There is a reason it is called "faith". It cannot be scientifically proven. You don't need faith or belief to be a good person. Just empathy. People are basically killing each other to see who's got the better imaginary friend. Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God? - Epicurus Faith itself is not bad as long as the person does good. It is a like a comfy blanket or pacifier for adults.  |
|
|
|
While I disagree with some of the opinions on here and find the whole accusation stupid. In my opinion I have done nothing wrong and neither has Lafu. However I have spoken to Lafu and agreed that we should not use merits on each others posts to avoid suspicion. This message was the one that made me smile and realise I have spent far to much time on this nonsense.  |
|
|
|
Edit: Oh by the way, I think I just discovered xtraelv has been abusing the merit system. If DT members could check his merit summary you will see that he has been exchanging merit with user Lafu back and forth.
Sherlock - Let me save you some time - Read here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4031390.0On the comment section you will find some uncomfortable comments like # # # etc (so far). I respect everyone's views but when it's showing anger, frustration from prior conflict of interests especially baseless accusations in most cases then it worth investigating before getting biased. Here is a list of some members, I find annoying characters to me (just for me btw). They will try to bring everything (anything) they can with their baseless accusations (in my opinion, for you to make a conclusion - please investigate then justify). I try (will try) to avoid their negative inputs except they bring something good on the table. If you are going to do show and tell make sure you show them the UPDATED posts rather than just the ones that you think make you look good. Your post wasn't posted at the date of the post - it showed reserved for a long time. You've only posted that in the last hour or so. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4019640.msg38055077#msg38055077https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3168616.msg37774968#msg37774968 All the abuse and multi thread posts are just a distraction. Just answer the question and accusations |
|
|
|
Since nothing really was done about the previous attacks (only a band-aid), the attackers now simply use two algos to fork the chain for their own use and are gaining millions:  Both algos, scrypt and lyra2re can be rented easily for a few bucks at nicehash, they simply send one block scrypt, after that a block lyra2re and so on and all with manipulated timestamps thus lowering diff to lowest possible mining several blocks per minute like this Another timewarp / modified vector attack. Official block explorer is back online, with a much higher blockheight. 2.205.900 is one of the last blocks from the attacker. Roughly 50.000 blocks were possibly mined. It appears the attack is over, 35 million XVG were generated in a a couple of hours. Official response is "mining pools were DDossed".  |
|
|
|
|
Het is altijd beter om he in een paper wallet of een hardware wallet (offline storage) te houden.
Koop een Ledger of Trezor (Ik vind mijn Trezor beter - Ik heb allebij)
Op een exchange heeft het altijd meer risico.
Als je niet de private keys hebt dan is het niet helemaal van jou.
Een beurs kan door een hack, rechtzaak, bankruptsy of een exit scam leeg gemaakt worden.
Exchange: Silk Road
Amount: $270,000,000 (171,955 BTC)
Exchange: MtGox
Amount: $700,000,000 (850,000 BTC)
Exchange: Cryptsy
Amount: $9,500,000 (13,000 BTC and 300,000 LTC)
Exchange: Mintpal
Amount: $3,200,000 (3,894 BTC)
Exchange: Bitstamp
Amount: $5,100,000 (19,000 BTC)
Exchange: Bter
Amount: $1,750,000 (7,000 BTC)
Exchange: Bitfinex
Amount: $72,000,000 (120,000 BTC)
Exchange: Nicehash
Amount: $60,000,000 (4,000 BTC)
Exchange: Coincheck
Amount: $534,800,000 (523,000,000 NEM)
Exchange: BitGrail
Amount: $195,000,000 (17,000,000 NANO)
Exchange: CoinSecure
Amount: $3,300,000 (438 BTC)
|
|
|
|
|
Ja het is een goeie beurs. Maar support is soms langzaam.
Niet shitcoins kopen die hebben vaak problemen met wallets en delisting.
Nooit crypto op een beurs laten staan als je het niet voor trading gebruikt.
