|
^^ As far as I know, the workout will be this week, so it might not have started yet as we speak, so obviously, there will be no news for now. As for the James Harden situation, it seems that we have 2 high profile sit down for this season, Harden and Lillard.
So it's going to be interesting what Adam Silver will do with this kind of situation. I think he will have to step up and see what he can do as a commissioner so that this two superstars will play and not just like sit while fans wanting them to see in action.
|
|
|
|
Casimero is a disciplined boxer. If not, he won't achieve being a dominant boxer. The problem is his attitude and being cocky. His weight problem is not because he's not disciplined but rather his body is just naturally growing and not fit anymore and capable of fighting at 118.
But let's talk about Tapales for now as this is his thread lol. Tapales is also a disciplined boxer and one of the best achievements he has currently is upsetting the previous champion in the 122 lbs division Murodjon Akhmadaliev. But in that fight, he seemed showing struggle too although in the end, he got the win.
Since we speak about being a disciplined boxer, Naoya Inoue tops these 2 PH boxers mentioned. He's so disciplined at everything that's why he reaches the status of being called a monster. Quickness, speed, agility, strength, boxing IQ - all of these traits are all on Inoue that's why he is hard to beat toe-to-toe. No offense to PH boxing fans but Inoue does have the advantages if he faces either Casimero or Tapales.
This is a very good observation. The stated information is also the reason why I think Tapales won't stand a chance against Inoue. Tapales just got lucky in winning those two belts and I believe his fight against Akhmadaliev is still controversial and may go either way. I can't say that Tapales is underrated when compared to Inoue. I have watched the performance of Tapales and they are not that explosive as Inoue. There is a huge difference between the ability of these two fighters and Inoue without any hesitation is the better of the two so it would really surprise me if Tapales will come out victorious in their upcoming fight. Reality speaking that was true and PH boxing fans should accept that. If Marlon Tapales able to upset Akhmadaliev, I don't see how he can repeat that against Naoya Inoue who is far more dangerous than Akhmadaliev and just recently beat out the other champion at the 122 lbs division, Stephen Fulton who is thought better as a boxer compare to Akhmadaliev. Tapales being a title holder is a good achievement now but unfortunately, he's at the same time as the prime Inoue. I want Tapales to win I admit that, but I truly recognize how strong Inoue is. I don't see Inoue do have a better match here at 122. Maybe Casimero but it's like it will take more years to come before we see that happened and Casimero is now reaching his Father time. We always love to see upset happen, just like when he beat Akhmadaliev, it was one of the biggest upset that we have. But as you have said, it's very different if you are going to face the monster Naoya Inoue. He is very much in his prime years, very fast, strong, good chin and have the discipline that's why he became a unified champion in bantamweight and I cant' recall who is the last man who did it in that division. So Tapales really have a big plate in front of him, and as much as we like to see him win, let's admit it, he can't pull a Akhmadaliev here. |
|
|
|
Canelo will definitely be favoured by the fans. And it is absolutely true that a lot of people know him, even the casual fans as well. But Crawford especially when compared to Canelo is definitely a little less popular in my opinion. But just because we are comparing which fighter is going to have bigger support, does not mean that the fight is not going to be interesting. The fight is really going to be interesting and both of them will be able to bring a lot of people to see this fight. It is I think we can say that this is a much-anticipated fight and the pay-per-view is surly going to be big for this one, if this happens, of course.
