Bitcoin Forum
April 25, 2018, 04:08:40 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.16.0  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 [58] 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 ... 274 »
  Print  
Author Topic: SatoshiDICE.com - The World's Most Popular Bitcoin Game  (Read 473238 times)
ingrownpocket
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 952
Merit: 1000


View Profile
January 31, 2013, 09:12:45 AM
 #1141

Sad Looks like someone has learned how to cheat satoshiDICE - made themselves BTC10,000+ - while causing disruptions for other players
--'
1524629320
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1524629320

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1524629320
Reply with quote  #2

1524629320
Report to moderator
1524629320
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1524629320

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1524629320
Reply with quote  #2

1524629320
Report to moderator
1524629320
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1524629320

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1524629320
Reply with quote  #2

1524629320
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1524629320
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1524629320

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1524629320
Reply with quote  #2

1524629320
Report to moderator
1524629320
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1524629320

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1524629320
Reply with quote  #2

1524629320
Report to moderator
1524629320
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1524629320

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1524629320
Reply with quote  #2

1524629320
Report to moderator
Bowjob
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 250



View Profile
January 31, 2013, 10:39:57 AM
 #1142

Looks like dice went down to 0.00534524 O_O

It seemed like a good idea at the time.
FTWbitcoinFTW
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250



View Profile
January 31, 2013, 10:46:09 AM
 #1143

Looks like dice went down to 0.00534524 O_O

no ask wall... first "little" dump and price go down quickly
But 12h before the div ?

What the point ?

Sad Looks like someone has learned how to cheat satoshiDICE - made themselves BTC10,000+ - while causing disruptions for other players

Same player lost 15K 2 days before, for me it's ok, he can continue for life

Lost coins only make everyone else's coins worth slightly more. Think of it as a donation to everyone.
it has lots of buttery taste..
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2058
Merit: 1000


Poor impulse control.


View Profile WWW
January 31, 2013, 10:50:56 AM
 #1144

Looks like dice went down to 0.00534524 O_O

Buy up big - unless sd is completely broken (which I find very hard to believe) they'll be back over the red line in no time. You won't go broke investing in the house.

Bitcoin network and pool analysis 12QxPHEuxDrs7mCyGSx1iVSozTwtquDB3r
follow @oocBlog for new post notifications
flaab
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 121
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 31, 2013, 08:29:41 PM
 #1145

I just gave it a spin, played x64 and won. No payment yet after 4 confirmations.
https://blockchain.info/es/tx/0116c393c8a7d78de301e69b3110428bff42e8f97d8f37b2cccf8a3344db0470

Will SD be forced to switch 1confirmation payments?
dooglus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2492
Merit: 1124



View Profile
January 31, 2013, 09:05:06 PM
 #1146

I just gave it a spin, played x64 and won. No payment yet after 4 confirmations.
https://blockchain.info/es/tx/0116c393c8a7d78de301e69b3110428bff42e8f97d8f37b2cccf8a3344db0470

It looks to me like they paid you in the same block as you paid them.  That means they processed your bet before it was confirmed.

Just-Dice                 ██             
          ██████████         
      ██████████████████     
  ██████████████████████████ 
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
    ██████████████████████   
        ██████████████       
            ██████           
   Play or Invest                 ██             
          ██████████         
      ██████████████████     
  ██████████████████████████ 
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
    ██████████████████████   
        ██████████████       
            ██████           
   1% House Edge
ingrownpocket
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 952
Merit: 1000


View Profile
January 31, 2013, 09:08:44 PM
 #1147

I just gave it a spin, played x64 and won. No payment yet after 4 confirmations.
https://blockchain.info/es/tx/0116c393c8a7d78de301e69b3110428bff42e8f97d8f37b2cccf8a3344db0470

Will SD be forced to switch 1confirmation payments?

http://src.satoshidice.com/longpoll.php?tx=0116c393c8a7d78de301e69b3110428bff42e8f97d8f37b2cccf8a3344db0470
Lucky you  Wink

EDIT: With that lucky number you could have won the 249.861x (less than 256). 
ghostshirt
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 216
Merit: 100