Als je er een probleem hebt dan zoek mij op in Cryptopia discord (of steur een message hier) .
Zelvde naam - xtraelv - Ik ben een vrijwilliger chat moderator daar. Dus ik kan vaak helpen.
|
|
|
|
|
MyEtherWallet en een Trezor.
Ledger kan meer coins doen maar Trezor in mijn opinie is beter.
Echt je geld waard om een Trezor te kopen. It heb teveel Newbies gezien die hun crypto hebben verloren.
Voorzichtig zijn. Gebruik op een trusted computer.
|
|
|
|
Somige banken sluiten rekeningen als er transacties van Crypto op komen. Belasting is een probleem als je het voor imand anders doet. Geld witwassen is illegaal - je weet niet waar het vandaan komt of waar het voor gebruikt word. Niet doen ! Het is net so slim als een pakje voor iemand van Columbia op he vliegtuig mee te nemen.  Krijg je meer geld voor en gratis vakantie. |
|
|
|
I merited mdayonliner a few times, so you know his posts aren't bad. It doesn't matter if some (or even all) of his posts were about merit--the point is that they were well thought out and constructive, and he's fairly adept at English. Compare his posts to xtraelv's, and you'll see quite a contrast.
I don't have any issue with you so don't really want to go indepth in this but: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3502223.msg36761868#msg36761868 Really ?  I understand that the other guy was being a dick but under the criteria - that is a "like" - not a meritable post. It is that easy to make a mistake. |
|
|
|
|
BEAR
This is a term borrowed from the Wall Street. This means a trader/investor who believes the prices of a particular cryptocurrency or market will fall and wants to profit from that fall.
BULL
This is a term borrowed from the Wall Street. This means a trader/investor who believes the prices of a particular cryptocurrency or market will rise and wants to profit from that rise.
BEARWHALE
This means a trader with a fat account who is bearish on the price of a cryptocurrency.
REKT
This is a misspelling of “wrecked”. This term refers to a trader or investor who is utterly ruined and destroyed with losses from the current downfall of a price.
ADDY
This refers to a cryptocurrency public address (or key). For example: “Tell me your ADDY, please.”
BTFD
Buy The Fucking Dip (an indication to buy a coin when it has dumped so hard)
DILDO
Long green or red candles
DUMP
To Sell off a coin driving the price down.
PUMP
To drive the price up by buying.
DUMPING
Downward price movement
PUMPING
Upward price movement
DYOR
Do Your Own Research
FA
Fundamental Analysis
JOMO
Joy Of Missing Out
TXid
transaction ID used for finding a transaction on a block explorer.
Explorer
Block explorer used to verify transactions.
Hardware wallet
Dedicated device for securely storing crypto offline. (Ledger, Trezor etc)
|
|
|
|
Congratulations. Great strategy. Make lots of posts in topics with "merit" as the subject, lots of self promotion and 5 new threads for something that you can say in one.
Yes, but it beats abusing the merit system to gain merits for what amount to shitposts, followed by whiny bitching about the merit system once tagged for doing that. Know what I mean? I merited mdayonliner a few times, so you know his posts aren't bad. It doesn't matter if some (or even all) of his posts were about merit--the point is that they were well thought out and constructive, and he's fairly adept at English. Compare his posts to xtraelv's, and you'll see quite a contrast. Most of his posts were dedicated to merit though, he has done a good job. However, @xtraelv, your received and sent merits are not looking good, To be honest, I'm not accusing you. Almost all merits you received and sent are in a single thread. it looks ackward. I agree it looks awkward and it has already been the subject of a thorough discussion here. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4031390I have no control over who gives it to me and I feel sorry for Lafu that it ended up being scrutinised. Being dyslexic I don't often post - I often pass on information to others that have more flair for posting. So when I do post it is just for minor stuff. |
|
|
|
Congratulations. Great strategy. Make lots of posts in topics with "merit" as the subject, lots of self promotion and 5 new threads for something that you can say in one. https://web.archive.org/web/20180522010319/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4104852.0  Edited https://i.imgur.com/Jnge3sr.png / replaced previous image with error  Most merit obtained from posting in threads with "merit" as the subject. (I probably even missed a few) It is clear to me and others that "merit" is extremely important to you and that it is the motivation for some of your conduct. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4104852.msg38101744#msg38101744The red is where merit was given and received from the same users or KNOWN alts / family. Why do I care ? - normally I wouldn't. But I am holding you to the standard that you are applying to others. Do I think you exchanged merit ? - yes I do. Not just with your brother. Just check the matching dates.
