I Want to Trade My House for Some Bitcoins - An Innovative Idea or Unnecessary Risk?
It's about as stupid an idea as you can get. The Internet is full of stories of disappointment of investors who do this. Understanding people try to cash out the profits from digital currencies into the real sector, so they diversify their assets, buy some real estate, etc. Non-understanding people, on the contrary, try to convert real objects into digital assets, which is a risky investment. Buying a house by selling bitcoin is a smart decision. Buying bitcoin by selling a house is an absolutely foolish venture. Only invest in cryptocurrencies that you are willing to lose. |
|
|
|
Who participated in the last token sale on Binance, can you tell me if it is possible to count on a good allocation with 5 BNB?
Any amount would count, but 5bnb maybe not so much since theres a lot of participants. This launchpad favors huge holder of bnb. But even though any amount would do good since surely the token would be worth 5x to 10x or more valuation when it got launch. It's understandable that any amount will make a difference in the distribution. As far as I understand, the system is not lottery based, but based on distributing tokens to all pool members after a snapshot is taken. They will then distribute the tokens according to the weight of your locked BNBs. I've read feedback from some participants that they blocked a few BNBs and receive $1.5 worth of new project tokens. Questionable business. Deposit about $1000 on a centralized exchange to be able to get new tokens worth $1-$2. |
|
|
|
If this blockchain is not backed by some large capital, there is no point in this new blockchain, nor in new token standards. In the market, the advantage of projects is far from the cost of transaction fees. If that were crucial, blockchains like ETH or TRON would have been forgotten a long time ago because their fees are quite high. This is not the case because these blockchains hold a large layer of the crypto ecosystem. The new token standard itself is of no interest to anyone without proper embedding in the ecosystem. Even if it supports commissions worth $0.00000000001$.
My take on this through research is the ico bagged 40 million dollars in bitcoin and ethereum yes? Bitcoin at the time was worth 4500 dollars it then peaked at 60000 a coin now at 30000 so unless they cashed it all which I highly doubt they have a HUGE budget.....I tell you something is going to happen here I just feel it.... During this time, the project has no development. It looks more like the developers just collected this amount of investment and distributed it into their pockets rather than investing it in the development of the project and providing the token. How long do you need for the project to fully launch after the money has been raised? 5 years? Maybe 10 or 20 years? Those times were very wild and such projects appeared like mushrooms after rain. All of them were created just for raising money and personal enrichment. |
|
|
|
|
Что вы приняли? Вы продолжаете делать то же самое: постите новости без источника и не относящиеся к вашему обменнику. В общем так, последнее предупреждение, если после этого поста вы продолжите в том же духе, получите бан.
|
|
|
|
Мы добавили новую монету для обмена - MAVНе нужно постить в ваш топик различную инфо, которая не касается вашего обменника. Тем более, в виде плагиата. За это на нашем форуме можно получить бан ( пункт 33 правил форума). Будьте так добры, прочтите правила раздела и старайтесь выполнять их. |
|
|
|
Не нужно писать сюда то, что не относится к вашему обменнику. Это не новостной топик. Тем более, что вы размещаете инфо без ссылки на источник, это у нас на форуме считается плагиатом ( пункт 33 правил форума ). Продолжите в том же духе, получите бан. Будьте так добры, прочтите правила раздела и старайтесь выполнять их.
|
|
|
|
Сопротивление?  Где? В Рф? Где одни послушные скоты, которые верят зомбоящику и не умеют аналитически мыслить. Никто даже и пальцем не пошевелит, чтобы высказать свое недовольство по этому поводу. Так поступит основная часть, а другая будет скрипеть зубами и смотреть на это безумие, не высовываясь лишний раз. Давайте не нагнетать. Раздел Политика у нас в другом месте. |
|
|
|
Well, I was just going to ask when the user was banned and what was the reasoning behind that?
I have checked and unfortunately did not find the reason for banning this user. I am unfortunately limited by my status to find such information. And since it was a long time ago, it is useless to ask global moderators, it is unlikely that any of them will remember this particular case. As for the ban evasion, I completely agree with you. |
|
|
|
I know some people won't like this but Crypto is a Ponzi scheme, the people that lose out are the greedy and the laggards, we need new set of people to enter the space for the price to pump. I always run away from projects that have pumped and dumped because the people that they dump the token on will be praying for the price to pump and will dump at any given opportunity. SafeMoon is a good example of these and there are many tokens in the space that are dead but the good thing about them is that as long as they are on exchange its value won't go to zero, DEXes have even makes it easier for them to trade now
The whole altcoin industry is some sort of pump&dump scheme, but definitely not a ponzi scheme. In ponzi schemes there is no utilitarianism, there is a beautiful legend and groups of investors. Cryptocurrencies have ready working products and some utility, the projects solve certain problems and problems in blockchain networks, so they can not be called completely empty, but at the same time, most cryptocurrencies are still simple empty, which have nothing but the desire of their creators to make a quick buck on investors. |
|
|
|
Not bounties themselves but the prices are what get affected by the bear market since even if the tokens are launched if it's done during a bear market, they won't be able to gain enough exposure and high prices which makes the hunters sell their tokens at a very low price. Where if they get $50 for the bounty tokens they've got in a bear market, they could get maybe about $100 if it was launched during a bull season as prices generally go up at that time.
