Harris Vs Trump - Bitcoin betting on the 2024 US Presidential Election

[mindrust]

I think this is very well said.  Trump is pushing his touting of bitcoin and cryptocurrency very hard right now (even though he has absolutely no idea what any of it is or how any of it works) so it's really just about pandering for votes.  As you've mentioned, sort of like gun laws, Kamala isn't going to try and ban guns, just like shes not going to try and ban bitcoin, she's just going to make sure that both are well regulated, which I see nothing wrong with.

Trump has always supported Bitcoin. Kamala on the other hand has been in power for three and half years now, and during this time she has come up with more and more restrictive regulations related to cryptocurrency. Kamala's newfound love for Bitcoin is just a hogwash. In case she is elected, she will try whatever in her capacity to destroy the cryptocurrency sector in the US. Just look around. States which are ruled by Democrats have the most restrictive cryptocurrency laws in the United States.

Damn right. Everything has changed when Trump attended the bitcoin conference. Kamala were ignoring the crypto crowd completely but then suddenly she changed her tone about crypto but we all know she is lying. If she were such a bitcoin lover, she could have made her moves before Trump but she decided not to. Now the main stream media is trying to sell her as a crpyto-friendly candidate but nobody buys that.

Trump changed the rules of the game forever. If you don't support or against crypto, you cannot win and since Trump supports crypto, he is going to win.

[stompix]

Trump has always supported Bitcoin.

Typical.

This guy has the memory of goldfish, he's the best indicator of how things will never play out.
He was a trump supporter four years ago, said that only catastrophes will happen, that the economy will tank, bla bla, then after the Russian invasion he was saying Ukraine would be conquered in 3 months, and then he was making fun of Europeans freezing to death and us not afford a car or a litter of gas, he never set foot out of his village in India but he's a genius international thinktank all but himself.

Let me quote a few of this genius statements:

LOL.. so you are saying that Europe will find replacement in the next couple of years. What will they do until then? Maybe they will travel in donkey carts and heat their homes by burning firewood? And there is no guarantee that they will find replacement in the next 24 months. It is very simple. There is not enough supply of oil and natural gas in the world, to replace the supply from Russia. It is Europe that is going to crumble, not Russia. And already the signs are obvious. Now the catch here is that Russians are used to a life of hardship and difficult economic conditions. But can the Europeans deal with such conditions?

Most of the European countries don't even have a proper army nowadays and are entirely dependent on the United States for their defense deals. Within a few weeks, all these media hype about heroic Ukrainian defense will fall apart and Putin will walk away with half of Ukraine. Europeans will be left with another 10 million economic migrants from Ukraine, which will add further strain to the budget (that is already under pressure from the raising gas and oil prices).

Deleted the post because he realized how stupid he was and tried to erase the traces of it:

https://ninjastic.space/post/55596110

COVID 19 had hardly any impact on the crude oil prices. But the election of Joe Biden as the POTUS will be having a huge impact. I expect the crude oil prices to reach $100-$150 per barrel in the next 2-3 years. Donald Trump had removed most of the regulations/restrictions in crude oil production within the US, and this helped the country to achieve the status of the top crude oil producer in the world. Now Biden will put all those regulations and restrictions back in place, which will destroy the US oil industry. There is going to be a supply crunch and the oil prices will shoot up.

Rule of thumb, if Sithara007 says something about geopolitics bet your house the opposite will happen!

[EarnOnVictor]

Trump is using the cryptocurrency trump card very well. He is living up to his name... One day he pays with cryptocurrencies, one day he makes positive statements about cryptocurrencies and one day his son announces that he is launching a cryptocurrency project in his name. The information obtained from big data must have told them that this area will increase their votes... Kamala Harris is more cautious on this issue. If I had a negative opinion about cryptocurrencies, I would prefer Kamala Harris' tactic...

The thing with Trump is that he will basically say whatever he thinks will make him win more votes at the moment that he is talking.

It's kinda like the truth doesn't matter any more, or even the presidential candidate's opinion, all that seems to matter is what is being said at the moment.

The presidential election is almost like a reality TV contest these days.

