 08, 2014, 10:04:11 PM
 #5921

Sites down ?

Want a chance at winning some BTC, LTC or another crypto currency ?
Then be sure to check out our Weekly Crypto Lotteries: Crypto Lottos

1481368366
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481368366

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481368366
Reply with quote  #2

1481368366
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1481368366
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481368366

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481368366
Reply with quote  #2

1481368366
Report to moderator
navigator
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 360


View Profile
February 08, 2014, 10:04:53 PM
 #5922

everything down for me Sad
MoreBloodWine
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924


I rule with an iron fist !


View Profile WWW
February 08, 2014, 10:07:23 PM
 #5923

I've been mining for over a day and a half so I hopee I'm still connectd to the backend mining.

Want a chance at winning some BTC, LTC or another crypto currency ?
Then be sure to check out our Weekly Crypto Lotteries: Crypto Lottos

eleuthria
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750


BTC Guild Owner


View Profile WWW
February 08, 2014, 10:07:59 PM
 #5924

Everything should be back online now.  There was a problem with the DB server connectivity, and the pools (hopefully) disconnected users so they would hit failover servers instead of potentially losing mining time.

R.I.P. BTC Guild, 2011 - 2015.
BTC Guild Forum Thread
MinerRob
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2


View Profile
February 08, 2014, 11:49:04 PM
 #5925

Greetings, recently started mining; anyone ever seen a day where there were backend issues and some good luck, or does bad luck line up 100% of the time when there are technical issues with the backend / non miner end of things?
BrandonMcPherson
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 205


View Profile
February 09, 2014, 12:04:02 AM
 #5926

It's a coincidence, MinerRob.

And note that even with the soul-crushing bad luck since the 3rd, our five month average is still more than 102%.
eleuthria
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750


BTC Guild Owner


View Profile WWW
February 09, 2014, 12:08:10 AM
 #5927

Greetings, recently started mining; anyone ever seen a day where there were backend issues and some good luck, or does bad luck line up 100% of the time when there are technical issues with the backend / non miner end of things?

That happens quite a lot (good luck + server issues).  Actually, it's pretty much exactly as frequent as bad luck + server issues.  Luck and backend issues are COMPLETELY unrelated.  The luck is based on how many blocks we found vs shares that were submitted.  When the backends crash for a few minutes, we aren't finding blocks, but we also aren't adding any shares either.  Also, the luck wasn't that bad when the backends had trouble.  The bad luck was over 6 hours before that.



It's a coincidence, MinerRob.

And note that even with the soul-crushing bad luck since the 3rd, our five month average is still more than 102%.

3 month average is what's shown on the chart (all-time history made the chart freeze most browsers).  Though this last week has been brutal enough to finally put our 1-month average under 100%.  Not that it's not expected, you can't *always* be above 100%.

R.I.P. BTC Guild, 2011 - 2015.
BTC Guild Forum Thread
BrandonMcPherson
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 205


View Profile
February 09, 2014, 12:17:41 AM
 #5928

Thanks for the clarification. Not sure how I got to five months...
MinerRob
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2


View Profile
February 09, 2014, 12:18:39 AM
 #5929

Thanks Brandon, thanks eleuthria, appreciate the details!
hurricandave
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 868



View Profile
February 09, 2014, 12:18:58 AM
 #5930

I haven't mined enough to take a payment yet But whenever I click the button on the website it stops responding and windows can't recover the page. Is this simply because I haven't received a payment yet? I was just curious what that page is going to look like but can't open it at all. Just to clarify I mean the "Payments" icon at the top banner not the ones in the balance field.
eleuthria
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750


BTC Guild Owner


View Profile WWW
February 09, 2014, 01:21:52 AM
 #5931

I haven't mined enough to take a payment yet But whenever I click the button on the website it stops responding and windows can't recover the page. Is this simply because I haven't received a payment yet? I was just curious what that page is going to look like but can't open it at all. Just to clarify I mean the "Payments" icon at the top banner not the ones in the balance field.

Not sure why you're having issues on that page...it hasn't been changed since it was put there over a year ago.  It's simply a list of your PPS earnings and payments to your wallet.

R.I.P. BTC Guild, 2011 - 2015.
BTC Guild Forum Thread
hurricandave
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 868



View Profile
February 09, 2014, 01:30:15 AM
 #5932

O.k. That's why I thought maybe it was because I have not taken a payment yet.
MoreBloodWine
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924


I rule with an iron fist !


View Profile WWW
February 09, 2014, 02:48:20 AM
 #5933

I know this is probably a stupid question but when I first hookd up the avalon it seemed like I was getting waaaay more shares wired. Then I wen to wireless because I couldnt stand the noise of the machine. Well, I do have a 150' Cat5 I can run to the laundry where he machines at so I'm curious on your thoughts, do you think I might get more shares if I wire it back ?

Want a chance at winning some BTC, LTC or another crypto currency ?
Then be sure to check out our Weekly Crypto Lotteries: Crypto Lottos

BrandonMcPherson
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 205


View Profile
February 09, 2014, 03:00:09 AM
 #5934

I'd at least try it, BloodWine. At the very least, you could rule it out as a factor.
MoreBloodWine
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924


I rule with an iron fist !


View Profile WWW
February 09, 2014, 03:01:57 AM
 #5935

It is worth a shot, yes, but a little late in the day (10pm) to run wire, family gettin ready for bed so I'll do it tomorrow but I am curious as to other peoples thoughts on the matter.

