Bitcoin Forum
December 07, 2016, 12:45:55 PM *
News: To be able to use the next phase of the beta forum software, please ensure that your email address is correct/functional.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 [101] 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 ... 255 »
  Print  
Author Topic: SatoshiDICE.com - The World's Most Popular Bitcoin Game  (Read 399285 times)
dooglus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2002



View Profile
November 16, 2014, 05:37:17 PM
 #2001

Can you, please, reply to my PM?

I'm not affiliated with SatoshiDice in any way, but can I reply unofficially on their behalf?

"Fuck you, and fuck your ineffective DDoS attacks. We're not paying you a single satoshi."

1481114755
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481114755

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481114755
Reply with quote  #2

1481114755
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1481114755
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481114755

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481114755
Reply with quote  #2

1481114755
Report to moderator
1481114755
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481114755

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481114755
Reply with quote  #2

1481114755
Report to moderator
mezmerizer9
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 789


View Profile
November 16, 2014, 05:46:22 PM
 #2002

the Mine game doesnt like me , i always loose whenever i play big , i know its just a bad luck Tongue

Why surprised? it will let you play a long time with a smaller bets and when you think you are going good, you raise your bet, computer says "fuck you" and you lose. Right?


███████████████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████
████████████████████████
███████████████████████
█████████████████?7?3████
███████████████████████
████████████████████████
██████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████████████████
DECENT
FOUNDATION



██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██

██
██
██


[D]ecentralized application
[E]liminated third parties
[C]ontent distribution       



██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██

██
██
██


[E]ncrypted & secure
[N]o borders
[T]imeless reputation 



██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██

██
██
██



██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██

██
██
██

Chijio
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126


View Profile
November 16, 2014, 05:51:48 PM
 #2003

nice idea good work

▓▓▓▓    New Real-time Cryptocurrency Exchange             → CREATE  ACCOUNT ▓▓▓▓
▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅  BIT-X.com  ▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅
▓▓▓▓    Supported Currencies: BTC, LTC, USD, EUR, GBP → OFFICIAL THREAD ▓▓▓▓
alani123
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176


Professional googler


View Profile
November 16, 2014, 06:48:19 PM
 #2004

the Mine game doesnt like me , i always loose whenever i play big , i know its just a bad luck Tongue

Why surprised? it will let you play a long time with a smaller bets and when you think you are going good, you raise your bet, computer says "fuck you" and you lose. Right?

That's why provably fair gambling exists.

Coef
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 882


Exhausted


View Profile
November 17, 2014, 06:08:32 AM
 #2005

There is something wrong when I want to set my bet by changing the "Roll Under to Win".

If I set the "Win Chance" to 93.079%, the "Roll Under to Win" will be calculated correctly to be 61000.
If I set the "Roll Under to Win" to 61000, the field will change to 0 automatically and my bet will fail with a warning "belowRollToWin Is Too Small".

dooglus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2002



View Profile
November 17, 2014, 09:25:54 AM
 #2006

There is something wrong when I want to set my bet by changing the "Roll Under to Win".

If I set the "Win Chance" to 93.079%, the "Roll Under to Win" will be calculated correctly to be 61000.
If I set the "Roll Under to Win" to 61000, the field will change to 0 automatically and my bet will fail with a warning "belowRollToWin Is Too Small".

I see the same bug.

Also, my balance is -0.00010007 (negative). I only referred one player (myself) and he hasn't played since the referral system was changed to stop making immediate payouts. My negative balance was cleared by my winning a 1.25 BTC daily leaderboard prize - so why's it negative again now? I'm pretty sure that's the amount I was down before, but I already paid that debt from my win.

avicii123
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 12


View Profile
November 17, 2014, 11:06:29 AM
 #2007

There is something wrong when I want to set my bet by changing the "Roll Under to Win".

If I set the "Win Chance" to 93.079%, the "Roll Under to Win" will be calculated correctly to be 61000.
If I set the "Roll Under to Win" to 61000, the field will change to 0 automatically and my bet will fail with a warning "belowRollToWin Is Too Small".