That is what the US get for even allowing someone like Donald Trump to contest for the president for the second time, not after what the whole world witnessed during his first administration. This guy is selfish, self-centred, dividing and inciting, the US has never had it this bad in this new age where their president/intending president would have it almost all wrong.

You can't open your mouth to say the truth but it's all about you and what you want to achieve, so you must find a crooked way to get it. As you said, the truth doesn't matter anymore and the US president's seat looks like a mockery now even as everything looks like a TV show, so we should enjoy the show as it unfolds.

[tbct_mt2]

That is what the US get for even allowing someone like Donald Trump to contest for the president for the second time, not after what the whole world witnessed during his first administration. This guy is selfish, self-centred, dividing and inciting, the US has never had it this bad in this new age where their president/intending president would have it almost all wrong.

You can say whatever you think about Trump and his personal characteristics, but about his works as a President, it's better than Biden and Harris time.

You can't open your mouth to say the truth but it's all about you and what you want to achieve, so you must find a crooked way to get it. As you said, the truth doesn't matter anymore and the US president's seat looks like a mockery now even as everything looks like a TV show, so we should enjoy the show as it unfolds.

It's what's happening in the Presidency and administration of Joe Biden and Kamala Harris. The censorship in the USA happened four years ago in 2020 Election and it has been lasting till 2024, not better but become worse.

So is it because of Trump or combination of Biden and Harris?

Watch why Robert Kenedy Jr. left Democratic Party, but in his words the party left him.

These people Biden and Harris have no solid explanations why they opened the USA border for criminals, drug traffickers and violent people invaded their country. Lately because of their fear of losing the election, they do this.
Immigrants Are Becoming U.S. Citizens at Fastest Clip in Years

The only explanation is they are doing this, to import undocumented illegal immigrants and approve them as citizens as fastest process, to steal the election again. It's because these new citizens will surely vote for Democratic Party.

You can see this common trend in European countries too, with massive problems from illegal immigrants and locals are trying to request governments make mass deportations, to bring their countries back to normal.

[Tipstar]

Trump is using the cryptocurrency trump card very well. He is living up to his name... One day he pays with cryptocurrencies, one day he makes positive statements about cryptocurrencies and one day his son announces that he is launching a cryptocurrency project in his name. The information obtained from big data must have told them that this area will increase their votes... Kamala Harris is more cautious on this issue. If I had a negative opinion about cryptocurrencies, I would prefer Kamala Harris' tactic...

The thing with Trump is that he will basically say whatever he thinks will make him win more votes at the moment that he is talking.

It's kinda like the truth doesn't matter any more, or even the presidential candidate's opinion, all that seems to matter is what is being said at the moment.

The presidential election is almost like a reality TV contest these days.

That is what the US get for even allowing someone like Donald Trump to contest for the president for the second time, not after what the whole world witnessed during his first administration. This guy is selfish, self-centred, dividing and inciting, the US has never had it this bad in this new age where their president/intending president would have it almost all wrong.

You can't open your mouth to say the truth but it's all about you and what you want to achieve, so you must find a crooked way to get it. As you said, the truth doesn't matter anymore and the US president's seat looks like a mockery now even as everything looks like a TV show, so we should enjoy the show as it unfolds.

Everyone do have different political views and the people directly involved in politics may have strong views towards their candidate and against competitor. But it takes a larger degree of brainwashing to speak against democracy or people's choice.
Surely, democracy is not perfect but none of the alternatives are as better as democracy. When we are talking against democratic values, we are favoring autocracy and a system which is biased towards a small group of people while exploiting the general population.

[Haunebu]

You can say whatever you think about Trump and his personal characteristics, but about his works as a President, it's better than Biden and Harris time.

There are valid arguments showing that he is better than Biden on certain occasions, but calling him better than Harris is just silly especially after the way he botched the debate against her recently.

Harris might be a corrupt politician just like any other politician, but she is clearly better than Trump overall and only his fans would say otherwise.

[ChiBitCTy]

You can say whatever you think about Trump and his personal characteristics, but about his works as a President, it's better than Biden and Harris time.

There are valid arguments showing that he is better than Biden on certain occasions, but calling him better than Harris is just silly especially after the way he botched the debate against her recently.

Harris might be a corrupt politician just like any other politician, but she is clearly better than Trump overall and only his fans would say otherwise.

