I've been through this as well and opened a thread about it. See here.A suggested solution was to find somewhere a public WiFi, and register an account without using Tor and then use the unique link to login without captcha.
|
|
|
Why everyone is using imgur? Just because it has the BBcode ready link to copy it? I fo like thus as im lazy to edit tags but I hate their mobile app, something happened some time ago and I'm unable to upload images from mobile, just freezes. Reinstall, tried on another phone, same thing. On the others hand the if ypu mske a gif file it changes it to .gifv and there are always issues with them in thr forum.
|
|
|
Trust shouldn't be used only for trading. If someone is abusing the system, promoting scam, suspicious activities, abusing using alts , etc they should be tagged as well. Like foxpup did.
Okay, then tag these abusers. We was never trading with anyone of them Flag abusers (Part 1)Flag abusers (Part 2) The fact that your creator (I refer to BSV) cannot confirm his claims, and wants to present himself for someone who he obviously is not, is a sufficient reason for me to support the flag. This is exactly what the trust system is for, to mark all the conman. No need to derail more the thread. You already have a place for the discussions, but of course is heavily moderated, wonder why
|
|
|
I was so disappointed to find out that the welcome message is not yet available to the newbies when I created my testbuddy alt. The message already looks complete, why is not implemented already? Even not 100% finished is still better than a totally un oriented newbie banned for some foolish mistake.
|
|
|
~
Interesting, this guy woke up on exactly the same date with 2 years difference. https://bpip.org/Profile?p=DetrixAnother interesting thing is that he have only 17 posts deleted my the mods. I wonder if those are only since the last awaking. Clearly on the picture we see a post bursting guy who somehow fooled fillippone to get the Jr. merit...
|
|
|
Sounds not that bad but i don't think it will ever come to life, especially as we know what theymos thinks about the altcoins/tokens thing. Even if he agrees it would be with a veeeeery low priority (= will never happen). It was discussed earlier about a bitcointalk coin/token without success. As i said before the forum has already a coin (it's even in the name). If you can start making money fron your account (legally) people will again flood the forum with spam, we already saw the "merit broke my life" movement
|
|
|
New update from today, also some old versions from some days ago. We are moving forward. 1.29.0 (2020-09-11) Bug Fixes client/layout/login: check google credentials (e08b548) access config variables in forumData (8089456) Features code cleanup (652fb2f) fix sign up flow, hide google sign in if creds arent provided (a5fffca) implement google sign out (e7059e9) implement login with google (06646db) move app domain into env variable (97a9fe7) prompt user for username when registering with google (fc0c819) rename googleLogin to googleAuth (b1234e6) show error when trying to log in with google in incognito mode (ac7a400) update docs for login with google (1d993f7) config: add google api key/cient id (b7092dd) example.env: add google api key/client id (95bd588) public/index.js: add google_client_id/_api_key (b5ca123) set avatar and name when creating account with google (4833aaa) update code to supply client id and api key in all views (00bc25a) server/routes/index: add google api config (4bc4719) — 1.30.0 (2020-09-15) Features prompt for account login when hitting the sign in with google on the register modal (26ce1bd) — 1.31.0 (2020-09-15) Features fix hapi issue reported by dependabot (0b976fa) —
|
|
|
we need to set up monitoring to alert us when stuff like that breaks The monitoring is done by the users, in this case Ratimov. If it breaks and nobody notices, it's not needed True, I'm keeping an eye on the site as I'm almost every day checking things so if something fails I will let you guys know as i did it many times before Out of curiosity, how many unique views the site has per day?
|
|
|
Assuming you wish to check trades made in 2017, first you have to make a request to see your trades in June 2020 until September 2020, then a request for March 2020 until June 2020, then December 2019 until March 2020 and so on. So, instead of making a single request to see your trades in 2017, you have to make more than 10 requests.