There is no need to have such comparison because we all know that Canelo have his whole country to back him in every fight he had, and he will have in the future while Crawford doesn't have that much as the whole USA is somehow divided because they also have their own picks and some of the fans from the US are also backing Canelo. If only this fight will be determined by how many fans they have, I won't be surprised if Canelo got twice or thrice than Crawford. But since it won't be judged that way, there is only one way to find out and that is to let this two fight. If these two end up fighting, it is surely going to be a bigger support for Canelo. And that is probably going to give him a good boost of confidence. Definitely, he is going to be the better fighter if this fight happens. But that is the bigger question, if this fight is going to happen or not. The people in the USA cannot even decide if they are a man or a woman. And how can they decide which fighter to support? LOL. Jokes aside, I am not saying that people cannot have preferences of their own. But the people of the USA are not such a big fan of Crawford, as the Mexican people support Canelo. Boost of confidence in-terms of the amount of people that will be supporting him in case their fight will be pushed through but it's still hard to say if it will happen or not because Canelo is still deciding whether he will accept the invitation or not because a fight against Crawford will not give him any benefits aside from the money that will on the pot once it will materialize. But for Crawford, he surely got nothing to lose because he doesn't have anything on that weight class aside from his record that is on the line. And with the money reason I guess if it's really huge and both camps will negotiate in closing the deal maybe the fight can be pushed to happen, though you have valid reason in both sides for Canelo more on money and additional hypes to his career, while with Crawford it will have a much more favorable side if ever that he will win. Let see if Canelo's camp will be willing to give Crawford a chance to fight him and see if whoever will be the winner, but money wise both will generate a decent amount of money. Considering Canelo's movement nowadays, somehow, I can say that he's only in the for the money and just take advantage of anything while he is still sitting at the top holding all those four belts. But he only wanted a fight where he got the advantages, like Charlo for example, we don't know what will happen but we know that it won't be an easy one for Charlo because he got to climb a long way just to get Canelo's division, the same with Crawford if Canelo will accept it. But for the likes of Bivol and Benavidez? I don't think he is interested in those fights as it's more risky for him. Bivol I do agree that he seems to duck him, he doesn't want to fight him at 175 lbs because he is at a disadvantage basing on the result of the first fight. For Benavidez, Canelo says that he hasn't face anyone yet to be sort of worthy of Canelo's time so he just ignore him for the meantime. However, it is just ironic though that he doesn't want to fight big fighters are 168 lbs - 175 lbs and yet goes for a super welterweight at best in Jermell Charlo and then have him to 2 weight class to fight him. So yeah, maybe at this point of his career, Canelo is looking for less risk but bigger rewards in terms of paycheck but not legacy. |
|
|
|
My opinion is that these countries that ban gambling are hypocrites. They ban gambling but they allow football clubs, to be sponsored by gambling organizations. Such that even their stadiums, jerseys and other articles to have gambling ads scattered everywhere. They are I directly benefitting from it.
Indeed. Hypocrisy is a very present and at same time hidden characteristic of human behavior. I live in a country where gambling is illegal, but it's the gambling industry which is sponsoring national soccer leagues in large scale. It's impossible to watch a soccer matchand not see a dozen of sports betting platforms brands on the TV ads, around field's banners and on players' uniforms. Moreover, the government has its legal casino, that is the national lottery. It's the peak of hypocrisy, in my opinion! Yes, and the thing is that this government allows it making their population bet on it and we don't know if it is real or also being rigged themselves. So it's always a double sword standard here, if the government sees that they can profit from gambling then they will allow it. And then will go after the so called illegal gambling dens, but then again there are corrupt police or even local politicians that might give protection to this illegal gambling places and so gambling continues in may ways, whether legal or illegal in any countries, I reckon. |
|
|
|
As we all know, halving is coming. Should I invest my savings in Bitcoin? Or should I lean towards altcoins this time? Which one? I don't have health problems and don't have to worry about job security but it would make me sad to lose all the savings but life in Canada is getting expensive every fucking day.
You talking about the bitcoin halving, so obviously the advise is that you should be investing on bitcoin and not on altcoins. Why? it's because we really don't know what altcoins to invest, majority are meme coins, pump and dump and shit coins. Of course there are solid coins in the market, in the top 10. However, if you want to sleep at night and not to worry about the price and if you are here for the long term, then bitcoin is the best investment. You just have to learn how to property protect your bitcoin, so learn about wallets, and have the knowledge about private keys. |
|
|
|
Same here, it's kind of late already since Casimero is still fighting to have a decent rank in this weight class and on the other hand, Naoya Inoue is already on his way unifying all the belts against Tapales. After that, we're still unsure if Inoue will still remain in this division if he already achieved his goal as the undisputed champion because there is also that other chance that Inoue will climb again.
