|
AmericanBit
|
 |
July 03, 2014, 07:08:29 AM |
|
Go for gold tardo  tardo?...you are such a tool dude |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin mining is now a specialized and very risky industry, just like gold mining. Amateur miners are unlikely to make much money, and may even lose money. Bitcoin is much more than just mining, though!
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RiverBoatBTC
|
|
July 03, 2014, 07:10:33 AM |
|
Oh lawd lol, you should really read a key part of that, These ratings are from people who are not in your trust network. They may be totally inaccurate. Just wait Chris I got something for you Well its still there...I don't have any of that. Ok, Robert... better make it good cause Im about to go all out on you bro. that |
|
|
|
|
AmericanBit
|
|
July 03, 2014, 07:11:51 AM |
|
Oh lawd lol, you should really read a key part of that, These ratings are from people who are not in your trust network. They may be totally inaccurate. Just wait Chris I got something for you Well its still there...I don't have any of that. Ok, Robert... better make it good cause Im about to go all out on you bro. that I don't talk bro...I act. Do what you gotta do |
|
|
|
|
|
AmericanBit
|
|
July 03, 2014, 07:18:31 AM |
|
Oh lawd lol, you should really read a key part of that, These ratings are from people who are not in your trust network. They may be totally inaccurate. Just wait Chris I got something for you Well its still there...I don't have any of that. Ok, Robert... better make it good cause Im about to go all out on you bro. that I don't talk bro...I act. Do what you gotta do Maybe you need to do some more research on my family, then decide whether you want to continue going down this road... |
|
|
|
|
|
RiverBoatBTC
|
|
July 03, 2014, 07:20:06 AM |
|
No one cares, don't worry it should start any minute now  You will know what I am talking about soon. Till then sit tight lol |
|
|
|
|
mcjavar
|
|
July 03, 2014, 07:25:18 AM |
|
Could you please stop? Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
AmericanBit
|
|
July 03, 2014, 07:27:26 AM |
|
Could you please stop? Thanks.
Yep, this is the guy that's in charge of your debt collection RiverboatBTC...a little hide behind his computer little bitch. I hope everyone is real proud of themselves. A little hacker nothing dipshit..WOW Begged for a 3 bitcoin loan to operate his illegal online gambling casino that will be looked into very deeply very soon |
|
|
|
|
|
AmericanBit
|
|
July 03, 2014, 07:28:25 AM |
|
Could you please stop? Thanks.
Yep, this is the guy that's in charge of your debt collection, RiverboatBTC...a little hide behind his computer little bitch. I hope everyone is real proud of themselves. A little hacker nothing dipshit..WOW Begged for a 3 bitcoin loan to operate his illegal online gambling casino that will be looked into very deeply very soon |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AmericanBit
|
|
July 03, 2014, 07:31:36 AM |
|
Don't worry, once the US government starts looking into it, Im sure they will find something...maybe even that kitty porn you were advertising |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AmericanBit
|
|
July 03, 2014, 07:40:59 AM |
|
I'm sure they have to take any possible lead they get very seriously. |
|
|
|
|
|
RiverBoatBTC
|
|
July 03, 2014, 07:43:22 AM |
|
Guess I could do the exact same thing to you, lol Or maybe even more better clean anything illegal in your house never know when they might get a "tip" about a silk road vendor living at 40972 159th St E, Lancaster, CA 93535-7050 |
|
|
|
|
AmericanBit
|
|
July 03, 2014, 07:48:33 AM |
|
Guess I could do the exact same thing to you, lol Or maybe even more better clean anything illegal in your house never know when they might get a "tip" about a silk road vendor living at 40972 159th St E, Lancaster, CA 93535-7050 Well there is this little hang up called "probable cause"...its usually needed. You have none..I, however, have a written statement from an unbiased 3rd party saying you offered child porn for larger deposits. Plus you admit to being owner and operator to a possible illegal gambling site. Im sure they would be pretty interested. I have the unique ability of going directly to the top... |
|
|
|
|
|
AmericanBit
|
|
July 03, 2014, 07:50:05 AM |
|
Guess I could do the exact same thing to you, lol Or maybe even more better clean anything illegal in your house never know when they might get a "tip" about a silk road vendor living at 40972 159th St E, Lancaster, CA 93535-7050 Well there is this little hang up called "probable cause"...its usually needed. You have none..I, however, have a written statement from an unbiased 3rd party saying you offered child porn for larger deposits. Plus you admit to being owner and operator to a possible illegal gambling site. Im sure they would be pretty interested. I have the unique ability of going directly to the top... I don't even have tor bro...plus you will need to identify yourself...please do that actually |
|
|
|
|
|
RiverBoatBTC
|
|
July 03, 2014, 07:54:14 AM |
|
Guess I could do the exact same thing to you, lol Or maybe even more better clean anything illegal in your house never know when they might get a "tip" about a silk road vendor living at 40972 159th St E, Lancaster, CA 93535-7050 Well there is this little hang up called "probable cause"...its usually needed. You have none..I, however, have a written statement from an unbiased 3rd party saying you offered child porn for larger deposits. Plus you admit to being owner and operator to a possible illegal gambling site. Im sure they would be pretty interested. I have the unique ability of going directly to the top... Go, Go, Go! The sad part is I have all your information and you only have my name... lets see who can get something to happen first  http://www.npr.org/2014/04/22/305993180/court-gives-police-new-power-to-rely-on-anonymous-tipsThe U.S. Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that police can stop and search a driver based solely on an anonymous 911 tip.
