Bitcoin Forum
April 26, 2024, 01:25:37 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: I would purchase mining time with...
BTC - 231 (57.5%)
MTGOXUSD Codes - 32 (8%)
Credit Card - 112 (27.9%)
Other e-currency (ie. Dwolla, Paxum) - 27 (6.7%)
Total Voters: 400

Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 [60] 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 ... 130 »
  Print  
Author Topic: GPUMAX | The Bitcoin Mining Marketplace  (Read 215503 times)
BinaryMage
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 500


Ad astra.


View Profile
March 26, 2012, 06:49:01 PM
 #1181

Cutover to new cluster has already improved things for me! Getting less rejects/disconnects now, plus the website seems to be improved (no transaction history, or payout estimate yet though, which would be nice!)

All my work seems to be going offline though  Sad  except for once and a while, where I will get lots of leased work for a short time, then back to all offline. Pirate, are you testing purchases on the new cluster still? Any idea when the cutover/testing process will be complete, and new purchases/resulting leased-work will be available?

Ditto; my rejects are significantly lower. Any news on public work Pirate?

-- BinaryMage -- | OTC | PGP
1714094737
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714094737

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714094737
Reply with quote  #2

1714094737
Report to moderator
1714094737
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714094737

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714094737
Reply with quote  #2

1714094737
Report to moderator
1714094737
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714094737

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714094737
Reply with quote  #2

1714094737
Report to moderator
You get merit points when someone likes your post enough to give you some. And for every 2 merit points you receive, you can send 1 merit point to someone else!
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714094737
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714094737

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714094737
Reply with quote  #2

1714094737
Report to moderator
1714094737
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714094737

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714094737
Reply with quote  #2

1714094737
Report to moderator
DILLIGAF
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100



View Profile
March 27, 2012, 12:29:49 AM
 #1182

I must be getting some public shares to receive .02 btc from gpu max and the rest from my backup

In the last couple of days during the migration there were brief periods where they did the public work that is the payment you see, I also got one for those days.
hashking
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 27, 2012, 02:43:17 PM
 #1183

People might have realized that its not profitable to pay .000055 a share.  Pirate might not have any buy orders right now.  I have been on public works since yesterday at .000036.
rjk
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 250


1ngldh


View Profile
March 27, 2012, 02:46:26 PM
 #1184

People might have realized that its not profitable to pay .000055 a share.  Pirate might not have any buy orders right now.  I have been on public works since yesterday at .000036.
Guys seriously, transferring to a new server/cluster isn't an instant bang bang done thing, it usually takes a bit to optimize. Setting your price to something retardedly low like that will only make it impossible for everyone else to have theirs high. The reason you aren't getting leased shares isn't because you are charging too much, it's cause leased purchases likely aren't happening right now.

Mining Rig Extraordinaire - the Trenton BPX6806 18-slot PCIe backplane [PICS] Dead project is dead, all hail the coming of the mighty ASIC!
minero1
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 303
Merit: 250



View Profile
March 27, 2012, 02:48:06 PM
 #1185

i'm getting a bit of public work at 0.000042
JWU42
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666
Merit: 1000


View Profile
March 27, 2012, 02:49:19 PM
 #1186

It isn't a price issue right now as rjk said...

michaelmclees
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 633
Merit: 500


View Profile
March 27, 2012, 02:57:37 PM
 #1187

It isn't a price issue right now as rjk said...

I thought that Pirate said earlier that price is the result of some function and asking prices on miners' parts.
rjk
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 250


1ngldh


View Profile
March 27, 2012, 03:38:25 PM
 #1188

It isn't a price issue right now as rjk said...

I thought that Pirate said earlier that price is the result of some function and asking prices on miners' parts.
The price paid for rented power is a function of how much the miners are asking to be paid. If the ask is too low, then the buyers pay less, and everyone makes less. If people keep asking 0.00003, then the buyers will only be paying 0.000035 or 0.00004, and those that are asking 0.00005 or 0.00006 won't be paid at all.