I am mostly in agreeance with you here for the most part.  I certainly don't think that either Donald Trump or Biden are fit to be president of the United States.  But for that matter I don't believe that Kamala Harris is suited either.  But with that said, I think she does make for a better president than Trump because at minimum she's not going to separate and divide us like Trump already well has.

Still not 100% sure on how I'm going to be this thing.

[Marvell1]

You can say whatever you think about Trump and his personal characteristics, but about his works as a President, it's better than Biden and Harris time.

There are valid arguments showing that he is better than Biden on certain occasions, but calling him better than Harris is just silly especially after the way he botched the debate against her recently.

Harris might be a corrupt politician just like any other politician, but she is clearly better than Trump overall and only his fans would say otherwise.

How is she better than Trump? I don't think it's fair to judge who's better based on one debate, that just makes you no different from Trump supporters. You are just trying to defend the candidate you support without providing any concrete evidence.

In all fairness, the best person will be the one who gets the most votes and becomes president. So until the election is over, we will never know who is better.


Everyone has different problems in life as well as different perspectives on life, so we have different choices. We can vote for whoever we think is good but we should not divide each other just because of voting.

[bitgolden]

How is she better than Trump? I don't think it's fair to judge who's better based on one debate, that just makes you no different from Trump supporters. You are just trying to defend the candidate you support without providing any concrete evidence.

In all fairness, the best person will be the one who gets the most votes and becomes president. So until the election is over, we will never know who is better.


Everyone has different problems in life as well as different perspectives on life, so we have different choices. We can vote for whoever we think is good but we should not divide each other just because of voting.

The best person is definitely not the one who will become the president, presidents are not picked the way it should be and it doesn't matter if Kamala wins or Trump wins, USA will get worse, and that's a sad fact. How do I know this? My age is good enough to remember papa bush, clinton, bush jr, obama and trump along with now biden, NONE of them made the nation better, and I mean none of them. So that means, no matter who you elect, it will be a bad president who will make the nation worse.

This is just "lets pick who will make the USA less worse" type of thing, if you think Kamala will make the nation less worse than trump could then you vote for her, if you think trump will make it worse but not as much as kamala then you pick him. It's definitely nothing more, neither will make it a better nation.

[Onyeeze]

You can say whatever you think about Trump and his personal characteristics, but about his works as a President, it's better than Biden and Harris time.

There are valid arguments showing that he is better than Biden on certain occasions, but calling him better than Harris is just silly especially after the way he botched the debate against her recently.

Harris might be a corrupt politician just like any other politician, but she is clearly better than Trump overall and only his fans would say otherwise.

Their is no politician that is not corrupt when you compared the politicians characteristics to order countries You will see that there most of the politicians their mind is at back when they have the opportunity will be in seats but when there are seeking for the opportunity you will see them be having good to the people of the nation by immediately their assume office that method of life will it totally change So let me just make it brief all the politicians to be is corrupt except that you don't have a foresight you will not understand them but when you focus directly to them you will not use that there are corrupt, nobody has know Harris very well but when you him power through his leadership is when you will know if he's corrupt or not, among all I think Trump is better than all.

[tbct_mt2]

There are valid arguments showing that he is better than Biden on certain occasions, but calling him better than Harris is just silly especially after the way he botched the debate against her recently.

Harris might be a corrupt politician just like any other politician, but she is clearly better than Trump overall and only his fans would say otherwise.

Did Harris actually make a better speech in the debate?

Did you watch the debate or simply read reviews on media, televisions which are all manipulated by Biden, Harris team and Democratic Party?

If you want the debate fully and if better, watch speeches of Harris in interview recent weeks or in the past, she is very bad, no good train of thought. No idea on good policies for her country and by this I don't see anything that makes Harris better than Trump.

Watch Kamala Harris's broken speech on economy.
https://x.com/EndWokeness/status/1839744097403167184

This is another explaining reason on why Google made "bugs" in their Search engine and months ago, after Biden passed his nominee to Kamala Harris, if you Google "Donald Trump", you will get all results about Kamala Harris; while if you Google "Kamala Harris", you will only get results on Kamala Harris.