Do I think you have been deliberately merit farming ? - yes I do. I've given you the same replies you give others. HEREIt made you really angry and you haven't answered the accusations. Why am I doing this ? To point out the hypocracy of your actions.Do I want you to get into trouble for merit farming or exchanging merits ? No I want you to admit and realise that your method and how you treat others (people you don't know) is wrong. |
|
|
|
Hey - I may be wrong but I find it hard to believe someone randomly clicks someones "merit". Out of the 19 cases this is the only one being discussed in a seperate thread to draw attention to it. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3168616.0In my entire time on Bitcointalk I had one message removed by a moderator. That was at the same time as this merit issue. The removed message didn't break the rules. It was politically motivated for calling out a scam. Co-incidence ? Maybe... or people are getting played. I assist in removing between 1000 to 5000 spam/scam messages daily from a forum. I hate spammers & scammers with a vengance.
We could have a better ending if you read it and acted accordingly instead, you have chosen a way to humiliate me for nothing! Why these harsh words everywhere?
You post same shit everywhere, a new way of spamming...There is nothing in the rules that says that your smerit decisions will be scrutinised by a blackmailing spam clown with some warped interpretation of the rules.https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4019640.0 Scam Accusations > Serial feedback blackmailer - mdayonliner http://archive.is/BHD1Y#selection-7507.0-7519.62http://archive.is/zU24W#selection-2299.0-2307.49http://archive.is/tE40M#selection-1283.0-1295.49There is nothing that says that your decisions will be scrutinised by some blackmailing spam clown with some warped interpretation of the rules. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4019640.0 Scam Accusations > Serial feedback blackmailer - mdayonliner
Your ignorance oopsy! seems like you edited your comment!! Did i tell you yesterday that I was looking your activities? Here what you said originally.mdayonliner is giving merit away as "prizes" in a signature campaign and his signature is "for rent". Win $25 + 4 Merits every week! mdayonliner is giving merit away as "prizes" in a signature campaign and his signature is "for rent". How hypocritical is that ? Did you even read this before accusing me not to PM you several times? #I wish I could but there are so many cases I am investigating that I have actually no time to PM individuals asking for explanations. That's why I always leave the RedTrust removal link on the tag I give.
You claim yourself a scam buster but I see your investigating skill is very poor. Scam busting is not your league. You better retire or find something else. You can think it's malice all you want, but being a "scambuster" you should know that the people you are responding to here bust 100 spammers/scammers (accounts) a day at times by analyzing merit and crypto transactions, and they deserve it..
If you look, their are threads specifically analyzing all the merit ever transacted on this forum with all kinds of stats, charts, and graphs so yeah people analyze merit a heck of a lot and the reason you were singled out is your suspicious merit activity..
You said it mate. Thumbs up! @eddie13
And don't mix up me with my brother. We don't even live in the same country. I have declared on the trust page with a very good explanation that mahimonliner IS my younger brother. A better explanation is here I gave to marlboroza when we had conflict You tagged him for no reason. Remove his tag. Account of my younger brother. The rules says to declare someones ALT with a neutral trust however I find it necessary to declare this account in public for two reasons:
1. The username contains same suffix: _____onliner
2. When merit system were introduced my younger brother sent 4 merits to my account to try how the new merit system works. (If someone consider this as merit abuse then IMO the justification will be wrong. It was a mistake but an innocent one. When merit system introduced on 25th Jan 2018, first few days were confusing for everyone. A major number of members were testing the merit system by sending it to each others. I received those 4 merits on the Jan 27th.)