If you want the buyers to pay 0.000055 or 0.00006 or whatever, you can't set your price at 0.00003, it just won't work. I guess it's a little harder for people to figure out since there are no fancy charts of the bid/ask and also since bid/ask functionality is severely castrated in the current software's form.

Mining Rig Extraordinaire - the Trenton BPX6806 18-slot PCIe backplane [PICS] Dead project is dead, all hail the coming of the mighty ASIC!
pirateat40 (OP)
Avast Ye!
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


"Yes I am a pirate, 200 years too late."


View Profile WWW
March 27, 2012, 03:38:57 PM
 #1189

Update

After a problematic migration we're now ready to fire back up the system and throw everything we can at it.

It's now time to get back to inviting.  To those that have patiently waited on the waiting list, I'm sorry for the delays and hope it will be worth the wait. Smiley

Enjoy,

imsaguy
General failure and former
VIP
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 500

Don't send me a pm unless you gpg encrypt it.


View Profile WWW
March 27, 2012, 03:41:58 PM
 #1190


And yes, I have set my measly 5 Ghash at many veried prices between .000035 and .00005 and never, afterwards, have I seen the purchase price at anything but .000055. 

Sigg

The price people pay is based off the bottom 50% of what the average price is.  Do you really think your 5G is going to push around the price that these guys with 200+G have set?  You are small fish and get to swim whichever way the water is flowing.

Coming Soon!™ © imsaguy 2011-2013, All rights reserved.

EIEIO:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=60117.0

Shades Minoco Collection Thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=65989
Payment Address: http://btc.to/5r6
guruvan
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 500


View Profile
March 27, 2012, 03:43:12 PM
 #1191

Update

After a problematic migration we're now ready to fire back up the system and throw everything we can at it.

It's now time to get back to inviting.  To those that have patiently waited on the waiting list, I'm sorry for the delays and hope it will be worth the wait. Smiley

Enjoy,

exciting news!

TheSeven
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 500


FPGA Mining LLC


View Profile WWW
March 27, 2012, 04:29:26 PM
 #1192

Update

After a problematic migration we're now ready to fire back up the system and throw everything we can at it.

It's now time to get back to inviting.  To those that have patiently waited on the waiting list, I'm sorry for the delays and hope it will be worth the wait. Smiley

Enjoy,

So where is my invite?  Huh

My tip jar: 13kwqR7B4WcSAJCYJH1eXQcxG5vVUwKAqY
imsaguy
General failure and former
VIP
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 500

Don't send me a pm unless you gpg encrypt it.


View Profile WWW
March 27, 2012, 04:40:16 PM
 #1193

Update

After a problematic migration we're now ready to fire back up the system and throw everything we can at it.

It's now time to get back to inviting.  To those that have patiently waited on the waiting list, I'm sorry for the delays and hope it will be worth the wait. Smiley

Enjoy,

So where is my invite?  Huh

Coming Soon!

Coming Soon!™ © imsaguy 2011-2013, All rights reserved.

EIEIO:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=60117.0

Shades Minoco Collection Thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=65989
Payment Address: http://btc.to/5r6
jamesg
VIP
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358
Merit: 1000


AKA: gigavps


View Profile
March 27, 2012, 04:43:58 PM
 #1194

Update

After a problematic migration we're now ready to fire back up the system and throw everything we can at it.

It's now time to get back to inviting.  To those that have patiently waited on the waiting list, I'm sorry for the delays and hope it will be worth the wait. Smiley

Enjoy,

So where is my invite?  Huh

Coming Soon!

Chirp chirp.
runlinux
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 566
Merit: 500



View Profile WWW
March 27, 2012, 05:08:11 PM
 #1195

I have live stats!!!!   Grin

BinaryMage
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 500


Ad astra.


View Profile
March 27, 2012, 05:43:07 PM
 #1196

I'm getting public work, but ~35% (!) rejects. Anyone else experiencing this?

