jubalix
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 1029
|
|
July 13, 2014, 09:55:45 PM |
|
Hi all,
just want to show support for the DEVs decision to hardfork the blockchain.
I like it, how finally somebody stands up against all these cryptothefts by protecting the property of community members and investors.
I am all for letting those thieves know, that they cannot screw up the vericoin blockchain. A hardfork will discourage them to try again, because they have nothing to gain. It will in fact protect the integrity of the blockchain, because property rights are respected here.
Bitcoin Foundation and DEVs thought/think they need to protect the integrity of their blockchain by never rolling back transactions even after considerable amounts of BTC were stolen. This only lead to more thefts, scams and fraud - up to the point, when mtgox itself went into bankruptcy under highly suspicious circumstances. And now $-volume at the exchanges is falling and mainstream is scared away from bitcoin, because of all these thefts.
It is not more than a theory, that you cannot roll back fraudulent transactions, because it will discourage future investors - eventually it will be proven wrong.
That is just my opinion,
Thanx
If vericoin gets dumped, I will buy more.
so what happens if such a centralized dev team gets leaned upon by gov which includes a gag order not to say they are being leaned upon? it looks like a single point off failure.
|
|
|
|
Dadams
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
July 13, 2014, 09:56:10 PM |
|
It's hard to see how VRC is going to come out of this well.
consider. Forks in BTC have been for technical reasons asfaik.
I just occurred to me... if I was the hacker:
I would send most of the coins to an address without keys. something like: mintpalsucskandhasnosecuritylol
Hacker turned hero? Shows Mintpal security flaw. Decreases coin supply. Keeps small amount as fee. Price of coin goes up. ?? ? Profit
Mintpal dies. Central exchanges die. Central everything dies. Distribution lives. New world.
|
|
|
|
onsightit
|
|
July 13, 2014, 09:56:42 PM |
|
From Li Zhuan: "We help community propser, not just us. When #vericoin releases new wallet required for hardfork & people adopt,our full force will be shown."
Thanks, Li!
I think Li Zhuan will happily catch all the dumpers after the fork. i'm holding and staking...
|
VRC: VMTMcvFjZHAshmVNLY5KYVHCTqcfEnH6Bd SLR: 8W7D6D7rortYp51BK9MSrfripSoZWyVPVr BTC: 1LbgAsTDtyWEGjiSaguJhJbaHBPgcMnHfP BCC: 1Ta39PK67VXTD2xnmPNo5J9KJyBVHdYmy
|
|
|
Conurtrol
|
|
July 13, 2014, 09:58:04 PM |
|
Hi all,
just want to show support for the DEVs decision to hardfork the blockchain.
I like it, how finally somebody stands up against all these cryptothefts by protecting the property of community members and investors.
I am all for letting those thieves know, that they cannot screw up the vericoin blockchain. A hardfork will discourage them to try again, because they have nothing to gain. It will in fact protect the integrity of the blockchain, because property rights are respected here.
Bitcoin Foundation and DEVs thought/think they need to protect the integrity of their blockchain by never rolling back transactions even after considerable amounts of BTC were stolen. This only lead to more thefts, scams and fraud - up to the point, when mtgox itself went into bankruptcy under highly suspicious circumstances. And now $-volume at the exchanges is falling and mainstream is scared away from bitcoin, because of all these thefts.
It is not more than a theory, that you cannot roll back fraudulent transactions, because it will discourage future investors - eventually it will be proven wrong.
That is just my opinion,
Thanx
If vericoin gets dumped, I will buy more.
so what happens if such a centralized dev team gets leaned upon by gov which includes a gag order not to say they are being leaned upon? it looks like a single point off failure. so what happens if ghash gets leaned upon by gov which includes a gag order not to say they are being leaned upon? it looks like a single point off failure.
|
|
|
|
kd5zgl
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
|
|
July 13, 2014, 09:58:26 PM |
|
here's the problem with a rollback: You sell me 100 oz. of GOLD, not fiat, not bitcoin, not pork bellies (tho the pork bellies wld be same as Au) for an equivalent amount of VRC.
You and I agree that VRC has value, so we agree to the exchange, I send you VRC, you ship me gold coins.
A bad man steals many VRC from MintPal. Blockchain gets rolled back. I get my VRC back.