I'm sorry but I think you're wrong. Checking trade history in Binance doesn't work this way. You don't actually have to go through all these hassles. You just need to choose any consecutive 3 months in whatever year, click OK, and then click search. And then your trade history within that period will appear. So that's just a single request. You can actually hop immediately to any month in your trade history. You just need to make sure that you are choosing a 3-month period, meaning you cannot search "June 2020 until September 2020" as that is already a 4-month period. However, it is still a bit of a hassle if you aren't sure when the specific trade that you are looking for took place. You didn't read the OP, did you? If you have the binance app, go and try to browse back to 2017 (if you have existing trades back then, because it looks like you can go back just to your first transaction). We are talking only about the App, not the website access. I have contacted Binance on Twitter, let's see what happens.
|
|
|
Thanks guys, so it's not only me with that problem. I doubt that it's done on purpose you make much more requests tl the server if you have to move back with the 2 months workaround . I'll report it binance and see what they will do about it.
|
|
|
Interesting case for sure. If someone breaks into your computer and your Coinbase Pro, the closest thing in my mind would be to withdraw the coins to another wallet and disappear . But in the OP's case, someone broke into only to place orders, this is more than weird and nobody will use so much resources to just fool around with your orders. Looks like not everyone was reading the OP deeply enough. I wish there's more investigation on that case.
|
|
|
I don't know what is going on, i haven't used Binance for more than a year and now i want to check some alts I bought in 2017 but it looks like i can't go back in my order history.
If i try to set a starting date like 2017, it comes an error that sais that the ending date is with more than 3 months difference and reset the date to the current one. If i change the end date, comes an error that the ending date cannot be before the start one.
Complete chaos.
Found an workaround, going back 2 monts first on start then on the end date and repeat until i reached 2017 but its ridiculous.
Please if someone can check it the Order History has the same issue or it's just me...
|
|
|
Hello again. I may repeat myself but this is one of my favorite projects/tools ever. I have a few more suggestions. Since this tool will be mainly used by people like me, hunting for spammers, alt accounts, etc. It would be very convenient to have a search of social media links cross posted by different users, like it is now the search for the addresses. You only need Twitter, Facebook, and Telegram. In addition, maybe make like a profile page for each user with just links to all addresses he posted and all the social media links.
|
|
|
Ding, soon.
Let me be the first one to congratulate you (soon). BTW I already checked you account this morning but you were not active. Well, today is the day Congrats, it's been a long wait.. Now you have nothing more to chase unfortunately.
|
|
|
It's simple (it's not!!), if you want to change the 5th page rule, the campaign manager should start evaluate every single post and make a decision if those posts deserve to be counted or not. But.. you know there's always one but(t)... This will probably rise a lot of questions and debates " why my posts are not counted". After all it's the camp. manager who is has the last word. On the other hand there will be speculations that the Campaign Manager is not independent and is part of the Service provider, and maybe will try to "save" money by skipping posts like that.. so drama... It is very difficult to define a rule which will keep the both sides satisfied. On my side, I don't really care if those after page 5 will be counted or not, I post the way I did it before I joined the campaign. It's a highly paid campaign, compare to the other ones out there, so people shouldn't be greedy. Advice: Just wait and see how it will go with the current changes, if more additional adjustments are needed later, we continue the discussion. Maybe posts in the this thread shouldn't be paid too..
|
|
|
Since the spam is not so much of a problem now and many already are keeping eye on the shitposters, it's maybe a time to change the focus of my hobby and start catching the alt accounts. It's fairly easy to catch accounts, as they tend to be lazy and many use even almost the same usernames. In addition there are a few, wonderful scripts and tools that came up recently to make our life even easier, so why not.
P.S. Everyone can enable the Patrol page link: Go to Forum Profile Information and put a tick on Show patrol link: Shows a link to the patrol page under "watchlist"
Then you have a quick access to the Patrol page.
|
|
|
I admire the desire for adapting the signature campaign to the forum needs. Not many services tent do do it. You made some good changes like keeping the minimum required posts to 10 and paying per post which just reduced the HQ spam which gives you a better reputation.
I don't want to be pushed to post just because I'm missing 4-5 post. Ideally the signature campaigns shouldn't change the posting behavior of the participants, but this of course is almost impossible as many users are here just for the $. Anyway, you can make it a bit more flexible if you want. Like the participant can choose to wear avatar or not, many people prefer to keep their own avatars and have only signatures on for reduced reward of course.
Sometimes you see participants from the same campaign in a discussion and it's a wall of all the same avatars and signatures and for my opinion it doesn't look very attractive, but again this is just my opinion.
The content of the posts should be more important than the number of the posts. Of course, every service wants a better exposure but the practice have shown that those who hire posters just to reach the weekly quota are not taken very seriously. So you are heading towards the right decision.
The CM campaign has put the bar very high but it's a good example how a sig. campaign can be successful in a long run.
Good luck to your business.
|
|
|
I normally do a random address check, from time to time and quite often i see ban evaders. When i have more time I'll do a few more experiments like this one and will try to compare the data to get a bit more realistic overview of what the bounty hunters really look like.
|
|
|
|