doctorbyte
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 140
Merit: 1
|
|
January 01, 2015, 02:21:49 PM |
|
any working web wallet? my offline wallet not syncing THE REASON IS YOU NEED INTERNET. OFFLINE=NO_INTERNET=NO_P2PCONNECTION=NO_SYNC
|
|
|
|
eldinhadz
|
|
January 01, 2015, 03:41:25 PM |
|
Is this ok ? Using eu.burstcoin.io port 8126
Could not get mining info from Node. Will retry.. 0 MB read/0 GB total/deadline 28692897211s (28692897179s left) New block 51183, basetarget 1602615
Could not get mining info from Node. Will retry.. 0 MB read/0 GB total/deadline 26926532562s (26926532536s left)
|
|
|
|
dec93
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
January 01, 2015, 04:31:49 PM |
|
Hello All.
Does anyone have non java miner for ARM cpu? i tried to compile dcct's c miner for Linux but no success...
Thanx!
replace the shabal.s file with the one for the arm platform. the url for the shabal.s file is mentioned in the source. worked for me fine. callmejack thank you for your advice but i cannot find the url now... found it must be here i think http://www.shabal.com/?p=213#more-213
|
|
|
|
fivebells
|
|
January 01, 2015, 05:06:41 PM |
|
Although I haven't played with that assembler tool myself perhaps try this instead: Thanks, that worked and produced matching output.
|
|
|
|
fivebells
|
|
January 01, 2015, 05:09:16 PM |
|
Is there an easy way to run AT code independently of the blockchain?
|
|
|
|
CIYAM
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1890
Merit: 1086
Ian Knowles - CIYAM Lead Developer
|
|
January 01, 2015, 05:25:18 PM Last edit: January 01, 2015, 05:36:45 PM by CIYAM |
|
Is there an easy way to run AT code independently of the blockchain?
Apart from using a "testnet" you could use the C++ prototype, however, it can only emulate API functions with appropriately provided test data (and doesn't implement the A and B 256 bit registers at this stage). I agree that it would make things easier to have a better "emulator" for testing (but am unfortunately rather too busy at the moment to put a lot more effort into the C++ prototype). Perhaps this is something that Burst could consider creating (having an Assembler tool is a great start as writing pure machine code is very time consuming).
|
|
|
|
CIYAM
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1890
Merit: 1086
Ian Knowles - CIYAM Lead Developer
|
|
January 01, 2015, 05:30:09 PM Last edit: January 01, 2015, 06:01:12 PM by CIYAM |
|
Although I haven't played with that assembler tool myself perhaps try this instead: Thanks, that worked and produced matching output. Glad to know - I will make a note to update all the test cases (as many of the op codes are going to have the same issues). Unfortunately when the test cases were first created the precise syntax had not been worked out (am happy to see that burstdev has been very accurate to what had been intended). This was mostly an issue of the "list" output from the original C++ prototype and the Java version of that (rather than an issue with the specification itself). The use of @ indicates a variable to be "assigned" whereas the use of $ indicates a variable to be "read" (of course @ could mean read and write but $ should never indicate write and normally the first variable will be the one to be assigned if there are two). Creating a simple and consistent syntax for a "virtual CPU" is actually not so easy (as I discovered). I will say that you are in good hands with the Burst developer as he has even corrected myself over inconsistencies with AT. If you are keen to participate more with AT then feel free to make more direct contact with those involved to become "part of the team" (there is no intention to make ATs "too hard" but we are at the very start of creating tools to make that easier so I hope people can be tolerant while we work on making it more accessible).
|
|
|
|
Irontiga
|
|
January 01, 2015, 06:46:23 PM |
|
any working web wallet? my offline wallet not syncing wallet.burstcoin.io that will do the trick
|
|
|
|
oktay50000
|
|
January 01, 2015, 07:36:55 PM |
|
any working web wallet? my offline wallet not syncing wallet.burstcoin.io that will do the trick tnx mate
|
BTC : bc1qqz9hvv806w2zs42mx4rn576whxmr202yxp00e9
feel free to buy me a bear
|
|
|
fivebells
|
|
January 02, 2015, 01:48:29 AM |
|
there is no intention to make ATs "too hard" but we are at the very start of creating tools to make that easier so I hope people can be tolerant while we work on making it more accessible The competition sets a very high bar.