I don't know why others are having that as a problem. Casimero is fighting to get back in the champion list, not to chase Inoue or what. It doesn't matter anymore if Inoue will climb up to the next division if he wins against Tapales in their unification fight. Casimero just needs to follow his own timeline and win as much as possible in all of his next fights until he is in a title match regardless of who will be his opponent. If it is destined that he will face Inoue soon, then so be it. His career is not all about facing Inoue in the first place. I know it's really exciting to watch the face-off between Inoue and Casimero but Quadro Alas can move forward even without fighting Inoue. Casimero doesn't have any control of the situation already, he is no longer the champion. Perhaps the only reason is that he can't keep his mouth from mentioning Inoue's name and that's why people are still very intrigue and interest on whether he will fight Inoue or not. But his strategy is to win every fight and win it by knockout. Meaning it should be impressive that the boxing community might think that he will have same chance against the Monster. And if he wins by knockout, then for sure, the first thing that he will call is Inoue. But Naoya will have to deal with Tapales for unification. |
|
|
|
If this should be implemented will it affect bitcointalk casinos? As we all know most established and new casinos come to bitcointalk to launch their ANN thread and carry out signature promotion campaigns which can be regarded as ads in a sense. If ads should be banned will their promotion in Bitcointalk also end?
It's been a few months already since the news and so far nothing changed here on the forum. The ban seems to be focused on Australia and wasn't picked up by other countries. In my country I haven't heard about any political movement that wants to ban gambling advertising. When I look on all the ads we have over here it would be crazy to not allow gambling ads, but then all the other things. The most common ads I notice are either for alcohol or cigarettes. The huge hype about e-cigarettes and vapes can be seen on billboards on every big corner. It would be unfair to ban on specific industry and allow everything else. The question is also how such a law could be enforced if ads are only displayed online. Banning something in Australia should have no real impact for the majority of users here on the forum. Yes, more on alcohol and cigarettes as well here in my country. Nevertheless, there are also ads about gambling as well, with even faces of well known athletes are part of the ads and promotion. So I guess our country is not to hard core about gambling per se, although sometimes there are police raids about certain area wherein they are doing illegal gambling, but it's rare and we even have like 3 big casinos operated by big casino companies. Yes, there are news about Australia lately about their casino rules and regulations, but then again, it's going to be a uphill battle for the government to totally stop gambling, in my opinion. |
|
|
|
So, question to you, did you ever consider paying taxes on your gambling winnings, or deduct the taxes with the losses you've created? If not, what is the reasoning behind it?
We don't have this in our country and I don't include it in my tax report I'm not a whale and I never made a profit from my gambling I win some but most of the time I lose and I don't want to deduct my losses to my tax, gambling for me is only recreational, our government does not charge taxes to small time gamblers but it's different when you win a lottery which the favorite gambling form in our country. They deduct 20% from your winning of course since the government run the casino and lottery they targeted big winners instead of small bettors. Same goes with me, so I will say that I don't pay any gambling taxes because it is not mandated by law here. On the other hand, it is the casino themselves who pay taxes to the government, but I think it's very lenient to some extend as our government are trying to attract casinos to put here, to bring jobs in our country. But if they are going to say that we will have to pay taxes then why not? So I guess we are just lucky that our government even how small or big gamblers we are, we are not on any tax bracket. |
|
|
|
Breaking news: ESPN Sources: The Blazers have ended trade talks on guard Damian Lillard and plan to bring him back to training camp for start of the season. The blazers had periodic offseason conversations with the Heat — Lillard’s desired destination — but no traction on a deal materialized.