The 5-4 decision split the court's two most conservative justices, with Justice Clarence Thomas writing for the majority and Justice Antonin Scalia penning the dissent.
In August 2008, an anonymous 911 caller in California phoned in a report that a pickup truck had run her off the road. The caller gave the location of the incident, plus the make and model of the truck and the license plate number.
Police subsequently pulled over a truck matching that description and smelled marijuana as they were walking toward the vehicle. Officers eventually found 30 pounds of marijuana in the truck and arrested the driver, Jose Prado Navarette.
Navarette challenged the search and arrest as unconstitutional, arguing that officers did not have reasonable suspicion to pull him over in the first place because police knew nothing about the identity or reliability of the tipster.
The five-justice court majority disagreed, and in so doing gave police new authority to rely on anonymous tipsters.
The court has long held that officers can make stops based on anonymous tips, but the information in those tips must provide enough detail to give rise to a reasonable suspicion of criminal activity. In this case, Thomas, the author of the majority opinion, concluded that because the 911 tipster said she had been forced off the road, she was an eyewitness, and that police could infer that there was reason to believe the truck driver was drunk.
Relying on 911 tipsters is reasonable, he said, because "a 911 call has some features that allow for identifying and tracking callers," and the calls can be recorded.
In a scathing dissent, fellow conservative Scalia called the Thomas opinion a "freedom-destroying cocktail" that would encourage "malevolent" tipsters to make false reports. It matters not whether the caller gave details about her alleged accident. The issue, said Scalia, is "whether what she claimed to know was true."
As to the inference that the truck's driver was drunk, Scalia pointed out that the police officers here followed the pickup for over five minutes — and "five minutes is a long time" — without any indication of drunken driving or even bad driving.
"After today's opinion," said Scalia, "all of us on the road, and not just drug dealers, are at risk ... "
Joining Scalia in dissent were three of the court's more liberal members: Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan. Joining Thomas in the majority were Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Anthony Kennedy, Samuel Alito and Stephen Breyer, who defected from the court's liberal bloc to provide the fifth and decisive vote. |
|
|
|
|
AmericanBit
|
|
July 03, 2014, 08:00:25 AM |
|
Guess I could do the exact same thing to you, lol Or maybe even more better clean anything illegal in your house never know when they might get a "tip" about a silk road vendor living at 40972 159th St E, Lancaster, CA 93535-7050 Well there is this little hang up called "probable cause"...its usually needed. You have none..I, however, have a written statement from an unbiased 3rd party saying you offered child porn for larger deposits. Plus you admit to being owner and operator to a possible illegal gambling site. Im sure they would be pretty interested. I have the unique ability of going directly to the top... Go, Go, Go! The sad part is I have all your information and you only have my name... lets see who can get something to happen first http://www.npr.org/2014/04/22/305993180/court-gives-police-new-power-to-rely-on-anonymous-tipsThe U.S. Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that police can stop and search a driver based solely on an anonymous 911 tip.
The 5-4 decision split the court's two most conservative justices, with Justice Clarence Thomas writing for the majority and Justice Antonin Scalia penning the dissent.
In August 2008, an anonymous 911 caller in California phoned in a report that a pickup truck had run her off the road. The caller gave the location of the incident, plus the make and model of the truck and the license plate number.
Police subsequently pulled over a truck matching that description and smelled marijuana as they were walking toward the vehicle. Officers eventually found 30 pounds of marijuana in the truck and arrested the driver, Jose Prado Navarette.
Navarette challenged the search and arrest as unconstitutional, arguing that officers did not have reasonable suspicion to pull him over in the first place because police knew nothing about the identity or reliability of the tipster.
The five-justice court majority disagreed, and in so doing gave police new authority to rely on anonymous tipsters.
The court has long held that officers can make stops based on anonymous tips, but the information in those tips must provide enough detail to give rise to a reasonable suspicion of criminal activity. In this case, Thomas, the author of the majority opinion, concluded that because the 911 tipster said she had been forced off the road, she was an eyewitness, and that police could infer that there was reason to believe the truck driver was drunk.
Relying on 911 tipsters is reasonable, he said, because "a 911 call has some features that allow for identifying and tracking callers," and the calls can be recorded.
In a scathing dissent, fellow conservative Scalia called the Thomas opinion a "freedom-destroying cocktail" that would encourage "malevolent" tipsters to make false reports. It matters not whether the caller gave details about her alleged accident. The issue, said Scalia, is "whether what she claimed to know was true."
As to the inference that the truck's driver was drunk, Scalia pointed out that the police officers here followed the pickup for over five minutes — and "five minutes is a long time" — without any indication of drunken driving or even bad driving.
"After today's opinion," said Scalia, "all of us on the road, and not just drug dealers, are at risk ... "
Joining Scalia in dissent were three of the court's more liberal members: Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan. Joining Thomas in the majority were Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Anthony Kennedy, Samuel Alito and Stephen Breyer, who defected from the court's liberal bloc to provide the fifth and decisive vote. Well you were definitely behind that stupid fucking indiegogo Cryptney or whatever that stupid shit was. So that kind of stuff is easy to find out. Plus scottbtc is 98% sure you are that dipshit looking mother fucker Robert Panzy. So 98% is good enough for them im sure |
|
|
|
|
|
AmericanBit
|
|
July 03, 2014, 08:06:53 AM |
|
So if you ever call my mother's house again. If you ever post anything else personal about me or my family. I will go directly to the FBI, tell them what has happened. Give them everything I know about you, and push this thing as far as I can. Is that understood?
|
|
|
|
|
|