I see the same bug.

Also, my balance is -0.00010007 (negative). I only referred one player (myself) and he hasn't played since the referral system was changed to stop making immediate payouts. My negative balance was cleared by my winning a 1.25 BTC daily leaderboard prize - so why's it negative again now? I'm pretty sure that's the amount I was down before, but I already paid that debt from my win.

Hey, dooglus i found a big exploit on satoshidice which results in double cashout and negative balance, i know what causes it and i only exploited it once (unintentionally) and i tried reporting it to satoshidice , but they never responded to my email , could you contact them regarding this? i would be willing to share my informaiton for some kind of Reward.
Chemistry1988
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092


View Profile
November 17, 2014, 11:16:15 AM
 #2008

From what I see in the past, dooglus' advice and suggestion will get handled much more seriously, but there is no way dooglus can guarantee you will be able to get some kind of reward for reporting the bug.

You either wait for SD's response to discuss the reward yourself, or you send the info to dooglus and risk not getting any reward.

avicii123
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 12


View Profile
November 17, 2014, 11:26:08 AM
 #2009

Well this is a pretty big exploit, i could exploit it myself and make a lot of BTC, but i rather do the right thing and report it, since many other websites offer rewards for bugs, i think i should deserve 1 aswell, if satoshidice agrees to pay reward i will provide full information on how the bug appears and how it can be solved.
Chemistry1988
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092


View Profile
November 17, 2014, 11:55:23 AM
 #2010

Well this is a pretty big exploit, i could exploit it myself and make a lot of BTC, but i rather do the right thing and report it, since many other websites offer rewards for bugs, i think i should deserve 1 aswell, if satoshidice agrees to pay reward i will provide full information on how the bug appears and how it can be solved.


Appreciate your decision and yes I agree you deserve a big bug reward if the problem can be reproduced to make double withdrawals. But I don't know if SD will consider it a big exploit and offer bounty for it.
In fact, dooglus was having some little conflicts with PRC Dice just a few days earlier because of a bug reward.

avicii123
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 12


View Profile
November 17, 2014, 03:52:16 PM
 #2011

Well this is a pretty big exploit, i could exploit it myself and make a lot of BTC, but i rather do the right thing and report it, since many other websites offer rewards for bugs, i think i should deserve 1 aswell, if satoshidice agrees to pay reward i will provide full information on how the bug appears and how it can be solved.


Appreciate your decision and yes I agree you deserve a big bug reward if the problem can be reproduced to make double withdrawals. But I don't know if SD will consider it a big exploit and offer bounty for it.
In fact, dooglus was having some little conflicts with PRC Dice just a few days earlier because of a bug reward.

Yeah, im just surprised that satoshidice doesn't even care about it, since they haven't replied to my email for over 2 weeks now
coincolonel
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70


View Profile
November 17, 2014, 05:03:43 PM
 #2012

Well this is a pretty big exploit, i could exploit it myself and make a lot of BTC, but i rather do the right thing and report it, since many other websites offer rewards for bugs, i think i should deserve 1 aswell, if satoshidice agrees to pay reward i will provide full information on how the bug appears and how it can be solved.


Appreciate your decision and yes I agree you deserve a big bug reward if the problem can be reproduced to make double withdrawals. But I don't know if SD will consider it a big exploit and offer bounty for it.
In fact, dooglus was having some little conflicts with PRC Dice just a few days earlier because of a bug reward.

Yeah, im just surprised that satoshidice doesn't even care about it, since they haven't replied to my email for over 2 weeks now

Why is this satoshidice, a site with years of experience still has this kind of bugs Huh
SatoshiDICE_PR
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 362


SatoshiDice.com SatoshiCircle.com


View Profile WWW
November 17, 2014, 08:18:37 PM
 #2013

There is something wrong when I want to set my bet by changing the "Roll Under to Win".