View Profile
February 01, 2013, 06:00:41 PM
 #1148

Is it possible for SatoshiDice not to pick a bet even after  many confirmations?
http://blockchain.info/tx/949b387b09582c5e9faddf5f395423dd57cfeb64304d37bacd9c7baa5e207413
but,
http://satoshidice.com/lookup.php?tx=949b387b09582c5e9faddf5f395423dd57cfeb64304d37bacd9c7baa5e207413&limit=100&min_bet=0&status=ALL

BRules
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 293
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 01, 2013, 06:53:01 PM
 #1149

as you sent below the minimum bet yes, you will have to wait a while

dooglus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2492
Merit: 1124



View Profile
February 02, 2013, 04:54:36 AM
 #1150

it's only a 1BTC bet with 0.01 fee... no response... what the fuck?

I just looked at blockchain.info, picked a random satoshidice bet transaction, and looked it up.

The bet: http://blockchain.info/tx-index/48513265
The payout: http://blockchain.info/tx-index/48513287

Both are currenty unconfirmed, so they're definitely still paying out some unconfirmed bets.

I don't know why they're not processing your bets until they're confirmed.  It would be useful if you could look up a bet on their site and see its status even if it wasn't processed yet.  Possible statuses could be "waiting for confirmation due to insufficient tx fee" or "waiting for confirmation since not all inputs are confirmed".

Just-Dice                 ██             
          ██████████         
      ██████████████████     
  ██████████████████████████ 
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
    ██████████████████████   
        ██████████████       
            ██████           
   Play or Invest                 ██             
          ██████████         
      ██████████████████     
  ██████████████████████████ 
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
    ██████████████████████   
        ██████████████       
            ██████           
   1% House Edge
dooglus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2492
Merit: 1124



View Profile
February 02, 2013, 05:00:31 AM
 #1151

i include 0.01 miner fee, and all my prior transactions are confirmed.

[...]

here is another one:
https://blockchain.info/tx/484a19a838247b08b5bd9cd5d53704c339d325f55080f30cd9c1fdc38a76a14d

That one's input is confirmed in the same block as the bet itself.  This means that the bet's input wasn't confirmed when you sent it.

I would suggest breaking your 300 BTC input up into a bunch of smaller inputs.  Like send yourself 30 BTC ten times in the same transaction.  Then you won't be recycling the same brand-new 300 BTC input over and over.  Hopefully the client you use is smart enough to use confirmed inputs before new ones.

Just-Dice                 ██             
          ██████████         
      ██████████████████     
  ██████████████████████████ 
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
    ██████████████████████   
        ██████████████       
            ██████           
   Play or Invest                 ██             
          ██████████         
      ██████████████████     
  ██████████████████████████ 
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
    ██████████████████████   
        ██████████████       
            ██████           
   1% House Edge
Ploo
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 125
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 03, 2013, 11:22:16 AM
 #1152

It'd be interesting to let players bet on 'greater than'. At the moment to consistently win a player must repeatedly get below a certain threshold which is unlikely as lucky numbers are evenly distributed. If players could bet on 'red' as well as 'black' maybe you could exploit more players suffering from gamblers fallacies?
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2058
Merit: 1000


Poor impulse control.


View Profile WWW
February 03, 2013, 01:54:07 PM
 #1153

It'd be interesting to let players bet on 'greater than'. At the moment to consistently win a player must repeatedly get below a certain threshold which is unlikely as lucky numbers are evenly distributed. If players could bet on 'red' as well as 'black' maybe you could exploit more players suffering from gamblers fallacies?

I'm not sure your wording would encourage anyone to run with your suggestion.

Bitcoin network and pool analysis 12QxPHEuxDrs7mCyGSx1iVSozTwtquDB3r
follow @oocBlog for new post notifications
gmiwenht
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 115
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 03, 2013, 05:40:10 PM
 #1154

[deleted]

1xsBEUVzo6EtAST5Bq96AztiTR5mBXNzt
evoorhees
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 994
Merit: 1000


Democracy is the original 51% attack


View Profile
February 05, 2013, 03:51:51 AM
 #1155

SD is fucked up AGAIN

every time i make a bet it tells me "tx ... cannot be spent" (i am using blockchain.info)

what the fuck does that even mean? all my previous transactions are confirmed! and i am including generous miner fees.

i don't get a payout until 1 confirmation, and even then there is a significant delay.

