I would be very appreciative of your input.  You're one of the most rational and unbiased individuals on this forum.  I was hoping I wouldn't have to ask (I didn't want to impose on your time,) but since things have gotten so messy I was actually planning to reach out.  Thank you for offering.

Matches
10. Arnold Allen
9. Max Griffin
8. Waldo Cortes-Acosta
7. Josh Fremd
6. Dustin Jacoby
5. Phil Hawes
4. Marcos Rogerio de Lima
3. Junyong Park
2. Chase Hooper
1. Carlos Mota

Match 10 winner Total Strikes: 93

1.  Astros
2.  6 games
3.  7 runs

1. BAL
2. TB
3. BAL
4. Yes
5. Over
6. 2nd
7. Odd
8. Even
9. TB
10. BAL

Final Score prediction: Ravens 27 - Tampa Bay 24

Hello nubcake_MeoW,

I'm reluctant to agree with you that the bet qualifies as a draw, at least not yet.  My reluctance is partly due to the fact clause #3 doesn't include a timeframe, and since the bet does not reach maturity until January 1^st, 2023.


It's also fair to point out that FatMan does not wish to enter the dispute phase based on this specific disagreement, and would prefer to let the bet continue.  I think it would be unfair to make a decision at this time with that being the case.


Yet another reason I'm of the opinion that it's best to let the bet run it's course is that the LUNC burn initiative seems to be in flux.  Initially it was set to 1.2%, before it was recently reduced.  I'm not convinced that we've seen the last adjustment, nor am I convinced that CEXs won't impose other methods to burn LUNC.  FatMan posted a message from CZ indicating that Binance might impose a voluntary option to allow LUNC users to burn at their discretion, and using those opt-in values to determine how to proceed.  I understand that since CZ's message was published Binance has chosen to burn their spot trading fee, and not impose any further tax on their clients who trade LUNC, but again I'm not convinced this won't change before the deadline.  I'm of the opinion that you still have a chance to win this bet, and calling it a draw might be as much a disservice to you as it would be to FatMan.

seoincorporation's responses were quite detailed and informed.  I agree that he's a good resource for investigating smart contracts of this type, and I will also vouch for him.  The funds have been released, thank you both for making this an easy deal.

Juwan Johnson is available on the wire, he filled in for the Saints other tight end last week and had a good day.  If you only need him this week, it might be worth picking him up and keeping on eye on the injured starter.  

Confirming that I am holding the payment for this service.

bc1qgkaalsvm5sl2ykymaq5ta4jf7rlf7a98arfqr3

Jones looked like he was trying to force things too much.  He struggled early in the season, got hurt, then Zappe came out and won two games in a row.  That would make any QB nervous about his job.  Zappe just lobbed another deep ball, also for an amazing catch. 

It's too early to tell if Zappe is really that good, or just having some luck.  The two games he's played so far were won on the ground, but those were a couple of nice passes so far this evening.

Haha, not!  Full discloser; the only bet I place on football this weekend was the Niners money line, with CMC to score. 

I should have taken my own advice and bet on them thar Giants.


That and Sasquatch Barkley!

Actually, it's scammers like you that make people hesitant.  


If you're a representative of coinsmart, why haven't you posted a link to their website?  7 posts already, and not one directing people to official site, why?  Why didn't you start a thread in the Services section with legitimate contact information?  And conversely, why did you start this scammy request in Currency Exchange, asking people for their KYC?  That's not how a professional representative of a legitimate exchange would behave.


If coinsmart is your business, add a link to your Bitcointalk user profile on coinsmart's webpage, or post it using the official twitter profile.  Do that, and I promise to STFU.  Otherwise, I'll keep exposing you as the scammer I know you to be.

Maasdamer, is that you?  What's wrong, did someone thwart your latest $20 scam attempt?

Oh, my bad.  One newbie vouching for another newbie certainly means this is legit.  What was I thinking?  Lad?  I mean, it's not like I could create a new account named BinanceOTC without actually being a representative of Binance.   

Or, is it more likely is that both of these accounts belong to the same scammer and have nothing to do with Coinsmart?

Congrats on the yellow cap, I hope to get one some day, lol.  This is my third year participating, and I have yet to even come close.

---

I didn't know much about Gerard until I heard the news of him getting axed.  But I am surprised by this discussion.  Isn't a bit premature to talk about Klopp's successor?  Am I unaware of something Klopp said that makes people think he's going to step down?  Because I really can't see LFC ownership forcing him out after one bad season.

---

NOOooo, that's not good news for me, lol.  I'm 7 places behind you at the moment, but realistically two or three good weeks could put either one of us in contention for a prize.  Not that winning anything is the whole point, it's just fun to gauge my predictions against others.  I hope you change your mind.

---

Well, this weekend's predictions have been rather difficult for me.  So many potential upsets, including MU keeping Chelsea from scoring at home.  It feels like any correct prediction I come up with this weekend is pure luck.

That actually seems like a good deal to me, I can't imagine why the Giants would be underdogs in this game.  Bookies often give the benefit of the doubt to the home team, but the Jags have been so inconsistent so far this year.  I don't know what sports book your using, but SB currently has the Giants handicap set to +3.5 @ 1.76.  That might be the best underdog deal of the weekend.


Commies, lol!  Almost as good For-Skins.  I like the GB in this game, but only by a field goal.  I think -4.5 is a bit excessive.  Not that I think the Packers aren't capable, but they too have been rather inconsistent, and I never like a large handicap favoring an away team.

What on earth makes you think that someone would send their KYC to a new forum account?  Would you send your KYC to some newbie who made such a post as yours?


You are laughable troll.  Just fuck off, already.

Are you willing to let the escrow agent hold the bitcoin for 6 months, the time limit for submitting PayPal chargebacks?  If not then escrow is pointless, as are your responses.  You are sounding more and more like a scammer with every post.  If you aren't a scammer you would be offering TransferWise, wire transfers, or even Revolut, all of which are far safer for the seller than PayPutz.

You've made 15 posts in the last 9 years, 7 in the last two years.  Despite your air-dropped merit making you a senior member, you are essentially a newbie asking for a no collateral loan.  I seriously doubt anyone is going to take this risk.

I suggest you offer collateral or lock this thread.

I don't know what you mean by this, can you elaborate?


Are you doing this through the terminal, or are you downloading using a web browser?  Either way, can you share the link where the download is coming from?


Since you mentioned "Electron," can you confirm if that was a typo?  The reason I ask, Electron Cash is the Electrum fork designed to be used with Bitcoin Cash (BCH,) not Bitcoin (BTC.)  I'm wondering if you're confused about the two.  Bitcoin Cash is not bitcoin, but the scammer behind that fork intentionally tries to cause confusion between the two coins.

I heard a rumor that this might happen, and totally blew it off as nothing but yet another pipedream for Niners fans.   Another thing that really surprised me was his contract, 4 years $68m...  That seems like a real bargain for the Niners, even with the three draft picks they traded.  Will he be on the Niners' roster this weekend?  The article didn't say.  Regardless, I'm as giddy as a schoolgirl.


Once Elijah Mitchel is back, the Niners will be back to their normal routine of Running Back Committee.  Obviously CMC will make a huge impact, but I wouldn't expect him to put up fantasy numbers like he did in Carolina.