|
|
|
|
CIYAM
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1890
Merit: 1086
Ian Knowles - CIYAM Lead Developer
|
|
January 02, 2015, 03:40:08 AM Last edit: January 02, 2015, 03:52:54 AM by CIYAM |
|
True - but they are also trying to convince everyone to use their own browser (something we are not planning to do). Also it should be noted that if we get GCC to do AT then you'll have every fancy tool you could ever want at your disposal.
|
|
|
|
coinits
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1019
011110000110110101110010
|
|
January 02, 2015, 03:47:51 AM |
|
True - but they are also trying to convince everyone to use their own browser (something we are not planning to do). Stay away. Goldman Sachs is involved so that means co-opted by Banksters. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q5FDvzj8YX4
|
Jump you fuckers! | The thing about smart motherfuckers is they sound like crazy motherfuckers to dumb motherfuckers. | My sig space for rent for 0.01 btc per week.
|
|
|
fivebells
|
|
January 02, 2015, 04:12:48 AM Last edit: January 02, 2015, 04:38:59 AM by fivebells |
|
Also it should be noted that if we get GCC to do AT then you'll have every fancy tool you could ever want at your disposal. That would be awesome. Is anyone working on that? I was looking at the feasibility of an LLVM backend today, but decided it was probably too awkward because it's claimed here that the binary it produces for a minimal program is 10KB, and the current maximum code size for a burst AT (if I'm reading correctly from MAX_MACHINE_CODE_PAGES in AT_Constants.java) is 2.5K. I am pretty clueless about compiler technology, though, would love to be wrong. Does the machine code size depend on the backend you use?
|
|
|
|
CIYAM
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1890
Merit: 1086
Ian Knowles - CIYAM Lead Developer
|
|
January 02, 2015, 04:19:00 AM Last edit: January 02, 2015, 04:30:18 AM by CIYAM |
|
Also it should be noted that if we get GCC to do AT then you'll have every fancy tool you could ever want at your disposal. That would be awesome. Is anyone working on that? Not as yet. In regards to a minimum program size understand that things like "standard I/O" don't apply to AT so basically you would need to look at something closer to cross compiling I think (just like people creating programs for CPUs that don't have an OS - and note that at this stage there is not even a "heap"). Over time the plan is to extend the AT API to include more and more functionality to make it easier for standard systems such as GCC to work with it.
|
|
|
|
electrogen
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
|
January 02, 2015, 08:49:22 AM |
|
Hi, I have noticed that the pool doesn't pay me when I have accrued large share values. Last night I found a block in 5 seconds so was expecting a 1000+ burst payment that never came. also this thing happens with smaller payments too.
|
|
|
|
xizmax
|
|
January 02, 2015, 10:24:34 AM |
|
Hi, I have noticed that the pool doesn't pay me when I have accrued large share values. Last night I found a block in 5 seconds so was expecting a 1000+ burst payment that never came. also this thing happens with smaller payments too.
Would also help if you said which pool is in question here
|
|
|
|
electrogen
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
|
January 02, 2015, 10:26:37 AM |
|
lol sorry I thought this was the pool thread. (early poster). it burst.ga.
|
|
|
|
xizmax
|
|
January 02, 2015, 10:32:50 AM |
|
lol sorry I thought this was the pool thread. (early poster). it burst.ga.
Hmm, I'm not certain what is happening there. Since you found a block for the pool everything should've been in order. I mine at burst.ga as well and haven't noticed such a problem. Crowetic or irontiga will be more of help here, I'm just a noob
|
|
|
|
electrogen
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
|
January 02, 2015, 10:46:54 AM |
|
I got a payment for 256 burst but my share value on main page said 1125 burst. I was top of the list so should have been first paid
|
|
|
|
unsoindovo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1932
Merit: 1042
https://locktrip.com/?refId=40964
|
|
January 02, 2015, 03:15:58 PM |
|
new burst network size record!!! thi is really promising!!! really much more of the low volumes on c-cex
|
|
|
|
|