https://twitter.com/wojzspen/status/1703084100712566962So it seems that Lillard has been ask to go back to training camp as there are no deal made by the Portland management to his desired destination of Miami Heat. This could impact his performance though, and if I'm not mistaken, there are also reports that he might sit out the rest of the season? We will see what's going to happen on Lillard's case here at the start of the NBA next month. I have read some days ago that Lillard even refuses to take part of training camp with the Blazers. That of course also means he doesn't want to start or play the regular season. In my opinion that's really shameful. These players sign contracts and have to be held accountable for that. You can't just refuse to do your job. Next to not getting paid these players should also get extra fines for contract violations I think, otherwise this will never end. Not showing up is damage to the team. Not only do they not have their best player and therefor it's impossible to compete but also they will lose jersey sales. Which fan on Portland thinks about buying Lillard's jersey if they have to assume he is leaving anyway -> missed sales for the franchise. Yeah, it's really hard to see Lillard sitting this season and not playing for the Blazers. And if you look at his contract, it's about $216 million left. So that is a huge money that they are going to pay him if he is not going to play this season. Looking very ugly right now, not good for Dame and for the Blazers as you have said, they are losing big money every day that Lillard misses and probably the tickets are also going down as fans doesn't want to watch the game live without him in the Blazers uniform. That's why there's a contract. If Lillard doesn't violate his contract by sitting out the whole season, then he cannot be held liable for any damages. The Blazers should have already anticipated events like this, as similar situations have occurred in other teams in the past. So, if they choose to keep Lillard but he refuses to play, I think the better solution would be to trade him. In the end, it's not personal; it's all about business and should aim to be a win-win situation for both parties. And if there are losses involved in the decision-making process, at least they can work on minimizing them. I think it will be an obvious violation of his contract if he is healthy but doesn't want to play. If he is not, or have some kind of injuries, so there's no question about it, he can sit. So it will be over like Ben Simmons case in Philly, wherein he doesn't want to play anymore and if I'm not mistaken, he losses millions due to that. But in the end, the Sixers can't do anything but to really let Simmons go and move to Brooklyn Nets. |
|
|
|
How can users protect their assets if they are stored in centralized platforms?
The only way to protect assets is to store them in non-custodial wallets where only you have the private keys.
This is right. Its reminded that every trader on cex exchange that put some funds only they are afford to lose. Yes this is a protocol, but if they pouring a lots of money into the game they should be aware of the consequence indeed. Or if they trading a huge amount of money they should at least transfer it on non custodial and give it back during trading activity only ans not used as a wallet. Yes, and when you hear that private keys have been leaked, you will really have to cringe and feel sorry for those who have been a victim in this breached. And the numbers that are being thrown here are huge, $100 million? ouch. I think it's more of a education really, centralized exchange are not good and it's better to stay our coins in wallet that we have total control. And if ever it will be breach though, there's nothing but to blame but ourselves. At least we have the initial control in the beginning, and it could also be a good lessons learned for us if ever we lost our coins in that manner. |
|
|
|
It's interesting that in the undercard or co-main event, there will be Ugas vs Barrios for the WBC interim championship 147 lbs belt. Initially though it was supposedly Ugas vs Thurman, but unfortunately, Thurman again back out of the fight and so the man he beat will have the chance to get an interim belt.
And this is the first time that Ugas will fight after Spence f**k him up so bad more than a year ago to get the belt he won against Manny Pacquiao. And as per bookies, Ugas is 4:1 favorite here.