*But I Still Have Your Gold.*
|
|
|
|
YoyodyneSystems
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1023
|
|
July 13, 2014, 09:58:41 PM |
|
BTC was forked 100 times LTC forked many times DRK forked twice last month
.........................ETC ................
VRC FORKED NOW . SO WHAT ?
|
|
|
|
socal
|
|
July 13, 2014, 10:00:19 PM |
|
Well what I see is a few people for the rollback I really don't see the issue with it you like to say "oh bitcoin never did this bitcoin never did this" but there's two MAJOR ISSUES with that argument. FIRST AND FOR MOST VERICOIN IS NOT BITCOIN. Secondly Bitcoin has never had 30% of all coins stolen, bet you money something would be done if it did happen to bitcoin though.
So all in all I believe the Devs are doing the right thing and yes there will invariably be a dump after the exchanges unfreeze but I'm excited for it because that means once again I get to take VRC out of the hands of idiot day traders and weak hands for cheap and put them in my nice long term staking wallet to actually support VRC
|
|
|
|
BadAss.Sx
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1002
Bulletproof VPS/VPN/Email @ BadAss.Sx
|
|
July 13, 2014, 10:02:03 PM |
|
But the meaning of a decentralized exchange has been set again.
|
|
|
|
barabbas
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 13, 2014, 10:02:26 PM |
|
This is not even an option. Blame Mintpal not Vericoin. Rollback is a must. If Vericoin doesn't rollback then it will be worth NOTHING. The coin will be DEAD. There is a reason why Bitcoin transactions aren't arbitrarily reversed after thefts. There shouldn't be a rollback. A hardfork to undo this is worse than the thief dumping the coins. Mintpal are just trying to erase their losses here. Apples & oranges @ no time was almost 30% of ALL BTC stolen. Firstly, it makes no difference just because it's a large number. Decentralisation and irreversibility are the two fundamental underpinning tenets of Bitcoin. I guarantee you, long term, Vericoin price will be hurt more by doing this rollback than just leaving it be. No new future investors will touch a coin that does something like this. Either way the price will be damaged by this, if some of you are naive enough to think a dirty rollback will "fix everything" and the price will carry on as normal, you are going to be in for a shock. Secondly, there is not much of a difference between doing this once and doing it for every theft. It's a dangerous precedent. You "guarantee" a lot of shit, that's what you "guarantee". As a matter of fact if EVERY THEFT is reversed, that would indeed guaranteed no thefts at all. And the cryptyo community needs that dearly to gain any semblance of credibility in the real world. Oh and by the way, I am going to believe that you, Mr. Random, are indeed involved in this theft. Just like I would consider anyone who defends that a massive theft goes unpunished. I am wired that way.
|
|
|
|
Dadams
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
July 13, 2014, 10:02:49 PM |
|
NOISE
Precedent of a rollback would be horrible. Rollback is not possible without losing all credibility. What the hell is the use of a cryptocurrency if this is the way it will be played. How many rollbacks in the future? Oh hell I made a mistake in my payment, lets just roll it all back. Might as well just stick to central banks and credit cards. Why not lobby to get BTC rolled back to before MTGOX lost all money? People lost way more there. No rollback. No fork. The people at fault here is Mintpal and the hacker. Only person who can actually save vericoin at this stage is the hacker. Funny thought.
|
|
|
|
Seldar
|
|
July 13, 2014, 10:02:59 PM |
|
here's the problem with a rollback: You sell me 100 oz. of GOLD, not fiat, not bitcoin, not pork bellies (tho the pork bellies wld be same as Au) for an equivalent amount of VRC.
You and I agree that VRC has value, so we agree to the exchange, I send you VRC, you ship me gold coins.
A bad man steals many VRC from MintPal. Blockchain gets rolled back. I get my VRC back.
*But I Still Have Your Gold.*
You win the arguments fight, end of discussion! I'm not a VC supporter, but I can't stop being revolted by Mintpal's behaviour. They make an horrible mistake with their poor security and then they asked (or threatened ?) the devs to reverse the blockchain... Poor devs, all their work beeing destroyed like that because of a so bad company...
|
Sorry for my bad english
|
|
|
eiskalt
|
|
July 13, 2014, 10:04:51 PM |
|
so what happens if such a centralized dev team gets leaned upon by gov which includes a gag order not to say they are being leaned upon?
it looks like a single point off failure.