If I set the "Win Chance" to 93.079%, the "Roll Under to Win" will be calculated correctly to be 61000.
If I set the "Roll Under to Win" to 61000, the field will change to 0 automatically and my bet will fail with a warning "belowRollToWin Is Too Small".

I see the same bug.

Also, my balance is -0.00010007 (negative). I only referred one player (myself) and he hasn't played since the referral system was changed to stop making immediate payouts. My negative balance was cleared by my winning a 1.25 BTC daily leaderboard prize - so why's it negative again now? I'm pretty sure that's the amount I was down before, but I already paid that debt from my win.

Hello, this is because we disabled so that the revenue share from affiliated players were not reflected in the balance any more. We then made the decision to activate this code again. This is because we had to disable the affiliate system but we don't want to take any affiliate's revenue share. So basically, you have a negative revenue share of 0.00010007 that was not visible before.

New affiliates are not given an affiliate link (for now). When we activate the affiliate system again, affiliates will instead get a small percentage of the bet amount that affiliated players make.

shitaifan2013
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 869

monero


View Profile
November 17, 2014, 08:20:38 PM
 #2014

this is going to end in complete chaos  Grin

SatoshiDICE_PR
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 362


SatoshiDice.com SatoshiCircle.com


View Profile WWW
November 17, 2014, 08:23:39 PM
 #2015

There is something wrong when I want to set my bet by changing the "Roll Under to Win".

If I set the "Win Chance" to 93.079%, the "Roll Under to Win" will be calculated correctly to be 61000.
If I set the "Roll Under to Win" to 61000, the field will change to 0 automatically and my bet will fail with a warning "belowRollToWin Is Too Small".

I see the same bug.

Also, my balance is -0.00010007 (negative). I only referred one player (myself) and he hasn't played since the referral system was changed to stop making immediate payouts. My negative balance was cleared by my winning a 1.25 BTC daily leaderboard prize - so why's it negative again now? I'm pretty sure that's the amount I was down before, but I already paid that debt from my win.

Hey, dooglus i found a big exploit on satoshidice which results in double cashout and negative balance, i know what causes it and i only exploited it once (unintentionally) and i tried reporting it to satoshidice , but they never responded to my email , could you contact them regarding this? i would be willing to share my informaiton for some kind of Reward.

At the time we received your email, we had already corrected this. The code that is disabling parallel execution of withdrawals was unfortunately not activated on the live site (but it is now). Thanks for reporting the problem!

avicii123
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 12


View Profile
November 17, 2014, 08:43:48 PM
 #2016

There is something wrong when I want to set my bet by changing the "Roll Under to Win".

If I set the "Win Chance" to 93.079%, the "Roll Under to Win" will be calculated correctly to be 61000.
If I set the "Roll Under to Win" to 61000, the field will change to 0 automatically and my bet will fail with a warning "belowRollToWin Is Too Small".

I see the same bug.

Also, my balance is -0.00010007 (negative). I only referred one player (myself) and he hasn't played since the referral system was changed to stop making immediate payouts. My negative balance was cleared by my winning a 1.25 BTC daily leaderboard prize - so why's it negative again now? I'm pretty sure that's the amount I was down before, but I already paid that debt from my win.

Hey, dooglus i found a big exploit on satoshidice which results in double cashout and negative balance, i know what causes it and i only exploited it once (unintentionally) and i tried reporting it to satoshidice , but they never responded to my email , could you contact them regarding this? i would be willing to share my informaiton for some kind of Reward.

At the time we received your email, we had already corrected this. The code that is disabling parallel execution of withdrawals was unfortunately not activated on the live site (but it is now). Thanks for reporting the problem!


I have tested it today, the bug still seems to be working
SatoshiDICE_PR
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 362


SatoshiDice.com SatoshiCircle.com


View Profile WWW
November 17, 2014, 09:12:06 PM
 #2017

There is something wrong when I want to set my bet by changing the "Roll Under to Win".