[TwitchySeal]

There are valid arguments showing that he is better than Biden on certain occasions, but calling him better than Harris is just silly especially after the way he botched the debate against her recently.

Harris might be a corrupt politician just like any other politician, but she is clearly better than Trump overall and only his fans would say otherwise.

Did Harris actually make a better speech in the debate?

Did you watch the debate or simply read reviews on media, televisions which are all manipulated by Biden, Harris team and Democratic Party?

I watched the entire debate and there's no question Trump lost.  Harris definitely made a strategic decision to make convince the country why they shouldn't vote for him rather than why they should vote for her, and there's fair criticism to make on that decision, but without a doubt she executed her strategy very very well.

She made him look like a petty old man that spends too much time on the internet.  She was smart to call him "confused" instead of a liar as he keeps claiming he won the last election and watching her bait him over and over again, when it was so obvious what she was doing, and him falling for it completely every single time made him look very week.  It reminded my of that old road runner cartoon, where the road runner draws a picture of a tunnel on the wall, and the coyote runs into it.  Then later he does it again.  And again.  And the coyote just keeps running into the wall thinking it's a tunnel every time.

No conspiracy was needed to manipulate anything when there were exchanges like this:

VICE PRESIDENT KAMALA HARRIS: So I'm the only person on this stage who has prosecuted transnational criminal organizations for the trafficking of guns, drugs, and human beings. And let me say that the United States Congress, including some of the most conservative members of the United States Senate, came up with a border security bill which I supported. And that bill would have put 1,500 more border agents on the border to help those folks who are working there right now over time trying to do their job. It would have allowed us to stem the flow of fentanyl coming into the United States. I know there are so many families watching tonight who have been personally affected by the surge of fentanyl in our country. That bill would have put more resources to allow us to prosecute transnational criminal organizations for trafficking in guns, drugs and human beings. But you know what happened to that bill? Donald Trump got on the phone, called up some folks in Congress, and said kill the bill. And you know why? Because he preferred to run on a problem instead of fixing a problem. And understand, this comes at a time where the people of our country actually need a leader who engages in solutions, who actually addresses the problems at hand. But what we have in the former president is someone who would prefer to run on a problem instead of fixing a problem. And I'll tell you something, he's going to talk about immigration a lot tonight even when it's not the subject that is being raised. And I'm going to actually do something really unusual and I'm going to invite you to attend one of Donald Trump's rallies because it's a really interesting thing to watch. You will see during the course of his rallies he talks about fictional characters like Hannibal Lecter. He will talk about windmills cause cancer. And what you will also notice is that people start leaving his rallies early out of exhaustion and boredom. And I will tell you the one thing you will not hear him talk about is you. You will not hear him talk about your needs, your dreams, and your, your desires. And I'll tell you, I believe you deserve a president who actually puts you first. And I pledge to you that I will.

DAVID MUIR: Vice President Harris, thank you. President Trump, on that point I want to get your response.

FORMER PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: Well, I would like to respond.

DAVID MUIR: Let me just ask, though, why did you try to kill that bill and successfully so? That would have put thousands of additional agents and officers on the border.

FORMER PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: First let me respond as to the rallies. She said people start leaving. People don't go to her rallies. There's no reason to go. And the people that do go, she's busing them in and paying them to be there. And then showing them in a different light. So, she can't talk about that. People don't leave my rallies. We have the biggest rallies, the most incredible rallies in the history of politics. That's because people want to take their country back. Our country is being lost. We're a failing nation. And it happened three and a half years ago. And what, what's going on here, you're going to end up in World War 3, just to go into another subject. What they have done to our country by allowing these millions and millions of people to come into our country. And look at what's happening to the towns all over the United States. And a lot of towns don't want to talk -- not going to be Aurora or Springfield. A lot of towns don't want to talk about it because they're so embarrassed by it. In Springfield, they're eating the dogs. The people that came in. They're eating the cats. They're eating -- they're eating the pets of the people that live there. And this is what's happening in our country. And it's a shame. As far as rallies are concerned, as far -- the reason they go is they like what I say. They want to bring our country back. They want to make America great again. It's a very simple phrase. Make America great again. She's destroying this country. And if she becomes president, this country doesn't have a chance of success. Not only success. We'll end up being Venezuela on steroids.