What assures you that this didn´t already happen to bitcoin or any other coin? Here it is about theft of peoples property and if the only tool you have left to discourage theft is a hardfork, than it is the right thing to do. Yes, it is experimental but at some point it has to be done by someone anyway.
|
|
|
|
FUD_master
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
July 13, 2014, 10:05:33 PM |
|
But the meaning of a decentralized exchange has been set again.
A majority of stakeholders have to agree on the fork. Without forking now, there will be a single entity that can make the blockchain fork. If we do fork now it takes away the power to do that. Edit: and I believe that, in this case, there is a general agreement among stakeholders to fork.
|
|
|
|
Yuzu
|
|
July 13, 2014, 10:07:40 PM |
|
here's the problem with a rollback: You sell me 100 oz. of GOLD, not fiat, not bitcoin, not pork bellies (tho the pork bellies wld be same as Au) for an equivalent amount of VRC.
You and I agree that VRC has value, so we agree to the exchange, I send you VRC, you ship me gold coins.
A bad man steals many VRC from MintPal. Blockchain gets rolled back. I get my VRC back.
*But I Still Have Your Gold.*
You win the arguments fight, end of discussion! Uh, no. If you have the gold and you gave another man the VRC for it, then HE gets his VRC back while you have the gold. So everything is still even.
|
|
|
|
barabbas
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 13, 2014, 10:08:52 PM |
|
How many rolls back in the future is the question?
The clear answer: As many as situations grant. Any and all thefts will be reversed. How's that for assurance, transparency and honesty?
Ultimately VRC will be worth what its community determines and supports. What's with all these familiar names (all associated one way or5 another with BC and The Black Hand, by the way) that never ever posted here and now come to post shit against hard forking and leaving the thieves with nothing? People add two plu two, come on!
|
|
|
|
Dadams
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
July 13, 2014, 10:09:10 PM |
|
so what happens if such a centralized dev team gets leaned upon by gov which includes a gag order not to say they are being leaned upon?
it looks like a single point off failure.
What assures you that this didn´t already happen to bitcoin or any other coin? Here it is about theft of peoples property and if the only tool you have left to discourage theft is a hardfork, than it is the right thing to do. Yes, it is experimental but at some point it has to be done by someone anyway. No. The answer is not to protect broken systems. The answer is to create better systems that can't be broken. If people have not learned NOT to trust centralized things like Mintpal and Mtgox.. here is another lesson for you. Everyone else take note. You have money on Poloniex? Bittrex? Bter? anywhere else centralized? This can happen to you.
|
|
|
|
stormia
|
|
July 13, 2014, 10:09:17 PM |
|
here's the problem with a rollback: You sell me 100 oz. of GOLD, not fiat, not bitcoin, not pork bellies (tho the pork bellies wld be same as Au) for an equivalent amount of VRC.
You and I agree that VRC has value, so we agree to the exchange, I send you VRC, you ship me gold coins.
A bad man steals many VRC from MintPal. Blockchain gets rolled back. I get my VRC back.
*But I Still Have Your Gold.*
You win the arguments fight, end of discussion! Uh, no. If you have the gold and you gave another man the VRC for it, then HE gets his VRC back while you have the gold. So everything is still even. Not if the exchange of VRC for gold happened after the attack
|
|
|
|
alwa1
|
|
July 13, 2014, 10:09:28 PM |
|
NOISE
Precedent of a rollback would be horrible. Rollback is not possible without losing all credibility. What the hell is the use of a cryptocurrency if this is the way it will be played. How many rollbacks in the future? Oh hell I made a mistake in my payment, lets just roll it all back. Might as well just stick to central banks and credit cards. Why not lobby to get BTC rolled back to before MTGOX lost all money? People lost way more there. No rollback. No fork. The people at fault here is Mintpal and the hacker. Only person who can actually save vericoin at this stage is the hacker. Funny thought. Maybe the hacker will want ransom in BTC
|
|
|
|
stormia
|
|
July 13, 2014, 10:10:37 PM |
|
I just want to know why they targeted only VRC...
|
|
|
|
adaseb
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3878
Merit: 1733
|
|
July 13, 2014, 10:11:07 PM |
|
Well this is exactly what greed and fear do to people
Just like the stock markets
Just let them rollback. Nothing will go wrong
|
|
|
|
|