I think this fight might be good in the first couple of rounds, and then Ugas taking over with his boxing skills. For me Barrios is just a overballoon 147 lbs, no offfense to him, but this is a very tough weight class and it's very hard to survived if you don't have the power. So maybe in less than 10 rounds, Ugas might win with a KO or the corner of Barrios stopping the fight because of the damage that he is taking. And it's just weird that he is getting this kind of opportunity though by WBC and fight for the interim belt. But this 2 fighters are going to be just toyed by current champion in Crawford. I'm not sure about Ugas after his loss to Spence; perhaps he has become more predictable. Therefore, this fight is going to be interesting. Both boxers are coming off losses, so they'll be training hard to get back on the winning track. The good thing with Ugas is that he defeated Pacman, but you never know – what if Barrios pulls off a surprise? I personally believe that once a boxer loses in a championship fight, he is never the same boxer again. If I'm not mistaken, Barrios came from a win mate, against a relatively unknown Jovanie Santiago. So he might be in the momentum here against Ugas. I wouldn't say that Ugas is predictable, he had success early on Spence and almost knock him down with Spence lost focus. For Barrios, he had losses to Thurman, so I guess we can see that when he tries to step the competition, he somewhat looks very B level fighter as compare to Ugas who has fought and give better fights when he faces tough opponents. |
|
|
|
Casimero is aging fighter so chances for this fight to happen is so slim since he doesn't anything hold to get convince to fight Casimero. But if Casimero will get a championship belt where Inoue camp is interested to get then maybe we can see their match up to happen so he really need to win against Oguni and get win on more bigger matches to have good chance to provoke Inoue and make this fans dream fight to happen.
Casimero is 34 years old his last fight was not good I'm not saying that he is past his prime but he needs to have impressive fights to have good fights that are worth title contention, there are unpredicted that happen in boxing we just never know if Inoue's management decided to talk to Inoue's management to have a title fight before Inoue moved up of course this will happen after he beats Tapales. Inoue and Casimero both have Japanese managers and promotions so there's a possibility that this could happen, if Casimero knocks Oguni out Japanese boxing could demand Inoue to step in for revenge. Perhaps he might be in the borderline of losing his prime years already at age 34 years old. So everything depends on his this fight, I mean if he looks sharp and win by knockout, then we might say that he can still fight and pull that trigger. But if he can't and then won by a boring 12 rounds decision which also happens in his last fight in Manila, maybe he was already on the decline and he can't do anything if ever he will have to face Inoue in the future. So let's see how his performance against Oguni before we can make our conclusions. |
|
|
|
You've hit on a few truths there, but let's not sugarcoat it. Some people thinking they're smarter than the system. The key is: the house always has the edge. While I'm not here to hold anyone's hand, the idea of looking at gambling as a steady income is 100% stupid. But hey, if you can enjoy a game without going bankrupt, more power to you. For those who can't, a reality check is overdue. But really, find another way to make a living. Not everyone is meant for the gambling world
Those people are arrogant, they somehow believe that the math behind the games does not really apply to them, as if for some reason the odds of the games are going to change simply because they are the ones playing, and when that does not happen they refuse to accept the reality and blame the casino, their luck and anything and anyone they can, without ever admitting they are the main source of their problems, as their belief they can make money while gambling is not true. It's there mentality though, they think that can have crack the code or something and thought that they are smarter and win everytime they step up on the casinos. But after several tries, Lol, you can see on their face that their arrogant has gone and that they can't believed they lost and now starts the blaming game. Yeah, seen this to several players, that I know and even don't know inside a casinos and you can see and tell that they have attitude. And even if you advise them, they will just give you that weird look, very arrogant. |
|
|
|
Looking at the total market capitalization of more than 1 trillion USD, while the assets that FTX holds are only a few billion USD. Honestly, even if they sold them all at once it wouldn't cause any serious problems but it seems like someone is taking advantage of this news to manipulate market sentiment quite well. Panic is prevailing even though there has not been any official announcement about the sale of FTX's assets.
Personally, I really appreciate ETFs, it will cause bitcoin prices to skyrocket because demand will also increase thanks to ETFs. But that's also what I'm concerned about, ETFs won't be approved anytime soon because the government doesn't want people to use bitcoin and give up their bonds or fiat.