DAVID MUIR: I just want to clarify here, you bring up Springfield, Ohio. And ABC News did reach out to the city manager there. He told us there have been no credible reports of specific claims of pets being harmed, injured or abused by individuals within the immigrant community --

FORMER PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: Well, I've seen people on television

DAVID MUIR: Let me just say here this ...

FORMER PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: The people on television say my dog was taken and used for food. So maybe he said that and maybe that's a good thing to say for a city manager.

DAVID MUIR: I'm not taking this from television. I'm taking it from the city manager.

FORMER PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: But the people on television say their dog was eaten by the people that went there.

DAVID MUIR: Again, the Springfield city manager says there's no evidence of that.

FORMER PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: We'll find out

DAVID MUIR: Vice President Harris, I'll let you respond to the rest of what you heard.

VICE PRESIDENT KAMALA HARRIS: Talk about extreme. Um, you know, this is I think one of the reasons why in this election I actually have the endorsement of 200 Republicans who have formally worked with President Bush, Mitt Romney, and John McCain including the endorsement of former Vice President Dick Cheney and Congressmember Liz Cheney. And if you want to really know the inside track on who the former president is, if he didn't make it clear already, just ask people who have worked with him. His former chief of staff, a four-star general, has said he has contempt for the constitution of the United States. His former national security adviser has said he is dangerous and unfit. His former secretary of defense has said the nation, the republic would never survive another Trump term. And when we listen to this kind of rhetoric, when the issues that affect the American people are not being addressed, I think the choice is clear in this election.

If you want the debate fully and if better, watch speeches of Harris in interview recent weeks or in the past, she is very bad, no good train of thought. No idea on good policies for her country and by this I don't see anything that makes Harris better than Trump.

Ok give me a transcript of Kamalas worst couple minutes you can find between now and July and I'll give you 5 examples from the same time frame of Trump and any one of them on their own will easily show Trump is the less fit candidate.  If you want Trump to win because of policy reasons that's fine, but if you're seriously arguing that Trump should win because " is very bad, no good train of thought. No idea on good policies for her country" then you're lying to yourself, or, more likely the media sources that are informing you of this big conspiracy making it look like Kamala won the debate are the ones lying to you.  And I won't even use the "they're eating the cats, they're eating the dogs, THEY ARE EATING THE PETS!!!!!!!" line.

Go ahead, find the worst thing Kamala has said in recent weeks.

[fruktik]

Damn right. Everything has changed when Trump attended the bitcoin conference. Kamala were ignoring the crypto crowd completely but then suddenly she changed her tone about crypto but we all know she is lying. If she were such a bitcoin lover, she could have made her moves before Trump but she decided not to. Now the main stream media is trying to sell her as a crpyto-friendly candidate but nobody buys that.

Trump changed the rules of the game forever. If you don't support or against crypto, you cannot win and since Trump supports crypto, he is going to win.

And I was just recently thinking about this. The candidate who comes to his senses in time and remembers about crypto will become president. It seems that at the moment Trump has a clear advantage in this regard. He decided to remember about cryptons in time. But was this action the last ace up his sleeve? What else is he capable of doing? Will he really allow Bitcoins and other coins, tokens to be accepted throughout America? This, of course, would be an incredible and pleasant shock event.

Oh, why did Kamala pass so much? It seems too late that she decided to press on this topic and attract even more votes to her side. I just felt that there would be "heated" debates on this topic now.

[Haunebu]

How is she better than Trump? I don't think it's fair to judge who's better based on one debate, that just makes you no different from Trump supporters. You are just trying to defend the candidate you support without providing any concrete evidence.

The debate itself is concrete evidence which is why you just sound silly here. Also, she is a lot younger than him which is a pro in her favor these days.

This is just "lets pick who will make the USA less worse" type of thing, if you think Kamala will make the nation less worse than trump could then you vote for her, if you think trump will make it worse but not as much as kamala then you pick him. It's definitely nothing more, neither will make it a better nation.

Couldn't have said it better myself. None of these people compare to legends like FDR, Lincoln etc which is why the world is left to choose the lesser evil at the end of the day and that is messed up to say the least.

