Are you so particular about bounty or ICO ?
There would always be ICOs whether we like it or not as new projects will keep springing up every now and then.

Moreover, we have to understand that a team will need to do more than enough at this stage to be able to get smart investors to invest in their idea and product and it is normal in that vein to see an ICO not being successful as a result.

It is one of the things that affects bounties too which is what any hunter should understand before even deciding to take on bounty hunting, but to say because of that, bounties will end up long gone is absurd. Consider there are so many quality ICOs that have sprung up nonetheless.

Bitcointalk Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=152752
Current amount of Posts (Including this one): 1507
BTC Address for Payments: 1EjdmqPuZ8UskHsRA9LNQQMGyN119FQHrC
Did you follow @merit on Twitter? Yes/No: Yes

That is usually the best way to go rather than wasting so much time thinking the market could still go lower than it is.

The fact remains that no one can really time the market or know how far a market would go, but what is important is that you should be pleased with whatever you are getting now and look forward to what the future of what you are holding is going to be which for bitcoin, we all know this is a great one already and there is going to be so much coming in the future that some of us who even think we are late now will be pleased we joined at the time we did.

I think not even remotely close to what it can be, I believe bitcoin and crypto can be really getting at the hands of the people with some sort of more global and easy to use debit card and if you could use that debit card everywhere and if you could create it a lot cheaper than banks debit cards than you can make the consumers use bitcoin and crypto a lot easier however right now we are talking about how banks are greedy and they are making huge amounts of profits from their credit cards and all that however their debit cards are free yet bitcoin debit cards are incredibly expensive and they charge you insanely high amounts no matter where and how you spend it.

I hate banks, one of the main reasons why I am in bitcoin. When I get paid in bitcoin for my work I basically send it to the bank and cash it right away, not keeping any money on them.

The only reason for my hate for the banks is actually logical for them, I understand its their job and there are some computer algorithm involved as well and all that but back in the day my dad was a manager in a huuuge global firm and was making amazing money, so of course whenever we get a credit card and use it greatly he paid it easily, when we took out loan for new cars he paid it easily.

One day he was forced to retire because of the 2008 crisis, of course we had to find a way to pay the debts, with his retirement money and all that we paid as much as we can but one bank (HSBC) was unpaid, my dad just lost all of his income and all his savings because he was let go and yet HSBC kept calling us all the time, like call ALL THE TIME, 5 times a day or so, as a family we hate it to the bone.

Of course we finally paid it in the end, but HSBC can call me up and tell me they will give me 1 billion dollars for using them and honest to god I will say no.

Idex is actually a decentralized exchange, so KYC will not be required but you have to understand that sometimes liquidity for some tokens may be a problem since there may not be much activity on the exchange compared to centralized exchanges. However, for someone who simply is just after trading ERC20 tokens, I believe this should be good enough for them at least.

Just very few exchanges can be one's favorite, but to be able to get the best from them without having any limitations when it comes to withdrawal, you will be better off with KYC. However, for now, my favorite ones are binance and Kucoin.

At least with these ones, you can still open an account and still have a minimum withdrawal of about 2 btc a day, which is good enough for anyone who is a small volume trader. I still do not know why people run away from KYC anyway like it is some big deal if they have nothing to hide.

Well, it can make a little bit of difference in a way.

However, it is normal to see this kind of situations when most bounty hunters really care less about the project, does not even have any information about the project to know the price during ICO and they are just ready to dump what they are meant to hold anyway at even a bad price.

Locking up the tokens will at least have been able to get the market to an extent where the support is solid enough to withstand anything, but all the same, I still feel some big time investors who ended up having a lot of bonus at the start of the ICO usually dump their coins or tokens, just to remove the weak hands such as some bounty hunters from the market.

Bitcointalk Profile Link:  beerlover
Post Count: 1503
Merit Count: 1018
BTC Address: 1EjdmqPuZ8UskHsRA9LNQQMGyN119FQHrC
Telegram Username: @beerlover

What is the point assuming what the future holds for bitcoin rather than just waiting to see how things would pan out eventually and most especially in its usage as currency than just a speculative asset. Bitcoin has a lot of functions and values it would bring to the world at large, as well as blockchain technology which we know it is the future and also the foundation of decentralization which bitcoin and some other cryptocurrency is built.

As time goes on, I expect that when the real life usage start coming into play, we will start getting to see more merchants seeing it as a means for payment and the value even surging and in a way stabilizing to some extent as time goes on.

I don't know about the 5 big mistakes but I know one huge insanely big mistake that all beginners do. I have been in crypto for over 6 years now and I have seen all kinds of people do this mistake when they first get in. Join right at the top.

Now when bitcoin goes up like 100% and the bull run is here and everything is going up people who do not hold bitcoin joins in the market so they won't miss the ride however they join already after the big increase and they make a bit first and when it starts to drop they lose more money than they are comfortable with losing and they leave thinking bitcoin is a "scam" or something.

You do not get in to a financial instrument when its already at 100% increase, basic concept, common sense, yet everyone keeps doing it.

There is very much positive news than this, which never brought good tidings. If anything is going to cause a huge growth in bitcoin, that would be some huge development in the protocol as well as some high demand based on real life need and usage.

News have never been the right way to judge the movement of this market as it moves the way it wants, let alone, considering a CNBC documentary to be the cause. Let's see how far the upward movement is going to go before we can even start considering anything at all.