Couldn't agree more with you, mate. The market is being heavily-manipulated as we speak. Not only big investment companies are doing it, but also governments themselves (especially the US with the SEC). They want BTC to crash real hard to buy lots of coins at a discount. It's likely these entities are waiting for the BTC halving to occur, before "pumping" market prices all the way to the moon. If you're smart, you'd follow their footsteps by buying as much "cheap" BTC as possible. Sooner or later, Bitcoin will reach a price of $100k per coin. Even higher, if demand continues to soar at an unprecedented rate. I think the real trigger for a bullish market will be the swift recovery of the global economy. Central banks like "The FED" and the "ECB" need to stop raising interest rates for everything to get back to normal. At least, a new normal since the Russia-Ukraine war and the COVID-19 pandemic are still an on-going crisis. Who knows what the future holds for Bitcoin? Just my opinion  Well there is a new player https://cointelegraph.com/news/crypto-biz-paypal-rolls-out-crypto-ramps-franklin-templeton-joins-btc-etf-race-and-moreSo yeah, most likely there will be a reach as who will get the approval for a BTC Spot ETF and this could trigger the next bull run. I do agree about the interest rate and what is the US government is doing. Nevertheless, I do not think they have a huge impact in the next bull run. Remember that we even have Covid-19 pandemic in 2021 and yet we did see new all time high. So most likely, it will be the race for a BTC Spot ETF that will likely be the catalyst for 2024-2025 run. |
|
|
|
There is no scenario where they keep all their good players and still get Giannis. Mathematically, their contracts wouldn't allow such a thing to happen. Warriors have 209 million dollars salary per year, that is by far first in the league, even with Celtics paying Jaylen Brown insane supermax, its still Warriors ball to conquer. The salary cap is at around 123 million, or so it was last year and I do not know how much it went up this year. It is still easy to say that they are way above that line, and paying a HUGE luxury tax as well. They do have Chris Paul now, no how they managed to make that happen, but it looks like they are paying a ton of money to him, and Wiggins as well. If they somehow trade those two, then maybe? They need to find space, and when you are over 80 millions above the salary cap, that's not easy.
Getting rid of Jordan Poole was a pretty big salary dump. Chris Paul also won’t be around too much longer and could probably be bought out for cheap if it was necessary anyway. I think they would be wise to get rid of Draymond and keep Wiggins, which might be possible since Draymond obviously wants to play with LeBron. Bottom line is that the Warriors would do whatever it takes to get Giannis if the opportunity presents itself. That might do, overall, the Warriors is still on the pace where they will make an experimentation and if things won't work their way, I won't be surprised if they set free Draymond and Chris Paul to free up some space because either way, it's not giving the team the benefit they wanted. And more obviously, they might want to free some space so that they can have a spot for Giannis, you know, just in case the star will ask for a way out from the Bucks. And there were also some speculations that Juan Toscano Anderson is back with the Warriors though. I just read it somewhere in Yahoo sports but they say when they interview Moody, they somewhat see the jersey of JTA hanging in the Warriors dug out. If we can remember, he had a good year with the Warriors back then, him and Jordan Poole was really strong during that year. Unfortunately, he was let go of the Warriors and went to the Warriors. But if the news is true then it's a total flip as JTA is back with the team and Poole out apparently. |
|
|
|
Do anyone play on casino's which have vault feature (a wallet type feature where we store the crypto which we don't want to play with)
it will be easy to know asking from real users who have account on that casino. it will be difficult and very time consuming to ask about vault feature on every casino's support chat.
we cannot see the vault feature by just visiting the site, because vault feature is visible if i have account on that casino and i am logged in on it.
here are some i know bcgame, stake, bitsler, wolfbet.
please reply if you know a casino
If I'm not mistaken there is also one casino that implemented this kind of vault, not sure if it has the same idea as yours, but I totally forget the name of the casino, or how successful it was before or it the casino still exists today. And just like what others say, duelbits is one casino that has this kind of features. I'll try to find the casino's though that I have mentioned, maybe I could refresh my memory. |
|
|
|
Now where is @OP? he was asking a question and suddenly disappear until now. Those megathreads with football transfers and all that stuff, they all share predictions sometimes if it comes to it and no one gets banned. It's not really banned here, and everyone is actually welcome to do so as we are in a gambling discussion sub-forum. Sharing betsi is actually one of the reasons why people flock here as they are using these bets and compare what they came up with then discuss why they have that option as a bet.