[Rabata]

You can say whatever you think about Trump and his personal characteristics, but about his works as a President, it's better than Biden and Harris time.

There are valid arguments showing that he is better than Biden on certain occasions, but calling him better than Harris is just silly especially after the way he botched the debate against her recently.

Harris might be a corrupt politician just like any other politician, but she is clearly better than Trump overall and only his fans would say otherwise.

How is she better than Trump? I don't think it's fair to judge who's better based on one debate, that just makes you no different from Trump supporters. You are just trying to defend the candidate you support without providing any concrete evidence.

In all fairness, the best person will be the one who gets the most votes and becomes president. So until the election is over, we will never know who is better.


Everyone has different problems in life as well as different perspectives on life, so we have different choices. We can vote for whoever we think is good but we should not divide each other just because of voting.

Appreciate, considering the current times, if we support anyone, it will not be acceptable to the supporters of the opposite party. In that case, it is not possible to say whether Trump or Harris will be good or bad in favor of democracy or America in the right direction. We can come to a decision on this issue only after getting the results through the election process. I would say based on news from various sources that Harris is ahead in the polls but when the election actually happens that poll may be wrong. Elections are being politicized by political leaders, so must be depended the verdict of the people who they really want.

[Marvell1]

How is she better than Trump? I don't think it's fair to judge who's better based on one debate, that just makes you no different from Trump supporters. You are just trying to defend the candidate you support without providing any concrete evidence.

In all fairness, the best person will be the one who gets the most votes and becomes president. So until the election is over, we will never know who is better.


Everyone has different problems in life as well as different perspectives on life, so we have different choices. We can vote for whoever we think is good but we should not divide each other just because of voting.

The best person is definitely not the one who will become the president, presidents are not picked the way it should be and it doesn't matter if Kamala wins or Trump wins, USA will get worse, and that's a sad fact. How do I know this? My age is good enough to remember papa bush, clinton, bush jr, obama and trump along with now biden, NONE of them made the nation better, and I mean none of them. So that means, no matter who you elect, it will be a bad president who will make the nation worse.

This is just "lets pick who will make the USA less worse" type of thing, if you think Kamala will make the nation less worse than trump could then you vote for her, if you think trump will make it worse but not as much as kamala then you pick him. It's definitely nothing more, neither will make it a better nation.

The nature of politics is lies, corruption, they care more about themselves than their citizens, that's why whoever gets elected, we will always see things getting worse instead of better.

Yes, we only make choices based on who will make the country less bad but even if they try their best to help the country achieve its best state, you or many others will never feel satisfied. Because we are just like politicians, we are all human and human nature is greedy. We will never be satisfied even if we have the life that many people dream of.


America is getting worse but they are still the top country in the world, while you feel things are getting worse there are still billions of people in the world who want American citizenship. Sometimes things are not as bad as you think if you can control your greed.

[Sg4j1n3ll0]

How is she better than Trump? I don't think it's fair to judge who's better based on one debate, that just makes you no different from Trump supporters. You are just trying to defend the candidate you support without providing any concrete evidence.

In all fairness, the best person will be the one who gets the most votes and becomes president. So until the election is over, we will never know who is better.


Everyone has different problems in life as well as different perspectives on life, so we have different choices. We can vote for whoever we think is good but we should not divide each other just because of voting.

The best person is definitely not the one who will become the president, presidents are not picked the way it should be and it doesn't matter if Kamala wins or Trump wins, USA will get worse, and that's a sad fact. How do I know this? My age is good enough to remember papa bush, clinton, bush jr, obama and trump along with now biden, NONE of them made the nation better, and I mean none of them. So that means, no matter who you elect, it will be a bad president who will make the nation worse.

This is just "lets pick who will make the USA less worse" type of thing, if you think Kamala will make the nation less worse than trump could then you vote for her, if you think trump will make it worse but not as much as kamala then you pick him. It's definitely nothing more, neither will make it a better nation.

The nature of politics is lies, corruption, they care more about themselves than their citizens, that's why whoever gets elected, we will always see things getting worse instead of better.

Yes, we only make choices based on who will make the country less bad but even if they try their best to help the country achieve its best state, you or many others will never feel satisfied. Because we are just like politicians, we are all human and human nature is greedy. We will never be satisfied even if we have the life that many people dream of.


