Nansen have put the blame on the vendor side publicly because that is what probably happened but they also did it to try to reassure customers they did not do anything wrong to facilitate the hack inadvertently. Having said that, the company is not going to shake off the fact they have been hacked.

One thing to consider is that maybe the hackers did not want or expect to retrieve useful data, it is possible they wanted to test how robust the security system was before they move on to bigger targets.

The OP seems to have received five negative tags after he created this thread and not only that, his last login was one day after he created it therefore it seems safe to conclude he will not be back. He has probably given up on trying to milk the tokyohd account but as usual these people are operating several other accounts therefore their focus will be on them now.

That is a strange post coming from someone with a track record such as yours.

Another nonsensical post.

That is the part that confuses me. It is absolutely true without proof people can make whatever claim they want but if you read through some of his post history, he certainly has moments of "did he really write that" but there are also some very well detailed and articulated posts therefore I asked the OP to clarity if he was using the name without consent or if he really was Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

The day is here, the next set of Champions League games are taking place this evening. Arsenal travel to RC Lens with the safety net of accepting a draw because they already had a stunning victory in their first game and will probably qualify with ease.

If Manchester United fail to beat Galatasaray it will mean they will probably not qualify for the knockout stages and it would add further pressure on Ten Hag. Napoli vs Real Madrid is probably going to be a close game.

I did not write Chelsea off because I was fairly sure they would have to bounce back at some stage. Chelsea had a disastrous start to the season and it was not something that would continue, at some point Chelsea would become a cohesive unit. By all means this win does not indicate they will join the chasing pack but if they manage to go on an unbeaten run over 10 games it will mean they would have made strides towards being the team Pochettino envisaged.

We should not take anything away from Fulham though because they played very well. Had some decisions gone their way it would have made an interesting end to the game but when it is analysed, Chelsea won the game, Mudryk scored his first goal, Broja demonstrated he is a very good player and they kept a clean sheet therefore they should be satisfied.

He has been online after you sent him the PM. He made three posts to add to filling his avatar quota and for all we know he may have taken the opportunity to reply to you. I look forward to reading his version of events.

It could result in an elaborate storyline worthy of a Hollywood film plot where brothers, sister, uncles and aunties were involved in passing a forum account around for reasons that will be very difficult to seem plausible. On the other hand, he could cite something less dramatic but will it be believable?

I am not stating it occurred here but if not all then definitely some permutations of the following seem to have become more noticeable recently: sold/farmed accounts, merit searching in WO, obsession with pizza related threads and links to a particular language board.

You are right about the pizza  

I am really curious here. Are you really Joseph Van Name of the University of South Florida? If the name has been picked up on by members with ulterior motives that could mean damaging the name of someone without him even knowing. Your posts suggests you are him but for the sake of clarity, could you confirm?

I am not sure what the OP is intending to achieve with what seems to be drawing even more unnecessary attention to himself. It is not as though he is not aware of what is going when threads are removed. After he received the latest negative tag he started posting in a more irrational manner but each to their own.

Name me what the deleted topics were called? As far as I remember, this is the first topic I deleted while I was moderator of this section. So any questions about other deleted topics, that's not for me.[/quote]

I have just posted in your other thread in the Off-topic board.

For those thinking about obtaining certification, the links you provided would be helpful. I am not suggesting nor advocating using the service but thought if it is mentioned within a wider reach related specifically to the forum, the discussion could be interesting.Overall, I do not know why anything related to ICS2 would be of use in a subforum because all forum members should take certain precautions for security without the need of being told but I was curious about what ICS2 was therefore went online to have a little read about it.

A search revealed some reviewers and commentors alluded they felt the certification was easy to obtain or had little value when listing on a CV. Some mentioned they were happy with the result they achieved after they signed up and paid an affordable fee.

I am posting here after this thread was mentioned here: Cybersecurity subforum

I have seen some reviews and discussion about the certification awarded by ICS2. The opinions have ranged varyingly but the one thing have not been called is a scam. Some have stated they feel the certificate was quite easy to obtain whereas some stated other things. In the end, this does not seem something I will be interested in but for those that might be, the OP has put links in his post.

I am not advocating it, I would like to read opinions of forum members.

RESULT:

Fulham 0-2 Chelsea

You went for 1-2 and I went for 1-4 therefore were far closer to the final result than I was. Mudryk  finally got off the mark with a goal and it should give him a lot of confidence because Chelsea paid huge amounts to buy him. Broja got the second goal, he played well. What was still not good enough was they had 44% possession when Fulham had 56%. Chelsea are slowly coming back on track.

As for Fulham, they played well. They had opportunities to get back in the game but it was not their night.

Thank you icopress, I have changed the signature using the red tint. Can I please have this avatar:

JollyGood _______________

Various media have reported that Liverpool have officially requested the audio recordings from the officials (on field referee, VAR and VAR assistant) after stated they will "explore the range of options available". As far as Liverpool as concerned an apology will not do, they want much more.