The only thing he can get banned if @OP took someone else prediction or using ChatGPT, if @OP create a bullshit prediction, he will get bullied and maybe a neutral feedback.  Discussing and sharing a good bet is definitely better than just giving a prediction without giving any analyze. Yes, checking his post history, it seems that he has disappeared with no predictions at all. Maybe he has read all the replies here and just decided to totally quit, Lol. But at least though, he should have share at least one and less see if he has what it takes to be a good predictor or giving us tips. Sadly, it's not the case. But the good thing is that we have a lot of threads already with almost all the sports and there are free betting tips by everyone. All we have to do is just follow it and see how it goes. |
|
|
|
where and how to find crypto investors for my ultra innovative crypto token
Not really sure where you can find investors though, but if by any chance, you can go visit this board, Project Development.It's a long shot, but who knows. Maybe if you can post your project there and made several discussions and explanation, perhaps you could get lucky that someone will message you and be interested on your innovative crypto token. So best of luck to you. |
|
|
|
The price rebounded quickly from the bottom of 25,600, which confirms that it is still possible to retest 31,000 again during this month, but the possibility that we will reach levels of 38,000 thousand to 42,000 has become a little more difficult. Thus, we can say that during this month, the best we will get is to retest 31,000 again.
it is still possible for us to be between 19,500 and 24,785. Therefore, during this month, if the price does not move higher, the end of this month will definitely be between these two levels.
<snip>
I feel 38 to 42k is a must by April 1st 2024 Mostly because it is the number needed to not collapse miners. But that is 5-6 months away. My hope is we move quickly to 33-35k in sept-oct this year. Thus we take the fear away of the need for 38k-42k by April 1 2024. As always I am a slanted person as I mostly mine to get income. If I'm not mistaken, there is a prediction that at least $50k at the end of the year. But I don't see it happening though, as we have a hard time breaking $30k and I think that will be the mental barrier for now. So let's see, for now the market is still trading sideways and it could continue up to the end of the month. And if that happens, then maybe the last 3 months might be the same with slow to none movement. |
|
|
|
Some casinos allow 18 years old to gamble, but others prefer to let those who are 18 years old above play just to be on the safer side of the law. So it really depends on where you are residing. However, since it's a matter of parenting, I believe that as long as you are still living within the same roof as your parents, meaning you are still under their care and everything is still being provided for you by them, it's just right to abide by their rules. Their house, their rules.
At 18 years old, if you really want to make decisions on your own, you can move out and live the life that you want without being monitored or dictated by anyone. Be independent if you want to sustain your gambling desires. But if you can't, then just stop. After all, a weekly allowance is still given by the parents. It's not as if you earned them.
Times have changed nowadays, kids used to be more obedient back in the day compared to the kids of today. Children nowadays don't listen to their parents after reaching a certain age because they start thinking that they are now big enough, they can do everything themselves and they should make their own decisions, and from that point onwards, they stop following what their parents tell them even if they are residing under their roof for now. I would have to agree with this, everything has change now. Kids are somewhat not listening to their parents and it's really hard to discipline them. You really have to be their on their side always if you wanted to be close with your kids. This is the biggest reason why children nowadays move out of their parent's house and live by themselves because they want to be independent. Those who manage to survive just stay alone, and those who find it very difficult to manage everything will go back and then ask for forgiveness from their parents.
But if I have kids that will to be separate with with at their earlier age? I wouldn't do that. I mean if they have jobs already it might be good, but if not then they will have to stay with me to teach them life lesson, just saying. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