America is getting worse but they are still the top country in the world, while you feel things are getting worse there are still billions of people in the world who want American citizenship. Sometimes things are not as bad as you think if you can control your greed.

people's perspectives on the condition of a country largely depend on their individual circumstances and requirements. Sure, American politics has its share of problems, but so does every other country. The fact that the United States remains an attractive destination for many, despite its issues, signifies the relative privilege and opportunities it continues to provide.

Comparative advantages or disadvantages notwithstanding, it's essential for the citizenry not to be complacent and continue striving for improvements and changes that promote the greater good, rather than solely focusing on selfish interests. Greed certainly plays a part in politics, but so does the capacity for empathy, ideals of justice, and the strive for a better society. It's a balance that needs to be carefully struck and maintained.

[FanEagle]

There are valid arguments showing that he is better than Biden on certain occasions, but calling him better than Harris is just silly especially after the way he botched the debate against her recently.

Harris might be a corrupt politician just like any other politician, but she is clearly better than Trump overall and only his fans would say otherwise.

I am mostly in agreeance with you here for the most part.  I certainly don't think that either Donald Trump or Biden are fit to be president of the United States.  But for that matter I don't believe that Kamala Harris is suited either.  But with that said, I think she does make for a better president than Trump because at minimum she's not going to separate and divide us like Trump already well has.

Still not 100% sure on how I'm going to be this thing.

You are 100% right, none of them are suited to be president and we are in a weird period of USA politics where we haven't seen a good candidate for MANY years now, over 8 years and over 3 elections. First it was Trump vs Hillary, which we all know was a terrible one without a doubt, then it was Trump vs Biden, and that was terrible as well, and now it's Trump vs Kamala, which is once again not ideal. I miss the days where it was just difference between policy that was the reason why you would vote for republicans or democrats, now even the personality is a questionable one.

The fear I have is that if we keep this up, then could we potentially have even worse people? If that's a risk, then the future definitely looks very scary, I hope we go back to professional people who act nice.

[Haunebu]

You are 100% right, none of them are suited to be president and we are in a weird period of USA politics where we haven't seen a good candidate for MANY years now, over 8 years and over 3 elections. First it was Trump vs Hillary, which we all know was a terrible one without a doubt, then it was Trump vs Biden, and that was terrible as well, and now it's Trump vs Kamala, which is once again not ideal. I miss the days where it was just difference between policy that was the reason why you would vote for republicans or democrats, now even the personality is a questionable one.

The fear I have is that if we keep this up, then could we potentially have even worse people? If that's a risk, then the future definitely looks very scary, I hope we go back to professional people who act nice.

You spoke my mind. It's really tough to believe that the options for the world's most powerful person are Trump, Biden, Harris from the last couple of years which just goes to show how much worse corruption is getting in the USA over time.

Miss the days when there were proper options available like FDR etc even though I just heard how well they executed their terms.

[EarnOnVictor]

That is what the US get for even allowing someone like Donald Trump to contest for the president for the second time, not after what the whole world witnessed during his first administration. This guy is selfish, self-centred, dividing and inciting, the US has never had it this bad in this new age where their president/intending president would have it almost all wrong.

You can say whatever you think about Trump and his personal characteristics, but about his works as a President, it's better than Biden and Harris time.

Thank you for giving me the right to say whatever I want to say, it is my right indeed...lol

However, what I won't agree with is Trump better than Biden and Harris. No doubt, the present administration has its flaws but I bet that if it were the fake Trump controlling the affairs of the US now, the country would have been in recession, if not in an abyss. You don't judge the country when everything is fine with when there are more pressing global economic issues. Even during COVID-19, we saw how he handled an issue of urgent and sensitive national issues lightly, what a president! His carelessness claimed millions of US lives and still encouraged people not to use a nosemask and mocked those who used it.

For your information, this present administration managed the situation well and is overcoming it, you can only hear the rumour of recession, but it never happened despite the global economic challenge. Had it been it was another president like Trump as seen in history, I am sure that the US would have been in recession by now and panic would have been everywhere. He can't do better than his Republican father George W. Bush who drove the country into the great recession of 2007-2009.