WHY WHY WHY

What size bet are you placing? Also, can you copy here a link of the transaction ID?
scatha
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 107
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 05, 2013, 01:02:45 PM
 #1156

It'd be interesting to let players bet on 'greater than'. At the moment to consistently win a player must repeatedly get below a certain threshold which is unlikely as lucky numbers are evenly distributed. If players could bet on 'red' as well as 'black' maybe you could exploit more players suffering from gamblers fallacies?

I'm not sure your wording would encourage anyone to run with your suggestion.

It really does make no difference because the numbers are truely random and are used only once for each game- you can't bet against another player, only against the house, so it wouldn't catch on.
dooglus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2492
Merit: 1124



View Profile
February 05, 2013, 06:51:01 PM
 #1157

It really does make no difference because the numbers are truely random and are used only once for each game- you can't bet against another player, only against the house, so it wouldn't catch on.

Your argument is similar to saying that we don't need the 'red' bet on a roulette table, since there's no difference between 'red' and 'black'.

Mathematically that's true, but players like to feel like they have some control.  If you feel the lucky number is going to be high next time you play, wouldn't you like to be able to play "over 32767" instead of "lessthan 32768"?

Just-Dice                 ██             
          ██████████         
      ██████████████████     
  ██████████████████████████ 
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
    ██████████████████████   
        ██████████████       
            ██████           
   Play or Invest                 ██             
          ██████████         
      ██████████████████     
  ██████████████████████████ 
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
    ██████████████████████   
        ██████████████       
            ██████           
   1% House Edge
kano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2436
Merit: 1039


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
February 05, 2013, 11:35:12 PM
 #1158

It really does make no difference because the numbers are truely random and are used only once for each game- you can't bet against another player, only against the house, so it wouldn't catch on.

Your argument is similar to saying that we don't need the 'red' bet on a roulette table, since there's no difference between 'red' and 'black'.

Mathematically that's true, but players like to feel like they have some control.  If you feel the lucky number is going to be high next time you play, wouldn't you like to be able to play "over 32767" instead of "lessthan 32768"?
Ah nice - help people 'feel' better about their delusions Smiley

Pool: https://kano.is Here on Bitcointalk: Forum BTC: 1KanoPb8cKYqNrswjaA8cRDk4FAS9eDMLU
FreeNode IRC: irc.freenode.net channel #kano.is Majority developer of the ckpool code
Help keep Bitcoin secure by mining on pools with full block verification on all blocks - and NO empty blocks!
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2058
Merit: 1000


Poor impulse control.


View Profile WWW
February 06, 2013, 06:22:04 AM
 #1159

It really does make no difference because the numbers are truely random and are used only once for each game- you can't bet against another player, only against the house, so it wouldn't catch on.

Your argument is similar to saying that we don't need the 'red' bet on a roulette table, since there's no difference between 'red' and 'black'.

Mathematically that's true, but players like to feel like they have some control.  If you feel the lucky number is going to be high next time you play, wouldn't you like to be able to play "over 32767" instead of "lessthan 32768"?

And how many people would bet each way (both over and less than x) and think they have a fool proof way of beating the house? It might take over from martingale strategies.

Bitcoin network and pool analysis 12QxPHEuxDrs7mCyGSx1iVSozTwtquDB3r
follow @oocBlog for new post notifications
Ploo
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 125
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 06, 2013, 04:09:30 PM
 #1160

It really does make no difference because the numbers are truely random and are used only once for each game- you can't bet against another player, only against the house, so it wouldn't catch on.

Your argument is similar to saying that we don't need the 'red' bet on a roulette table, since there's no difference between 'red' and 'black'.

Mathematically that's true, but players like to feel like they have some control.  If you feel the lucky number is going to be high next time you play, wouldn't you like to be able to play "over 32767" instead of "lessthan 32768"?

That's the exact reason why I suggested it. While mathematically it makes no difference, the unaware gambler may misinterpret this as something they can use to their advantage which may lead to more volume.
Pages: « 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 [58] 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 ... 274 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!