I am going for a victory statement by Chelsea. Fulham will play well and the crowd will urge them to play tough but in the end there will be a clear winner: Fulham 1-4 Chelsea

Liverpool are not going to sit idle and let this issue go. What was going on with the VAR and his assistant, how could both of them managed to have not stopped the game after the lines were not showing up on their screen? Garnacho seemed to have a perfectly good goal for Manchester United disallowed against Arsenal because of another strange VAR decision that could have seen them win the game 1-2 but ended up losing 3-1.

Fulham always get the better of us but I think BTS will be the most valuable bet [/quote]
I am confident Chelsea will win the game and it will be by a big margin too. I think Pochettino and his team will send a statement to the rest of the Premier League to let them know they are back.  Fulham will play without awe and will take the game to Chelsea but I think it will end bad for them as Chelsea will take maximum points.

What Emery he did consistently at Spanish clubs Valencia, Sevilla and Villareal fantastic considering budget restrictions in comparison to what the La Liga giants spent. I think he could have done well at Arsenal had he been given more time but he was under intense pressure on a regular basis while he managed there therefore he had to move on.

Gerrard clearly failed Aston Villa as their manager and the experiment went wrong but it seems Emery has found a good mould in Aston Villa, the club and the manager fit well together. They will be the team to watch this season alongside West Ham United as they try to take on the bigger teams.

If I have this correct, below is the current list of accounts directly associated with the superman184 account mentioned by the OP here and here are some links with excellent work conducted by Stalker22. There could also be several more accounts in the farming process but they are not yet known (if they exist at all):

min end
Shishir55
pappu789
superman184
ramgautam125
KomalSonkar#_@KS
RANASINGHAZAZ9099
RAVINDRAKUMAR7777
SHAHILSHINGH332211

I doubt the account farmer or puppeteer will even both putting up a defence trying to avoid getting tags on any associated accounts but for if he ended up posting to what the OP and subsequent members stated, it might make an interesting read.

These are results from the games played today:

Aston Villa 6-1 Brighton and Hove Albion
Bournemouth 0-4 Arsenal
Everton 1-2 Luton Town
Manchester United 0-1 Crystal Palace
Newcastle United 2-0 Burnley
West Ham United 2-0 Sheffield United
Wolverhampton Wanderers 2-1 Manchester City
Tottenham Hotspur 2-1 Liverpool

Aston Villa continue their excellent start to the season, they beat an in-form team such as Brighton quite easily. It was a good game for them, they look like they will cause bigger teams problems this season.

Manchester City lost their 100% record. Wolves played well under intense pressure but in the end won the game against the reigning champions Manchester City. That defeat allowed Arsenal and Tottenham to close the gap but Liverpool played with nine men at one stage after having two players sent off. Still, Tottenham had to score to get the win and they did it.

Ten Hag is failing badly at Manchester United, he will probably get sacked soon, well done to Crystal Palace for winning the game. Newcastle United also got a much needed win and West Ham United won their game.

Here is the Premier League table as it currently stands:




VAR gave some dubious decisions today. I have no idea what is going on but how can they determine what the referee is supposed to determine what is a clear and obvious error and how does that fit in when VAR themselves look at a decision and make the wrong call when it is obvious they are wrong.

What would have happened if he simply changed his ways, stopped using the AI bot and instead contributed positively to the forum? One thing seems possible is that the OP would probably have escaped some (if not all) of the negative and/or neutral tags. In the interim from the first neutral to the first negative tag, if he had been serious about his remorse he would have handled this thread in a different manner.

You are right, it is too late for the OP now. It is not as though he has done anything special with the tokyohd account, he just does not want to create a new account for farming purposes.

These are the games taking place today Saturday 30th September 2023:
 
Bournemouth vs Arsenal
Everton vs Luton Town
Manchester United vs Crystal Palace
Newcastle United vs Burnley
West Ham United vs Sheffield United
Wolverhampton Wanderers vs Manchester City
Tottenham Hotspur vs Liverpool

The early kick-off result: Aston Villa 6-1 Brighton and Hove Albion

What a start by Aston Villa, with their win they currently sit in 3rd place in the Premier League table but that could change later today after the others games have taken place.

There are tags from multiple members therefore the chances of you having every single one of them either removed or replaced (with neutral tags) is very low. Let us not forget you also have neutral tags that are quite critical of your conduct.

The problem many members will have with the statement you made above is that it does not seem sincere even in the slightest. Had you put some element of truth or remorse within it, you may have been better placed to deceive but your lack of sincerity is apparent.

I have just given you negative trust and excluded you from my trust and it will stay there until/unless compelling reasons are presented. As for other members that left you feedback, do you honestly believe you will succeed in having them remove/revise what they have written for you?