This is not the first time bitcoin is going to have a little growth upward and I would not even call that a spike in any way. This to me is just more like a quick correction upward or the bulls really trying to hold on to the $6800 to $7k region, but that does not mean in a bear market, the bears can still not strike back at any time. The volume is not really that appealing to me anyway.

I stand on this lane as well. Looking at so many factors that makes NEO tick as a smart contract platform and for the fact that it would be like an Ethereum in the Asian territory the most with some pretty good support, I believe this would be a very good and advantageous coin to hold for the long term.

I still have my reservations for EOS since after their main net was launched, but all the same I believe there should be some pretty good potential as well. MAN is quite a new project without much activity but looks quite promising as well, so they are some good catch all together.

I kept wondering what would make the token so different in the first place when it just serves simply like any other form of payment in cryptocurrency that already exists. This is what I call unnecessary as far as I am concerned and not like trying to hate on the devs whatsoever, but they will have to come up with something very compelling and convincing to investors and not just some discounts on purchase or thereabout.

First and foremost, you opened an account to post this in the name of AgosAgsTocken and still telling us this is a coin you discover, like a normal investor? I am trying to wrap my head around how you have even started lying from the first instance.

It seems though that you are trying to attach it with ecommerce, or will I say sales of goods which sound not so bad with the whole discount thingy, but even after searching online, I could not get much information on the main product you are trying to peach out here.

Allowing blockchain technology and the government inculcating it into the system does not mean it would end up decentralized, and I do not see any reason why government will not want to be threading this path in the long run. The idea of giving up control as a result of decentralization is the main threat that is being posed to the government.

In a case where we get to use it an adopt it normally, and the government could find a way to regulate it without any serious challenge or threat posing situations, I guess we can see fiats not being necessary eventually. However, this is just one big assumption considering where the government of each country stands presently.

The kind of thinking that would get their pocket drained eventually.

Martingale sucks and there is no strategy that can ever work effectively for gambling without you exposing yourself to a huge risk eventually since the chances of losing more to gaining so little will always keep increasing.

This is one reason why I still find it amusing why some people think they could end up gambling for a huge profit in the long run as long as they are consistent with a strategy which is why I can see why some people will remain poor since they can never use their head.

It is sad to see Manu go but people are reacting like spurs are gone as a franchise and will never be like the good old days. First of all they had a 40 year Manu last year, even tho he played well and provided with some bench and veteran presence he wasn't the person who change the course of the team or something. Secondly they had Kawhi but he played like 9 games and was gone, he didn't play at all so when they traded Kawhi and got Derozan back, that is a HUGE improvement for them, not because Derozan is such a great player (he is tho) but because they basically got Derozan in exchange of nothing (maybe green). So basically this year they will have a all-defense point guard at Dejounte, a Rudy gay that is healthier, a Derozan, lma and Pau at big. This team is once again a 50+ win team and can even content if they can improve from last year (hardly enough to beat warriors but who knows what happens). So even tho Manu going is end of one era, it also creates a whole new era for spurs.

The main problem with these is that, when you do a research on politics to get info on who will vote for who it makes a bit sense, you can ask 1000 random people on different places and see who will vote who, however if the questions is regarding something as specific as owning cryptocurrency, asking 1000 people in a country doesn't really reflect the end result as well.

You can ask 1000 people but there is like 80 million people living in turkey, hence its impossible to really even be close to it.
Also where have you asked, have you asked just modern cities or have you also asked people from more eastern middle east borderline cities where people are not even using internet that commonly ? I doubt so.

Basically this is all a wrong guess from the part of the people who made this and probably not even remotely close to the real results. Considering the lira dropped in august and this was done in June, OP is also quite wrong.

Yes, fast transactions is one thing any entrepreneur will always be looking at and as long as it makes processes easy for them without having any form of barrier internationally when it comes to their business, then it is a space that would be a lot relevant and useful for them. When a business is looking for worry-free way of holding funds for future developments and to attract new community of customers for their business then bitcoin must be very good choice for them.

Asides that, I believe the usage of this space depending on the sector of the entrepreneur anyway can enable them get work done faster based on certain skills and have no problem paying whoever completes the task wherever they may be. One thing an entrepreneur wants is to be able to utilize time and funds effectively and this sure looks more like it.

No one is really stopping anyone from selling as long as they have a concrete and reasonable reason for selling in the first place.

For yours, I can understand, but for the OPs', I cannot simply understand why having a small scaling problem could be an issue for investing and it is not like the whole scaling thing may not end up becoming a thing of the past.

Generally, scaling sure looks like a big issue in the crypto market once it hits the large scale, which is why it makes it easy for coins like this to keep growing since this is what the devs will be building on to bring about a better product in the long run.

I just shocked on reading this article :
https://www.scmp.com/news/china/society/article/2158782/why-other-countries-are-giving-china-licence-print-money


When a country is unable to facilitate the infrastructures to print money, I just wonder how effectively they could manage their economy ? Instead of struggling with this types of management I believe they may adopt bitcoin or may introduce their own cryptos just to focus on making their economy better.

If printing money alone is a big problem like taking measurements against counterfeiting then digital payment system must be the perfect solution to them.  Bitcoin and its descendants are having regulated money supply and big security against counterfeiting. But who will teach these governments about the prospectus of adopting cryptos ?