If I set the "Win Chance" to 93.079%, the "Roll Under to Win" will be calculated correctly to be 61000.
If I set the "Roll Under to Win" to 61000, the field will change to 0 automatically and my bet will fail with a warning "belowRollToWin Is Too Small".

I see the same bug.

Also, my balance is -0.00010007 (negative). I only referred one player (myself) and he hasn't played since the referral system was changed to stop making immediate payouts. My negative balance was cleared by my winning a 1.25 BTC daily leaderboard prize - so why's it negative again now? I'm pretty sure that's the amount I was down before, but I already paid that debt from my win.

Hey, dooglus i found a big exploit on satoshidice which results in double cashout and negative balance, i know what causes it and i only exploited it once (unintentionally) and i tried reporting it to satoshidice , but they never responded to my email , could you contact them regarding this? i would be willing to share my informaiton for some kind of Reward.

At the time we received your email, we had already corrected this. The code that is disabling parallel execution of withdrawals was unfortunately not activated on the live site (but it is now). Thanks for reporting the problem!


I have tested it today, the bug still seems to be working

Well you can execute several withdrawals simultaneously, as long as you have balance available for each withdrawal. What you can't do for the last few days is to bring the account into negative balance.

dooglus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2002



View Profile
November 17, 2014, 09:20:49 PM
 #2018

my balance is -0.00010007 (negative). I only referred one player (myself) and he hasn't played since the referral system was changed to stop making immediate payouts. My negative balance was cleared by my winning a 1.25 BTC daily leaderboard prize - so why's it negative again now? I'm pretty sure that's the amount I was down before, but I already paid that debt from my win.

So basically, you have a negative revenue share of 0.00010007 that was not visible before.

That isn't true. It was visible before, and I paid it off out of my winnings. I even posted a screenshot of it!

I'm not making things up. What I wrote above is true. I had a negative balance, paid it off, and now you've made it negative again, effectively charging me twice for the same winnings.

Here's my initial post about the same negative balance:

The most interesting feature ever.

It seems to suffer from rounding errors too.

"testing" won 1000 satoshis, causing "dooglus" to lose 100 satoshis from his positive balance. "dooglus" then gambled his balance and kept going all-in until it was zero. The "testing" won 99094 more satoshis, making a total profit of 100094 satoshis. At that point "dooglus" balance should have been -9909 satoshis, but it's only -9907 - so two satoshis were lost somewhere.

I guess it doesn't matter, but it does suggest that affiliate payments aren't being calculated correctly.

Edit: dooglus' affiliate page agrees with my record of testing's profit:



but dooglus' balance doesn't (I would expect it to be 100 satoshis more than -0.00010009 BTC, or -0.00009909 BTC):



Dabs
Staff
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526


64blocks.com


View Profile WWW
November 18, 2014, 01:44:56 AM
 #2019

I have tested it today, the bug still seems to be working

avicii123, do it. Go grab a few BTC. Then show proof. Explain. Reproduce. Then, return back the BTC you got that you know is not yours. SD should then acknowledge your bug, and they should offer a bounty. But do not hold their BTC hostage, return it in full (except your own deposit of course).

If you can successfully withdraw 10 BTC for example, and return it (or hold it), then I see no reason why SD should not accept 9.9 BTC back. Or whatever bug bounty you guys agree on.

Just my opinion.

Large companies tend not to do any actions until exploits have actually been executed.

64blocks.com Social Multiplayer Dice (Gambling) - Escrow Service (Services) - GPG ID: 32AD7565, OTC ID: Dabs
All messages concerning escrow or with bitcoin addresses are GPG signed. Please verify.
CompTIA A+, Microsoft Certified Professional, MCSA: Windows 10; Windows Server 2012, MCSE: Cloud Platform and Infrastructure; Productivity; Messaging
King Agamemnon
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 111


View Profile
November 18, 2014, 01:51:36 AM
 #2020

this is going to end in complete chaos  Grin

I love to see whats coming. Fcking up dooglus is  not a good idea. Come Just-Dice, what do you have?

Pages: « 1 ... 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 [101] 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 ... 255 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!