I would also add that launching tokens during a bear market also affects how long the price stays high. During bear trends, projects exhaust their growth very quickly and then go into a prolonged decline. Sometimes there are situations when investors do not have time to sell their received tokens at good prices, because the price was growing for a very short time and then there was a price crash. |
|
|
|
|
If this blockchain is not backed by some large capital, there is no point in this new blockchain, nor in new token standards. In the market, the advantage of projects is far from the cost of transaction fees. If that were crucial, blockchains like ETH or TRON would have been forgotten a long time ago because their fees are quite high. This is not the case because these blockchains hold a large layer of the crypto ecosystem. The new token standard itself is of no interest to anyone without proper embedding in the ecosystem. Even if it supports commissions worth $0.00000000001$.
|
|
|
|
The project has a good chance to start with 1$ on Binance trading. Not sure if I have enough BNB to get a good allocation.  Who participated in the last token sale on Binance, can you tell me if it is possible to count on a good allocation with 5 BNB? |
|
|
|
Is there even one smart contract platform in the crypto industry right now that is truly decentralized? In my opinion, no. ETH is also centralized. If a platform doesn't have a centralized apparatus, there are always major investors or validators who are subject to certain jurisdictions and certain regulators. From that, platforms can impose some regulation or censorship on the network.
Ethereum Classic (ETC), Ubiq (UBQ), and Expanse (EXP) are all truly-decentralized smart contract platforms. Unfortunately, they're not as popular as they're centralized counterparts. The low market prices for said coins explains everything. It's all about making money these days, instead of focusing on crypto's potential to eliminate the middleman for good. BNB is one of those coins that are centralized. It's too tied to Binance. Have you noticed that everything in the crypto industry that offers decentralization, fast transactions and cheap fees is extremely unpopular. I've always wondered why this is the case and people are increasingly drawn to networks that violate the main principles of cryptocurrency, i.e. they are centralized, they are expensive and they are not the fastest. BNB and ETH are the most prominent examples of such non-ideal networks, but at the same time have such a huge impact on the entire crypto industry. |
|
|
|
Scam, death both have in altcoins market so why you want investing altcoins?
My opinion buy dip and sold faster on some profits like to be best revenge for all altcoins investors!
What's your skills and opinion?
What attracts people to altcoins is their generosity when it comes to spending their time in exchange for tokens or investing $100 and getting $10,000 in profit. In this respect, altcoins are much better than bitcoin and that's why they attract a huge number of users. In cryptocurrency people, in the main, come for earnings. It is quite difficult to make money with bitcoin, it is slow and expensive in terms of growth potential. Altcoins are more flexible in this respect and are more suitable for all kinds of speculation and quick enrichment. |
|
|
|
|
Still, despite the success of bitcoin and some other projects, the rest of the crypto industry is an absolute scam to this day. The possibility of making money on scam does not mean that this project is reliable. It means that you are among the lucky ones who managed to cash out their profits in time, while the rest lose money on crypto investments. The crypto industry is not yet sufficiently developed in terms of regulation and regulations regarding the various mechanisms for buying and selling cryptocurrencies. Scammers take advantage of this uncertainty and therefore create many dubious schemes.
|
|
|
|
Regardless of any digital currency, it does not have any value itself. Its value comes from whether there is a market and whether it can be used in circulation. If it does not have these two points, it will not have much value. If there is a digital currency that can be used in a specific way If it becomes a currency in circulation, its value will be very high. Do you guys have any recommendations for this type of currency?
Value is only determined by the presence of large capitals. As long as they are interested in a coin, it will grow, whether it has any utility or not. If you choose coins based on utilitarian features, you may be in for a disappointment. Because the value of a completely useless coin can be 1000 times higher than a coin that has a lot of utility, has a lot of potential, has an interesting concept, but no one is interested in it because of the lack of support from big capitals. Why does this happen? Because most market participants are interested in altcoins not in technology, but in profit. |
|
|
|
It has crashed once, so maybe it will continue to crash for a second or third time. So there is no reason for us to invest in a currency that has lost faith in the community. After all, people's trust in the project is what developers aim to develop well, but taking advantage of trust is really an asshole. So it's best not to care about this project. This pointless coin was created once again to warn people not to get too hyped and to teach the crypto community a great lesson.
There is really no point in investing in such projects on a long-term basis, as trust in such coins tends to zero, but these projects are valuable for various short-term investors. I don't remember cases in the altcoin industry that any project after a complete devaluation fully recovered and continued to develop further. What happened to LUNA has put an end to its future. The coin can live for a long time and have some liquidity, but it will never gain the importance and capitalization that it had before. We can safely forget about it. |
|
|
|
А кто такие сибилы?, я далек от этого всего...
Если не ошибаюсь, это люди, которые создают множество аккаунтов для участия в аирдропе, чтобы по-больше получить актива с аирдропа. Если не прав, меня поправят. |
|
|
|
While I understand your frustration with meme coins and the negative impact they have had on the crypto space, it's essential to approach the topic with a balanced perspective. Meme coins indeed garnered significant attention, and unfortunately, some people did lose money due to their speculative nature and lack of substantial underlying value.
However, it's important to recognize that the crypto industry as a whole should not be judged solely based on meme coins. Cryptocurrencies have the potential to revolutionize various sectors and offer innovative solutions. There are numerous legitimate projects with dedicated teams and genuine visions that contribute positively to the industry's development.
Regarding DOGE and its price increase, it's crucial to understand that market dynamics can be influenced by various factors, including investor sentiment, social media trends, and celebrity endorsements. While Elon Musk's influence may have played a role, it's worth noting that DOGE's rise is also a result of the collective actions of traders and investors
So far, the crypto industry has been evaluated solely on the basis of such useless projects for the ecosystem. Unfortunately, very often such coins are widely publicized and people base their impressions of the entire crypto industry on these examples. Almost all altcoins work only by pump&dump scheme. Unless there is serious regulation of altcoins in the industry, the whole market will be just some wild west without rules and decency. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