-- BinaryMage -- | OTC | PGP
jjiimm_64
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1876
Merit: 1000


View Profile
March 27, 2012, 06:58:14 PM
Last edit: March 27, 2012, 07:22:40 PM by jjiimm_64
 #1197

I'm getting public work, but ~35% (!) rejects. Anyone else experiencing this?

I cant see my rejects...  accessing date thru php scripts..  but I can see the btc's rolling in  ch-ching

gpu diffs:
BTC'S:    3.044700 in: 6335 seconds   0.03 p/m- 1.73 p/h- 41.53 p/d         
shares:  61,699 in: 6335 seconds  584 p/m  35,062 p/h  841,483 p/d


edit:  400 seconds later.. still getting shares regularly

0.194818 in: 396 seconds   0.03 p/m- 1.77 p/h- 42.51 p/d         
3,941 in: 396 seconds  597 p/m  35,827 p/h  859,855 p/d


edit2:  still kickin ass ..woot
0.469105 in: 996 seconds
0.03 p/m- 1.70 p/h- 40.69 p/d

1jimbitm6hAKTjKX4qurCNQubbnk2YsFw
minero1
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 303
Merit: 250



View Profile
March 27, 2012, 07:14:21 PM
 #1198

oh joy, TAKE ALL MY SHARES!   Cool
e21
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 105
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 27, 2012, 08:51:09 PM
 #1199

I'm getting public work, but ~35% (!) rejects. Anyone else experiencing this?

One of my rigs with 1.7 GH/s running Phoenix 2 is getting 90-100% rejects, also tried phoenix 1.7.5 which got 100% rejects. On a rig with 235MH/s, phoenix 2.0 is running fine, but on newer drivers... Rig with 1.7GH/s is using 5870s/5970s, so if I update the driver I will lose a signifcant amount of MH/s. Also, I am not convinced this is driver related.
 
Have a rig with 1.5GH/s running DiabloMiner 11.12 drivers, which is getting an acceptable amount of rejects, but GPU usage is all over the board, jumping between 0 and 100% usage, and everywhere in between, in no particular order on all of my GPUs, this is resulting in about a 20% decrease in hashrate  Angry

Have a rig with 2.3GHs, using 7970's and DiabloMiner, which also has GPU usage problem, but much worse, resulting in about 50% decreased hashrate.

About a day ago, my rig with 1.5GH/s was working just fine offline, since public work resumed over the past however many hours, this problem started occurring.

I am curious why DiabloMiner, which is not listed as supported by GPUmax, works better than Phoenix 1.7.5 and 2, which are listed as compatible...
minero1
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 303
Merit: 250



View Profile
March 27, 2012, 08:55:03 PM
 #1200

I'm getting public work, but ~35% (!) rejects. Anyone else experiencing this?

One of my rigs with 1.7 GH/s running Phoenix 2 is getting 90-100% rejects, also tried phoenix 1.7.5 which got 100% rejects. On a rig with 235MH/s, phoenix 2.0 is running fine, but on newer drivers... Rig with 1.7GH/s is using 5870s/5970s, so if I update the driver I will lose a signifcant amount of MH/s. Also, I am not convinced this is driver related.
 
Have a rig with 1.5GH/s running DiabloMiner 11.12 drivers, which is getting an acceptable amount of rejects, but GPU usage is all over the board, jumping between 0 and 100% usage, and everywhere in between, in no particular order on all of my GPUs, this is resulting in about a 20% decrease in hashrate  Angry

Have a rig with 2.3GHs, using 7970's and DiabloMiner, which also has GPU usage problem, but much worse, resulting in about 50% decreased hashrate.

About a day ago, my rig with 1.5GH/s was working just fine offline, since public work resumed over the past however many hours, this problem started occurring.

I am curious why DiabloMiner, which is not listed as supported by GPUmax, works better than Phoenix 1.7.5 and 2, which are listed as compatible...

are you using BAMT? i had many issues with BAMT with phoenix and phoenix2 until i started using cgminer

but it looks like you have more experience building mining rigs than me so what do i know
Pages: « 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 [60] 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 ... 130 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!