Note: I used to be an affiliate marketer and influenced few people online because of my extraordinary performance in affiliate marketing. I noticed in several places they use their username with the suffix "onliner". My younger brother is one of them. In BitcoinTalk if anyone notice any username with a suffix of "onliner" then feel free to contact with me. I will Neutral trust with that person so that the community can identify it.
Courtesy question: If someone create an account with a suffix of "onliner" or any username, then once they earn enough sMerits, they send bunches of Merits to my account to ruin my reputation then will I be a victim or how the community will look at that?
A polite warning. Please do not bring my personal stuff in here. I can have three Facebook accounts. What is it here to do with that? You do not know me. What I do for living, my profession, my motivation nothing at all. So, stay away for good.  Lets just keep it in this thread. I've just started. I don't have all the info yet. While your friends may have seen it. My friends haven't seen it yet. All these accounts which you are bashing because of merit abuse and your brother has sent you all his merits just to test how this system works..  If you trust your brother(of course you do, it is your brother) why don't you trust people who sent merit to their family/friends/etc? Don't you think you should give -ve to your brother for merit abuse as well? You were clearly warned by marlboroza about your conduct yet continued. Just stop posting same shit on my topics. It's spamming.
That is an interesting concept - but since you make a new thread for almost everything - the threads are spamming. I'm consolidating by directing it to one thread. You demand that I remove feedback - but let me quote you what you told me: See? Wake up call! You woke up after my red trust. I guess you are so busy with self gain that since last Jan 24th to recently you had no clue?(!) I already laid out your excuses: [Parody] Merit translation. Your excuses are nothing new to me. Demn.... Just look at the merit history![/b] Technically both are correct. I edited it to make it clearer. You are giving merit away in a signature campaign - someone elses merit. I then changed it to "endorsing" to make it clearer for you what I meant. Being dyslexic means I often edit posts a number of times correcting words and sentences and I add information. Nothing ominous about that.  |
|
|
|
Come on. If they can't solve "KYC problems" they shouldn't be in this business.
There are other ways to limit growth too. Don't list every shitcoin under the sun maybe.
This is the scale of the problem on Bitcointalk. Nothing is done about it. Not removing all the dodgy links to people selling exchange accounts is likely to eventually come to the attention of the likes of the SEC, FINSEC or symilar.  Each exchange has their own methods of KYC compliance. Someone buying a verified account with a $50K (or higher) daily limit can do a lot of laundry before getting caught. Especially straight after a big hack like Coincheck. They delisted lots of coins. They increased the price for listing to discourage new listings. They reduced the amount of coins listed by 20% API spam and malicious bot activity increased. That is currently being addressed. |
|
|
|
You can think it's malice all you want, but being a "scambuster" you should know that the people you are responding to here bust 100 spammers/scammers (accounts) a day at times by analyzing merit and crypto transactions, and they deserve it..
I wasn't referring the malice to anyone other than the OP. Hey - I may be wrong but I find it hard to believe someone randomly clicks someones "merit". Out of the 19 cases this is the only one being discussed in a seperate thread to draw attention to it. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3168616.0In my entire time on Bitcointalk I had one message removed by a moderator. That was at the same time as this merit issue. The removed message didn't break the rules. It was politically motivated for calling out a scam. Co-incidence ? Maybe... or people are getting played. I assist in removing between 1000 to 5000 spam/scam messages daily from a forum. I hate spammers & scammers with a vengance. |
|
|
|
All those crappy exchanges with support issues made the choice to neglect their customers. They could have stopped new user registrations or deposits or otherwise slowed down their growth to allow themselves to catch up but they didn't.
Stopping accounts doesn't help anything. They tried stopping registrations. It just causes KYC problems and serious legal issues. The problem is mainly on bitcointalk and other forums. Also ebay.  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2590167.0 |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