Want a chance at winning some BTC, LTC or another crypto currency ?
Then be sure to check out our Weekly Crypto Lotteries: Crypto Lottos

Trongersoll
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448


Retired Software Engineer


View Profile
February 09, 2014, 03:39:21 AM
 #5936

It is worth a shot, yes, but a little late in the day (10pm) to run wire, family gettin ready for bed so I'll do it tomorrow but I am curious as to other peoples thoughts on the matter.

Mining does not use a lot of bandwidth so wired or wireless shouldn't make a difference. (i think)

*insert appropriate begging line here* 
BTC: 1CS6AV7VnjcPLxaTFoUhTjXK4mQCTzfSxE
Doge: DB22tiynvXKg7SyPpnH9jyfitKLTZb6ejc
MoreBloodWine
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924


I rule with an iron fist !


View Profile WWW
February 09, 2014, 03:43:02 AM
 #5937

It is worth a shot, yes, but a little late in the day (10pm) to run wire, family gettin ready for bed so I'll do it tomorrow but I am curious as to other peoples thoughts on the matter.

Mining does not use a lot of bandwidth so wired or wireless shouldn't make a difference. (i think)
It's not about the bandwidth, my thought on this is the direct connection vs the time it takes to send and receive on wireless, especially without knowing the kind of NIC in the Avalon and the anywhere from 30-40 signale strength to the machine.

Want a chance at winning some BTC, LTC or another crypto currency ?
Then be sure to check out our Weekly Crypto Lotteries: Crypto Lottos

jedimstr
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784



View Profile
February 09, 2014, 03:48:46 AM
 #5938

Bandwidth doesn't matter for mining but Latency does.  High lag can manifest in more rejects.

Ping your Avalon from your computer on the network over wifi.  If your pings come back lower than 5ms (some of my miners on an optimized wifi bridge link get 1ms or less), you should be ok. If it's higher, a wired connection will benefit your setup.

MoreBloodWine
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924


I rule with an iron fist !


View Profile WWW
February 09, 2014, 03:54:20 AM
 #5939

Bandwidth doesn't matter for mining but Latency does.  High lag can manifest in more rejects.

Ping your Avalon from your computer on the network over wifi.  If your pings come back lower than 5ms (some of my miners on an optimized wifi bridge link get 1ms or less), you should be ok. If it's higher, a wired connection will benefit your setup.
Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
(C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.

C:\Documents and Settings\Owner>ping 192.168.1.11

Pinging 192.168.1.11 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 192.168.1.11: bytes=32 time=349ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.11: bytes=32 time=541ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.11: bytes=32 time=542ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.11: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64

Ping statistics for 192.168.1.11:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 1ms, Maximum = 542ms, Average = 358ms

C:\Documents and Settings\Owner>

Edit: Second time///

C:\Documents and Settings\Owner>ping 192.168.1.11

Pinging 192.168.1.11 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 192.168.1.11: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.11: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.11: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.11: bytes=32 time=4ms TTL=64

Ping statistics for 192.168.1.11:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 1ms, Maximum = 6ms, Average = 3ms

C:\Documents and Settings\Owner>

Third time...

C:\Documents and Settings\Owner>ping 192.168.1.11

Pinging 192.168.1.11 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 192.168.1.11: bytes=32 time=538ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.11: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.11: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.11: bytes=32 time=-534ms TTL=64

Ping statistics for 192.168.1.11:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 1ms, Maximum = -534ms, Average = 2ms

C:\Documents and Settings\Owner>

Want a chance at winning some BTC, LTC or another crypto currency ?
Then be sure to check out our Weekly Crypto Lotteries: Crypto Lottos

jedimstr
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784



View Profile
February 09, 2014, 04:21:26 AM
 #5940

Bandwidth doesn't matter for mining but Latency does.  High lag can manifest in more rejects.

Ping your Avalon from your computer on the network over wifi.  If your pings come back lower than 5ms (some of my miners on an optimized wifi bridge link get 1ms or less), you should be ok. If it's higher, a wired connection will benefit your setup.
Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
(C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.

C:\Documents and Settings\Owner>ping 192.168.1.11

Pinging 192.168.1.11 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 192.168.1.11: bytes=32 time=349ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.11: bytes=32 time=541ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.11: bytes=32 time=542ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.11: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64

Ping statistics for 192.168.1.11:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 1ms, Maximum = 542ms, Average = 358ms

C:\Documents and Settings\Owner>

Edit: Second time///

C:\Documents and Settings\Owner>ping 192.168.1.11

Pinging 192.168.1.11 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 192.168.1.11: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.11: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.11: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.11: bytes=32 time=4ms TTL=64

Ping statistics for 192.168.1.11:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 1ms, Maximum = 6ms, Average = 3ms

C:\Documents and Settings\Owner>

Third time...

C:\Documents and Settings\Owner>ping 192.168.1.11

Pinging 192.168.1.11 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 192.168.1.11: bytes=32 time=538ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.11: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.11: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.11: bytes=32 time=-534ms TTL=64

Ping statistics for 192.168.1.11:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 1ms, Maximum = -534ms, Average = 2ms

C:\Documents and Settings\Owner>


Yup, looks like your Wifi is getting periodic interference there... you'll definitely benefit from ethernet.

Pages: « 1 ... 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 [297] 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 ... 426 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!